Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Next stop? THE SUPREME COURT! Snicker ROFLMAO! UR finished peeps! Maybe PTSC appeals to the SC but in my opinion they will never hear this case. Its funny even after the news is out nobody even cares enough about this stock to sell it!
O R D E R Appellants Patriot Scientific Corporation, Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC filed a petition for rehearing en banc. The petition was first referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The mandate of the court will issue on April 17, 2019.
FOR THE COURT
April 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
PACER!!>>>04/10/2019 101 ORDER filed denying [99] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Patriot Scientific Corporation, Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [598899] [PBC] [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:27 AM]
You lost this time its likely permanent. This troll is done! Appeal to the Supreme Court? Hey if that is what it takes for the PTSC folks to keep sucking paychecks then it is possible!
In my opinion.
The JUDGES DECIDED AGAINST YOU.IN.THE.APPEAL! DONE! Sell UR shares ASAP the appeals court judges have officially decided the case is over and your appeal will go nowhere. Get a cup of joe at least for UR gosh darn shares! In my opinion.
We NEED 2.get.Mr.Fred Falk back.Fix things right up! WE GOOD then back in da money! IMO IMO (in my opinion).
We good! Its just a stutta step.GONNA>B>RICH! The pattens EDIG has R YUGE!
A.judge.on.the court has.to actually request.a.vote of all the judges on the federal circuit for there to be even be a consideration of an "en banc" re hearing of a case. The judges would then vote and if there was a majority the case would then be re heard. That is why it is so rare and almost never happens. You lost. Sell them shares! IN my opinion.
EDIG shall.prevail! We will keep FIGHTING and trading IMO IMO! We good.
I hear the crypto scam stocks.R.the way.to go my friends! Check it out! OR the pot stocks. U got hosed here! Sell UR shares and shuffle along.
How can.U.peeps.be so STUPID! This is pure.garbage! A.flim.flam.operation in my opinion!
No.FDA.application even approved yet! Not to mention a study that will likely take well lover 1 year. An FDA study is required before the company can make any claims about their product in marketing. They said they will need to raise more money before this is even finished! Maybe they can sell a boatload of shares at 3c! This thing is toast. It is worth much less than the current trading price. In my opinion.
I.expect.WAVES.of PRs.soon.We are due! 19.years.of.patience.and all these EDIG technologies. I simply do not see how we can miss. Somebody needs to get Mr. Falk on the horn and get this big ol mess straightened out. We good imo. My gut feeling tells me we gonna B rich! In my opinion! (imo)
NUNCHI!MICROSIGNET!PLUTO SO many.irons in.da.fire.What.could possibly go wrong! In my opinion with all the different tech EDIG has it is still a good bet because only one has to really work out for us 2 B rich! EDIG has always had many things going on at once so as to ensure there would always B a very good reason to invest in the stock as there is potential! In my opinion.
Little Timmy's knees R a knocking! Apple.or.Google.merger imo imo! Very soon perhaps a buyout. In my opinion.
NUNCHI.gonna.b.YUGE! Just.read.the gosh darn.PRs!
PTSC is FINISHED! en banc hearings are.NEVER,DONE except in very limited circumstances. Certainly not for this patent troll! Stock is done. Worth NOTHING! Sell now and get UR self a cup O joe! In my opinion.
GO EDIG! Can NUNCHI do that? YES!!!! We good.imo.imo.imo!
Stick to the.pot.miner.or crypto scams.my friends! Much.better.opps.than this junk! Jus say'N!
TRIED 2 warn.U but U would.not listen! Stock.is.garbage.
Told.ya.hosers! No Product.4.sale.until.LATE 2020 (2021-22 MAYBE in my opinion these guys can never make a timeline even one they establish!). They said they will need more money red flag! They seemed to say their Rochester study results would not be published to protect their secrets! RED FLAG! Nothing in the public sphere to support even the current valuation. In my opinion this thing has all the BS trappings of your typical penny stock piece of junk. Dump it now! In my opinion.
Apple.Samsung buyout or merger? Hey.ya.never know! IMO IMO! We good peeps.
Should.be.00001! They.lost.the.appeal. The full.appeals.court.will NOT.hear.the.case they almost never do unless it is a constitutional question or if 2 different district courts have opinions that conflict. You have lost....of course almost nobody cares so the stock might have bottomed out. LOL! IMO!
That is not the FDA trial. Read the disclaimer>>
"The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government."
The FDA trial application is another matter and the FDA trial is what is required to be successfully completed before any claims can be made about the product in marketing material. This "trial" is just some stuff posted on a website. In my opinion.
My guess is their FDA.trial.application.was denied. I am amazed that this garbage stock is still around! Snicker. What a stinker! I would sell them shares ASAP the 6c is a GIFT! These guys simply cannot fail to miss every single time! In my opinion.
NEWS>Huawei, Nintendo Quash Microprocessor Patent In Appeals Court
Posted Feb. 6, 2019, 1:20 PM
Appeals court affirms California court’s non-infringement ruling
Dispute started after Technology Properties sued for infringement in 2012
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., ZTE Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Nintendo Co. Ltd and LG Electronics Co. Inc. convinced a federal appeals court to kill a microprocessor patent they were accused of infringing.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Feb. 6 upheld a lower court’s dismissal of Patriot Scientific Corp.'s Technology Properties Ltd.'s patent infringement lawsuit against the five companies.
The patent licensing company had accused the five companies in 2012 of producing products using technology in...
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/huawei-nintendo-quash-microprocessor-patent-in-appeals-court
You lost folks. Down in flames. If you listened to the oral arguments you would see even your new lawyer was terrible in court and could not address the judges questions properly. She argued like a little girl in front of adults. Very sad. My bet is all 3 judges voted against this rotten patent troll. Sell UR shares and buy a cup o joe! In my opinion!
"en banc".full.appeals court re-hearings.are almost.never allowed. The 3-judge panel is given a great deal of deference as was the trial court judge in his decision. Only the high standard of obviously error would lead to anything changing for PTSCs losing case and the judges did not see that at all. You lost. en banc rehearing will be denied and PTSC can appeal to the US Supreme Court! Good luck they will never take your case. You lost.
Yup its over CASE CLOSED!>>>U.S. District Court California Northern District
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 2/12/2019 at 8:14 AM PST and filed on 2/12/2019
Case Name: Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number: 3:12-cv-03865-VC
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 12/13/2017
Document Number: 157
Docket Text:
USCA JUDGMENT as to (155 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Technology Properties Limited, LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, (116 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (119 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (112 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (150 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (128 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (152 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (168 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (115 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
Case Name: Technology Properties Limited, LLC et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
Case Number: 3:12-cv-03876-VC
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 12/13/2017
Document Number: 161
Docket Text:
USCA JUDGMENT as to (155 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Technology Properties Limited, LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, (116 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (119 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (112 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (150 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (128 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (152 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (168 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (115 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
Case Name: Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Samsung Electronic Co., LTD et al
Case Number: 3:12-cv-03877-VC
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 12/13/2017
Document Number: 160
Docket Text:
USCA JUDGMENT as to (155 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Technology Properties Limited, LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, (116 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (119 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (112 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (150 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (128 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (152 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (168 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (115 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
Case Name: Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. LG Electroncis, Inc. et al
Case Number: 3:12-cv-03880-VC
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 12/13/2017
Document Number: 174
Docket Text:
USCA JUDGMENT as to (155 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Technology Properties Limited, LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, (116 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (119 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (112 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (150 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (128 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (152 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (168 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (115 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
Case Name: Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Nintendo Co., Ltd et al
Case Number: 3:12-cv-03881-VC
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 12/13/2017
Document Number: 156
Docket Text:
USCA JUDGMENT as to (155 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Technology Properties Limited, LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, (116 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (119 in 3:12-cv-03876-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (112 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (150 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (128 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, (152 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (168 in 3:12-cv-03880-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03865-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, (151 in 3:12-cv-03881-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Patriot Scientific Corporation, Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, (115 in 3:12-cv-03877-VC) Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, filed by Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
3:12-cv-03865-VC Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Aaron Richard Hand     ahand@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Charles T. Hoge     choge@knlh.com, bhagar@knlh.com
David C. Doyle     ddoyle@mofo.com, christian@mofo.com, david-doyle-8781@ecf.pacerpro.com, dcoletti@mofo.com, rose-sheehan-1419@ecf.pacerpro.com, rsheehan@mofo.com, sdpdrive@mofo.com, ykametani@mofo.com
Denise M. De Mory     ddemory@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Henry C. Bunsow     hbunsow@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Lam Khanh Nguyen     lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com
Lauren Nicole Robinson     lrobinson@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Michael E Flynn-O'Brien     mflynnobrien@steptoe.com, mbrewer@steptoe.com, rpada@steptoe.com
Thomas Christopher Cecil     tom@nelbum.com, alissa@nelbum.com, ericca@nelbum.com, rylie@nelbum.com
Timothy C. Bickham     tbickham@steptoe.com, ssholloway@steptoe.com
William Frederick Abrams     bill.abrams@foster.com, christina.lewis@foster.com, litdocket@foster.com
3:12-cv-03865-VC Please see Local Rule 5-5; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC
Technology Properties Limited LLC
3:12-cv-03876-VC Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Aaron Richard Hand     ahand@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Charles M. McMahon     cmcmahon@mwe.com, ChicagoDocketing@mwe.com, jrbaker@mwe.com
Charles T. Hoge     choge@knlh.com, bhagar@knlh.com
David C. Doyle     ddoyle@mofo.com, christian@mofo.com, david-doyle-8781@ecf.pacerpro.com, dcoletti@mofo.com, rose-sheehan-1419@ecf.pacerpro.com, rsheehan@mofo.com, sdpdrive@mofo.com, ykametani@mofo.com
Denise M. De Mory     ddemory@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Fabio Elia Marino     fmarino@polsinelli.com, mortiz@polsinelli.com, pdeneen@polsinelli.com
Henry C. Bunsow     hbunsow@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Jay H Reiziss     jreiziss@mwe.com, jrbaker@mwe.com, lbalsan@mwe.com
Lam Khanh Nguyen     lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com
Laura Kieran Kieckhefer     Kieran.Kieckhefer@shearman.com, courtalert@shearman.com, managing-attorney-5081@ecf.pacerpro.com, manattyoffice@shearman.com, rcheatham@shearman.com
Lauren Nicole Robinson     lrobinson@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Robert Steven Mallin     rmallin@brinksgilson.com
Scott Robertson Miller     smiller@sheppardmullin.com, ktuszynski@sheppardmullin.com
Thomas Christopher Cecil     tom@nelbum.com, alissa@nelbum.com, ericca@nelbum.com, rylie@nelbum.com
William H. Frankel     wfrankel@brinksgilson.com
3:12-cv-03876-VC Please see Local Rule 5-5; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC
Technology Properties Limited, LLC
3:12-cv-03877-VC Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Aaron Wainscoat     aaron.wainscoat@dlapiper.com, aaron-wainscoat-4432@ecf.pacerpro.com, carmen.manzano@dlapiper.com
Aaron Richard Hand     ahand@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Andrew P. Valentine     andrew.valentine@DLAPiper.com, andrew-valentine-6805@ecf.pacerpro.com, zhanna.sarkisova@dlapiper.com
Carrie Lynne Williamson     carrie.williamson@dlapiper.com, carrie-williamson-2478@ecf.pacerpro.com, christine.cain@dlapiper.com
Charles T. Hoge     choge@knlh.com, bhagar@knlh.com
David C. Doyle     ddoyle@mofo.com, christian@mofo.com, david-doyle-8781@ecf.pacerpro.com, dcoletti@mofo.com, rose-sheehan-1419@ecf.pacerpro.com, rsheehan@mofo.com, sdpdrive@mofo.com, ykametani@mofo.com
Denise M. De Mory     ddemory@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Erik R. Fuehrer     erik.fuehrer@dlapiper.com, christine.cain@dlapiper.com, erik-fuehrer-4624@ecf.pacerpro.com
Henry C. Bunsow     hbunsow@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
James M. Heintz     jim.heintz@dlapiper.com
Lam Khanh Nguyen     lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com
Lauren Nicole Robinson     lrobinson@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Mark Fowler     mark.fowler@dlapiper.com, 3854@ecf.pacerpro.com, mark-fowler-0917@ecf.pacerpro.com, zoya.khodosh@dlapiper.com
Thomas Christopher Cecil     tom@nelbum.com, alissa@nelbum.com, ericca@nelbum.com, rylie@nelbum.com
3:12-cv-03877-VC Please see Local Rule 5-5; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
3:12-cv-03880-VC Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Aaron Richard Hand     ahand@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Charles T. Hoge     choge@knlh.com, bhagar@knlh.com
Christian A. Chu     chu@fr.com, binford@fr.com
David C. Doyle     ddoyle@mofo.com, christian@mofo.com, david-doyle-8781@ecf.pacerpro.com, dcoletti@mofo.com, rose-sheehan-1419@ecf.pacerpro.com, rsheehan@mofo.com, sdpdrive@mofo.com, ykametani@mofo.com
Denise M. De Mory     ddemory@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Henry C. Bunsow     hbunsow@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Lam Khanh Nguyen     lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com
Lauren Nicole Robinson     lrobinson@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Leeron Kalay     kalay@fr.com, varelas@fr.com
Michael J. McKeon     mckeon@fr.com, haynes@fr.com
Olga Ivanovna May     OMay@fr.com, eDockets@fr.com, srodriguez@fr.com
Scott A. Elengold     elengold@fr.com, truax-padilla@fr.com, warden@fr.com
Thomas Christopher Cecil     tom@nelbum.com, alissa@nelbum.com, ericca@nelbum.com, rylie@nelbum.com
Wasif Hasan Qureshi     qureshi@fr.com, cjones@jw.com
3:12-cv-03880-VC Please see Local Rule 5-5; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC
Technology Properties Limited LLC
3:12-cv-03881-VC Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Aaron Richard Hand     ahand@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Charles T. Hoge     choge@knlh.com, bhagar@knlh.com
David C. Doyle     ddoyle@mofo.com, christian@mofo.com, david-doyle-8781@ecf.pacerpro.com, dcoletti@mofo.com, rose-sheehan-1419@ecf.pacerpro.com, rsheehan@mofo.com, sdpdrive@mofo.com, ykametani@mofo.com
Denise M. De Mory     ddemory@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Henry C. Bunsow     hbunsow@bdiplaw.com, halic@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Jennifer Lu Gilbert     jlg@banyspc.com
Lam Khanh Nguyen     lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com
Lauren Nicole Robinson     lrobinson@bdiplaw.com, jsprague@bdiplaw.com
Matthew J. Brigham     mbrigham@cooley.com, calendarrequest@cooley.com, tgibbs@cooley.com
Stephen R. Smith     stephen.smith@cooley.com, lwilliams@cooley.com, mviguie@cooley.com
Thomas Christopher Cecil     tom@nelbum.com, alissa@nelbum.com, ericca@nelbum.com, rylie@nelbum.com
Thomas J. Friel , Jr     tfriel@kslaw.com, jinghram@cooley.com
3:12-cv-03881-VC Please see Local Rule 5-5; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:
Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC
Technology Properties Limited LLC
Updeep S. Gill
Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.
901 North Glebe Road, 11th Floor
Arlington, VA 22203
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:N:\VC 12-3865.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP CANDStamp_ID=977336130 [Date=2/12/2019] [FileNumber=15584693-0]
[a0a2b91876a5080b09e4ef8d0d58e770a549a0270fda3c47d3e4364f8a2e248198f5
c8ef1d1e5e6ecc794ba25d7683be31865bfbc317b8542b4141ee7fd94c76]]
PACER:THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 6,2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 02/06/2019
98
JUDGMENT filed. AFFIRMED. Issued pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 36. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. [583675] [18-1439, 18-1440, 18-1441, 18-1444, 18-1445] [PBC] [Entered: 02/06/2019 09:12 AM]
PACER-You lost.District.court.decision.was.AFFIRMED! There is actually one last chance where PTSC/TPL can request an "en banc" or full court hearing with all the judges not just the 3 judge panel that canned your case. Then you can appeal all the way to the Supreme Court! Snicker. In my opinion not good!
Judges.R.about.to.STOMP.U.OUT! SELL.ASAP.FOR GOODNESS SAKE! Listen to the trial arguments here for URself! They give your argument no chance. It is over. If you listen to the 3 judges panel you will see 2 of them, a male and a female, are totally against your argument in every way possible. There is simply no way you can hope to win. Here it is again just for U>>>>
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings?title=&field_case_number_value=&field_date_value2%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=2019-02-04
BOTH the female.and.male.judges ENDED.UR case! Listen.here!>>>>
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings?title=&field_case_number_value=&field_date_value2%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=2019-02-04
UR lawyer was not very good. she sputtered and could to counter the judges tough questions she just did not answer them! The female judge said that in order for U to win she would have to overturn dozens of years of legal precedent and throw the entire patent/legal system into disarray! NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! You lost! So happy to see this patent troll finally get ended! In my opinion.
U Lost.the.case today.in.court.Listen to the.oral.arguments. Your "lawyer" sounded like she was 20 years old and simply count not counter the judges questions correctly. This should be an easy decision for the judges! Junk this rotten patent troll right quick! In my opinion.
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings
Penny.stocks R generally CONS AND SCAMS. Total BS.This 1.is.as well my friends. Sell UR shares and move on to the Crypto Mining and Pot scam stocks that are more legit. In my opinion.
This.is.penny.stock garbage folks.The insiders.have.made their $$$ and are well in the black leaving you holding an empty bag. They are yanking UR chains playing U for fools looking to hose you big time. It is very said to watch how people can be so foolish about these near worthless penny stocks making ridiculous claims to greatness. It fools a lot if the ignorant "mom n' pop" "investors" out there who end up getting their money cleaned out time and time again. Why do they do it? It works these insiders make a bundle. Sell my friends this thing stinks.
No FDA trial even started. Their application has not even been approved. No product marketing claims can be made to physicians until they are proven in an FDA study. The study process and acceptance will take YEARS. The outcome may not be positive. WAY before then they will run out of money and need to issue many more shares to keep hobbling along. That means share price dilution. I see them at a billion shares outstanding in the next 2 years and the price will be like 2-3c. Maybe its a speculative buy then if the FDA trials work out.
Bottom line is this is a sell at the current high price of 8c a share. More money will need to be raised and they will have a hard time even getting 8c a share. My guess is potential future private placements at 2c a share. Sell now maybe keep an eye on it every 6 mos or so and if it is still around in 2 years and they have FDA approval and a product then just maybe its a buy. In my opinion!
This.sad.former.Canadian.mining.company now.a MEDICAL COMPANY=RED FLAG A company suddenly changes businesses from mining to medical supplies? Hello this is a big time red flag when it comes to questionable penny stocks! Get out whilst u can my friends. These hosers are try'N to hose U! In my opinion.
These.hosers.R play'N U.dumb canucks for fools! You folks need to stick with the mining, crypto and pot scam stocks they have a much better chance of "succeeding" than this junk. They have no FDA approval to market any benefit for using their product. Not even an FDA approved trial. No results means no approval to market a benefit of the product to physicians. This equals almost no sales except "off-label" which will not generate much money. How can you all be so stupid! This info is well known in the industry or with anybody with a keen mind and a search engine. In my opinion.
No more 15 minutes.if.they.are not.mentioning it! That is what you always have to watch out for with these penny "riches" stocks and their wild claims that make them seem especially valuable. They simply will stop talking about one of them from time to time and that means the claim is no longer valid. Its a read between the lines kind of thing. Essentially there is a minimal benefit to their tech over well established companies with market share and distribution channels/direct representation like Storz or Olympus! In my opinion! The stock is junk.
Stick.with the.pot.mining.and crypto cons my Canadian.friends. You will see much more of a return there than this pie in the sky junk!
They cannot.market.until.FDA.study is done=2years at best. Maybe they can do some sales in 1 year but they cannot promote the product until the FDA study is done. At this point we do not even know if their application for the study is accepted by the FDA. Then they have to recruit patients and complete the study then, if the results are favorable, send them to the FDA to see if they are strong enough that the FDA will allow them to make claims about the product in marketing to physicians. All that takes YEARS. Sure maybe some off label sales in 1 yr but no real volume. They will be out of money and you will see HUGE share dilution by then. I bet before the product can even be marketed or sold you have 1 BILLION shares outstanding! In my opinion!