Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
One more thing I forgot to mention. Here is a site with annual reports and other for years 1996 through 2012 but they're very sparse of info and some even blank. At least, it's something.
http://ccfcorp.dos.state.fl.us/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc_number=S83392&inq_came_from=NAMFWD&cor_web_names_seq_number=0001&names_name_ind=&names_cor_number=&names_name_seq=&names_name_ind=&names_comp_name=GREENOASISENVIRONMENTAL&names_filing_type=
No drilling permit necessary, as I see it. There will be no drilling there or at least, should be no drilling there. MT has no oil pools allowed, for one thing. More important, the function of CCP is not drilling but receiving slop oil from drilling sites to process (cleaning, filtering and then shipping (my guess is via railroad) to Shell Trading in Texas. The problem is, there have been no financials provided so no one (publicly) has knowledge of the volume of slop oil CCP actually process and ships or the revenues from that activity in any of the CCP facilities. With the Waldo site closed and abandoned (tanks and equipment were moved to the Michels site) and the Waldo site, I believe to be the site that is to be or was or has been cleaned up as a supposedly separate matter of agreement and the Criner site near (don't know where but Criner is a ranch so the area in question might be on the ranch) Lindsay, OK (spelled LINDSAY everywhere I look but on the CCP website where it's LINDSEY and despite requests to correct it, it's not been done) where all the equipment and tanks have been removed and relocated to, I believe, the McBeth (also occasionally misspelled) facility near Gillette, WY. So that tells me there are or at least, may be two active sites out of all those mentioned in PRs and both web sites but unless I can find any evidence to support that, I'm thinking that there is just as good of a chance that there is only one site that's active. That's because the Michels site is under construction. That leaves the McBeth site and there's really nothing to support the idea that it even exists. That's because, according to the permit document I found on line lists only one facility in Campbell County (Gillette) on the McBeth property and that one is operated by Jim Rodgers of Jim's Water Treatment Services. I did find a PR that suggests that GRNO/CCP has contracted with a company, Western Environmental Services, Inc :
http://www.westernenvironmentalservices.com/ (looks like they may have two web sites)
a cleaning company and also may be affiliated with Bulldog, Inc., a trucking/transport co.
That's all I've got, for now.
I'm just wondering if there's any way that minority shareholders can force a shareholder meeting and not mention it or just withhold that info. to management, using the same rules justifying voting shares not voted to be proxy voted by active, meeting shareholders.
I like to do something like that, some way to force them out without having to go through all the red tape.
Just when I have myself convinced this investment is worthless, something comes up to sway my bias.
Out of this:
http://www.alphatrade.com/news/stories/AM/2012-06-20/MRW/201206201330MRKTWIREUSPR____0901482.html
Comes this:
http://www.bakkenblog.com/bakken/HOME.html
And out of that, comes this:
http://www.bakkenblog.com/bakken/Permits/Permits.html
And this: (permits)
http://www.bakkenblog.com/bakken/Permits/Entries/2012/8/24_WEEK_34__August_20-24.html
Having been watching the National Debt Clock, the Crude Oil Clock caught my attention:
According to the clock, over 20,254,250,000 barrels of Global Oil Consumption year to date have been consumed since 1:35 pm CDT.
Also, those "Frack!" caps are unique.
I'm with goalpost, what he said.
I don't think it would be appropriate to include that topic in the questions since it is a matter of litigation in the hands of the DOJ/SEC. I would like to include it but with that, I think it might just disqualify the whole inquiry.
What the hell, I doubt if I'll get a reply anyway.
I'm finding great irony in being hornswoggled twice in the same investment vehicle by two different hornswogglin' crews. I'm certain the first crew was a scam. Despite all the encouragement I and many have gotten this second time around, I'm finding it tempting to pick up the phone and start calling law enforcement folks to see if they'll go out on their regular runs to the facilities that are supposed to be in operation; Michels near Wibaux, McBeth near Gillette and two that are not in operation, Criner near Lindsay (BTW mispelled on the CCP website: http://www.customcarbonprocessing.com/operations.asp) and Waldo near Sidney. These sites, are all named after the owners of the properties said to be leased by the landowners. There was a new release last year about cleaning up a salt water disposal facility in northern MT (http://www.otcreporter.com/Reportdetails.asp?rptid=325). Of course, the article said, " (CCP) is currently planning but didn't say it was going to and since it happened over a year ago and there has been no word on that since, I sense it has long been forgotten. I also sense the facility in question is the Waldo property. If CCP dirtied it, it doesn't seem a stretch to clean it. After all, that stuff is on the web sites in with the "environmental" stuff.
Then there is the Gillette property (McBeth) and the permits list with the only permit in the McBeth property belonging to Jim Rodgers & Jim's Water Treatment and no mention of CCP or GRNO.
Next, there have been no financial documentations, whatsoever – not even an accounting of revenues from any facility.
Also, there seems to be, according to Steven, the guy I was phone transferred to with question but could answer no questions (more on that later) a problem with producing accounting documents of CCP activities for several years prior to the GRNO/CCP acquisition. The story is that the S.E.C. is requiring those documents. I haven't checked with the S.E.C. contact yet but I have that info and need to do that.
On Steven, I was to send him a list of questions last Friday and he would forward them to Peter. Peter, of course would answer all those question and send them back to Steven and then I was to call Steven on the 31st for the answers Peter provided. The list just seems to be growing and growing, has taken over a week to generate and is still not complete. With that, in the interest of expedience, I will forward the list to Peter and carbon copy Steven so he won't be in the dark any longer. It's going to be awhile.
I was impressed when I spoke with Matt (or Mark in January/early Feb. (don't recall when, exactly) but I am having some second thoughts about that since the permit discrepancy came up and the timbre of Debbie voice sounded very unsettled, abrupt and defensive, although she could have been pressured and hurried, being the office administrator recording and fielding all the calls requesting slop oil reclamation services and answers to questions that no one can give.
Did you remember to change your answering machine message?
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on July 20, 2012, it filed a civil fraud action against former Connecticut resident Jerry S. Williams, a stock promoter, and two companies that he controlled, Monk’s Den, LLC and First In Awareness, LLC. The Commission charged Williams with running a scalping scheme from which he made over $2.4 million. Scalping is a type of fraud in which the owner of shares of a security recommends that security for investment and then immediately sells it at a profit upon the rise in market price which follows the recommendation.
http://sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22420.htm
Isn't this exactly what Goldman Sachs did regarding the credit default swaps the sold to their clients? As I recall, nothing much came of it, other than a fine of proportions that would be considered by GS as trivial and insignificant.
I think this secured loan line of credit is hinged on the value of the stock at the stock price at the time it was established in May. I think there is no activity in any of the sites. i think the sites are all just plots of land on leased property. I think the p.r. on a northern Montana site cleanup that was put out several months ago http://www.otcreporter.com/Reportdetails.asp?rptid=325
is to clean up the Waldo site that they've abandoned and closed last year.
I'm sure I'm not going to get any information from management on this. I don't even know if that place has been cleaned, yet. It sure looks as though it hasn't from the aerial photo map at google.
http://www.alphatrade.com/news/stories/AM/2012-06-20/MRW/201206201330MRKTWIREUSPR____0901482.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/102090833/TCA-Global-v-Marine-Industries-Et-Al-Doc-1-Filed-17-Jul-12
No.
IMHO, they ain't talkin'. We'll see.
I spoke with Mr. Taylor, this afternoon. I asked many questions, mostly about financial documentations, audit time frames and the delays in any financial filings with the S.E.C. and reasons for those delays. I asked about the motivation behind management's role in lack of communications with share holders concerning periodical updates in the activities of the company. Somehow, it seems to be a real task to believe so little is happening, hearing that day to day operations are ongoing, the Wibaux facility is in full operation and Ms. Mitchell and the current auditors have been grinding for almost two full years to bring filings up to date.
It seems the S.E.C. wants audits of C.C.P. activities prior to the merged incorporation, Peter has them but seems to be holding on to them, for reasons I just don't understand. Mr. Taylor has requested that I list questions in detail and send them in an email to him. He will, in turn,
submit them to management and have the answers by next Friday, August 31.
If you have questions, you should also submit them to Mr. Taylor. Mr. Taylor has told me that Mr. Margiotta is upset over delays in submission of those past due S.E.C. financial filings.
All three of those are McBeth properties. There are no others that I have found. Those are the only three listed. Where else could or would a McBeth facility other than McBeth Pits operated by Rodgers Water Services, the only McBeth facility listed, be located?
I also think I located the now abandoned Waldo facility southwest of Sidney, MT.
Start here: http://www.blackbookonline.info/MT-Richland-Property.aspx
lick on: Name: Property Tax Mega Search HOT and enter "waldo". The fun begins here.
Or: go to google maps and enter: hwy 261, richland county, mt
Then scan to hwy 261 se of Sidney and just east of the Yellowstone river. The location of interest is about 2 1/2 miles south of where 261 vectors from a n.e. to s.w. and continue due south to an area just east of 261 and just north of an east/west hwy designated, "County Rd".
There you should see an area with a dirty dark brown portion that would resemble a livestock lot. Scan that square area to the hwy and notice the structures present. Those structures appear to be tanks very similar to those in the photos on the CCP website.:
http://www.customcarbonprocessing.com/operations.asp (see: Waldo)
The color of the earth is also very similar.
At this point, there's so little in the bag.
McBeth found (sort of). At least, the location and so it might be shared with those interested, it is here:
http://www.ccgov.net/assessor/online/property/index.rsp
When the page comes up, insert the name, "McBeth" in the "Owner Name" bar and click the "Search By Owner" button.
There will be three different listings. All three will take you to the same location:
2490 WY-50, Gillette, WY 82718
This address is also good for Google Maps.
You can search the area for any location that even somewhat resembles what could be an aerial view of the photos of the McBeth facility as depicted on the GRNO and CCP web sites. I've been looking at anything with a road leading from Hwy. 50. That's as close as I've gotten. Need help, here.
I'm also skeptical about the address in Gillette (511 S. Kendrick) listed in the expanded information, here on iHub. There is no CCP or variation listed with those folks and business at that address.
But just across the street is the Gillette City Administration building, City Attorny and Police Dept.
Someone there might be able to help with this mystery.
I think it would be a great benefit to all if there were some form of communication from the company, including mgt.
I don't think the transfer agent can know who has stock and who is trading if the shares are not being held physically. In example, I don't have physical possession of my shares, they are all in my brokerage account which is probably the case for many or maybe most of us. I talked with him a week ago, asking for the number of shareholders there are on record. He told me (sorry, forgot his name but have it written down somewhere) he only had the number of unrestricted shares (see post #75305: 74,136,342) .
I have found no records for the McBeth site involving CCP or GRNO. However, I did find records indicating that the Wibaux sites are owned by Michels on the west side of Yates Rd. and by Mojahn on the east side of Yates Rd. Both properties are listed as ag. and/or grazing land but ag. productivity doesn't seem to be very robust.
The information from the June '12 news release indicates only that a $2mm credit line is established and $500,000 is to be used for the upgrade of Michels site. If the Michels site is exclusionary then then it would follow that the Mojahn site across the road, if it had been used for an oil reclamation facility by CCP, it is no longer and the equipment in the aerial photos as well as the CCP web site photos are to be moved and relocated to the Michels site on the west side of Yates.
There is nothing on the document (see link in previous post) to indicate that CCP or GRNO either own or lease any property in Campbell County, WY. The correct spelling of the facility, according to GRNO website and CCP website as well as the oil disposal facility permit document is McBeth rather than MacBeth, as in the Shakespearian literary work. Also, there is no record of ownership in the name of Green Oasis Environmental, Custom Carbon Processing, This is the link to the Campbell County assessor site:
http://www.ccgov.net/assessor/online/property/index.rsp
Let us know if you find anything useful. I could not. I've got to get on the phone, contact some of these folks and see if they will provide anything useful or meaningful.
You're most certainly having a more enjoyable time than I am. I'm spending much of the weekend working on fundamental analysis of GRNO and so far I've done nothing but waste time. I did find one document that I hadn't seen before. I found a list of all of the permitted facilities in the counties in Wyoming with interests in oil recovery. I found a familiar name on the list, that of Jim Rogers of Jim's Water Service. I was mistaken about the magnitude of significance that company has. It seems to be very involved in Campbell county. In fact, it seems to be the only one listed doing business in a facility known as the McBeth Pit. I guess the reason it stood out so profoundly is because it's at the top of the list. In all fairness, the list is such that it shows the last update as 8/1/2011 but the GRNO and CCP web sites both show activity there at the McBeth facility long before that update and it seems to me that there should be mention of their involvement on that permit list but I can't seem to find it.
http://deq.state.wy.us/wqd/www/Permitting/Downloads/Produced%20Water/Oil-Field-Pits_Active.pdf
But then, I can't seem to find any documents that would expressly pertain to the facility of fundamental analysis, either.
Which is the better investment buy, GRNO, GM or FB?
Google the number on your post and it comes up something entirely different in an entirely different state. That means the 973 area code is not only in Jersey but in Texas, too. How does that happen?
I also learned there are 74,136,342 unrestricted shares readily available.
I just learned that TCA Global Credit Master Fund, the entity that has approved another $500,000 of a $2,000,000 credit line to GRNO is domiciled in the Cayman Islands. For the last several months I thought it was a G.B. concern as is it's parent.
This link shows: http://www.offshorealert.com/GetDocument.aspx?id=44969
I really hope that GRNO doesn't need the funding. I wonder what the interest rate is set at.
I don't see any good to come of this for GRNO.
It's still there. It looks like it may be getting some updating. The Custom Carbon Processing site is functional.
Waste your own time.
That's what I've been looking for; business permits. You're the one looking for environmental permits.
The company already told me the Waldo site was closed due to environmental issues and why the equipment there was being moved to the Michel site.
It could be all of us just nibbling like a fish on a worm. I recall Luken claiming he bought quite a bit last week; something like 85,000. That's not as impactive as the large blocks of the last several weeks, though. Could it be MONK?
Another thing that's been bothering is the timeline of events in the Williams complaint.
71. During late February 2010, Green Oasis hired Williams to promote the company by, among other things, selecting the company’s stock as a Float Lock Down target. Green Oasis paid Williams 1.4 million shares for $0.1 per share, at a time when the stock was trading at $0.8 per share. On February 26, 2010, the day after Williams received the first 650,000 of his shares, he sent an Email Alert selecting Green Oasis as a Float Lock Down. Subsequently, Williams posted the selection of Green Oasis as a Float Lock Down on the Monk’s Den message board, and maintained it as a Float Lock Down stock throughout at least 2010.
I can't be specific re: the time Ms. Mitchell came on board as GRNO's legal advisary & consultant. It's stated on the GRNO web site only as 2010. It seems that she would have known about the FLD plan in effect and the 1.6 million share payment at 10¢ (the complaint shows the stock price as $0.1 although it is likely it's meant as $0.10 to coincide with published historical pricing. This may be construed as nitpicking on my part but anyone knowledgeable of legal documents should be exactingly correct; that is should be but I find them frequently with errors significant enough to change the course of history.) I have to ask, Was Ms. Mitchell privy to the FLD negotiations information? Did mgt. inform and disclose? According to her job description on the GRNO web site,
Sharon D. Mitchell - Legal Consultant
Sharon has been with Custom Carbon Processing Inc. (CCP) since 2010 as our Legal Consultant.
Sharon has been primarily involved in developing and reviewing our corporate structures, lease applications, consultant contracts, press releases and development requirements in the applicable jurisdictions. She remains instrumental in organizing our rapidly expanding company.
All legal requirements are reviewed by Sharon prior to GRNO entering into purchases, assignments, and local registrations. We are pleased to have Sharon with us, as we are able to immediately respond to our ever-increasing opportunities.
With this, I'm hoping she did know, reviewed the FLD plan and found it to be legal with the concept that Williams would have held his shares to a higher appreciation without the "scalping" part of it.
Here is what I found on a MT permit:
https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/FilingSearch.aspx
https://app.mt.gov/cgi-bin/bes/besCertificate.cgi?action=detail&bessearch=F058763&trans_id=besa122190210514e2b01
It is headed by the MT Secy. of State and shows that CCP is in good standing and current as of 4/9/12. It also lists the principal office address as in Gillette, WY and it lists the MT address as Sidney which was reported as closed to me in January and it does not list Wibaux. That could be because the Wibaux facility (Michel) was not in operation at the time of filing but is or is not now, in August, '12.
bigoledog: You are right. It makes no sense to me that one state would be responsible for or willing to issue a permit to do business in another state even if that business entity were registered in its congruent home state. Why don't you give a shot at finding a permit in MT for either Custom Carbon Processing or Green Oasis Environmental. The MT Secy. of State should be a good place to start.
i can find CCP permit document record in Wyoming, although it originated in 2007 which is when CCP began there. What I cannot find is any documentation for CCP or GRNO in Wibaux County, MT. You could also call and request that they send you a copy of said permit. If that is refused or denied you can call the Sheriff in Wibaux County, MT and in inform them that you believe they are there in Wibaux County and doing business without a required permit. Be sure and record names, times, dates, etc. so you have a paper trail. That's always a good thing to have. I'm sure you'd have no trouble getting management to send you a pdf copy of their permits. Let us know what you find out.
I think that there is a Wyoming permit that also covers the MT facilities. This is from my recall of results of a search of about eight months ago.
I had been planning to travel to all of those locations in WY and both in MT. I am still wanting to do that. Of course, the Sidney site is now non existent and that leaves just the Wibaux and Gillette. I'm pretty sure the Gillette site is running because that's where the portable unit was supposed to have been delivered. I don't know about the Wibaux (Michel) site. With no communications from management for about a year now, I'm not too enthusiastic.
As for photos, that is on my to do list if we go there next month. I also thought about contacting the sheriff's office there and asking about a report on activity at the Wibaux site but the thought has been as far as that's gotten.
After reading the SEC complaint several times, it occurs to me that Sharon D. Mitchell may be involved in the timeline. I know that she came on sometime in 2010 but think it was later in the year. According to the web site info., it's one of her jobs to advise on situations such as that described in the complaint. The problem I see there is that the complaint stated that the scam was ongoing "at least" to the end of 2010.
About a week ago, I received a reply from GBH regarding the filings I enquired about. In that, I was advised to contact the company directly. I have not done that and under the circumstances re: Williams and GRNO's part in that little adventure, I'm reluctant to do so without having all of my ducks in a row. As of now, the ducks have changed positions.
Rocker4: The Michels facility, south and east of Wibaux is located just south of Black Diamond Rd. @ Yates Rd.
You can get there by going south from Wibaux on Hwy 7 to Black Diamond Rd. and then East on Black Diamond Rd. to Yates Rd. or east from Wibaux on Yates Rd. following Yates Rd. as it vears south to Black Diamond Rd. Go south on Yates from the intersection at Black Diamond Rd. about a quarter mile where you will see to areas, one on the west side, first and then a hundred or so yards on the east side of Yates. The Waldo facility south of Sidney Mt. was closed and the equipment moved to the Wibaux facility.
http://maps.google.com/ (Wibaux, MT)
You're right in each of your points. I want to add that, we would not have held this stock for so long if there had been no positive consideration. At this point there is not much to generate positive consideration since there has been little to no information for almost a year other than the note about the $2,000,000 credit line that has been established to fund a revamp of the Michel facility southeast of Wibaux. There have been no updates on the OK Crude facility, the Waldo facility, the Gillette facility or the Texas facility. The Waldo facility has been abandoned and I think it is the one that has inspired a mandate for cleanup. The PR was worded in a positive light (sort of) but I don't think it deserves an atta-boy. That's like being told by your parents to clean up your room and take out the trash when you're old enough to know it's your job anyway. Maybe the OK Crude facility needs a cleaning too, since the equipment had been moved a couple of years ago and the rest pretty much abandoned.
There has been absolutely no word at all on the Texas facility. Even I can pretty well guess there'll be no movement on the Yemen action. The big problem is, it was reported this spring that Taylor said the past due and Methuselistically late SEC filings would be, in part, submitted by the end of April.
That has been proven to be a damn lie. It was Luken that posted it. Just the other day, he said that he knows Peter had nothing to do with the paying of shares for promotion to MONK. The SEC action filing says otherwise; maybe not personally but Peter is in the chain of command and therefore owns the culpability though he still may not own the responsibility.
The stuff I posted the other day on reverse mergers, I posted because as I read through it, there were so many points in it that were just so close to the actions that the scenario depicted that have occurred with Green Oasis Environmental. Some of them, exact. If you didn't bother reading it, you might want to reconsider. The few PRs that have been disseminated lately (all two of them) have been so very vague that, if that is the intention, it seems so deceptive and if it is not, it appears that whomever has been writing them as a professional is quite inept in the profession.
As for posting seemingly negatively suggestive material, if one is doing so to shake the trees, it could have a positive effect for a buyer using fire to fight fire. What I would do, if I were Peter and serious about the success this corp as a viable business is disregard the good ol' boy network this looks like and get rid of some damaging baggage. I'd start with the PR rep and the in house legal counsel. But, I'm not Peter. I'm just a shareholder. As of now, what I see isn't very attractive. If I had more to lose, I might cut and run but there's really not a great deal at stake at this point so there's little to cut and run from.
The CYA clause:
Risk Disclosure
Public companies are required to disclose the risks of investing in their stock in a number of filings with the SEC. Below are examples of risk factor disclosures that some reverse merger companies have used in their SEC filings:
• Because we became public by means of a “reverse merger,” we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.
• Additional risks may exist since we will become public through a “reverse merger.” Securities analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is little incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. We cannot assure you that brokerage firms will want to conduct any secondary offerings on behalf of our company in the future.
• The transaction involves a reverse merger of a foreign company into a domestic shell company; as a result, there is no history of compliance with United States securities laws and accounting rules.
• Our management has no experience in managing and operating a public company. Any failure to comply or adequately comply with federal securities laws, rules or regulations could subject us to fines or regulatory actions, which may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
• We will incur significant costs to ensure compliance with United States corporate governance and accounting requirements.
• We may not be able to meet the filing and internal con- trol reporting requirements imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission resulting in a possible decline in
4 See Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Staff Audit Practice Alert No. 6: Auditor Considerations Regarding Using the Work of Other Auditors and Engaging Assistants from Outside the Firm (July 12, 2010). the price of our common stock and our inability to obtain future financing.
• As a public company, we are obligated to maintain effec- tive internal controls over financial reporting. Our inter- nal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, decrease the value of our ordinary shares.
• The relative lack of public company experience of our man- agement team may put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Another consideration is that some of the foreign companies that access the U.S. markets through the reverse merger process have been using small U.S. au- diting firms, some of which may not have the resourc- es to meet its auditing obligations when all or sub- stantially all of the private company’s operations are in another country. As a result, such auditing firms might not identify circumstances where these companies may not be complying with the relevant accounting stan- dards.4 This can result in increased risks for investors.
http://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/reversemergers.pdf
Not everyone finds Aldo's departure curious. He does have fans and likes on fb. I no longer see his name listed in re: GRNO but I see his name listed as current president of Airam Capital
http://www.airamcapital.com/AiramCapital/Team.html
Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:18:30 PM
seabreezing
Re: Walker post# 5862
Post # 5865 of 35212
Steven Taylor and Aldo Rotondi should be thanked for acting most quickly to correct this issue about the authorized. Shows how intent they are on being correct with what is on display about the company..thanks again slystocks..sea
Aldo's off selling hearing aids. Actually, he's off selling stock in a co. selling hearing aids.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=HRAL:US
http://www.hearatlastholdings.com/HearAtLastholdings/Wal-Mart_Locations.html
http://www.hearatlastholdings.com/HearAtLastholdings/About_Us_-_Aldo_Rotondi.html
Wherever those old news articles came from, the one re: "...deal to clean dormant disposal pit in northern Montana" (8/19/11) does not mention the name or specific location of that salt water pit.
I'm thinking it could be the now abandoned Waldo facility near Sidney that was part of the CCP locations prior to moving equipment from there to Wibaux. Could it be the "deal" was motivated by state mandate? Management didn't give a specific location for that Waldo site so I couldn't pin point. I was told it was south or east or both.
In response to your post, I am attempting to communicate with the entity GBH CPAs of Houston. Thanks for shaking the tree.
"...GBH has had 1 1/2 years to get it done and still hasn't produced.
...GBH has had more than enough time to sort through all of Carraway's dump and get their work done."