Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If memory serves me well. Valdetaro filed a suit because he was getting hammered by the IRS. I think they placed a lien on his home.
Yes that is true, Wade stuck Luiz holding the bag by Wades deception and devious scams.
Its not a nothing burger, Why would Lenn put his time and effort into something worthless with his restructuring ability's?
He takes dying companies and brings the back to life.
Lazerator
Re: cougar24 post# 7305
Thursday, January 19, 2023 12:56:33 PM
Post#
7496
of 7516
Especially since memristors still can't be produced and there is no viable product using them.
That may change soon.
The problem with Hp Memristors was vulnerability's.
Thats where SBV comes in. Do your homework Grasshopper.
That is SBV specialty.
Note to Readers: Four years later and there are now suspicions that metal-oxide memristors may have shelf-life issues. Read all about it here.
HP’s Memristor Problem
https://knowm.org/the-problem-is-not-memristors-its-how-hp-is-trying-to-use-them/
How, in the face of both intrinsic and extrinsic volatility, can unconventional computing fabrics store information over arbitrarily long periods? Here, we argue that the predictable structure of many realistic environments, both natural and artificial, can be used to maintain useful categorical boundaries even when the computational fabric itself is inherently volatile and the inputs and outputs are partially stochastic…We conclude that the stability of long-term memories may depend not so much on the reliability of the underlying substrate, but rather on the reproducible structure of the environment itself, suggesting a new paradigm for reliable computing with unreliable components.
Lazerator
Re: JediPawn post# 7278
Thursday, January 19, 2023 12:34:53 PM
Post#
7490
of 7514
Time already told us who the "fool" is. VCSY is delisted.
Oh yes grasshopper, Wade was the fool for not paying attention to what port was saying. Wade was too busy drinking and paying for hookers.
Lazerator
Re: RLHMAN post# 7274
Thursday, January 19, 2023 12:31:26 PM
Post#
7487
of 7513
Funny that Portuno hypes FPGAs now, nearly 40 years after their development, as if they're some new magical devices. We used FPGAs in the 1990s. It's about time he discovered them. LOL!
Port has always said that the old way wasn't the best way. and he's sticking to it.
Doc, are you going to download ploinks and help test it?
Luiz said the more testers the better.
Cougar, ploinks is now free for testing.
Luiz is looking for testers for Plonks. I believe it's free.
Go to Google play store and download the Ploinks app.
This is your opportunity to participate in helping get the Vcsy and plonks to market.
Please consider helping.
The more testers we have the better.
Let me know if you have any questions and I will get you answers from Luiz or Michelle.
After downloading The Ploinks app, open it up and click on the Ploinksbot icon.
The more we use ploinks the faster Luiz can fix any bugs. This is very important.
Dlkahn, can you post on ploinks your name, or user name so I will know who I am communicating with?
I have Michelle and Luiz contact info already. it will be very helpful to know who we are talking to, instead of checking phone numbers.
TIA
Here is Puddle at the play store.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vcsy.sustaincs
Dlkahn I see Luiz answered you right away this morning. I tried to post something on Ploinksbot but I don't think it went through.
I see Luiz talking about Ploinksbot, how do I access ploinksbot?
Dlkahn, looks like I was wrong about Ploinks, just downloaded it.
Looks like some have people have been communicating almost daily.
It looks alot better, I saw your conversation with Luiz.
My 1 question is how is it I can see the conversations from multiple people on 1 thread.
The value of vcsy is in our patents.
Believe it or not.
You are free to think what you want.
Ploinks is dead IMO.
I can't emphasize enough, you have to watch the whole video more than once,
you will have a much better understanding of what a Memristor is capable of.
This is really amazing.
It took 50 years for the tech world to catch up with the coming disruption in the way things used to be.
What did Port used say?
A new paradigm?
Is Port crazy? I don't know people thought Leon Chau was a nut case.
Dr Chau talks about a clam that was subjected to a invasion to the clam. and the clam restricted it organs to protect itself.
Like protective fabric with a 17 nanometer shield?
You can stack memristors, HARD DRIVE?
Wow Doc, no shit, i posted the Leon Chua seminar before I read the unread posts.
Great minds think alike< no it was pure luck$$$
check out from 12 mins in, See something familiar?
Fabric??
Virus 25 nanometers in diameter, fabric protection, 17 nanometers.
Sounds like we should have been wearing Memristors on our faces instead of the sheep masks.
The computer industry is headed to the edge of chaos.
1 hour of shits about to hit the fan.
6-Minute Memristor Guide
IEEE Spectrum
145K subscribers
Memristors???
Is it possible for a tiny Memristor to become a mini hard drive?
Just asking.
Merry Christmas, 1 day late.
Have a great new year to all.
We 'll see what happens as my friend says.
He's Orange!
The History of the FPGA: The Ultimate Flex
Asianometry
396K subscribers
Subscribe
Scott Winning
President/CEO at Sawblade Ventures, LLC
5d
Great summary of so many areas. I have recited these topic so many times to herds of deer in the headlights, it’s a wonder I can talk. I encourage non tectical people to record this and play it 100 times every night for a year.
There is so much in this video, Sawblade has an EDA tool to add to a design. We use FPGAs to demonstrate and sometimes end product.
$5,000? Nothing compared to $50M to get your first chip which will eventually be $1 over time and volume. Bless this guy.
Yeah, port is a scammer and a fraud.
Here is a message from Port today.
Oh yeah, the patents are worthless, right?
messaged Keith after watching this video from his LinkedIn page.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/keith-guidry-73192599_the-history-of-the-fpga-the-ultimate-flex-activity-7011344416376307712-_k1t?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android
Me-
Merry Christmas! The Ultimate Flex was a very interesting video. Hearing about Abritrary and functionality brings back some familiar memories. As Suggested by Scott in the comment section, I will listen to it everyday for 100 days and hope to understand it better with each time listening.
Keith-
We're making some really exciting discoveries and we see many ways to move forward with Sawblade projects and VCSY because we have VCSY in mind every part of our development among other partners.
Merry Christmas and let's hope somebody has some good sense to invest in what appears to be a burned out hulk but holds resources and opportunities to build quickly cheaply.
Report to moderator Logged
REPLY
NOTIFY
MARK UNREAD
SEND THIS TOPIC
PRINT
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up
« previous next »
10% for the big guy.
By the way, Elon is going to tell us what really happened with the Hunter Biden laptop from hell and with the Twitter censorship election interference at 5 Pm today with a live question and answer.
Enjoy the show!
Doc, I didn't post that,, I am only posting what someone else posted.
Im a digital worrier.
Info distributer.
Trying to enlighten people.
junk1984
Executive
****
Posts: 711
Karma: +188/-14
[Like] [Dis-Like]
View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Looks like Wade's appealing
« Reply #172 on: Today at 12:08:06 AM »
Quote[Like]0[Dis-Like]0
Quote from: terryd on Yesterday at 08:49:45 AM
Wade filed his appeal - 64 pages of declaring he did everything to save the company and blamed COVID at the end. Pretty repetitive read. I suggest reading it - https://search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=05-22-00454-CV&coa=coa05
Looks like we will be waiting a while longer
A quick read of this document leads one to realize we are dealing with a clear psychopath. Everything that went wrong was somehow, someone else’s fault. Wade was just an innocent bystander in all of this. …Of course, we all knew Wade was and is a crook and a liar…and this document proves it. First of all, regarding his longwinded excuse that the court sent his notification to the wrong address as he had moved prior to this…is not the fault of the court. It was Wade’s responsibility to notify the court of any move on his part. The court did comply with proper procedure in notifying him. The fact that he was not at the location due to his move is Wade’s fault alone, not the court. He says he did not move and that the notice was sent to the wrong address, but he is wrong. The address was where he listed himself as living. If he had notified the court in advance as he should have of his move, the notice would have been sent to the correct address. Also, Pete tells me the court kept Wade in the loop via e-mail of everything which the court reminded him of from the trial on the record. If Wade did not read these e-mails carefully, that onus is on him, not the court or the plaintiffs.
2nd. The arbitrator part I’m not sure about? Pete will coordinate on that, but this is all subordinate to Wade’s removal by the shareholder vote and later well documents tax fraud and misuse of company funds to pay for diners at high end restaurants in Dallas (at times with hookers), as well as his use of a company car 24/7 for mostly personal use, etc. The issue of an arbitrator becomes irrelevant when you egregiously break tax law and fiduciary laws and responsibilities to your shareholders as a company president or CEO.
3rd. I almost fell out of my chair when I read where Wade says on page 15:
“On April 29, 2020 Appellee Valdetaro, who still claimed to be an employee of VCS though he was Senior Android Engineer/Squad Leader at American Airlines, led a group of putative stockholders to bring derivative claims for purported breaches of fiduciary duty by Mr. Wade by giving them false or out-of-context information about him and his performance as President and CEO of VCS, which spanned 20 years that included keeping the company in business during many tough times.”
There is word for this. It’s called ‘Chutzpah’! The idea that Wade was somehow, this brilliant mind who steered the company though “rough times” and kept the company afloat is about as devoid of reality as it gets. The whole reason the company was experiencing these “rough times” under his stewardship was because of his own corruption and stupidity!!!. This company should have gone on the NASDAQ several years ago. The whole reason it did not is entirely because of Wade’s own cronyism. Good grief!
4. On pages 18 and 19, Wade makes is sound like all the financial problems were related to Freddy Holder. Wade seems to forget that he (Wade) has an accounting degree and that Freddy Holder is his subordinate. Not the other way around. When Wade signed off on the 10Ks, he is the one ultimately responsible for the numbers, not Freddy Holder. If Wade could not handle that, then he should have resigned from the company long ago and allowed someone else to take over the company who actually knew what he or she was doing. He did not do this, and therefore, takes on the responsibilities and liabilities that go with being a president and CEO of a publicly traded company.
5. On page 20, Wade makes brief refence to not being able to secure a new auditor. He does not point out the reason why he was unable to. The reason was because the company books were so out of compliance, that no auditor would touch them. That was the whole reason why the first audit firm they tried to hire, refused to take us on a client. Wade also does not address why the company profits were not much higher at that time, as they should have been. The reason the profits were so low these many years was because he was not doing his job. He had patents that were worth hundreds of millions, even back in those days…but he was not marketing them in any proper way to grow the company. I said it before and I’ll say it again…if you are the president of a 20 year old company…and you are still farting around as a penny stock…something is wrong!
6. On page 29, Wade tries to make the argument that he was no worse than current management of VCSY, by citing the example that we still have not done our audit, even with new management. He seems to be unaware (or ignores) that we can’t do the audit due to his and Farias’ legal battles with VCSY, not to mention the company being in this weak financial position is due to his failure to grow the company years ago as he should have.
7. On page 30, Wade makes it look like he raised more money than the current board. I doubt this is true. We have big money waiting on the sidelines, but it will not be released by any of the big money investors until after these cases with Wade and Farias are resolved. Thus, this is disingenuous on Wade’s part to make this comment, to say the least. If Wade had marked our patents properly years ago and made the company hundreds of millions of dollars…as he should have…he would then have a stronger leg to stand on. Given that the company was not bringing in the money it should have says it all…
8. On page 31, Wade states:
“Case law generally recognizes that directors owe corporations, not individual shareholders, a duty of obedience, a duty of care and a duty of loyalty as defined in the Texas Business Organizations Code.”
First off, the only way a director can “own” a company is if they own 50 plus 1 percent of the company stock outstanding or more. There were 1.2 billion shares outstanding, but Wade only owned roughly 82 million shares or so total. Now I know in Wade's world of fuzzy math, 82 million may be a majority of 1.2 billion, but for those of us with basic math skills, we know that 82 million is not a majority of 1.2 billion. Wade would have to have owned more than 650 million shares to own the company. He did not. As company president and CEO, he serves at the pleasure of shareholder, not the other way around. He may have some control of the company, as he should being president and CEO, but that is not the same as owning it. This is a clear distinction that needs to be made and I don’t think Wade understands that. I think this clearly illustrates part of Wade’s whole ego problem during all these years and we saw it in the way he ran the company all of those years. He ran it like an unaccountable fool. He treated the shareholders as if they did not exist, or with distain in many ways through his silence. He did not hold any shareholder meetings the past 4 years of his job…which you are required to have as a publicly traded company. The last one he had, he only did so because one of the shareholders threatened him with a lawsuit. When I sent the letter to the SEC about Wade back in early 2020, this was one of the facts that I pointed out about Wade.
Regarding his comment on how COVID set them back. He seems to overlook the fact that had the company been on the NASDAQ by then as it should have been, even back then, this would not have mattered. We would have been large enough to weather any storm at that time, even with COVID. Again, the company was not on the NASDAQ as it should have been due to Wade’s lack of proper leadership of the company. I love the way Wade tries to make all of this look like he was some innocent soul who was just trying to do the right thing. I can’t wait to see Pete’s rebuttal of these arguments made by Wade.
9. On pages 35 – 36, Wade says he used the company car legally. If that is the case, why did he try to backdate the tax paperwork by 5 years illegally to show this? You can’t do that. That is illegal. Also, the credit cards were also used for high end restaurants in the Dallas area for activities that were not business related. They were not just used for office supply purchases, etc…
10. On page 50-51, Wade states that Luis was the one who caused the delays in Ploinks development. This is simply not true. Wade was the one who ordered the delays. Also, if any of this is true that he claims in this whole entire document, then he should have clearly stated all of this back in 2020 or so. Wade should never have waited this long to reveal any of this information.
This document looks at first glance like Wade has a reasonable case for his side, but if you read into it and you know him, his history and his secrecy as evident over the years with his obsession with non-disclosure agreements, etc, most of his arguments will not hold up once you examine them in depth. The problem for us is, investigating all of this will take some time. My guess is a month or more at least. Pete texted me back and said he now has to file a reply brief for the judge. Some of the exhibits Wade presented were not in the record, so Pete will have to address this. I would be very surprised if we can get the counter arguments against Wade organized before late January. I hope I’m wrong, but we’ll see… While Wades allegations against Freddy Holder and Luis V do not make them look good, Wade is still the biggest scoundrel here and his past can’t conceal that.
Report to moderator Logged
Wade was given his 30 day extension.
Before the Court are appellant’s October 31, 2022 second motion for an
extension of time to file his opening brief and appellees’ response opposing the
motion. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 30, 2022. We
caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.
/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III
JUSTICE
Wade asked the judge for an extension until Nov 30 so he can find a lawyer.
I do not believe the judge is going to be happy about that.
Wade is always late for everything.
Always trying to scam the system.
His appeal should be tossed and I believe that is what the judge will, or should do.
Luiz vs Moutain Reservoir (Wade)
Looks like the lawyers for Mountain Reservoir have filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellant, Mountain Reservoir Corp., hereby files, this its Motion to Dismiss
Appeal, and states the following.
1. Appellant hereby moves for dismissal of this appeal, and that the Court
tax costs of the appeal against the party or parties incurring the same.
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL Page 1
ACCEPTED
05-22-00541-CV
FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS
DALLAS, TEXAS
10/28/2022 4:13 PM
RUBEN MORIN
CLERK
FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 10/28/2022 4:13:53 PM Ruben Morin Clerk
WHEREFORE, Appellant, Mountain Reservoir Corp., prays that the Court
grant this motion to dismiss appeal, and that it be granted general relief.
Respectfully submitted,
Law Offices Of
LIPPE & ASSOCIATES
Hopefully this frees up Luiz to get the VCSY shares from the TRUST
yes Laz, I believe it will.
Welcome to the board.
Appellants brief now due on October 31st. He didn't get the full 60 days.
If it wasn't for JQ we wouldn't even be discussing vcsy right now.
Wade has filed for a 60 day extension.
RE: Cause No. DC-21-06094
TO THE HONORABLE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS:
Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. JO.I and 38.6(d), the Appellant, Richard Wade,
files this First Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief.
Appellant's opening brief is currently due on September 13, 2022.
Appellant requests a 60 day extension of time to file its brief, making the
brief due on November 12, 2022. This is the first request for extension of time to
file the opening brief.
I. Appellant is representing himself.
2. Appellant received notice that the Recorders Records for cause No.
DC-21-06094 were filed on August 15, 2022. The Recorders Records were not
attached to the email, which did not include instructions on how to obtain the
records. Appellant checked the Dallas County Court Portal several times before
learning from Court Clerk that the Appeals Court does not post its records online,
including the Reporters Records from trials in the District Court. Appellant learned
that he could only get them by picking up a CD or paper copy at 600 Commerce
Street, Suite 200, Dallas, TX. He therefore did not receive the Reporter's Records
until September I, 2022.
3. Appellant is appealing Cause No. DC-21-06094 because he received
notice of the trial on April 14, 2022 on the morning of the trial when the Clerk
e-mailed him instructions on how to get on the trial call. He never received prior
notice of the trial and on the call was surprised to learn the call was about a case
filed in mid-2020. He, therefore, had no time to prepare. In June 2021, the attorney
he last worked with on this lawsuit told him there were no upcoming deadlines.
4. Appellant is currently spending 8-10 hours, 6-7 days a week, driving
for Lyft to pay for motel, food and Lyft's rental car and gas used for work. His files
are in storage. Appellant therefore needs extra time to find documents in storage to
defend the accusations made against him during the trial.
5. Appellant requires more time to find a pro bona attorney.
6. Accordingly, Movant requests that this Honorable Court issue an
extension to file Appellant's Brief.
Attached: Certificate of Service
Respectfully submitted by,
Richard Wade, Appellant
2825 Oak Lawn Ave.# 190402
Dallas, Texas 75219
(323) 561-7072
richardswade@gmail.com
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
This is to certify that Appellant, pro se, discussed the merits of this Motion
with counsel for Luiz Valdetaro et al and the Appellee's counsel is not opposed to
same.
Richard Wade
Appellant, pro se
Report to moderator Logged