Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I picked up a bunch of shares at .041 --- it closed green for me.
Judging by all the bashing going on ... it was a good move. I'm going to add more at .04
Nice, thanks for the post. The tides are turning, slowly, but it will. Can't wait for the trend to reverse.
Yeah, that was nearly 2 mil during power hour. Looking forward to the next one.
I like that trailer. Hoping that they find the funds to make the movie. I've seen other clips being made of patient interviews by a dispensary, though I do not know if they are related to CBIS.
That is some serious talent in that trailer though.
You misunderstood my post. I was calling out someone who call it a scam. If you read my posts, look at them all and you will see I support CBIS and SFIO.
TCC Objectives:
*To set the International standard for medicinal Cannabis.
*To encourage it's propagation, distribution, and it's use as a tool for healing the human condition.
*To inspire and define the future of humanity.
*To create an agronomicly based economic engine for the furtherance of Thailand's stated goals to become the greenest nation on Earth...
Those guys don't care about no stinkin facts.
And if they make a stinkin post they:
A. Didn't mean it.
B. Complain that it doesn't say what it says.
C. Complain that you misread it.
D. Didn't care anyway.
E. All of the above.
Not sure where you got your definition of contemplation, but if you are looking at a legal document, most likely penned by a lawyer, it would be wise to look at a legal dictionary.
Black's Law:
"The act of the mind in considering with attention. Continued attention of the mind to a particular subject. Consideration of an act or series of acts with the intention of doing or adopting them. The consideration of an event or state of facts with the expectation that it will transpire."
Must be time to pay some bills, no ???
support at .05 seem to be eroding
I understand completely, and wanted to apologize for others, because, I value the posts that you and other legalizers make on this forum.
I almost quit this forum a few weeks ago myself. I can understand differences of opinion, constructive criticism, and some negativity.... but I abhor lies, false accusations, and deliberate misinformation.
There are a good number of posts here that keep me informed and updated, and that's why I come back.
Respect goes a long way on forums, even when we differ with others. I know I have to put effort in keeping myself from getting mad and expressing my anger. In my view, we are all here to make money and advance the "free the weed" motto.
TY, and thanks for the offer. I am leary of free hosting sites and sometimes use a database. If mine crashes often, I'll be looking for a host....but mine is free for now.
Maybe I should not have released it here yet, as I notice that it needs LOTS more work.
I agree 420%. And while the partnership is not formalized, the facebook posting was not coordinated with CBIS. I would have posted the same info too. It was just a hiccup, and not a conspiracy or any wrongdoing.
Moose, I did criticize Don's web site. As a business entity, a professionally looking site is a must. I dabble a bit in making websites. Here is one that I've done on my home server.
http://cannabis.webhop.org
Okay, it too needs more work because it is unfinished, but I am available for hire !!!!
First of all, Smokin Moose, thanks for posting the public information.
This board has been frustrating for me at times as well and I am sorry that others accused you of insider trading. For example, at 9:54 am Slimbo2 posted this
Marijuana Is Here To Stay.
http://clear-uk.org/marijuana-is-here-to-stay/
Professor Grinspoon provided this article:
“in support of CLEAR”.
___________________________
In 1967, because of my concern about the rapidly growing use of the dangerous drug marijuana, I began my studies of the scientific and medical literature with the goal of providing a reasonably objective summary of the data which underlay its prohibition. Much to my surprise, I found no credible scientific basis for the justification of the prohibition. The assertion that it is a very toxic drug is based on old and new myths. In fact, one of the many exceptional features of this drug is its remarkably limited toxicity. Compared to aspirin, which people are free to purchase and use without the advice or prescription of a physician, cannabis is much safer: there are well over 1000 deaths annually from aspirin in the United States alone, whereas there has never been a death anywhere from marijuana. In fact, when cannabis regains its place in the US Pharmacopeia, a status it lost after the passage of the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, it will be seen as one of the safest drugs in that compendium. Moreover, it will eventually be hailed as a “wonder drug” just as penicillin was in the 1940s. Penicillin achieved this reputation because it was remarkably non-toxic, it was, once it was produced on an economy of scale, quite inexpensive, and it was effective in the treatment of a variety of infectious diseases. Similarly, cannabis is exceptionally safe, and once freed of the prohibition tariff, will be significantly less expensive than the conventional drugs it replaces while its already impressive medical versatility continues to expand.
Given these characteristics, it should come as no surprise that its use as a medicine is growing exponentially or that individual states have established legislation which makes it possible for patients suffering from a variety of disorders to use the drug legally with a recommendation from a physician. Unfortunately, because each state arrogates the right to define which symptoms and syndromes may be lawfully treated with cannabis, many patients with legitimate claims to the therapeutic usefulness of this plant must continue to use it illegally and therefore endure the extra layer of anxiety imposed by its illegality. California and Colorado are the two states in which the largest number of patients for whom it would be medically useful have the freedom to access it legally. New Jersey is the most restrictive, and I would guess that only a small fraction of the pool of patients who would find marijuana to be as or more useful than the invariably more toxic conventional drugs it will displace will be allowed legal access to it. The framers of the New Jersey legislation may fear what they see as chaos in the distribution of medical marijuana in California and Colorado, a fear born of their concern that the more liberal parameters of medical use adopted in these states have allowed its access to many people who use it for other than strictly medicinal reasons. If this is correct, it is consistent with my view that it will be impossible to realize the full potential of this plant as a medicine, not to speak of the other ways it is useful, in the setting of this destructive prohibition.
Marijuana is here to stay; there can no longer be any doubt that it is not just another transient drug fad. Like alcohol, it has become a part of our culture, a culture which is now trying to find an appropriate social, legal and medical accommodation. We have finally come to realize, after arresting over 21 million marijuana users since the 1960s, most of them young and 90% for mere possession, that “making war” against cannabis doesn’t work anymore now than it did for alcohol during the days of the Volstead Act. Many people are expressing their impatience with the federal government’s intransigence as it obdurately maintains its position that ” marijuana is not a medicine”. Thirteen states have now decriminalized marijuana. And, beginning with California in 1996, another 14 states and the District of Columbia have followed suit in allowing patients legal access to marijuana, and others are in the process of enactlng similar legislation. These states are inadvertently constructing a large social experiment in how best to deal with the reinvention of the “cannabis as medicine” phenomenon, while at the same time sending a powerful message to the federal government. Each of these state actions has taken a slice out of the extraordinary popular delusion known as cannabinophobia.
Perhaps in part because so many Americans have discovered for themselves that marihuana is both relatively benign and remarkably useful, moral consensus about the evil of cannabis is becoming uncertain and shallow. The authorities pretend that eliminating cannabis traffic is like eliminating slavery or piracy, or eradicating smallpox or malaria. The official view is that everything possible has to be done to prevent everyone from ever using marihuana, even as a medicine. But there is also an informal lore of marihuana use that is far more tolerant. Many of the millions of cannabis users in this country not only disobey the drug laws but feel a principled lack of respect for them. They do not conceal their bitter resentment of laws that render them criminals. They believe that many people have been deceived by their government, and they have come to doubt that the “authorities” understand much about either the deleterious or the useful properties of the drug. This undercurrent of ambivalence and resistance in public attitudes towards marihuana laws leaves room for the possibility of change, especially since the costs of prohibition are all so high and rising.
It is also clear that the realities of human need are incompatible with the demand for a legally enforceable distinction between medicine and all other uses of cannabis. Marihuana simply does not conform to the conceptual boundaries established by twentieth-century institutions. It is truly a sui generis substance; is there another non-toxic drug which is capable of heightening many pleasures, has a large and growing number of medical uses and has the potential to enhance some individual capacities? The only workable way of realizing the full potential of this remarkable substance, including its full medical potential, is to free it from the present dual set of regulations – those that control prescription drugs in general and the special criminal laws that control psychoactive substances. These mutually reinforcing laws establish a set of social categories that strangle its uniquely multifaceted potential. The only way out is to cut the knot by giving marihuana the same status as alcohol – legalizing it for adults for all uses and removing it entirely from the medical and criminal control systems.
Lester Grinspoon M.D. is Associate Professor of Psychiatry, emeritus, at Harvard Medical School
and the author of Marihuana Reconsidered and Marijuana, the Forbidden Medicine.
Medical Cannabis and it's impact on Human Health
Official Trailer
Full Documentary
This is a must see movie.
Dunkindonuts is listed at banned around 1:15, until further notice.
I was out this afternoon and missed the fray. Probably for the best, LOL.
Wow, it seemed like there were a ton of deleted messages and one person banned today.
Last May there were 13 PR releases. Thinking that now school is about out, Dr. Cannabuzz has been busy putting things together for CBIS.
Would be nice to see a definitive 14-C tomorrow for the power hour.
Don's been there a number of years and has done some great work.
On the other hand, the UFO post does not inspire confidence.
You are right, the web site is not professional at all.
Thinking this was what you were looking for.
http://www.facebook.com/THE1STGREENMAN/posts/1860694594130
How enlightened can Thai officials be ???
14 years for selling cannabishttp://bruneitimes.com.bn/news-national/2011/03/11/14-years-selling-cannabis
TRIO FACE DEATH IN CANNABIS CASE http://www.brudirect.com/index.php/2011042645916/First-Stories/trio-face-death-in-cannabis-case.html
Sorry, seem to have lost the article, but here is a few that are demanding rescheduling.
Teva Pharmaceutical
GW Pharmaceutical/Bayer/Otsuka [ JV ]
Insys Therapeutics
Good video!
Sorry to hear that Lyle C. dropped his petition to grow cannabis.
I like Paul Armentano's analogy that the DEA would allow vitamin C to be legal but prohibiting and incarcerating people who possess an orange.
Below is a excerpt from NIDA NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana dated 11/2010. This means that three federal agencies acknowledge that now marijuana is medicine.
Also ....
The Company had license revenues of $11,290 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to $0 for the comparative prior year quarter. This increase resulted from the Company ’ s license agreement with Rockbrook signed on August 18, 2010 and the associated recognition of license fees paid by Rockbrook to the Company for the distribution of its products. We are currently negotiating new license agreement terms with Rockbrook to remove the exclusivity clause and permit the Company to seek other licensees to market its products and add additional license revenues. The new agreement is expected to be signed on or before May 20, 2011.
NEWS !!!
10-Q and Pre-14C
What is neat about the Delaware bill is that it flies in the face of DEA who recently began bullying Governors about prosecuting state employees who grow and dispense the meds.
Showdown maybe ?!?!?!
I like showdowns like this because the fed opposition might make people rise up to take back control of their government ...or... if the feds back down, then the people win! Kind of a win/win situation, maybe.
It is good that Delawareans will get some relief.....but it has a cost to it as well.
"In a deal made with Delaware physicians, the Senate removed glaucoma, Crohn's disease and early stages of hepatitis C from the list of conditions that would qualify."
"Qualified patients and caregivers could face prosecution for failure to transport marijuana in tamperproof containers issued by the dispensary. While in possession of marijuana, patients will be required to carry their cards "and may be subject to prosecution for failure to do so," according to the bill."
You have to carry your papers at all times, commandant !!!!!
It would still be illegal to grow your own .... and no medical defense in court if you do.
Two steps forward, one step back.
GLTA
Here's what I observed.
There was a big support level at .05. Some investors were not getting their order filled at .05, so they bid just a little more than .05.
Large sell orders came in and hit the bids that were above .05. but since it was below the ask, the bid price increased somewhat. Some call that bidwhacking, but I think that is smart buying if you want to accumulate shares.
______________________________________________
I've seen it work the other way too. Large buy orders come in, but some nervous investor undercuts the ask to get their sell orders filled and the price drops even though buying outpaces selling.
Well, now I'm offended.
First, you did not answer a simple question to further our discussion of this accusation of $62 million of debt.
Secondly, you call my explanation a "spin" when I used actual investment terminology and quoted the sources of those terms.
Thirdly, you are now accusing me of threatening you. How, when, and where is that ?
Lastly, you keep propagating the false notion that CBIS has spent $62 million after I quoted from the financial record that the majority of spending was prior to CBIS taking the helm.
SNJgrower, a deficit is not necessarily a debt. Lets proceed with this discussion with some definition of terms.
That's a LIE.
I hope my last post will put the question of accumulated deficit and "debt" to rest. Post # 24266
First of all, CBIS is NOT in $62 million of debt, that is false and I hope you are not stating that to mislead others.
The financial reports state that this corporation has an "accumulated deficit of $62,197,625." ... that is if you include "$5,089,811 in impairment of oil and gas well lease(s)", and $19,782,860 in general and administrative fees.
Do you really believe that CBIS is in debt from gas and oil leases ????
The accumulated deficit (is the net loss which is carried every year from profit and loss statement to balance sheet under stock holder equity. the net loss carried every year collectively is known as accumulated deficit) is carried over from National Healthcare Technology, Inc., to Brighton Oil & Gas, Inc.,to Gulf Onshore, Inc., and now to CBIS.
Jeeze, now I need to light one up.
BTW, I am sorry if it came across as sarcastic earlier....I need to restock my sativa.
Are you looking for the science behind it?
google ... apoptosis + cannabis.
There are a few videos out there as well. google ... cannabis + video + cancer cure.
The real reason why pharmaceutical companies don't like the whole extract is because they cannot make money on it if everyone can make their own oil.
The keyword "contemplates" is used to provide an uncertain approach....because if they had a certainty of action, that would require setting a date ... since the approval and date is not set from FINRA or SEC yet, it has to be uncertain.
You must be smoking some good stuff. "$70 million in the hole" LOL
Stay away from the financial statements.....they will only confuse you.
Ed Rosenthal, the pot guru, travels to Amsterdam every month to help on a grow operation there. Rumor has it that Richard Cowan has relocated there as well.
Could be that Rich is lining up some investors abroad.....they do seem to have connections to authorities on cannabis....which is mainly abroad due to our fed laws not allowing any real research.
Just speculation on my part.
LOL - Where did that (420) come from?
Say, why does an Autism foundation have a partnership with a light bulb company ?
Just asking ....
Level II looks good this morning.
712,100 at .05 + at bid (strong support)
43,800 at ask to .055 (weak resistance)
Looks like a green day.