Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If the federal govt would just do the same thing. Move from class 1 (no medical value) to class 2 (recognizes some medicinal value). Come on already, put us in the same class as morphine at least.
In Dane cty WI they had a vote to see if the public would be interested in having a vote in the future for medical mary jane. Yes by a large margin. For what its worth.
Looking at the brighter side of things: CBIS still has the legal access to continue their research. California is still a market for us once we have an FDA approved medicine. We didn't lose that market like most of the other mary jane plays. The fact that everyone in Cali doesn't have legal access makes our product (once we have one) more valuable. I still like this company over the long term. It just isn't gonna come as quick as we all hoped for. With that said, Let's go Dr Bob! Figure out how mary jane can stop breast cancer so the guys in the NFL can stop wearing pink by next October!
CNN just wants to give their projected outcome before they go to sleep tonight.
Only like 14 million more votes to count, but you're right, It's over after counting around 3 million. Far from over yet.
Easy buddy. Not even 10% of the vote reported yet and it's neck and neck.
They do have CA now 49% yes 51% no
CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/my_elections/
nothing yet on CA
current article maybe,but not current poll. We will find out the results shortly.
Exactly! We could gain two whole entire states (AZ & SD) to market our products to medicinally today! That's huge in it self!
Thank you neo! That's what I was just looking for. This is the second time it has been brought to the ballot. I can't believe how this is dropping. There is nothing anyone could possibly know now that they didn't know yesterday. Should have sold yesterday and bought back in today after everyone got cold feet. They will all be chasing this tomorrow morning, when they actually will know some new facts about CBIS.
Then leave Jimmy. Are you upset that your not going to be able to get back in at your price target of .11?
Because it is a COIN press release, not a news article.
CBIS is a big part of the conference. Brian Vicente, part of our legal team will be a panelist during a business & legal discussion on Tues.
Business & Legal Ethics: Challenges in Advising Clients on Business Matters
1:35 – 2:35 PM
The Maine Bar Association Professional Ethics Commission recently issued an advisory opinion that forbids attorneys from counseling a client to engage in a federally criminalized business or to assist a client in doing so. What are the ethical limits and challenges inherent in counseling and assisting clients engaged in marijuana related businesses? Are attorneys and other counselors putting themselves at risk by giving compliance advice in this industry?
MODERATOR: NOAH POTTER, ESQ;
PANELISTS: JUSTIN ALPERT, Escher Alpert; BRIAN VICENTE, Sensible Colorado; Additional Panelists TBA
Agreed! The company that is running the conference looks like it is all about finding alternative investment opportunities.
DealFlow Media has distinguished itself as a provider of independent research and analysis of alternative asset markets. We publish alternative investment reports, investment databases, and weekly news wires as well as hosting conferences and web seminars throughout the year.
For more information visit www.dealflow.com.
Mr Holder can't seem to make up his mind.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8315603.stm
I think I remember seeing something about Bayer being interested in GW.
I can't wait till monday either matty. Screw football! Did I really say that? This is more fun to watch than them damn Packers. Dontcha know.
Nov 2nd
A good friend of mine always said, 'It's hard to find fault with a man doing something good.'
If Dabney is involved, someone should inform Dr Bob and Mr Cowen about his back ground. If they are being taken advantage of.
I see nothing with Dabney either. I see Steve Kubby and a Ray Carr, who used to be affiliated with CBIS, but no Ray Dabney.
My original point was, can't some of the other parts of the plant be legalized at least? If the only argument against legalization is the fact that people get 'high' from the THC.
I have a question. Is the entire cannabis plant illegal or just the THC part that gets people 'high'? If the other cannabinoids in the plant don't get people 'high' but could be useful in stopping certain forms of cancer. Shouldn't we be able to extract those and start going to the FDA for approval now. It just seems that soooooo many other drugs get approved based on the good that the promise only to find the harmful effects later. This is a plant for GODS sake. He put it here for us to use. Where are we as a society that we cast aside nature and in our ignorance try to find a chemical substitute? Do we really think we can make something better than nature? It's because this particular plant threatened someones pocket book that it is illegal right now. Instead when we get sick we take poisons so that the people who make them can get rich.
PS: Sorry about the rant. It just makes me mad.
I think the technology is already there. I also think a lot of research has already been done. The thing that needs to be done is, the laws regarding marijuana needs to be reformed. The California vote is huge!! If it passes, the federal government will have to seriously take a look at how marijuana is classified as a drug. They just have to move it from a class I drug to a class II drug that can be used medicinally. CBIS's problem is (IMO) it's hard to put something to market on a large scale when the laws are so 'iffy'. When the laws change we will see just how far ahead or behind the game we really are.
I love the fact we have in house lawyers.
POLICY ADVISORY BOARD
Corporate
Robert Raich Esq
Robert A. Raich practices law in Oakland, California, and is a graduate of Harvard University and the University of Texas School of Law. He is one of the most respected attorneys in the area of medical marijuana. He is General Counsel of the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, and was one of the attorneys in the U.S. Supreme Court case, United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Coop. and another federal medical cannabis case. He is a member of the California Attorney General's Medical Marijuana Task Force (Chairman, Caregiver Issues Subcommittee).
Sean T. McAllister Esq
Sean T. McAllister is public interest attorney with offices in Denver and Summit County. Sean has been involved with drug policy reform efforts for over a decade. Sean serves as the Chair of the Board of Directors of Sensible Colorado. Sean is a lifetime member of the NORML Legal Committee. He is a member and Board member of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar. He helped start the Colorado Bar Association Criminal Sentencing Project in 2005 to focus on criminal justice and drug policy reform. Recently, Sean was appointed to the Governor’s Drug Policy Task Force, which is working on reducing drug-sentencing laws to save the state money while maintaining public safety. Along with Brian Vicente, Sean recently founded the Canna-Business Institute designed to educate dispensary owners and caregivers on how to legally operate medical marijuana businesses in Colorado.
Warren Edson Esq
Warren Edson is an experienced criminal defense lawyer in Colorado having taken part in over 1,000 trials. He is also one of the organizers of Colorado's Medical Marijuana Law, Amendment 20, and is a Lifetime Member, NORML Legal Committee, and is a member, Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and is a Board Member, Colorado NORML.
Robert J. Corry, Jr. Esq
Robert J. Corry, Jr. is a Denver-based civil rights and criminal defense attorney, specializing in medical marijuana, who has successfully litigated several high profile cases around the country. He is admitted to the bars of Colorado, California, and Washington, D.C., federal courts in these jurisdictions, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Corry earned his law degree from Stanford University.
Brian Vicente, Esq
Brian Vicente, Esq., a Denver defense attorney who serves as executive director of Sensible Colorado, the states leading non-profit working for medical marijuana patients and caregivers. He is also the chairman of the Denver Mayor’s Marijuana Policy Review Panel and coordinates the Colorado Bar Association's Drug Policy Project. He was awarded the prestigious Gideon award for his free speech advocacy during the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
So in reality, it makes no sense for anyone to get a patent on anything. Since anyone can ask for a reexamination at any time. (Who Can Ask for Reexamination? Anyone can request reexamination at any time during the period of enforceability of the patent.)
What is wrong with this country we live in? The rules are set up in favor of the people who are doing wrong (infringers). Now I understand why no one does what is right anymore. IT DOESN'T PAY!
I see a 4 point spread!
Does the patent office's Official Gazette come out on Tuesdays?