Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He is not calling it a benefit, he is pointing out this discussion is useless as the answers will soon be revealed. This discussion is nothing more than pure speculation based upon nothing.
I am not doubting your perspective on this, I was one of the many who hated the last merger PR and the complete loss of control by the company. I found the reactive nature to be the direct cause of the big sell off proceeding that PR. A proactive response would have resulted in a more positive manner, but unfortunately the company took the reactive route based upon the current number of share holders and how many calls the fielded. It was wrong and well they got beat up for it.
All I can tell a new investor is to be a part of the CC during this week, that is exactly what it is meant for. If you are a serious investor you will not pass up the opportunity to get this DD.
There is no maybe, read the PRs, the company stated they are currently negotiating the share structure, this is not an interpretation here.
That is what the CC is all about and that is why they are having a meeting today to hammer the details out.
Longs are not going to make out unless we get new investors, the share float is too loose to make any positive gains. The company is sound and shows great potential and has started to report some results. But the float is being used by flippers to make money on news. So either current shareholders buy more or new investors get a position.
Not to point out the obvious here but we are no longer doing a REVERSE MERGER, that is how I know that it is no longer in effect. Nothing from that first merger PR can be used, the whole share structure and share price will have to be negotiated which was part of todays PR. So this is not an assumption on my behalf but actually supported by their own words in the last two PRs.
Actually that went away since that was part of the reverse merger that was announced back in September. That is no longer in effect and we currently have no idea as to what to expect for share structure or price until the CC later this week.
The problem is not the market currently, it is directly tied to the float and flippers. Because long term investors do not own the majority of the float it makes plenty of room for flippers to buy large chunks and sell short term. This negates any run on the stock and creates a perception that there must be something fundamentally wrong with the stock, when in reality there is nothing wrong. Not enough shares are held by long term investors since the price moved up, it is a little more difficult to buy multi million share lots now as opposed to when this was a .00X stock. It took far fewer shareholders to maintain a tight float, as the price moved up shares were sold loosening the float and now you can see after those two weeks of heavy selling we are now swimming in shares.
There are only a few things that will right this, current shareholders buying more shares, new investors buying a position, and lastly the company absorbing some of those shares. The last one occurring is almost impossible currently since you are talking about a pink.
It is not that hard to figure out, the PPS was not going to rocket with all of the flippers that purchased at what they thought along with investors was a bottom from last week. Most had set their stops for a quick profit while some others tried to wait out the initial spike in hopes of a continued rise in PPS. It did not happen so they bailed out during the afternoon with what ever they could get. I would be more interested in how tomorrow and the rest of the week goes, that will be a much more telling story than what has happened today.
.0274 265000 16:01:36
.0275 10000 16:01:56
Exactly, this is not MM manipulation. It is difficult to see what the MMs are seeing, the L2 does not tell the whole story, only the MM’s can see where the trading is at and they adjust accordingly. It may appear to be manipulation when you see a huge ask go through and then watch the ask get knocked down immediately after. The fact is they go where they have the most trading currently at.
The problem is other investors, people who purchase this stock looking for a quick churn to make a small profit and then go on to another stock ready to pop. There is no momentum coming from outside sources anymore, which is great for those who are currently holding this stock and are accumulating it. The bad of course is the eroding share price, nothing you can do about it until it attracts new investors on its own. You do not want another pump as this will inflate the share price with an even harder fall afterwards.
Listening to the progression of yearly taxes tells a story of future growth. There is all kinds of good information in this and at the same time it explains why some other things have fallen through, like what has transpired with the current HQ.
I am showing a total of 2,105,080 shares traded at 10:27:51.
Yeah I know, I just purchased another 3500 shares to see what happens and sure enough it showed up twice and counted into the volume as 7000. Something is screwed up or we are watching shares being traded for even money.
These are shares being exchanged for equal value, amongst whom? I have no idea, I could speculate like the rest which is MMs trading funds between each other.
So far nothing but duplicate trades since after the open.
Trades look like this:
.025 40000 9:50:15
.025 40000 9:50:15
.025 50000 9:58:38
.025 50000 9:58:38
.025 105000 9:58:43
.025 105000 9:58:43
.0255 5000 9:59:51
.0255 5000 9:59:51
.0255 50000 9:59:56
.0255 50000 9:59:56
This continues on, this is not trading going on from individual investors.
I was just getting ready to post the same thing, these trades are duplicates at the same trading price at the exact same time. This is not normal trading going on here.
Actually I said that then, because that is why I did not buy into the irrational behavior of others. I waited for the stock to drop and started buying in where I thought it would stabilize at. I am sure if someone told others they were being retarded for buying up to the .15 mark they would be ignored as the trend says it was going up and people did not want to be left behind.
Are you kidding, .15 was ridiculous and based upon nothing fundamental. It was way overpriced at that PPS and should never be used as a measurement for trending.
That was my point, here is a company that is already established and has their own PBR seeks out BEHL for a joint venture that may result in further projects. I suggest anyone remotely interested in what you are investing in to take a look at their PBR and compare to ours. You will quickly see why we are being referred to as the cheapest set up possible, and take confidence when others from outside sources state we also produce yields that result in the lowest cost.
I won’t even speculate on the merger, the PR was the biggest gaff to date along with the ideal of just spreading the correction via word of mouth. The company quickly figured out they botched this and released it too soon. Until the details are known it is difficult to weigh the future value of the company.
That is why I brought it up, people need to look at what is happening right now and pull information about it to further understand how big this really is. This is what should be discussed on this board and how this will affect future growth. People should be focusing on that finalized contract after the initial order is filled and the company signs a permanent reoccurring contract, no one is going to tell us the specifics of the initial order as competition could undercut the deal.
So you would rather generalize that all investors of BEHL believed in that? I cannot explain why some people felt that drive to .15 is justifiable and continued to push that buying opportunities were abound as the stock eroded quickly down to the .05 to .07 trading range. Some of those people did not like what I had to say when they posted such baseless propaganda, I place them in the same category as those who participate on this board that are not investors. Much like statistics you ignore the extremes and you look at the core.
No, what truly flies in the face of logical thought is thinking that .15 was justified, in fact anything above current trading range back at that time was completely illogical and based purely on speculative buying and hype. Also known as irrational buying behavior and as a result must be ignored when looking at long term effect and current information.
My point exactly, not everyone proofreads their replies.
Looking for clarification here, so are you implying it is fake?
Have you looked at RWEs PBR? It is a very nice piece of equipment and uses some pretty solid parts, I can tell you from my experience the cost of that unit is much more than a BEHL unit. I agree with your other thought of the algae strains as well, in order to make the most you must duplicate the process in which the highest success rate is achieved. From the quality aspect, BEHL must offer something of quality in order for an established company to want to do business with it.
That response is big and yet many people will downplay it unfortunately. I noticed you said you emailed the IR and in return you got a reply from the RWE President, that says even more. I am sure many of the doubters and flat out non investors that participate so regularly on this board have done their DD on RWE. I am curious as to what others think of their system? Why the need to build a working relationship with a competitor like BEHL? Will the synergy developed between these two companies result in a larger company with more growth opportunities? Logically speaking a business like RWE does not have to stoop to the minor leagues to pick a company like BEHL which has nothing to offer when they already have a finalized PBR.
You have lost the original argument, trading based upon TA only. Read everything I am saying in context with the original argument which is TA is not to be used a sole means to trade stock and has little effect on decision making. You can use it but it should be such a small part of support for the decision making when trading stocks.
Your logic is flawed, if you flip a coin 7 times in a row and all 7 times it lands on tails what will the next flip be? You have some people answer well obviously tails because the trend clearly indicates tails. The other side will so no, the odds are highly favorable to be heads since it has been tails the entire time. Neither side is right because the odds have not changed they are still 50% for either side. Just because you see a trend does not mean this what will happen in the future.
Observations can be made but I am not using that observation to make a decision upon. I pointed out a trend during that period of time. Variables change so whether or not it stays the same is not a matter of that particular observation. Did it eventually drop below that support, it sure did, but I was not using it as a basis for trading. So I do not see the relevance in your argument. I can doubt something, but doubt is no way stating it will not happen, variance is not predictable.
I have stated it already that emotion is involved in every decision you make, it is whether you are allowing it to be the deciding factor in making those decisions. Go back and dig for that one while you are at it. Either way you have made no case that TA is a definitive means of making money in trading or determining future events.
Technical analysis has no bearing on how future events take place. It is yesterdays news and is only good for specific information regarding trend analysis. If you trade stocks based upon TA you are on the loosing end of the stick. Trend indications are too late in calling buys and too late when calling sells. Fundamentals are slightly better but they are not inclusive to decision making, they aid in the decision making process. You can use both TA and fundamentals to develop a better picture in order to make a decision but this still does provide enough information to make a decision. It still requires doing continuous investigating to find the most current information in order to arrive with the best decisions.
The point is your constant posting of this site proves absolutely nothing and is such a small component of trading stocks it bears very little to none in how a stock will trade in the future.
Thought I would just post it again since you are not getting the hint.
Solid buying for over an hour at .0262 and the ask sits like nothing has happened, nearly 25% of of the total days trading in the last hour and almost all of it is buys.
Actually the large spread has shown something, they have raised the bid and yet still very little selling. Raising the ask is not going to result in buying at this time either, you are looking at equilibrium right now. This is a good thing as it tells us that the majority of current share holders are holding on news.
The ask was at .035 and no one bit and it trickled down from there. That is a pretty sound conclusion.
Technical analysis has no bearing on how future events take place. It is yesterdays news and is only good for specific information regarding trend analysis. If you trade stocks based upon TA you are on the loosing end of the stick. Trend indications are too late in calling buys and too late when calling sells. Fundamentals are slightly better but they are not inclusive to decision making, they aid in the decision making process. You can use both TA and fundamentals to develop a better picture in order to make a decision but this still does provide enough information to make a decision. It still requires doing continuous investigating to find the most current information in order to arrive with the best decisions.
The point is your constant posting of this site proves absolutely nothing and is such a small component of trading stocks it bears very little to none in how a stock will trade in the future.
No trade period for 25,000@.0277, I show only one T trade and it was 6000 shares at .03.
Weird.
No such thing on my active real time streamer and in fact my account shows a positive close with positive funds for BEHL. Maybe a glitch????
.0275 17670 15:51:36
.0275 5000 15:51:36
.028 1400 15:52:27
.028 68000 15:53:03
.0285 6000 15:53:49
.029 205000 15:54:25
.03 87720 15:54:31
.03 10000 15:55:38
.03 10000 15:57:42
.03(T) 3000 16:00:06
Now that was good DD, someone thought of the box and looked elsewhere for supporting information to make a great conclusion.
Let me get this straight you placed YOUR own money in a company and did not research it on your own and expect others to convince you that you did the right thing and this is not a scam.
I will help you out here……
YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!!!!!!