Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Fair question and I can't answer it. I do know that if I lived in the Gillette area and was looking for a job, I'd look here first:
http://gnr.adqic.com/finder/list.html?is_favorites=false&show_photos=true&offset=0&order_by=category_name+asc&category_id=51100&filter=_RESET_SEARCH_TERMS_&limit=50&=all&=50&=50&=51100
I'd look for union postings and I'd be looking on line in places like
http://www.careerbuilder.com/JobSeeker/Jobs/JobResults.aspx?lr=cbcb_la&siteid=cb_lanpqsb&use=all&s_rawwords=oil&s_freeloc=Gillette%2C+WY&s_jobtypes=ALL&Submit=Find+Jobs+»;
If I were hiring, I'd post on craigslist or on my own website under something like,
"Employment Opportunities". I haven't seen anything like that on any of the GRNO sites.
But, if they're not hiring, they're not hiring. This probably wouldn't be the case if GRNO were actually engaging in a business enterprise that received and shipped product, though.
There are other concerns in the same area that are hiring or will be; Halliburton for one, Peabody for another. http://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/stories/Oil-company-will-build-settle-later,59830?content_source=&category_id=4&search_filter=&event_mode=&event_ts_from=&list_type=&order_by=&order_sort=&content_class=&sub_type=stories&town_id=
Paula, why do so quickly become defensive at any indication of impropriety? A P.O. Box is not a bad thing. When a search for local information involving a local business lavished with internet P.R. has no mention of activity at the local level, it raises questions as to, why? No local employment, no business news and no mention of ownership of a company with no mention. Doesn't that sound a bit alarming? After all, it's been over two months since the last P.R. Newswire with apparently inaccurate info.- "acquired" at the point of order with a wait until it arrives to start building other parts, sounds just a bit questionable, to me.
This is a link to the Campbell County, WY Assessor's website. Gillette is in Campbell County. It seemed to me that if I typed in CCP's Gillette address, 511 S. Kendrick Ave. or Custom Carbon Processing or Green Oasis Environmental or one of the other names of the company, such as Global Enviro Solutions or Aldo Rotondi or Peter Margiotta or Frank Pelizzarri or Pelizzari or maybe Ramos and Ramos but nothing pops up.
Then I tried the Chamber of Commerce.
http://web.gillettechamber.com/directory/results.aspx?Keywords=custom+carbon+processing&AdKeyword=custom+carbon+processing&SearchCategories=True&SearchNames=True&SearchOnlyMembers=False
Nothing there, either.
Also, I found no evidence of employment under any of the company names in the Gillette area. Green Oasis did buy the CCP concern, didn't it?
I think it's mostly buying to cover short positions anticipating a report this month based on much ado about nothing.
Sidestyle says: i'd like to hear justification...of your statement that there has been massive dilution. the TA is not gaged...there is no mystery concerning the share count. appx 91 million shares outstanding with about 20 million in the float...that number has not changed...call the TA
There has always been discrepancy in total shares and float, for as long as I can remember.
Once again, I had to dig out the old files to check what it was then compared to now.
2/2/97 Total shares=5,167,000 (or maybe 5.6+/-200,000 shares). Actual float known to be 1.3 to 1.6M shares. Also sworn to be 5,916,000 shares outstanding.
2/13/97: the thermal oxidizer! That's the name of the secret part that was supposed to be the flux capacitor of the "machine" but of course, it never materialized.
Here's one, a form 10-QSB dated 3/31/1997 showing 6,465,134 shares outstanding at April 9, 1997. Then, on the last page (17) of the report (Exhibit 11, Computation of Earnings Per Share) (fully diluted as income per common share, $0.12) and weighted average number of common shares outstanding, 6,967,789.
Today 6/24/2011 3:58 PM EDT 25,062,242 shares
( http://www.greenoasisenvironmental.com/investors )
From: Investor Fact Sheet
(As of January 22, 2010) http://m.b5z.net/i/u/10077379/i/GRNO_IFS_-_Jan_22-10.pdf
Outstanding Shares 85.0M Float 5.60M
So from this, there may or may not be some dilution. Or maybe, nobody knows.
One thing I know, I have the same number of shares today that I had 14 years ago and they are not worth any more today than they were then. You wait until the stock price goes up and then you toss a few more shares into the float and the price drops. What's the point of that?
Over the week of June 14, 15, 16, 17 (forget about Monday, 13) GRNO hovered just above 4, trading .041-.05 with most between .04 and .05. Point is, if you could buy, the bid would be above .o4 because it only actually traded at .04 once during that period. My broker won't allow trades at prices less than whole cent bids. Who is able to buy at bids or sell at ask prices of less than a hundredth of a dollar? Anyone? What broker?
I'm just considering the technique, keeping the bid/ask at prices less than a penny as a manipulation method. Using a strategy like this could very well maintain control over price and volume, down so low, buying a block or greater could keep the stock down and heading toward .03 where that big block purchase would just have lost 25% of the investment. Give it up and it goes up. You cry a bit, angry at yourself for selling and buy back in at .04 again, only to find yourself sinking back to .03. Put the gun down.
I have no clue as to whether she's been "newly retained", "newly hired", or closed her practice in Yucca Valley to take employment in Canada with Pete and the gang. If GRNO's pr states "newly retained", what are the odds of accuracy of that if the pr from May states the company "acquired" a new special part when it goes on to state that the company can begin to produce the other parts necessary as soon as they receive the "acquired" part?
And that date (1/13/11) rings a bell. That's the same date GRNO had the audio interview with Stuart T. Smith. That's the one popularly known as the "Basically" interview.
What I do know is that, once the corp. begins to demonstrate public filings, they're going to have to play by a different set of rules, rules they probably don't care to deal with. They might feel that they're better off with no filings and ambiguous pr's, as they've been doing so well with, since the public corp began to rear its ugly head. Maybe they're better off sticking to the Carraway Play Book.
New employee ? newly retained. Now, let me leave you with these departing words from April 14, 1997:
As a fellow shareholder, my concluding thoughts are these:
Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. is growing ever stronger as a company, as an operating business and as an investment.... We thank you for your trust and confidence in the executive management of your Company.
Sincerely,
William D. Carraway
President and CEO
I think "new hire" may not be accurate. I think, since she's a lawyer in CA with a private practice, she's probably a contracted professional with GRNO as a client. She also has shown other clients, since that announcement. All that's needed is a google search and there is much info. about her. There is more than one listed but I'm pretty sure she is the one in Yucca Valley. If I'm wrong, let me know who else it is because this one looks to be the most likely suspect.
I'd like to know the number of barrels of slop oil processed in the first six months of 2011 compared to the actual number of barrels of slop oil processed in the second six months of 2010. Also, recognizing that a constantly fluctuating price of crude and processed slop oil would play a part in revenues, what are the revenues from processed slop oil for each processing plant for those two aforementioned time periods?
Since the first six month period of 2011 is not complete, I would expect only a complete tally for the second half 2010 six month period with an update for first half 2011 within the first two weeks of July, 2011 based upon a constantly updated running tally through the first half, 2011. I can't see where this would be a difficult number to provide, should the company actually be an ongoing concern with generally accepted accounting principals in place. On the other hand, if this does seem to be too difficult, it would certainly shed some light on the ongoing concern test, wouldn't it?
This doesn't even begin to address that part of revenues actually transferred to the income and earnings lines of such a G.A.A.P. report, which would provide some insight as to the portion of revenues transferred to operating expenses, etc.; other usual entries found on the income statement. With this information provided, I'd be a lot more comfortable waiting on the rest of the reports. I'd even be more comfortable with numbers from my first paragraph.
"i'm not excusing anything, i'm just offering one possible alternative to those who state with such certainty that the silence is because the SEC, FBI, CIA, and Scotland Yard are all lining up to storm the GRNO headquarters."
That would do it. We've already pissed off China over SEAL Team 6 invading Pakistan. Now you want piss off G.B. over Canada. It's not happening and neither is GRNO.
I think that would probably be, Oye Como Va composed by Tito Puente and Carlos Santana made a very creative upbeat correction to it but I don't see what that has to do with GRNO.
Just as disturbing is that you mentioned: "Now that they have the financials the attorney is working on the S1." So, I went to http://www.greenoasisenvironmental.com/investors
and in the column of links under, "INVESTORS", the link to "financials" is inactive. That was from Sept., 2010 and there are still no financials listed.
The link regards John Reed Stark and his current role and activities. Back in the late nineties, Mr. Stark, a D.O.J. lawyer with the S.E.C. special counsel on Internet Projects headed the team that halted Green Oasis Environmental stock trading because executives
(B.C. and others) allegedly payed a p.r. firm to release false and misleading statements to increase the price of its stock for the personal profit gain of the owners and other select stock holders, to disseminate information to the public that was designed to instill belief that the primary product worked that is, turned waste motor oil into useable number 2 diesel fuel, even after the few units that were sold to unsuspecting buyers were proven not to work as advertised, a blatantly fraudulent misrepresentation and motivated one unsuspecting stockholder to make claims he allegedly believed were true in that he was receiving no compensation for his efforts in promoting the company in various bulletin board postings and newsletters when, in actuality, he did receive certain specific equipment he used to further his postings and newsletters. Green Oasis also employed tactics very similar to a more recent situation in that, execs. maintained that a specific part was on order that would be the be all do all answer to the actual performance of the proprietary equipment. That specific part never materialized nor did anything more accurate in the accounting practices of the company's financial statements than the un-audited kind we're all so used to seeing here. There are just so many similarities.
I'll end with this, a message from MicrocapCC, an acquaintance of B.C., from Feb. 3, 1997:
"Let's not forget the true hero, the man behind the (processing plant) machine - Bill Carraway! He is the one who allowed all of (his) to invest in his dream."
Then past haunting financial problems, suits and failures to file will continue.
If that is the case, maybe a bankruptcy is in order. If the Canadians file bankruptcy on the U.S. shell in the U.S., does the fallout follow the Canadians back to Canada or does it stay with the shell in the U.S.? What about a reverse split? One new share for 100 old shares. That would take the wind out of the old sails. Oh, yes. I'm expecting the worst. Maybe even throw in some environmental violations and penalties. Not only from feds but from state and county governments, too. A few barrels of spill, here and there would put the icing on the cake. It's been about a month now, since that secret part was supposedly ordered or was it "acquired" ? Do those two terms mean the same in Canadian lingo? I don't know, the p.r. said it was "acquired" which would indicate the company already has possession of the part but then it also said the company was waiting on the part so other parts could be built around it. The most frustrating part of it is, the company is content to leave it in such an ambiguous state.
http://www.strozfriedberg.com/professionals/xprProfessionalDetails1.aspx?xpST=ProfessionalDetail&professional=157
That's encouraging, bigoledog.
Such an attempt to suggest the "possible" (as in, under God, all things are possible) so, as FINRA is discounted on a daily basis, the past two weeks paints a more realistic picture.
One scenario overlooked in the eloquence is the much overlooked and intentionally disguised painting of the tape. So, as proposed in the last paragraph of your linked post, it was probably meant to be confusing and as one half month period ends and the next begins, if the least current volume isn't replaced by the most current volume to watch a moving average, you'll discover a gross inaccuracy at the end of the current half month cycle which is what is published by nasdaq. You can do your very best to convince that it "doesn't mean anything" and what that does is blanket you with suspicion on yourself. Apply some disparagement, guilt and maybe throw in a little paranoia, while you're at it. It won't change the true picture. Run it up, run it down. Toss in some massive volume. Tell me how smart you are. Use the Jim Jones strategy. Pour the Kool-Aid.
You wouldn't happen to have any news on GRNO's essential part ordered early last month, would you? Now, that I would really appreciate.
You can't short sell a viable company out of business. You can try using such a trading strategy. It's unethical and that's rampant in the stock market. I'm not sure it's illegal.
Please, explain.
I can't find you one. I can't even find me one. None of that or hogwash explains the short position volume but it is there and it is consistent. Just because neither you nor I can explain it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. It doesn't mean it isn't accurate data and it doesn't mean that two individuals with broker's credence can't make the trade. But, since there's no risk in your $10,000 offer, I'll look harder to find you one. I can always use the money.
Yes, it went up. The problem is, it was very, very thin trading and most of it was generated by short sell positions. If you bought yesterday, chances are you bought someone's short.
This really is not an answer to your question but in it's early stages during the first marketable (though not operable) generation of the GRNO machine (1996-1997) the stock price went to $10/share before SEC halted trading. Had there been no fraud and had the machine actually performed as it was advertised and promoted that is, actually turned used waste motor oil into number 2 diesel fuel, my "guess" stock price was $50/share and that might have been low. If this time around can actually process waste oil/slop oil, it still might have a $50/share value but if it does, I'll be long dead and gone before it happens.
I wouldn't be comfortable with it either. Uncommonly forthright of you to do so.
As for questions you might ask, I'm curious about this "key piece of equipment" that's been ordered and when it will arrive so that other parts might begin fabrication, as stated in the May 11, 2011 press release.:
Press Release Source: Green Oasis Environmental On Wednesday May 11, 2011, 4:15 pm EDT
EDMONTON, AB--(Marketwire - 05/11/11) - Green Oasis Environmental Inc. (Pinksheets:GRNO - News), a Florida corporation, is pleased to announce its wholly owned subsidiary Custom Carbon Processing Inc., (CCP) has ordered a key piece of equipment for the high demand mobile processing unit (MPU). This unit will allow CCP the ability to go to the product, expand operations, and increase revenues while saving clients time and money. MPU's will also eliminate the need for trucking oil by up to 80 percent, while providing less environmental impact. Once the equipment arrives, CCP can begin fabrication on the balance of the components required to make up the MPU which CCP has developed.
"Having a mobile unit allows us the opportunity to expand on our current processing model. It will offer a rare service and major benefit to companies in the industry. The MPU will reduce the overall costs to our clients while increasing revenues for our company. This mobile technology will create new and limitless opportunities in today's high growth oil industry." stated President and CEO Peter Margiotta.
Green Oasis -- "Green today for a stronger tomorrow"
Why, in a modern technology world of "just in time" manufacturing and AutoDesk drawing capabilities, would there have to be a wait time? Am I expecting too much? Could it be no more than a Tommy-Lift for the pickup truck and the wait is to know how much air to let out of the tires to get the barrels to a "proper loading level"? Or will this be another replay of the Carraway flim-flam, waiting for the secret part that never arrives because the grindstone broke and the tooling can't be sharpened without it?
Does this non reporting public corporation really have to report anything if it chooses not to? Are any rules or federal laws being violated? Why would the fed. impart sanctions or have reason to do anything at all if there were no violations? These people know that, don't you think? Trading today was just another day - shorts outnumber the longs more than 2:1. I think this trading activity is largely do to one person or one small group of team players and I think they're in N.J. What do you think?
GRNO short volume 379,756, total volume 751,930
Could this be the real thing or a reprise of the mysterious missing link? As I recall, some time in the late '90's GRNO ordered a special part needed to make the processor work efficiently that all were waiting for. I think it might have been a flux capacitor or maybe a thermal oxidizer or something like that. Anyway, I don't think it ever arrived. B.C. blamed the downfall of the processor on that part not arriving. I think he even hired a machinist - fabricator to install the part, should it ever show up and build parts that would otherwise be required. I think his name was Pete. It was not the same Pete as the current.
This is not to say it's the same kind of situation. It just sounds so similarly coincidental.
It could be little more than a solid gold torx screw that would make a common steel torx screw unacceptable. I'm sure that once we learn the size of that screw we can ramp up on production of the parts needed to make it all fit together.
.08 is the target?
If GRNO were to be sold or shorted prior to 3/7 and then GRNO were to be deflated during the following weekly period, it might motivate substantial selling in GRNO stock. If GRNO were then inflated for a period beginning 3/14 after substantial acquisition at .04-.05, GRNO could continue to be inflated for six more weeks, say, to 4/28-29, it could well effectively motivate buying during that period, the end of which period, GRNO could then be sold back into the market and again shorted, leaving new buyers with a substantial increase in holdings of GRNO. This could, of course, never be accomplished in a "Boiler Room" atmosphere because that could substantiate a conspiratorial situation of which GRNO could not possibly be a part. GRNO should be coming out with their full reporting status sometime this month. It could happen.
MACD has nothing to do with a FLD.
I agree with you. In fact, I could not find any significance to the acronym, "FLD" in relevance to any financial definition or use, anywhere in any reference. I'd appreciate it if you'd enlighten me, even with your usual condescension. Maybe I'm just not looking in the right places.
And for those who disregard MACD's use in analysis of stocks such as GRNO:
The Moving Average Convergence-Divergence indicator, or "MACD," is a chart tool in the field of technical analysis. It allows traders and investors of nearly any financial product to better gauge the momentum in price action for the purpose of predicting future prices. It applies to stocks, options, futures, currency trading and nearly any product you can chart.
Also interesting is that GRNO has at least been temporarily removed from the NASDAQ short quote list. Could be that there are no short positions at this time.
For those of us who's main indicators are based on charting, it looks like the MACD has flatlined.
In your response (31845) to Paula (31843) you made reference to an SEC communication to Peter (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/914257/000000000010072490/filename1.pdf )
in which the third sentence, first paragraph stated, "If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our comments are inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary."
This same sentence was included in both the Dec. and Jan. communications. It indicates to me that if there is no further communication, no further communication is necessary.
Did Peter disagree? Are SEC comments inapplicable? Is a revision unnecessary?
In view of the timeliness of the SEC letters of Dec, 2010 and Jan, 2011 and the context of the third sentence, first paragraph followed by the consequence of the Shareholder Update of Feb. 7, 2011 and the international boundary between the physical location of the those involved and the virtual lack of capital value of the corporation, it is likely we will never hear from them again. The spoils, as I see it, by a seizure of all tangible assets would gain little more than a few select fields of waste oil product waiting to be cleaned up. At the very best, it would be a federal jobs creation program. Balallan Ltd. is just another entity waiting patiently in line, only to be informed when they get to the gate that the trough is empty.
Previous post was not to paint a picture. Only to reiterate that of the two p.r. enhanced articles, the first from Feb. 2010, the second from Dec. 2010, the first reported target revenues of $8.5 million and the second reported that numbers were still "on target".
Giving that a range of $8mil to $9mil, which doesn't seem to be an over stretch, any in the ball park would be acceptable.
Wyoming, Oklahoma, Montana, Texas. Each have facility. There could be more. North Dakota was also mentioned in the Dec. article. Who knows? No, Paula. I'm not calling to find out. I'm waiting patiently for the reports. That's for sea biscuit.
bigoledog
Share
Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:01:46 AM
Re: Paula post# 31737 Post # of 31752
... GRNO is a cumulation of all its pieces and ccp generated less than a mill in 09.PR states there were on line to make 100% year over year which I interpret as meaning they think they will generate about 1.8 for 2010 (not 8mill as first projected) that breaks down to about 150,000 per month divided by how many facilities 4? that makes about 37,500 for each per month. ... ... If my numbers are inacurate please show how.
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Green-Oasis-Environmental-Inc-on-Target-Record-Year-End-2010-Revenues-Over-85-Million-1121408.htm
Feb 24, 2010 07:30 ET
Green Oasis Environmental Inc. on Target to Record Year End 2010 Revenues of Over $8.5 Million
Revenue Forecast Based on $60 per Barrel of Oil
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/GRNO-Reports-2010-Revenue-on-iw-1943661692.html?x=0&.v=1
GRNO Reports 2010 Revenue on Target to Reflect 100% Increase Year Over Year, 50% Decrease in Expenses, With $4 Million in Assets Owned Free and Clear
Request for Slop Oil Processing Accelerating at Record Rate in 4th Quarter
Press Release Source: Green Oasis Environmental On Friday December 10, 2010, 4:15 pm EST
These numbers dispute the accuracy of those you presented. Both the Feb. 2010 and Dec. 2010 reports are, as it was presented in the attached articles, in approval and from the boss. Until the accounting is completed and published, all other is speculation.
In regard to Balallan and the lawsuit against GRNO for, as I recall, violation of patent rights,
I don't know what patent rights are in question here. Bill Carraway retained all ownership of patent rights and any used by the company in the production of their processors would not have been included in the shareholder sale to the new shell. Bill would most likely have kept those for himself. The truth is, they didn't work, anyway. If he sold them to Balallan then they bought a pig in a poke. Maybe their intention was to reverse engineer the process and attempt to correct any malfunction that prevented it from actually working.
Although I haven't read anything to support this, I do believe that this is why Kwikpower stopped the negotiations they had with GRNO (Bill) to buy the technology from him. GRNO was also in negotiations with other foreign countries to sell them the technology. Also there were negotiations with Jiffy-Lube to have units with the technology installed at each Jiffy-Lube franchise so that used motor oil could be processed right there on the site.
This also deteriorated. Why? Because, it didn't work! Every unit GRNO sold and shipped (which wasn't more than probably, a dozen, if that many) had problems and none worked the way they were supposed to, according to the advertising promises or those depicted in the promotional video. Not one of those processors worked. Even the model on the GRNO site in Charleston didn't really work. A good analogy to it would be gold mine salting. It was a scam! As I recall, once the SEC began their legal process, it sat idle and unattended until it was finally dismantled and hauled away. I don't know what happened to it after that.
I think the new crew bought the GRNO shell because that's all there was left and the name is appropriate for the business model and already in place. Whether the new crew is forthright, we will know soon but there is no reason, at this time, to believe otherwise.
Whether they manage to establish and grow the business is another story. If they are still on track to earn revenues of $8.5 million for 2010 will come out when they report and my instinct dictates that will be next month. I may be wrong. So, sue me. I'm holding.
In the meantime, I'm not so sure any of this past history is relevant. Stories? I've got a million of them. I've also still got the video and I've digitized it. If anyone would like to see it, let it be known. Maybe I'll stick it on a web site for all to see. We can all have a good laugh as we enjoy our stock appreciation to astronomical altitudes.
Share
Monday, March 28, 2011 10:28:06 AM
Re: Paula post# 31693 Post # of 31712
Why would anyone serve IR? Ignoring potential huge problems in a stock (aka "letting sleeping dogs lie") would be a huge and likely expensive mistake, IMHO.
I also believe it to be a huge mistake, etc. It would serve more benefit to all to be maintained in the forefront and discussed in comment whenever it's felt necessary and that would be by ones who regard it as necessary. To criticize for doing so is certainly not helpful. That just serves to cover up potential problems.
I'm anticipating seeing this come to fruition in the annual and quarterly reports that should be coming out early next month. I would expect these numbers to be on the most conservative side, considering the relative price of oil today.
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Green-Oasis-Environmental-Inc-on-Target-Record-Year-End-2010-Revenues-Over-85-Million-1121408.htm
Feb 24, 2010 07:30 ET
Green Oasis Environmental Inc. on Target to Record Year End 2010 Revenues of Over $8.5 Million
Revenue Forecast Based on $60 per Barrel of Oil
EDMONTON, AB--(Marketwire - February 24, 2010) - Green Oasis Environmental Inc. (PINKSHEETS: GRNO) is pleased to announce they are on target to record Year End 2010 revenues of over $8.5 million. Revenue projections are based on the most recent acquisitions and soon to be acquired Oklahoma project. This project is set to be acquired within the next few days. All revenue figures from listed projects reflect $60 per barrel of oil. Current market price per barrel of oil is $78.
Year End 2010 revenue forecast of over $8.5 million are based on six projects which are all located in the United States.
Of course, there's much more in the article.
http://freerealtime.brand.edgar-online.com/DisplayFilingInfo.aspx?Type=HTML&text=%2526lt%253bNEAR%252f4%2526gt%253b(%22ALDO%22%2c%22ROTONDI%22)&FilingID=7586353&ppu=%2fPeopleFilingResults.aspx%3fPersonID%3d3518130%26PersonName%3dALDO%2520ROTONDI
In June 2009, William D. Carraway resigned as Treasurer, Secretary, President and Director of the Company and Peter Margiotta consented to serve as Director and President of the Company. Additionally, Aldo Rotundi was appointed as Secretary, Treasurer and Director of the Company. On June 19, 2009, Aldo Rotondi resigned as Secretary and Treasurer of the Company and the Board of Directors appointed Frank Pellizzari Secretary, Treasurer and Director of the Company.
Peter Margiotta was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors approved the termination of American Stock Transfer Company and engaged the services of Bay City Transfer Agency and Registrar, Inc. as the Company’s transfer agent. On June 16, 2009, the Board of Directors resolved to issue from the Company’s treasury, 60,000,000 Shares to Peter Margiotta.
On July 9, 2009, Aldo Rotondi resigned as Director of the Company.
On January 11, 2010, the Board of Directors resolved to issue 2,000,000 Common Stock of Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. shares from treasury to Bulldog Inc.
On October 18, 2010, The Board of Directors resolved to appoint Aldo Rotondi as Director of the Company.
Who is the Director of the Company now?
What is Bulldog Inc. and why do they get 2,000,000 shares? Are they still holding those shares?