Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
risk/reward
my investment in apple at 10 dollars was supported with information,study,trending tech and faith in their business model.................this allowed me to play with this type of future
forget about profitibility....surely you jest....long road ahead...but your suggestion of burying the hope of financial success suggests a hollw tree unable to withstand the winds therin,given the challenges
still here......tired reading false negatives
my initial posting was a very honest answer questioning electrical supply,albeit their hardware or availability.....i was chastised and put to rest...not brain surgery....still feel positive towards the process,but mgt needs to step back and get their act together....lots of oil money out there....have a difficult time wondering why they aren't being gobbled up for a "drop in the bucket"
horticulture has a many setbacks as the goods go to market,the goal being to refine,improve product,create a market with demand...innovation is a slow developmental process and you need to be very careful....lest we forget,this is a penny issue..............just wish i had listened to my fishing partner that told me his son on the west coast advised to buy apple at 12
do you buy red tomatoes or green tomatoes?
I don't think it should be a supply,but an immediate adjustment to supply based on the viscosity on site.
and we get to .02 what makes you think there is value....folks,lets be real,there are electrical issues based with viscosity adjustment,in time adjustments for such based on the oil being supplied,we have not filled these dots with applications necessary for surge,constant electric source based on demand,not brain surgery,but shows a sprinter instead of a miler...the process could be a diamond,but the mgt, has not covered their bases.if they had,we would be bought in a NY minute!!!
as i questioned months ago,electrical was the question...not brain surgery...easily corrected
i think its time to buy
shorts are out....green causes the onslought....one tiny piece of positive application will cause the halls to have them tripping overselves to cover
my question of power supply was approached a couple months ago,but to only be dismissed as irrelevant,,,not so now...still long,but wonder why no one in big oil just doesen't take us out for peanuts?/ think about it...better transparency is needed on every point of the process
e-trade..never had a problem
Are we not due an updated progress report?Given the overwhelming importance of this demo-test,are shareholders at least deserving of progress or lack therof?
right click the url and open in a separate window
I'm fine with that.No shares available.
Are we halted??
pretty much what i said yesterday.as well of concern about electric issues weeks ago............glad we're on the same page
good advice and wise counsel.......the poster may and probably does have caring and innocent intentions,that being said,if he has a large investment in this tech,his internal conversations are wavering on the legal and disclosure edges.Iwould humbly ask QSEP mgt, to deal with this and possibly inform all shareholders immediately of the ins and outs of the power se
tback.it would put all fears to rest and clear the air of insider issues.
the poster is to be thanked but more careful.his exuberance is to be commended. i am a fan.
In answering a member of the forum asking my concern about adequacy of and confidence in the logistics and quality of power, given the environment of downstream needs and the challenges therin.The process will ultimely depend on in-line pump stations in the middle of SAND!!!.I'm not an engineer,but i would think the process would depend on fluctuating electrical demamd for power simply based on the viscosity of the given in-line product.I see no problems involved as long as the "generators"are governed by demand.Surely not brain surgery to accomplish.Just my two cents worth in my original post and here we are with that exact dilemma.A lapse in judgement should have been tested ans retested before the flow..............just my humble observation
A few weeks ago,I presented the question of power supply capabilities.
OK,Mgt,today seems to ask for transparency among several scenarios.Company IR coupled with the new hire for PR need to have their feet to the fire,given the dive today.A message of confidence to all should calm the waters.
Thank you for providing that info.
are we providing the necessary the generators and the crude deriatives necessary to power the "generators"...maintenance required at each station?have we partnered with supply in those areas?i'm invested here,but i have yet to really see a definitive model on the greater scale of complete successful application.
are sources of electrical power a concern,given the distance and geographical location??
Still plenty time to initiate a stop-loss on your shares.Still a great story with immense volatility involved if you have the kajunes.Be cautious of the banter working on emotion.Great bunch of posters here,but as i always ,err on the side of caution!!!
Wolf,would it be asking too much of you to limit your posts to CURRENT information?This thread of yours has mold growing on it.
The poobah has spoken.Nothing enlightening except his gift of prose.It's great to be led around the world of PTSC by such a gifted prognostonator,legal-eye and a complete vacuum of meaningful information pertainig to PTSC.I graduated with quite a few of his ilk...some things never chang.
We have all the carbon energy we need for the next 100 years.Just put the tree huggers on hold and the snail darterlovers on hold.A major oil giant has made a 100 yr. committment to the Marcellus shale deposit.
I agree with you.The MMP(recently strengthened)is the key to where we are going.All the other surperfluos drama will create flotsam until we settle ongong differences.In the meantime the question goes unanswered...where did the missing (4) go??
I take "dimly lit arena"to mean that you do not respect the less informed to share their views and information on this forum?Greeneyes is without a doubt more informed about this progress than all on here.