Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
''Now what?''
Business as usual. We will wait to see what Leon will do or not and have to go thru your analysises that could be right or not ...
Mkt cap 26.78M
52-wk high 0.76
52-wk low 0.17
Awful ...
ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!
Oups, posted at the wrong place. Sorry
My grand children are saying that also ... ''It's not me, it's him''. They however are not even in their 10's yet!
Do i read the tone of a frustrated person?
Now that split and dilutions scare tactics are a little old ones, there you go with your new one (''That debt to equity conversion will most likely be for preferred stock). I assume we will that new one for a while before you can invent another one in few months.
It would be stupid on my part to not read your OPINIONS as I read those of others. This being said notwithstanding the number of times you will repost your opinions, I keep saying that you may be right (50%) or not 50%. Ressussitating 2 and 3 years stories will not change that. All i know is whatever your profound analysises, after 2 years of trying to scare people away, Leon did not split, he did not dilute for 2 years, he still operates the business and duly reports our financials.
If he is the crook you suggest he is, I will write off my bet and whatever you keep repeating ad nauseam that will not change my opinion that this maybe a bad or a great bet (50-50).
''Well, I don't think he is stupid'' asnd ''Pretty clever strategy to pull his and his friends cookies out of the fire don't you think?''
Then I must conclude that according to you he is a crook scewing us regular shareholders.
As I keep saying it's a bet offering a 50-50 chance to go one way or the other. We shall see.
There is no limit to your capacity to produce BS herein. You know as much as us all but presume readers herein will not realise you also have an hidden agenda disparaging Leon and the company.
Trying to look smarter than anyone in here make you sound like a frustrated clown.
According to you, Leon is a stupid man (or worse ''a crook'') getting deeper and deeper in sh.t for only God and you knows why.
Because Leon could pull the plug anytime on 1 hand or solve the debt issue somehow on the other hand. At current pps (MV) if I was more positive I would add to my position but if I was thinking of the negative potential only I would sellout.
Right now I've placed my bet and will wait till the wheel stop spinning.
TYPPICAL MADE UP CONCLUSION ,,,
'' long time promoters'' ... as usual YOU MAKE UP whatever fits your objective.
In this specific case however readers do know I really stand : 50% chance to lose it all, 50% chace to win big.
If you call that PROMOTING, you obviously do not know what the word means or worst, you want to mislead again,
''I'm expecting ... a reverse split'' ... If you say it long enough, you may endup having been right (LOL)
Hard to believe the amount (time) of work you put in disparaging a stock you do not even own. All of that to repeat on and on the same garbage pretending to know more than most.
Your scare tactics are made of your continuous rehashing of events that did happen in the past, some quoting ad nauseam past financials we all know but many reffering to many years back if they still were relevant.
The only fact you can use honestly is that the company has large debts and we do not yet know if that issue will or not be resolved.
That debt causes our pps multiple to be below 0,5.
Any poster here in can believe this company to be a failure in the making or a golden opportunity to make huge profit.
Knowing what we know, the odds are 50-50 and your continuous effort to make believe YOU KNOW more than anyone is pure bashing and disparaging.
Who I believe is my gambler instinct making me belive that for the moment my odds are 50-50.
This being said, if you want to be honest (???) you can say the CEO promotes his stock but you can also admit Leon reports duly (giving you the information you dishonestly analyse) and keep working at solving the negative issues he faces.
Your byasses efforts (motivated by God only knows what) are a joke for any of us following that stock for some time.
As for my posts they address newcomers not knowing you and your hidden motivations.
If you have to go 3 years+ back to find good and old posts, you must be quite desperate in trying to make a point. On the otherhand you kept talking about dilution all along and still do. The same applies to your fixation with splitting. Both may happen some time in the future in a justifyable context but as of now, your affirmations are only scare tactics, those not familiar with your behavior could believe.
If you feel like telling him what you think, feel free to do it (LOL)
Tought you had replaced your VERY OLD DILUTION SCARE TACTIC (or dilutive issuance problem as you now refer bo it) by your somewhat more recent tactic of SPLITTING.
I must say that your dilution tactic was getting somewhat very old:Bubae, Friday, September 17, 2021: ''Save your powder because the DILUTION machine has plenty of new conversions eligible per the filings''.
''Looks like Shawn Leon and the wife may need to guarantee another nasty refinance agreement to keep this limping along.''
Why would they do that?
You're gettinng better and better as an historian doing research of historic stories: You now ressucitate a 7 years old document ??? ... ''research paper White Diamond did back in 2017''. Wasn't it this ridicule, a newcomer herein could think you are just one of these irrelevant posters we find now and then on these unreliable boards.
For them let us say that : Assuming you are not outright stupid (most likely not) then one has to wonder WHY you spend your life disparaging daily a company and its leader, not even being a shareholder ?
These newcomers you claim trying to protect mus do their own serious research and after doing it they will know that for the moment buying GRST shares is a 50-50 BET, one should only make with money he can afford to lose. If Leon can make this company solve its debt issue, the return could be outstanding ...
Quite a long post to finally say it has it is in less than 30 words:
''The company added pile on the new debt for this new narrative and you have to wonder how they intend to service it let alone pay any of it.''
We all know the company is crippled with debts and we shall be happy to see that you finally admit that YOU ALSO WONDER how they intend to service it. At least for once you do not hint that YOU KNOW what they intend to do about it.
1- ''You all on the other hand simply promote on nothing other than the words of Shawn Leon who I constantly discredit with the filings.''
Whatever you repeat ad nauseam are quotes that Shawn duly reports regularly. As for promoting, I do not know what that means to you but if you read my posts correctly (BET, 50-50, DEBT, ...) you must agre I do not promote knowing as much as any of us about the future (I however admit you are great as using PAST INFORMATION to support your agressive disparaging efforts.
2- ''Below is the link to GlobeNewsWire for Ethema Health going back to 2018''
As usual you show your expertise on what went on in the many past years (i.e. you can read) but know as much as us all about what Leon's plan is or not (noone can say that Leon does actively promote any plan of his).
3- As for defending this trash, I do not believe that saying that Leon may succeed (50%), or fail (50%) adding to only BET money one can afford to lose considering the risk) is what you call ''Defending this trash. On the otherhand, your continuous affirmation hinting that this is a failure in the making or a trasdh stock as you call it shows your biass and undivulged reasons to be that agressive doing it.
In summary, I suggest you post as much BS as thos being solidly positive that this is a definitive gold mine in the makig. You know as much as they and I do and suggesting otherwise shows that you have a hidden agenda based on past experiences of yours with Leon and or the company.
Ho! I forgot, there are 50% chances for you to be right ... on the otherhand ...
''The Company will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of common shares, and/or debt financing in order to implement its business plan and generating sufficient revenue in excess of costs.''
- Placement of common shares
- debt financing
No issue with that but, considering the national problem the company works on (addictions), government grants have to be also part of whatever plan Leon has.
Maybe I do not understand but this scenario doesn't seem realistic ???
Good way to do it.
I personally let Leon do whatever it is he wants to do and sit on my share waiting to see if I lost my bet or make a lot (I shall start considering a selling strategy at $0,01 ... if that ever comes). Till then I do not lose any sleep over it but enjoy playing with our board to spend spare tim.
''For those new to this stock beware of the nature of the character of'' BUBAE who obviously has an interest in disparaging Leon and\or the company!
Fact is that 50% of his post could endup having been right and 50% of them to be outright wrong.
GRST is a sub-sub penny stock having a real company behind it but it is currently crippled with debts (justifying a market value at less than 35% of its annual revenues).
One should therefore only ''BET'' money he can afford to lose, considering the possible very serious potential for a big gain.
Whoever is not fine with betting should stay away for the moment ...
GLTA
''My bet is that you couldn't move any of the pile that you are sitting on''
As usual you start with an unferified premise and assume a scenario that fits your wishful stupidity. from there you go with your bla, bla, bla ...
1- It's not I ''could' not''it is that i ''did not'' (at my current unit cost i do not even trade anymore)
2- As I keep saying, GRST has not and is not an investment but a good 50-50 bet
3- On the otherhand, if the 50% I wish for, does materialise I expect to sell when I will have seen my bet multiplied at the established level I defined.
4- I therefore keep my bet on the table because many cards haven't yet been turned.
Instead of being agressively assuming the worst (as you do), I stay on the neutral and wait. I have the honesty to admit I do not know yet how it will tirn out ... whatever BS you continuously produce herein.
Dilution and split being old inacurate topic of yours for years, here is your new toy: manipulation. What a pitty!
FOR NOW, pps fluctuations are not yet based on facts but hopeful expectations. That being said, I like an 8 better than a 3 (LOL)
I did not discuss OTC trading toys with manipulated values based on vaporware but a real duly reporting company operating a serious business but carrying a well defined critical debt. The high risk OTC market has no fundamentals per se but SOME OTC STOCKS (as ours) do, being issued by real, operating, honestly reporting ,companies.
An OTC sub sub sub penny stock is only owned by 157 stockholders (source: our infamous financial guru) and traded for many many months at between 0,0003 and 0,0007. Why keep these shares in your 'trading\betting account ?
Because: You did bet money you can afford to lose.
Why can one think that there are reasons to believe that this COULD BECOME A WINNING BET?
Because:
1- Behind the stock there is a real operating business that grew relatively significantly over the last few years
2- The said business operates in an extremely lucrative market
3- The O\S number hasn't change for years
4- The company formaly reports regularly
5- The CEO accept to work at making it greater for no direct retribution
6- The CEO accept to be compensate by paper investment (debt) in a company some believe will fail
7- ...
What is the risk (note: The CEO is not continuouly issuing BS PR's)?
1- Risk to lose it all: 50% (not enough information yet available)
2- Risk to win big 50% (not enough information yet available)
Q- What is the fundamental issue that creates such an environment?
A- The debt that behaves as a boat anchor keeping the MV of the company minimal relative to its revenues,
Can it be somehow resolved?
No one yet knows but the CEO doesn't seem stupid enough to accumulate owned millions in a company he believes is on the verge of bancrupcy.
What should one do?
Sell its shares or at least don't buy any if he believes what our vengeful financial specialist repeats ad nauseam.
Let the wheel spin|
Here you go again with your continuous non materialised split and rehasing of 3 years old story ... You really are desperate.
You say: ''The Leons are owed $2.6 millio n and the only way they can get that out is to convert to equity. As a practical matter converting to the common presplit doesn't help the price but rather hurts it with the increased outstanding share count.'' Pretty negative view of the situation (Not really a surprise from you)
I stand to be corrected but let's try to make it a more positive and possible scenario... assuming Leon put his money where is mouth is ...
1- Leon accept to convert the $2.6 million owed to him, trading it for shares he pays $0,0012 (as suggested earlier). He then get 2,150,000,000 new issued shares.
2- To reduce even more our debt situation, he and\or a friend of his invest another $1.4 million at the same $0.0012. That is another 1,150,000,000 shares issued.
Adding these 3,300,000,000 new O\S to the current 3,700,000,000 O\S, we endup having 7,000,000,000 O\S and a debt reduced by $4,000,000.
That being done our stock become much more attractive (good growing business and much reduced debt) and therefore a multipler of 15 times our current revenues would be quite realistic (15 times our actual $6,000,000 annual revenue TO START WITH or a $90,000,000 market value or a PPS of $0,0013 (15 times $6,000,000 divided by 7,000,000,000 O\S). Both Leon and the other investors are already 8% up.
Thereafter, a R\S of 2500 for 1 could be expected to render our bet an investment. That would make our PPS more or less $3.25
I do not know what Leon's plan is but I somehow do not believe he is stupid enough to accept to be owned $2,600,000 +, by a company he expect to go bancrupt.
The level of reverse split should be calculated after the market will have reacted to whatever debt conversion will be done. Whatever Leon does to eliminate some debt should have an immediate impact on our market cap (pps).
Whatever the BS type pretended serious analysis you post herein the only reason our MV (PPS) is what it is is the debt we carry split or not, Fooling around with the shares is just repackaging of a bad looking PPS crippled by our debt, Leon must eliminate seriously our debt (new large investor, government grant, ...) to start. Only thereafter will activities like dilution, split, or ... will make sense.
Alternatively, given time (years) and growing gradually the business could help but time is also a limiting factor.
DEBT, DEBT, DEBT that's what has to be resolved.
''they should have split the stock'' ... ''They should be on their second reverse split'' ...
Whatever the scenario you IMAGINE SHOULD HAVE BEEN, those reading you would know for years that, based on your continuous non materialised predictions, there was (is) no future for this business the way it's being managed.
This being said, They effectively carry a huge debt (they manage the best they can) but they did not split nor did they dilute us and at the same time they did build a serious duly reporting growing company.
As of now, the risk presented by the debt makes the MARKET VALUE OF THE COMPANY at less than $2,000,000 or more or less the revenues generated within a quarter of operation.
You (God knows why) only look at the negative potential scenario, manipulating numbers supporting your wish (Leon goes under for good and shareholders lose their BET) and subjectively do not even consider that may be (just maybe) Leon has a plan to address the debt sometime, somehow.
You know in life trying to look smart predicting the future, one endup looking stupid having no credibility.
Enjoy your GAME ... it may influence someone knowing nothing about the company. On the otherhand, anyone having been around for a while reads you only wondering why someone work that hard to look that ridiculous.
You are another one Paul who ,,, would defend that bit of misinformation ?
- If saying that GRST is the stock of an operating company suffering from debt and no one should invest (bet) on it money he can afford to lose, I plead guilty ...
- If, saying for 2 years that this is a high risk (50-50) bet is (serious reporting operation on one hand and a company crippled with debt on the other) then I balso plead guily ...
On the otherhand, claiming that this is an outright ''misinformation scam'' for years, with no shutting down of the ''plot'' cerainly doesn't make you credible.
You know as much as any of us about the outcome of that affair but I have the honesty to say I do not know how or when it will end. I will give you a 50% chance to be right but 50% chance also to be wrong, whatever stupid argumentation you advance to predict the final outcome of this ''venture''.
Ha! Ha! Ha! ''who has been correct about this story'' ... Come on ... how do you dare? To my knowledge, no split has occurred, dilution has been nill for 2 years, ... everything alse you predicted for 3+years never happenned ...
I knew you were blinded by your rage and frustration (God, you and Leon only know why) but here you overachieved in your ridiculous behavior.
I wonder ??? What does our stupid CEO do all day, looking at her (our) business going down the drain?