Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
At least this time, you end your post by asking the question instead of subjectively give an anwer showing what you wish presented as fact.
This being said, i'm more and more convince you are being paid by the post (but what do I know?)
'Real due diligence' ... You are kidding? DD is fundamental for anyone wanting to INVEST in a seriously established company.
Pretending to do serious DD looking at a stock having a pps of 1/100 of one penny and a MC of more or less $2M is either 1- totally incompetent (to be polite), or 2- supporting his day trading ,3-paidto post herein or worst even, all of the above.
''Friend'' (I do not assume i am aimed at)
''I don't make things up here'' (You effectively know the past and whatever official info the company did report).
The net proceeds of $2.3 million (Any honest analys not having an hidden agenda would have stop right there. However someons wanting to create FUD would add the second part of the sebtece : ''will cost them $19.5 million over 20 years'' )
The following sentence however effectively proves that these people (kowing what they are working toward) still have faith ... ''The deal required the signature of Shawn Leon personally, ...'' and they signed.
Shawn and his close ones may be wrong but at least they prove they honestly believe that they can succeed.
That's why I accept the RISK i keep refering to, instead of following the biased posts of some in here.
As I said multiple times and maintain it, this is a high risk bet but the company duly reports, keep doing business and Shawn hasn't given up. One doesn't have to claim to be a competent analyst to discuss the recent financials to say that. As opposite to some in here, I do not pretend to know more than anyone, However some, obviously work to support a strategy requiring others to believe that the situation is less than rosy (or even a bancrupcy in the making).
OK. I will keep looking at our site but will try not to answer Bubae ... unless he plugs new false information OTHER THAN THE ONE HE WROTE FOR YEARS PRETENDING TO HAVE BEEN WRITE ALL ALONG, notwithstanding that the company still progresses, still operates and still reports duly. Our self defined analyst has been wrong for years and that is a FACT ... at least up to now. Why would that change?
Reading crazy Bubea reminds me of another person repeating the same garbage so often that he ends up believng it.
If this man was so smart and apparently competent, what does he do bashing full time a sub-sub-sub penny stock instead of creating his own busines ???
Whatever this presumptuous 'assumed analyst' concludes out of anything normally and legally filed by the company is garbage and after having forecasted disaster for years (must be terrible to be so frustrated) he keeps being wrong since THE COMPANY IS STILL PROGRESSING and its CEO keeps working at it.
Having no respect for a person such as Bubea, I however have pitty for someone obviously having no life.
more than $19 million over 20 years
There you go again with your totally ridiculous analysist. A morgage of $100,000 is not a debt of millions over 20 years ...
Good at being a monday morning coach but I bet you never did manage anything other than your unjustified pride in forecasting disasters. What a pitty.
She is a lab scientific person totally incompetent relative to building a great company notwithstading the product quality. Stobborn as she is, she may thro the company under ground and became a harvard business case in the mba program ... How deep will she go before they acquire help and i do not mean getting more scientific people as her guides and BOD member. Is there someone somewhere able to get to her and explain her she is on a financial suicide track.
I hope FDA comes out with a positive resuld (may very well be) but if the woman doesn't wake up thereafter, she's done. I sold more than half my position earlier this year and I now regret not having sold more.
Oh my God ... Don't tell me ... You mean that the company has debts ... What would we do without you and your bright enlighten analysises of what did happen years ago, not accounting for your positive wishful thinking relative to your wish regarding the future ... You're one of a kind and still write if you thought anyone cares about your
According to you, Shawn is rich enough to endorse a multimillion deal and stupid enough to do it, knowing he will lose his bet.
I believe he is confident enough to place a very large bet even if he understands there is a risk.
I much prefer betting (reasonnably) with such a man than listenning to presumptuous analists only knowing the past.
Now your back at analysing the past trying to look smart and competent. it's better than discussing future with crazy argumentation relative to a morgage.
I did, I do, and know that Leon reactivated a company starting with a huge liability (debt). I also know that notwithstanding that situation he did built something out of the ashes of the previous operations andprogressed somewhat over the years since. I also know that the final outcome is far from being successful but it may also be.
Contrary to some I do not presume reading future in cards and accept the risk involved not assuming 'it's clear as day' ... one way or another. Neighter do you.
Not going to discuss politic in here but why am I not surprised by your opinion relative to the US current political situation? You obviously like negativeness, whatever the topic you look at and what the thruth is (Crazy Donald did lose fair and square). EOD
'$8.5 million deal worth mote than $19 million over 20 years'
Oups, a new approch to negativism, trying to scare people away (LOL). Since when does someone look at his morgage as worth the some of his monthly payments after 20 yars.
For once our infamous analyst looks ahead instead of the past and he succeed once again to make a fool of himdelf.
You seriously think I could go reading PR's going back 5 years (2018) to realise this is a risky bet that may become a final loss (I'm far from being over exposed) or results in a great return. Sorry but I have a life and for as much as I know, whatever the reading you refer to, this company still operates an reports (even if late).
I easily can understand why someone would not buy shares but if he does it based on the comments of our infamous analyst, even if he ends up being right it will be for the wrong reason.
Hard to believe anyone will act based on your garbage. You sound like a politician I consider more dishonest than others.
Another stupid post demonstrating you only post BS (You do not even have my address ...) LMHO!
Just in case you want to know you do not live in my head but I really have you my ...
As for correct content, monday morning coaches are always right ... It however proves they do not even know what they talk about.
As for your 'no credibility' comment, I cannot believe you think you have any yoursel ???
The guy is a BSer supporting his hidden agenda. GRST is yet to be a serious investment (if ever) but believing the posts of that man is really not serious.
3 possibilities:
- He is paid to do it
- He loss his shirt in the past with it
- He need attention, being a lonesome frustrated individual.
Whatever tha case, he knows the history of this company and has no clue what Leon is doing ... or not.
GRST is a sub-sub-sub-penny one should only play leftover money with, hoping Leon will effectively succeed but accepting that right now, with what we know, the probability of losing one's bet is serious.
One should be realisitic where our infamous analist is whisful. For the moment, being working on my pc a lot (producing a video covering our recent trip to US, posting in here is an interesting way to relax.
Enjoy the ride
'Wouldn't a 7/10th O/S ownership hand that person the controls?'
May be not if Leon is one of those creating the required funds.
This being said this is a theorical scenario as good as any other one assumed in here since no one in here knows what Leon is effectively up to.
THE ISSUE right now is thye debt (our infamous analyst will agree) and another theory would be to obtain government grant out of the existing funds addressing the addiction our customers try to cure.
'He has a lot of work to do at this point."
Granted but he obviously is doing it.
Assume someone take Leon's offering and buys 7,000,000,000 shares at $0,0012/share or $8,400,000.
If Leon then turns on and pays his debts, what would then be the market value of GRST.
Assuming $8,000,000 revenue per year to start with NO MORE DEBT to talk about, what would then be a realistic multiplier applicable and what would then be the market value of GRST?
Assuming 10,000,000,000 O/S and a multiplier of 2 times revenues the new pps would become $0.0016 (capitalisation of $16,000,000) and our investor would suddenly have 7,000,000,000 shares worth $11,200,000 or an immediate gain of 33%.
That iis a totally imagined scenario but why would it be less possible than the disaster our infamous analyst sees in his tea leaves.
30,000 shares ... you mean a 15 or 18 $$$ buy?. Those paying you to do the job you do in here obviously do not pay much (LOL)
'quit complaining when someone else posting the facts from the press releases and filings'
Not complaining relative to postic the facts issued by the company, just their subjective interpretation by someone having a secret agenda
Due diligence is not only QUOTING official historical information, it also involves finding out information not officially published by the company. If one does't find it, all he does is SUBJECTIVELY INTERPRET past data supporting whatever pre-defined prejudice or objectives.
Trying to look smart projecting outcome of a sub-sub-sub-penny stock on OTC is as crazy as Trying to predict the next card that will be pulled out of a deck of cards more tha half full.
This could be (who knows?) a bullet Leon keeps in his gun for when (or if?) some issues do get resolved before cleaning up the debts that keeps the market value lower than justifyable wwwithout such a debt. (see my post 48153).
As per your infamous analysises, all Leon's creditor are outright stupid and do not care if Leon suddenly decided to declare bancrupcy letting them lose whatever they have at play.
You sound like an infamous politicians that keeps saying he 'did nothing wrong'. What I keep telling you is that you are right quoting historic data as reported by the company (you call that DD) and are generally wrong (for as much as we all know) predicting Leon's and his creditors soon to be made moves. I also have the honesty to also admit you may end up having been right since none of us knows when and how this thing will evolve.
As for you, you never even can imagine a possible positive outcome, blinded by your (unexplained) rage and frustration. That's why, even if you could be right, your credibility is nil.
False posts not, you are right but as you keep saying you only quote historic fact copied from past filings.
However predictions such as 'up-list narrative will come. With it the reverse split', are may be not outright lies but certainly unfunded vivious predictions ... not much better than outright lies.
Nice to see the part of the story our infamous analyst never refer to. We shall see whose forecasting will having been right in the future. Till then no one really knows what Leon is up to. This being said till further notice (notwithstanding our infamous analyst predictions) Leon is still having the company live and kicking.
Hard to believe you can question the credibility of anyone else after having predicted disasters that never happenned for a couple of years. Notwithstanding all your posting, the company is still operating, reporting and implementing steps toward coming out of the mess they started with ... with possibly getting the situation repaired ... or not.
Honestly your credibility is close to 0 even you you may be right later but also having been full of it for years ... God knows why?
' get back to selling shares' ... Gradually setting up for going back to your 'dillution' argument.
We shall see t you know as uch as all of us. You however love to imagine negative scenaios created out of your imagination and dreams without any justification but your wishful vision of the future.
Let me be clear ... You may be right and you may also be totally wrong ... you know as much as us all about what's comming ... or not ???
Nice to see that YOU CONSIDER THAT TO ALSO BE a day trading toy some wants to play with.
- Trading toy: Why not?
- Risky bet: For sure
- Investment: Not yet (if ever)
First notwithstanding your pretention we do not know what Leon is working on (another of your unsupported affirmation).
Nice that you believe in the regulation ''A'' offering (shares at $0,0012). I already said that this COULD (I do not pretend to know as you would) be used to completely change the picture of the company (Post 48153).
Once more, notwithstanding your unexplained anger, this to me is an interesting RISKY BET that may turn out to have been a great investment.
First, thank ou for putting this on the board.
My comments.
The essence of her message is that they continue ‘developing’ products in view of ‘adding boxes on additional shelves’ as the only revenue generator strategy’
As she did 4 years ago, looking at an objective of revenue of $5 billions within 5 years, she still dreams looking at a market of $50 to $85 billions but doesn’t understand that to obtain her fair share of it she will have to invest in telling these markets that we exist and what we offer. Instead of trying to increase revenues by investing in marketing (she most likely consider useless expense), she looks at cutting expenses to increase margins.
Looking ahead, she goes back to product: ‘We believe that becoming the first non-dairy and non-soy FDA approved infant formula will be transformational for valuation of the company’. That may attract multinational interested in buying the company but if she is to keep rejecting these offers believing that customers will miraculously find out about our products and their benefits, without investing in communicating with them. she will fail miserably. The way it is going, she may become one of the next historical failure because of a belief that having a superior offering is the only success factor.
BOTTOM LINE
Revenues in the second quarter was $2.4 million, a 3% year-over-year growth versus the second quarter of '22. She however find excuses to explain such a disaster instead of trying to figure out what she is doing wrong.
QUESTION PERIOD
Once again, it is obvious they made both the questions and the answers. There also, she refuses to be challenged in her belief that ‘product’ is the only important Critical Success Factor’.
'It would certainly make no difference because the information that I post represents facts supported by the words of the company.'
Sounds to me that you say the company reports exactly what the situation was, even if it is often doe with some days delays.
Also sound to me that all you know (as us all) is historic data, not having a clue what Leon is working toward (as us all).
The difference however is you PRETEND KNOWING that this is a failure in the making whereas most of us are REASTICALLY UNDERSTAND THAT OUR MONEY IN THIS IS AT RISK.
Not much to refute, he just quote historic data filed by the company. The rest his an expression of his uninformed wishful thinking.
All I can offer, as everyone in here is that the company is alive, it regularly quaterly report (did not say timely) and it's doing business notwithstanding its liabilities.
Your post are continuous bashing picking and interpreting selected historic facts we all know as do monday morning self defined sport analysts.
As for my 'promotional case' if
-saying this is a bet considering what the company does (business, reporting, successfully negociating with creditors, ...)
and
- saying it present risk of failure if the debt issue stop improving
Then that fine with me. I get use to your misreading of whatever does not fit your theories based on historic fact.
At least I have the honestly to consider both possible outcome whereas you PRETEND to know that there is only one possible.