Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
stervc I have some recollection that you have posted this before but it is high time that it is posted again. You here come up with a lot of information suggesting that some things that the bashers constantly harp on have a very flimsy basis. But there are other things against John Park that I have not seen disproved. I refer to how John Parked when he switched horses to SPZI from another company. A lot of information that reflects very negatively on John Park has been posted here not long ago - information based on what the other company (NHMD) has stated.
Poeseidon It just occurred to me thatb I may have misunderstood what shareholder network refers to. I assumed that it referred to a group of sharholders. Now it occurs to me that John Park communicates information by using a particular channel called a shareholder network to do so. If the latter is the case I have to retract my statements. I still doubt that the net margin of a 600 million dollar sugar contract will be about 9% but only time will show. There is a saying that if something seems too good to be true it usually is.
Very good postmahatmapaul! Who are the morons here? The naive pumpers?
jdcpa "No one gives a chit about the judgments. We care about the $1B plus in contracts announced..." Not true! I care about them. The reason is that these judgments undermine the credibility of those contracts. Why trust people who act that way?
Poeseidon This is no news. This is the mindless wishful thinking of a group of shareholders. Just so much mindless speculation in my view:"Net profit:
+$27 million Chicken $303 million (gross profit 18% / net 9%)
+$55 million Sugar $617 million (gross 18% / net 9%)"
Sell-off. Somebody seems to be pessimistic about the future of this company: "0.34 / 0.353 (2500 x 5060)"
aandt It is interesting that HERB is in a financial position to do this in the USA.
Vika You did not understand that this was no real question. You seem not to have noticed the use of the word "something". It suggests that the apparent question is directed to nobody in particular. My intention was to try to make Laxmi pleased rather than to pester him with an unnecessary question. He regards us as part of his family and my impression is that he is happy to spend a bit of time for that purpose.
maq This is the sort of stupid pumping from a person close to the company that makes me distrust the people behind this stock.
I prefer to fight for the truth whether it is good or bad. Few seem to have that attitude here. There are almost only pumpers or bashers here in my view.
Poseidon "If you're a partner to someone who's BP (etc) partner, doesn't that mean a lot?" I don't buy that one. I burned my fingers very badly with TIO. It claimed it was the partner of Visa. I e-mailed Visa and got the information confirmed. It later turned out that TIO (Now TIOG down by about 99%) is a total swindle. 'The auditor was one of the leading auditors in the world (in this case a small division in Israel was used).
Poseidon I agree that the names on the board represent one of the positive things about this company.
Poseidon "What I love about this company is that they come out with irrefutable facts" That's a rich one. The problem with this stock is that the market does not know what the facts are. What world do you live in????????????????????
KAM Your post seems to be about a different company and not SPZI!
Dear Laxmi,
One day late I would like to congratulate you very much on your birthday yesterday! A bird chirped... I found the following information on internet that may be a good omen: "The chirping of birds is believed to carry spiritual messages and omens. Different types of birds are associated with different deities and have specific symbolic meanings. For example, the chirping of a peacock is believed to bring blessings from the goddess Lakshmi, the deity of wealth and prosperity." Does it signify something that your first name is very close to the deity of wealth and prosperity?
KAD IMO "I find no smoking gun. But everyone who had seen what Park's baseless boasting had done for Nate's likely jumped on the SPZI ''crazy train'' first." Convincing reasoning I think.
KAD Thanks for information that looks impartial to me!
aandt I would not be much surprised if we hear nothing for a long time. The interest in shareholders seems to have faded.
I-Glow I read with interest that you regard me as a pumper. Pumpers regard me as a basher at times. I am in fact neither. I have Huggy on ignore since I got the impression that he is a moronic basher. I read KAM with considerable interest. He has attracted attention to a couple of interesting points. Mr Park has mixed up his two companies in the right to export certain kinds of products to China. Moreover, the competition between SPZI and Nate's seems handled in a dubious way by Mr. Park based on information published by the company that he did not reach an agreement wit h.
I-Glow For how long do you consider Park a serial scammer before 2023? What is your evidence apart from the face masks? I am genuinely interesting in seeing how strong the evidence is. I have had the stupid bashers on ignore for months.
KAM I checked OTC markets regarding HEMP. It had very big losses for several years up to 2020. I see no financial information since then. If there was no misrepresentation of the facts I assume there was no reason for not signing the document even if it was company with dire future prospects. Or am I mistaken?
train The absolute minimum for NASDAQ is two and not one dollar. My impression is that the normal minimum is 4 dollars. Once on NASDAQ a company will be delisted if the pps falls below one dollar and stays there for a certain period of time.
KAM Thanks! The document in question seems deficient in that the names of the Members of the Board are not mentioned, if I remember correctly.
Mr Smith Thanks! I understand that most of the contents are general, but there is also some specific information. "Additionally, I have met personally (via video telephone conference) with two of the
three officers and members of the board of directors of the Company, William A. Hartman,
Chairman, President & CEO, Halberd Corporation and John S. Borza, Executive Vice President,
all on December 11, 2020,"
What seems to me important is that if the general information is not valid the person who has signed the document could be in for some trouble. If that is not the case the document makes no sense.
In the case of SPZI the important thing to me is that it is evidence that the alleged members of the Board of directors actually exist.
KAM I get the impression that this is the same document apart from the date. What conclusions do you deduce if this is the case?
KAM I don't believe that they all refer to Mr Park and that they have talked on the phone with most of the members of the board before you present at least a couple of cases indicating that you are right. These don't come across as standard formulations the way I see it.
RD For me it is ok to be honest and realistic.
KAM Thanks! I don't agree that the contents deserve to be ignored. I find the following interesting:
"I have met personally (via telephone) with a majority of the board of
directors and the officers of the Company (including John K. Park, CEO and director) to review
and discuss this information, the accuracy and completeness of such, and its adequacy for these
purposes".
money-maker I am unable to see the signature in your post.
money-maker Where is the signature????? Where are the comments about the following? "My firm has been retained by Spooz, Inc. (the “Company”) for the express purpose of
providing a legal opinion on the adequacy of current information available to the public in
relation to the filing of an “Information Statement and Disclosure” pursuant to Rule 15c2-11(a)".
Interesting information regarding Nate's Foods.
Stockrisk I see that there is just one big sale now and the volume of trading has had a big jump. This suggests that you may be right.
Why are there such big positions for sale if the news today is so good?
"MPID
Ask Price
Size
Time
CFGN 0.386 2,500 10:16
GTSM 0.387 76,000 10:16
CSTI 0.39 247,585 09:51
ETRF 0.39 109,248 10:12"
dranes What valuable information do you provide to the board`? That you own a lot of shares and that you have paid very little for them? Or that you are very frustrated becsuse the pps does not act the way you would like to see???
Big RDC Are you aware how shareholders evaluate the news? "MPID
Ask Price
Size
Time
CFGN 0.389 2,500 09:30
CSTI 0.39 247,585 09:30
ETRF 0.39 119,248 09:30"
moneyman Of course I cannot say for sure that this company will be a big success if you look 10 years ahead. But I think the chance of that happening is very slim. It takes huge skills as a manager to achieve what the leaders of some extremely successful companies have achieved - AMZN ory TSLA being a couple of cases. Does this company possess any unique technological insight or patents that it can build on? If that is not the case and is in a market with cut -throat price competition I don't understand how it can generate great profits in the future. But this stock is worth holding even of the pps were to grow 20% per year.
KAD I would be more impressed if you can find another example than this one. I have seen it rebutted months ago. Since my memory is so poor I only think I remember that Mr. Park came across as a victim rather than the offender. Moreover, I have seen a similar case in my own European country. Then it was the qualitty of the masks that was at issue. My impression is that the same is the case here.
gshores Don't you know that it will be very easy for him to increase the number of authorized shares? He is in full control running the company.
gshores I think it is a good question why he would lie about anything. The fact that he owns no ordinary shares is in my view very strange indeed. Hardly anybody is that altruistic. For me that is a red flag.I just don't understand his motivation. I don't find the adduced motivation convincing. He seems to have transferred ownership of his company to SPZI and has received nothing in return financially. It does not make sense the way I see it.
KAM "Park said he had "retained" an auditor..has anyone verified that he has and that an actual independent audit is underway?" What would he gain by lying? It would come to light if lied would it not? Lying has its limitations!