Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good Find. Did Nothing for Today's Trading...
But still, Good Find.
But, Are MP/MB Liable For This GTGP Disaster?
Seems those names are bandied about to redirect from GTGP/JF.
Good Outline on DROP Filings. Thanks.
An Author? How Does He Relate to GTGP?
https://www.google.com/search?q=Mark+C+Perry&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-Address&ie=&oe=&safe=active
Is Mark Perry writing an expose' on JF?
First dozen or so hits showing an Author?
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/781309.Mark_C_Perry
Author profile
Mark C. Perry
About this author
Mark Perry (born 1950) is an American author specializing in military, intelligence, and foreign affairs analysis. He has authored eight books: Four Stars, Eclipse: The Last Days of the CIA, A Fire In Zion: Inside the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process, Conceived in Liberty, Lift Up Thy Voice, Grant and Twain, Partners In Command, and Talking To Terrorists. Perry’s articles have been featured in a number of leading publications including The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Nation, Newsday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Christian Science Monitor, and The Plain Dealer (Cleveland, Ohio). He is a graduate of Northwestern Military and Naval Academy and of Boston University.
Or, maybe he is JF's dentist?
http://www.healthgrades.com/dentist/dr-mark-perry-x2878
Seems like more GTGP smoke and mirrors.
Understandable, the Frustration About GTGP/JF's False Qualifications...
JF/GTGP enjoys providing frustration, but that's how it works.
Only matters to GTGP/JF if he gets tools to keep working it.
Contracts being awarded right now.
GTGP not getting any contracts.
Now, why would that be?
Battelle "Opinion" Good as Fact, Battelle Has Credibility...
Careful, MSE-TA/GTGP MBS lab results are also only, "opinion."
The definition of, "opinion," has specific use in remediation.
Just like when regulations are enacted with a, "Proposal."
Behind a few curves on this remediation nomenclature stuff?
In remediation, there are multitudes of promising magic dusts.
Most all are economical only in very specific circumstances.
Unknown if the magic dust will be in those specific circumstances.
So, remediation lab testing results in an, "opinion."
The Battelle labs MBS "opinion" is as good as industry fact.
Why? Because Battelle has the best credentials in the industry.
Many remediation contracts being awarded now.
Yet, no GTGP MBS contracts. None.
Now, why would that be?
One Of the Numerous Technical Indicators...
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/onbalancevolume.asp
Nope - Truth/Reality is Battelle Found MBS as Uneconomical...
Nothing to do with your opinionated filled re-post.
The industry knows Battelle's outstanding credentials.
That is the Reality/Truth, so the Market reacted...
... and, GTGP got spanked down to illiquid pennyland.
Fact: A third party, Battelle, found MBS uneconomical.
Real third party Lab Results. Truth, as the Market sees it.
No GTGP MBS contracts.
Now, why would that be?
Easy question.
Hint - see above.
Semi-Public, Especially Since MSE-TA Distanced Itself From GTGP...
Archived page link? Seems no GTGP SEC filing names Ash Grove.
Believe archived page, or believe lack of GTGP SEC filing?
Current MSE-TA News page shows nothing with GTGP. Interesting.
All GTGP Has is Nothing But Misleading Assumptions...
Does not matter where, or if, there was a "hot run."
Only matters to GTGP/JF if he gets tools to work for him.
GTGP provides ongoing entertainment for why:
...MBS report has different style from all other MSE reports;
...GTGP does not ever have to disclose anything;
...Third party lab, Battelle, found MBS uneconomical;
...GTGP Headquarters in foreclosure proceedings;
...MEEC sales brochure proves gtgp is getting contracts;
...No GTGP contracts, while others get contracts now;
..And, the list goes on and on...
Stacked deck - GTGP/JF does not care about shareholders.
Now, why would that be?
Battelle Has the Qualifications, Shot Down MBS...
Believe Battelle or GTGP?
Hmmmm... Market spanked GTGP.
Pretty obvious Battelle has qualifications...
No speculation there.
Everyone knows it.
Reason Why GTGP Not Disclosing Purported Contracts...
MBS contracts may no longer benefit GTGP...
...and the shareholders of GTGP stock.
With MBS rights to J3, explains GTGP non-disclosure.
No GTGP rights to MBS... No reason for GTGP to disclose.
Only other reason is that GTGP has no MBS contracts.
Either way, not looking good for shareholders.
Yep, Same Ol', Same Ol'...
Cement/Power Plants will comply easily with available tech.
Plenty of PAC/B-PAC Remediation Contracts awarded daily.
J3 does not have to disclose their contracts. Although...
GTGP must disclose material events...aka GTGP MBS contracts.
Yet, GTGP discloses no MBS contracts that benefit shareholders.
Now, why would that be?
Maybe the MBS rights are J3's, and someone "forgot" the proxy?
Regardless, seems a GTGP epiphany happened...
Something to keep in mind is that full-scale implementation of B-PAC technology has been ongoing the last several years at numerous plants throughout the USA and verified to work, by third party labs. B-PAC is what is referenced by EPA with, "through currently available technology," to meet upcoming regulatory requirements for existing and new construction.
The testing of MBS (as an additive to PAC) with PAC being the main remediation ingredient, is claimed to have removed mercury emissions from an unknown cement plant. This, according only to the MBS vendor, has never been third-party verified to actually work as claimed.
PAC and B-PAC alone will easily meet the required percentage reduction, and is doing so right now. There is a place at the table for MBS as an additive to PAC, but the industry is using B-PAC right now. It is not a matter of time, as contracts are being awarded for B-PAC right now.
GTGP/J3/EMHI/SLUP are all interrelated for now.
Market understands and has spanked GTGP/EMHI/SLUP.
Now, why would that be?
Doubt There is Any MP DD That Matters...
Just more spin, rumor, and innuendo to obfuscate.
Pointing fingers at others, not making JF/GTGP responsible.
And, this using of another company's sales brocure?...
Supposed proof to help GTGP get contracts? Huh?
Actually shows competition is going after contracts.
Contracts that are available now. GTGP not trying.
Another outfit makes a brochure to aid GTGP. Yeah, Riiiight.
For some reason, GTGP is not going after contracts?
That is the question that needs asked. Sad.
At least there is entertainment value.
Breitling Certainly is Providing Itself Exposure...
Always hear their commercials during the commute.
On KNX news radio, in the Los Angeles area.
If Breitling going public helps JCDS, great.
Thinking the promised fins would help way more.
Back to Misquoting? Desperate GTGP Times...
"Claiming, non stop, of no contracts ever coming"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94126650
"Ever" is a strong word. Not used on my end.
Wait, could likely be an epiphany...
Understandable, that "...no contracts ever coming"
...Is the real thought about GTGP now going around.
Thanks for letting everyone know.
Nice Edit of Claim... Unfortunately, That's Not It...
Claim is that many are receiving remediation contracts NOW.
Lots of outfits receiving contracts NOW, EXCEPT GTGP...
BIG DIFFERENCE.
Not just a claim.
Does GTGP have any contracts NOW?
Suggest doing some personal DD.
Personal DD findings will reveal this fact...
GTGP has no contracts while others are getting contracts.
Now, why would that be?
Entertaining Reading That a Competitor's Sales Brochure Indicates...
...GTGP will somehow get contracts for MBS.
Yep, that seems to be the latest spin.
A Competitor's product claim, will sell MBS.
Although, it does bring up the question...
Where is GTGP's MBS sales brochure?
For handing out at conventions.
Oops!
Seems no need when they don't attend.
Yes, remediation continues, and is ongoing.
GTGP is not trying to grab the opportunities.
Belief in the Claims of a Sales Brochure?
From an unrelated company? Seriously?
Existing cement/power plants are in compliance.
And will continue to be when new regs take affect.
No other DD needed. Certainly, NOT by me.
The Sales Brochure has nothing to do with GTGP.
Hypes another company's product. Good job!
Making it tougher for GTGP to get a contract.
Might take it to the other board for that ticker.
More Faulty DD. Clearly, No One is saying thanks.
McCarthy Addresses House Committee, Clean Air Act Mentioned...
CONTACT:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
press@epa.gov
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 14, 2013
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy Testimony Before House Committee on Science, Space and Technology
WASHINGTON – As prepared for delivery.
Good morning Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Johnson, and other distinguished members of the Committee. I am pleased to be here to talk about the central role science plays at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Let me begin by stating that science is and has always been the backbone of the EPA's decision-making. The Agency’s ability to pursue its mission to protect human health and the environment depends upon the integrity of the science upon which it relies. I firmly believe that environmental policies, decisions, guidance, and regulations that impact the lives of all Americans must be grounded, at a most fundamental level, in sound, high quality, transparent, science.
Because we rely so heavily on science to meet our mission on behalf of the American people, it must be conducted in ways that are transparent, free from bias and conflicts of interest, and of the highest quality, integrity, and credibility. These qualities are important not just within our own organization and the federal government, but across the scientific community, with its long established and highly honorable commitment to maintaining strict adherence to ethical investigation and research. That’s why the agency has established—and embraced—a Scientific Integrity Policy that builds upon existing Agency and government-wide policies and guidance documents, explicitly outlining the EPA’s commitment to the highest standards of scientific integrity. And that commitment extends to any scientist or organization who wishes to contribute to our efforts. All EPA-funded research projects, whether conducted by EPA scientists or outside grantees and collaborators, must comply with the agency’s rigorous quality assurance requirements.
To ensure that we have the best possible science, we are committed to rigorous, independent peer review of the scientific data, models and analyses that support our decisions. Peer review can take a number of forms, ranging from external reviews by the National Academy of Sciences or the EPA’s federal advisory committees to contractor-coordinated reviews. Consistent with OMB guidance, we require peer review for all EPA research products and for all influential scientific information and highly influential scientific assessments.
Among the external advisory committees is the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB). SAB reviews are conducted by groups of independent non-EPA scientists with the range of expertise required for the particular advisory topic. We invite the public to nominate experts for SAB panels and to comment on candidates being considered by the EPA for SAB panels. The EPA evaluates public comments and information submitted about SAB nominees. The EPA reviews experts’ confidential financial information to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest.
SAB peer reviews are conducted in public sessions in compliance with the open-government requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The public is invited to attend and to provide oral and written comments for consideration by the SAB. Public comments help to ensure that all relevant scientific and technical issues are available to the SAB as it reviews the science that will support our environmental decisions.
Another example is the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) which provides independent advice to the EPA Administrator on the science that supports the EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The CASAC reviews the EPA’s Integrated Science Assessments which deliver science in support of the Clean Air Act.
Thanks to the science behind the implementation of the Clean Air Act, we have made significant and far-reaching improvements in the health and well-being of the American public. In 2010 alone, EPA estimates that programs implemented pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 avoided 160,000 premature deaths millions of cases of respiratory problems such as acute bronchitis and asthma attacks; 45,000 cardiovascular hospitalizations; and 41,000 hospital admissions. These improvements have all occurred during a period of economic growth; between1970 and 2012 the Gross Domestic Product increased by 219 percent.
Through a transparent and open process, we have also committed to enhancing the Agency’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment program. A strong, scientifically rigorous IRIS Program is of critical importance, and the EPA is in the process of: 1) enhancing the scientific integrity of assessments; 2) enhancing the productivity of the Program; and 3) increasing transparency so that issues are identified and debated early in the process. In 2009, the EPA made significant enhancements to IRIS by announcing a new 7-step assessment development process. Since that time, the National Research Council (NRC) has made recommendations related to enhancing the development of IRIS assessments. The EPA is making changes to the IRIS Program to implement the NRC recommendations. These changes will help the EPA produce more high quality IRIS assessments each year in a timely and transparent manner to meet the needs of the Agency and the public. A newly released NRC report is largely supportive of the enhanced approach the EPA is taking to develop the IRIS assessment for inorganic arsenic.
As I mentioned in my opening statement, science is the backbone of our decision-making and our work is based on the principles of scientific integrity and transparency that are both expected and deserved by the American people. I am proud of the EPA’s research efforts and the sound use of science and technology to fulfill the EPA’s mission to protect human health and safeguard the natural environment.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today. I am happy to answer any questions you may have at this time.
Seeing Many Outfits Still Receiving Remediation Contracts...
Mercury remediation continues on at cement/power plants.
All EPA mandates still apply to plants with emissions.
Numerous cement/power plants giving remediation contracts.
Some are gearing up for the upcoming deadlines.
Not like a deadlines happens, then contracts happen.
Everyone knows that lead time is necessary.
Private remediation also still giving contracts.
And, government continues their mercury remediation.
Soils, waterways, etc. And, yes, there are contracts given.
Y-12, OR, etc., continue their remediation work.
Some remediation work has been cut back/sequestered.
But, there is remediation work ongoing at those sites.
Regulatory delay never stops ongoing remediation.
And the contracts associated with that remediation.
Unfortunately, none of the above contracts for GTGP.
Maybe, just maybe some advertising would help.
Sadly, GTGP has no fancy brochure as touted.
Neither does J3. No fancy sales brochure.
Now, why would that be?
Pretty Chilling Right Now, With Market Spanking GTGP...
Might want to read up and learn how MACT really works.
Seriously. Do it personally - ignore rumors & Kool-Aid.
Besides, Cement/Power plants already comply with the MACT.
Now, and however it calcs out in 2015 also. That's Reality.
Now, why would that be?
Missed the memo?
Claiming of Friends Run Cement Plants...
Makes good feelings? Fair enough.
Too bad no MBS contracts for GTGP.
Even from "friends" who "run cement plants..."
Sad,... Outsourced Foreign DD Again Obfuscates...
As well as the influence by, "very close friends," at GTGP.
Everyone sees there are NO CONTRACTS for GTGP.
Yet, others are getting contracts on a daily basis.
Maybe it has something to do with credentials?
"Wrong Again!" sounding like False and LMAO's.
Sad.
Existing Cement/Power Plants Already Easily Comply...
Sounds like those, "very close friends," are with GTGP.
Funny, ones that cannot meet standards get contracts.
And, GTGP purportedly meets standards, yet NO CONTRACTS?
Riiiiight...
Suggest Some More DD. A LOT More.
The truth about cement/power plants is out there.
Cement/Power plants are in compliance without GTGP.
The truth about who is getting contracts is out there.
And, GTGP is not receiving any of those contracts.
Now, why would that be?
Try Some More DD. B-PAC is Much Different...
And keep on waiting for GTGP. Gonna be a long wait.
Reality is Cement/Power plants already in compliance.
Existing has lower requirements, now and future.
Many contracts to Calgon, Norit, Nalgene,...
Siemens, Battelle and numerous others.
Not GTGP, because Battelle put the kibosh on MBS.
So, GTGP not obtaining any of the many contracts.
Not with DOE/OR/Y-12, or any cement/power plant.
None.
Now, why would that be?
Thanks for the PM, But It Was Incomprehensible
No surprise there. Same ol', same ol'.
Sad - GTGP PM'ing, then blocking. Hit and Run.
Seems the GTGP/JF tactics continue ad nauseum.
Remember, no GTGP contracts coming.
Funny...
Calgon, Norit, Nalgene, Siemens getting contracts.
B-PAC works, and is getting contracts - Everyday.
Now, why would that be?
15th? Friday Buries News Over a Weekend...
Earlier in the Market week would be better.
Then again, any GTGP disclosure helps.
Especially with PR promises being ignored.
GLTY
GLTA
Possible Reason For DJ Not Assisting Fuse...
Recently, been hearing radio commercials during the morning commute, about DJ holding free seminars here in a few days, Nov 10-13. The advertisement touts that DJ, himself, will actually be speaking at these seminars.
Here is the web site noted in the radio commercials:
http://sharkinla.com/
Here is another DJ web site: Daymond John Academy....
http://www.daymondjohnacademy.com/
Looks like these seminars have been ongoing.
Usually these "free' seminars lead to sales of some sort of system, or "secret" information, or whatever.
It's free.
Fuse management can afford to attend when DJ's in FL.
GLTA
SLUP Voluntarily Went Dark a While Back, 2003...
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1051720/000117152003000279/eps1263.txt
OTC Markets show nothing voluntarily filed...
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SLUP/filings
OTC Markets shows nothing concerning financials...
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SLUP/financials
Isn't Meathead a Character on Archie Bunker?
I think the JCDS recommendation was a very good one.
Lots of great potential here, no doubt.
A CEO having issues concerning shareholders?
No one could ever foresee of such a thing.
Another thing to do on the DD list...
Ask psychic if CEO is ok with shareholders.
Funny How JF Has Time For J3 Announcements...
Yet, seems to have abandoned GTGP completely.
Going on nearly 90 days now since the last PR.
All those headframes on the J3 website.
Probably a clue to the market J3's after.
Might be gearing towards local mining.
JB apparently has much experience in it.
If there ever is a GTGP proxy...
...sure will make for an interesting read.
Nope, Asked All the Appropriate Questions...
Those in the industry know how to do so.
Others get dazzled and wooed by buzz-words.
Might call JB again and listen very carefully.
Instead of being JB-dazzled, suggest asking about...
Number of MBS contracts; any requested MBS proposals;
How GTGP benefits? Try hard and ignore JB's buzz-words.
No one need show credentials proving "expert," or not.
Only credentials needed is seeing Market spank GTGP.
Unfortunately, commons take the brunt of the spanking.
Besides... Albemarle, Battelle, Nalco, Norit, etc....
They're all receiving emission remediation contracts.
Lots, and lots, and lots, of contracts out there.
Must be frustrating and a big worry for GTGP.
All feel the frustration and worry in the False/LMAO's
No one can miss 'em, being bolded and all.
Another J3 Mouth to Feed. Interesting...
Wonder how this is all paid for?
Certainly not an MBS contract...
GTGP would announce it.
Don't Worry, We Talked Plenty Long Enough...
Market understands MBS by spanking GTGP.
Anything concerning GTGP, JB referred to JF.
And, we all know JF maintains silence on GTGP.
BTW, JB is more qualified than JG as a CE.
I know, it must be frustrating.
False again? Sorry Bro, But Have Called...
Been a while. But, yep, have talked with JB. Nice person.
Gilbert also sounds like a nice person. Also been a while.
Talked extensively about MBS. Same as the presentation.
No need to call again as they don't have the answers.
The person with answers is JF, and he does not answer.
Nothing speculative here. Factual info from third parties.
Something sorely lacking with MBS and the additive.
No third party, in last five years, giving MBS any cred.
Real DD is done, and punctuated with Market spanking GTGP.
Again, unfortunately, Commons do the most suffering.
False again??? Look in the mirror.
Thanks again for the entertainment.
Not False Downplay... But, Seeing Delusional Hype... World???
Sadly, product presentations makes not one an expert.
Would think JB would be the first to admit such.
Best CE's are expert in the numerous ways of remediation.
One trick ponies have a small chance of success.
Especially in the environmental remediation industry.
More importantly...
Why no more GTGP/J3 "invites" to those, important venues?
DD shows an, "important venue," occurs almost every week.
Certainly monthly for sure. Yet, no ongoing GTGP/J3 invites.
But, they really aren't invites now, are they?
No one need show credentials proving "expert," or not.
Only credentials needed is the Market spanking GTGP.
Unfortunately, commons take the brunt of the spanking.
World??? Thanks for the entertainment.
Waste Management Conference by WM-Symposia in Phoenix? World?
A little bigger than a local-yokal conference with EPA invited.
But, World? Nothing near that. But, nice try.
Correction - Presenters are NOT invited. They must apply.
Yep, application required to present their wares.
Like all other environmental conferences - app required.
But, if these are purportedly invite only shindigs...
Why no GTGP/J3 invites to the many other conferences?
Sad...
GLTY
GLTA
Whoa!, Repo-Man Still Working on Taking GTGP Headquarters?...
Sounds like busy times for the few GTGP employees.
No wonder GTGP phone calls and e-mail go unanswered.
Gotta move and hide what items & assets they can.
Try Calling Albemarle, Battelle, Nalco, Norit, etc....
They're all receiving emission remediation contracts.
Lots, and lots, and lots, of contracts out there.
REAL contracts for REAL implementation require lead time.
THINK! Only 14 months for mandated emission compliance.
GTGP can't answer to having contracts. They have NONE.
GLTY
GLTA