Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You have admitted selling shares already…..and
now you’re ASSuming folks got left behind because they doubted a company that has lost about 28MM dollars and issued over 8B shares without ever finding anything significant?
Are you saying if/when tech is proven there won’t be another opportunity to make money on SFRX?
That if you got left at the dock you’re SOL?
Is that why you sold some?
The reason I asked is because didn’t you admit to knowing things the public doesn’t know yet, and yet you sold?
Thanks for clarifying.
The last permit was from the US Army……
Corp. of Engineers, which a federal. They already had the DEP permit from the state.
The only folks that appear to be upset are “real shareholders” who can’t believe anyone would have any doubts about SFRX and share them.
“Real shareholders” can’t highlight any accomplishments the company has made since inception, but in their mind all of that is irrelevant.
Kyle even admitted they have been a failure because they haven’t found treasure.
They have the permits, now let’s see RESULTS that proves the tech works, not more hype. If/when that occurs I will be the first to congratulate shareholders and sticky the post for one month.
Happy Good Friday!!!
Make your plea and if it follows the…..
terms you agreed to follow when you joined, then Ihub will resolve it.
FWIW, it actually goes back to 2014. Folks were claiming SFRX had a Recovery Permit and treasure would be on deck in 30 days. The defendant was attacked repeatedly, but it turns out, he was right.
There was no Recovery Permit as SFRX claimed in SEC filings.
I have no issue with individuals engaged in such……
a transaction. To the contrary.
I understand you likely have skin in the…..
game, but leave folks gender out of this while you enjoy the hot air balloon ride.
Plus, a confused Cajun millionaire is far more amusing. I mean if you’re going to deflect, like you all desperately do, let’s laugh about it.
Thanks
Here’s more on the Torres lawsuit. Kyle……
once said he was a brilliant scientist and the mask find proved his tech worked. Lots of folks cashed in on some hot air profits then. Ran from the trips to near 2 cents in about 4 or 5 months.
Oh, and Spain’s attorney chimes in on SFRX’s view of salvage law…ie Sovereign Immunity.
Enjoy!
https://pretendradio.org/episode/treasure-hunter-michael-torres-vs-seafarer-exploration-corp/
He did, and the Judge rejected the settlement…….
in part, without a hearing. That hasn’t happened.
Been waiting on SFRX for almost 10 years to make a move.
SFRX has to prove he was libel and they were harmed.
His (ahem) admission was in order to get the issue resolved, but here we are almost a decade later and it still isn’t.
What are they waiting on?
You remember that convo y’all were having…..
with him when he was telling y’all to slow the heck down and SFRX didn’t have salvage rights?
He really made y’all look…..well, you know.
Almost 10 years later no treasure, not even a positive ID.
It doesn’t matter, SFRX shot itself in the foot by bringing up Spain’s property. The state would be liable if they allow SFRX to disturb a Spanish vessel without Spain’s permission.
But hey, hot air profits, right?
That’s really all that matters, isn’t it?
FYI, I wasn’t aware Tony called. Have him……
hit me up again.
BTW, I have emailed Tony and got responses from Tony.
But there was one time he emailed and I responded, but he didn’t respond back, which didn’t surprise me.
Chef said Tony was only joking.
I wasn’t.
Next?
Yes, I know it's still open and the.....
defendant has an attorney (Vinny Adam) who represented him at the last hearing when the Judge was about to toss the case because SFRX dragged its feet for years and didn't move the case forward.
You would think it was one of SFRX's salvage projects that never go anywhere.
You do know he was a SFRX shareholder, and he knew SFRX didn't have any salvage rights, and he confirmed that with the FBAR (Roger Smith).
Folks were on here claiming treasure would be on deck in 30 days at Melbourne. He simply said, not so fast they only have an Exploration Permit, which allows for minimal disturbance.
Then all hell broke loose.
About 10 years later the case is still open and SFRX is still exploring Melbourne.
Go figure!
Judge Stephens told SFRX that in order…….
to win their case they would need to provide witnesses who sold their stock based on the defendants postings, and then the witnesses would need to explain why they didn’t buy back at lower prices when they realized the postings were false.
The lawsuit is almost 10 years old, and SFRX has yet to go to trial. They also haven’t provided a list of witnesses that could testify as Judge Stephens directed.
BTW, the defendant has counsel, and has had counsel since June 2021, as well as given SFRX notice of availability.
The defendant rightly explained to the giddy shareholders here that SFRX only had an Exploration Permit at Melbourne, not a Recovery Permit as SFRX claimed they had.
For a year SFRX filed with the SEC claiming they had a Recovery Permit at Melbourne, which wasn’t true. Then they claimed it was a Dig and ID Permit.
Thanks to me they finally got it right and correctly said it was an Exploration Permit, with a Dig and ID amendment.
Glad I could help, along with Mary from the FBAR. She explained to Kyle there were only two types of permits the FBAR issued.
Huge news! I’m loading first thing in…..
the am!
Maybe pre-market.
Thanks for the heads up!
Maybe one day you fellas can point......
to an accomplishment SFRX has made.
And maybe one day they'll get the tech they've claimed works for almost 5 years........developed.
Maybe.
Maybe not.
And what would the life coaches, hall monitors,......
and water carriers do?
They probably have the most the to lose.
They sure invest a lot of time talking about or to posters they say shouldn't even be here or post what they do.
I get you're pissed that Tony got sales down to a promotor's wages, but folks "fer" or "agin" share the same First Amendment rights you do.
Relax....this is APRU 2.0 bro!
We all know it's gonna be the next NVD*!
My schedule wouldn't allow it. Besides......
I'm overseas in Mexico bro!
Git 'er done Tony!
The hall monitors need a break.
I thought you sounded Cajun, and I'm.....
sure you do.
In fairness, I think Tony is trying to.......
close on Lena, even though he made today's update sound like it was already APRU's brewery.
It appears Lena has a lot of debt, and what money has been brought to the table so far ($755K) isn't enough. The bank has to be satisfied to close the deal, hence the investor meeting.
If Jeff and Grant had gone to the meeting, we might have more insights.
You do you and ignore the self-appointed life coaches.
This is what they filed 2 days ago......
regarding Juno. Look at it in light of today's news about the Melbourne permit, as well as what they have said about the tech.
Notice the deleted area of the mag survey at Juno has no cannons. And how can there be a strong possibility the nonferrous targets have no significant value?
From November 2017 until July 2021, the FBAR had requested that Seafarer submit new recovery permit applications on three separate occasions. Two of the recovery applications were denied for reasons Seafarer found objectionable. After submitting the third recovery application, the FBAR correctly determined that they did not have the authority to issue the recovery permit all along because the site was awarded exclusively to Seafarer by way of an Admiralty Claim. The Admiralty Claim was originally provided to FBAR in November 2017. However, FBAR delayed Seafarer’s operations from continuing in Juno Beach until July 2021, a period of approximately three years and eight months.
The Company believes it is possible the Juno Beach Shipwreck site may potentially contain remnants of a sunken 1500s era ship; however, the Company does not have definitive evidence of the ship’s country of origin. Due to the fact that the Company does not currently have sufficient data to positively identify the potential Juno Beach shipwreck, or its country of origin, it is not possible to determine with any degree of certainty whether or not the ship was originally carrying cargo of any significant value.
With data from the Master Site Plan from entries by a Florida state archaeologist from 1988 who has since retired, which the Company believes may have been intentionally withheld from it for several years, Seafarer believes that it is possible that a 1500s era shipwreck may be located within the Company’s Admiralty Claim at Juno Beach, although it is very possible that if the shipwreck is located it does not contain anything of value. The Company has determined that a large portion of the magnetometer survey of the Juno Beach Shipwreck site that was originally provided to the Company by a past partner on the site was intentionally deleted. Shipwreck material and remnants including pottery, cannon balls, musket balls, ballast stones, nails, spikes, wood and scattered pieces of a sunken ship have all been found in the deleted area of a magnetometer survey.
The Company will attempt to complete a SeaSearcher survey of the entire deleted area when certain conditions are met. While non-ferrous targets have been identified by the SeaSearcher, none of these targets have been exhumed yet. There is also a strong possibility that there are no artifacts of significant value located at the Juno Beach shipwreck site. Even if there are valuable artifacts and/or treasure located at the site, recovering them may be difficult due to a variety of challenges that include, but are not limited to; inclement weather, hazardous ocean conditions, sand and significant overburden that cover large areas of the site, strong multiple layer currents, etc.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1106213/000119983524000134/sfrx-10k.htm
SFRX has long whined about working under.....
permit with the state.
I suppose the good news is they'll have that to fall back on......again.
Shake those pom poms.
Melbourne Project ~ 25 years and counting, with nothing to show for it!
Thanks for admitting SFRX has no achievements you......
can highlight. And you did it with such class.
BTW....Raider has forgotten more about the industry than Team SFRX has ever learned.
Enjoy the hot air balloon ride. Maybe one day it won't be one.
GL
I imagine carrying SFRX's water can be.......
quite burdensome, hence the hostility.
SFRX claimed this in the PR today.
If it wasn't fully complete, why were Peter.....
and Max saying it only takes a weekend?
That was late 2022 to early 2023, and the report shows they were at Melbourne last summer.
When they made that claim I asked.....well what about Melbourne?
That's when the AWOL affiliate said......oh, they had moved on from Melbourne.
The carpet ain't matching the drapes, but hey, hot air profits are still profits.
One "investor" just admitted he sold some.......but
what I said was SFRX can only attract investors that lack a basic understanding of salvage law or flippers.
Any "savvy investor" will tell you they don't always get it right. It doesn't mean they don't get a ROI.
It’s still a hot air balloon ride, until…..
it isn’t.
Matt and the gang have talked about Spanish galleons as if SFRX can find one and then salvage it.
It might impress you and others, but it shows they lack basic knowledge of salvage law.
SFRX apparently can’t attract any other type of investor, other than flippers.
GL
They’re focused on archaeology, not salving treasure…..
in my opinion, but what does that do for the company?
Well the videos they did last year got rave reviews here, so look for that to continue.
They jump in the water, find a fitting, and tell everyone how important it is to the world.
Just my opinion Gman.
GL
Maybe the tech found the $4B at Melbourne......
Yeah, that must be it!!!
Haven't shareholders been told the treasure was......
further out to sea at Melbourne?
The AWOL affiliate claimed they had moved on from Melbourne, which is now a 25-year-old project their partner began in 2000.
SFRX ~ The archaeology ticker.
More on the side-scan sonar and tech scan……
which apparently occurred over a year ago.
It really doesn’t get any better than this. The most important info is near the end of the video, but don’t hit that fast-forward button. It’s all a must watch!
Enjoy!
What Apple Rush beverages? People have said….
they’re still waiting on the samples.
Weren’t the samples supposed to be the current products?
Regardless, the questions I have are, does Tony have what it takes to close on the Lena deal?
Or does Lena have too much debt and it really doesn’t matter?
More on the tech in this video......
Turn a decade long search into a few days.
Maybe Tony will come out of the meeting.....
and speak with clarity regarding Lena.
The Worm Poop Pop tops the Torres Rally.....
for sure.
The (ahem) rare Peruvian Death mask that contained iridium had its moment, but nothing like this. At least not this high.
I guess more folks believe the treasure is under the worm poop than thought the mask was real. How could anyone not believe it was real, eh?
Just a thought, but maybe deBry should have checked the manifest before saying it was authentic and suggested it could have been on the Concepcion.
Always good to have another enthusiast here.....
Hope you make a ton!
The word is, they're close.
The treasure they don't plan to sell is supposed to be right under the worm poop.
It's almost like a fairy tale.
Any idea on what the target vessel could be?
I understand this isn't a forum for......
a shipwreck enthusiast.
Why would it be, right?
Hope you make a ton!!!
Wouldn't the SFRX board be such an arena?.......
It's rhetorical.
BTW, did you load up or are you still on the fence?
This is the place to start regarding any......
wreck from the 1715 Fleet that isn't grandfathered in.
Without Spain's permission, nothing else matters. But some survivor accounts have the wreck up around the shoals near Cape Canaveral and further out to sea.
Terry Armstrong probably has the most comprehensive info.
You’re chatting with a shipwreck enthusiast……
Not an expert, but not a novice either.
This thread began with you saying something about treasure. I simply asked, what treasure?
SFRX has been at this since 2007/2008 and lost about $27MM and issued over 8B shares.
In that time they have located an unidentified partial wreck at Melbourne and a few silver coins at Juno, which was probably what someone had in their pocket.
Kyle even claimed they were on “the wreck” at Melbourne in July 2016, but there was no wreck. Some debris but no wreck, and certainly not “the wreck” as he claimed.
So whoever is working on their research files needs to consider another line of work.
But hey, they got the hot air balloon flying high again, and I know that’s all that matters to some.
GL
I asked about treasure, but even that……
statement is a bit questionable.
Hold up. Waiting on a reply about treasure……
but not holding my breathe I’ll get a response.
It’s a hot air balloon ride until it isn’t.
GL