Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That was a interesting read. What do you think the % of stocks that are put on a DTC chill ever come off?
Dude, I actually feel sorry for you. I was saying nothing bad about rcch, just giving the definition of inc vs corp!!!
Definition of the "INC" & "CORP" discussion regarding RCCH
Corp vs Inc
Diffen › Economics › Business
Corp. is short for corporation and Inc. stands for incorporated. They are both used in names of incorporated entities. When you register a business, you can use either in the business name.
In terms of legal structure, compliance obligations, limited liability or tax structure, there is no difference between the two. However, they cannot be used interchangeably. Once an institution is registered with Corp. or Inc. in the company name, it must use this extension in all its legal paperwork.
Both Inc. and Corp. represent an institution that is granted a charter recognizing it as a separate legal entity having its own privileges, and liabilities distinct from those of its members.
An important feature of both is limited liability, which means that the shareholders, directors, employees are not personally liable for the debts that the institution owes to the creditors.
The company whether it is a Corp or an Inc comes into legal existence when its founders comply with their state's incorporation process.
Bottomline: It doesn't matter which one you choose: Inc. or Corp. Having made a choice in the company name, the business cannot use the other extension without filing for a formal change of name.
When forming a new business entity, it is more important to think about the structure of the entity. For example, will it be an Inc or LLC? And if it's a corporation, choosing between a C-Corp or S-Corp. These entity types have different tax and regulatory obligations.
Comparison chart</> EMBED THIS CHART
Improve this chart Corp Inc
Stands for: Corporation Incorporated
Usage: Used globally Mainly in North America
Really, what are you talking about?? Haha, I wish I wasn't a shareholder!!! Just answer my question , if rcch has over 80 million in assets, why did they sell discounted shares to gendeme
So let me get this straight, a company that has over over 80 million in assets has to sell discounted shares to gendeme??? Really??? You do know that bogus release was from 2006??? Would love to see REAL VERIFIABLE INFO ON RCCH. Any financials?? Any audits? Any uplists? The answer is no, no , no.
Rhinegold, a lot of us here would love to see VERIFIABLE rcch news,a lot of us, me included, would love to be wrong about newton. I have followed this crazy stock for over 5 years. A couple things that have always caused me to really question newton's integrity are as follows. Only certain people claim to have wonderful news, this news IS NOT FOUND ON THE INTERNET, it is emailed, or direct phone calls. ALWAYS THE SAME REASON IS GIVEN, BASHERS!! I have been privy to some of this garbage over the years( thank god they would never email or call now because how I have soured on rcch). To say the information that is VERIFIABLE is on the Internet, and you won't post because of rcch chat room is sort of silly. DON'T YOU THINK IF THAT INFO WAS REALLY ON THE NET THE BASHERS WOULD HAVE IT TO?? That's why I know it's not on the net, it's the typical newton way of dangling carrot's to the few. Jim tash, op, seeker, nat, myself and many many others have searched for something with teeth concerning rcch. We have all found something's but nothing and I mean NOTHING can be VERIFIED. I hope your faith in newton and rcch is rewarded. I would just question the one's that re giving you this info
Really doesn't matter to some of the sheep here. Newton could be on you tube declaring his part in the dilution of RCCH and the sheep would say it was the bashers. This stock is dead, been dead for years and yet some still , for reasons that make no sense, still think this is a viable company. Newton over the last 5 years has lied, deceived, used promoters to get false information out to only certain people, surrounded himself with outstanding citizens like essman, lux, and the totally honest Raymond chin. He is nothing but a 2 bit con man that is out of moves. So when a settlement happens or the case goes to court and everyone realizes that the outcome means squat to shareholders, how will the sheep react?
Newton has been off the radar for 5 years!!! Thorpe for a couple months!!!
Actually 5+ years and waiting, but what's a year or two anyway.LOL
There is no court date next month anymore. There was a settlement in principal, it still had. To be approved . They set new court date, I believe, for September , but only if settlement did not get approved
Rhinegold, I have had them up for sale( not all) and no takers so far. My orders all expired so I just did them again. Would love to be wrong about rcch and newton, but there is just to much proof IMO that this clown took our money and split.
Op, you know the answer, and so does everyone else. That's why nobody has answered your questions
Anvil, as you correctly pointed out , the case that Kramer posted was much more heinous than that of rcch, yet no buy back? I am a shareholder(stupid me) in this sh&& called rcch. When there is a settlement and nothing changes with rcch, including freeze, do you still think certain people will blame everyone but newton? This guy is a scammer, those who can't see it just don't want to admit there mistake
Rhinegold, I do believe there are bashers, I just don't subscribe to the theory of bashers ruining buisness. Isn't that the reason for short stoppers? Law enforcement? Also he stopped releasing pr's well before we had a chill.really Rhine , your depending on people bashing rcch to give it hope. I just don't trust newton enough to ever believe that
OP, your spot on!!! It's so ridiculous to keep hearing the basher theory!! Can you imagine A REAL COMPANY like Pepsi, google, etc. not putting out pr's and buisness news because bashers call the businesses? Newton is a scum bag that has lied for years and years. To defend him at this stage is just downright insane. And yes , a REAL COMPANY that had all these businesses wouldn't need to sell discounted shares if its company were strong. If there REALLY is VERIFIABLE NEWS out there that can bring a shread of light to this pig it would of been out there on newton's order. Shareholders have to dig and claw just to get info THAT ONLY COULD BE RELATED to rcch. There is nothing out there that is verifiable
He/she has always pumped rcch with old outdated DD for years. Now he has NEW info but is keeping to himself , because of chill? Whatever, it all means ZERO. We don't need DD from anyone but the source(newton or smith) or whoever is in charge!! Wonder what happened to the gendeme settlement?
ctrumabll, that is a very well written post, as was Nat's.Nat is a realist (as am i). there are more than a few here that have been around this hideous stock since 2008. there have been many PROMOTERS of this stock(pumpers). most, if not all, have gone back in there hole or are now pumping other garbage. Now on the other hand you have posters here that have ZERO SHARES in this stock , yet continue to beat a already dead horse. So you tell me, why would anyone waste there time on this garbage is they had no financial interest in it? With all that being said, this stock has people on BOTH SIDES that are very deceptive and are making money from others failures, not from there own work. Do i believe because there are bashers that this is going to turn around one da? ABSOLUTELY NOT. Gene Newton iis the one man that really knows what happened, but he is a proven liar, so even if he talked now it would be like the boy that cryed wolf!! Bottom line is this, iF newton had anything positive at all his croonies would be back on this board talking about uplist, to the moon,dollar land. his end game is about up, all REAL SHAREHOLDERS just want closure with this crap. so, since you dont have shares why do u care?
Rhinegold, first of all, how are you doing. I remember you way back in 2008-2009 on I hub and golden boards. I know you still believe BIG in rcch. But I totally disagree with who you are placing the blame.to not blame gene newton for all the LIES throughout the years is sticking your head in the sand(IMO). Do I believe there have been people calling businesses of rcch and hassling them? Probably . Are there bashers on this and other boards continually beating newton and rcch? Yes. And what about the court case? There was a agreement between principals that's needs to be voted on for approval, a settlement . If you are throwing all your eggs in the SHORT basket I think we all are in trouble. How many REAL businesses get attacked, yet they show there strength by showing there profitability , you know, HOW THERE BUISNESS IS REALLY DOING. Hiding in the pinks newton can make any excuse he wants , while he hides behind non reporting. I was a believer in 2008-9 but came to realize what a shyster this clown is. I know you said most blame bashers and not rcch, but I disagree strongly with that. One day I would love to say you are right and I was wrong, but that never seems to happen here.
That's all fine and dandy but bottom line is, we have been sitting @ .0001 going on 5 years!!!!! I don't care about Inc or corp, most have been sitting in the gutter with this sh&& for years!!!! It's time newton and rcch do something to help this pathetic stock!!!!!!
I wasnt talking about you
Kramer, if it really is RCC HOLDINGS INC, then why do they have the 3rd grade web site, started by randy newton, as there contact? Why under contact us is there no mention of NJ office? We need answers but we have needed that going on 5 years!!!!
When you have no shares in rcch and you keep posting , continuously, beating a dead horse it is not for current shareholders. So why would some , with NO MONETARY interest keep beating a no bid, chilled, .0001 stock? Couple things are very obvious to me. Gene newton has been a complete failure with this stock and his management skills to this point( also im not convinced he is no longer involved) 2nd , i trully believe some are very scared here, there really is no other explanation why you would post DAILY on a stock you dont own. This by no means is a excuse for newton and managements incompatence and disregard for shareholders. Whats funny is the only ones that believe it could come to life are the ones with no shares!!!!
Hahaha!! I remember that, I believe it was last march.
We know since 2008, when the uplist pr was released rcch has been a complete and utter failure. People,like myself, that did invest money have had 5 years of nothing. It is a fascinating stock. Usually when a stock lies dormont as long as this has the interest in it is zero.while there really been limited interest over the last year or two, there still is interest. The funny part is if you counted the post from those that HAVE NO SHARES in rcch for the last several years compared to REAL SHAREHOLDERS that post I think you would be shocked. Now that being said, gene newton and rcch have and is a complete failure to this point. His lack of respect for shareholders is indefensible. I don't subscribe to the basher theory keeping the stock down, that is a convenient excuse for people like newton . Now we all have to try to guess if newton is even with rcch anymore? If a settlement with the sec vs gendamare. Is reached what if any effect will it have? Right now anyone that has been beating this stock and newton into the ground has been correct, while defenders have a big fat ZERO next to there name. A lot of us wish somehow that could change, but see no evidence it will.
Thanks
Is H2omes rcch's?
what is this?
http://www.rccholdings.com/index.php/solesubidiary/international-home-solutions
The most interesting name on this list is Claude Smith. Newton had a falling out with him over IWS. I think newton is definitely out. Regardless , this whole situation is ridiculous. We will never really know the story. Newton will never address RCCH, IMO
Your right, total guess, but I think he is either furious or totally embarrassed by the latest set of events. I think Wyatt is correct when he said thorpe was very high on newton. I think thorpe NOW realizes how newton used him as a mouth piece. Only thorpe can clear that up though
It is looking more and more like that could be the case. I really hope not, but settlement, new people in charge,smells like this is going to RS. Shareholders always get screwed in the end it seems. Well one way or another hopefully we will know. This whole thing has been a disaster. I really hope newton is never allowed to hold a public trading company, if he is I hope people do there homework and look at his track record and learn from all our mistakes.
It is looking more and more like that could be the case. I really hope not, but settlement, new people in charge,smells like this is going to RS. Shareholders always get screwed in the end it seems. Well one way or another hopefully we will know. This whole thing has been a disaster. I really hope newton is never allowed to hold a public trading company, if he is I hope people do there homework and look at his track record and learn from all our mistakes.
It's becoming clearer each day what a con man newton is!! He got all our money, and I trully believe you will never hear from him again,concerning rcch. Maybe he starts another con in stinky pinky land, but if you actually believe he will release all that info you are asking him to do, I believe you will be waiting for 100 years!! If he released that it would show what a crook he is
he is meeting with gene in office down in florida( THE LOCAL DENNEYS RESTAURAUNT). all 60+ companyies presidents are there to, of course the denneys isnt that big so only a couple of them can sit with jim and gene at a time. he also has his public defender down there as council, along with essman and lux. someone said lux was also having a book signing at dennys. claude smith tried to get a table next to gene but was not permitted. very exciting times in rcch land!!!!
Luc, please stop it!!! you give credence to the old saying " there is a sucker born every minute". Geeze if your depending on anyone from a message board , that can flat out just lie with no repercussions then your in for a world of hurt my friend.
Trent , the only thing I do agree with you on is the certain posters on here continuously , with seemingly no shares involved. But the bottom line is this, that does not mean that rcch will ever be a viable profitable company. The red flags here are overwhelming, gene newton has LIED throughout . Really if the only glimmer of hope is the basher theory or the NSS then this company is totally screwed( which I believe it is) . Why is the inactivity of shortstoppers just glossed over? After all it was formed to handle the shorts,correct? Why is all the recent copy and paste businesses just ignored? Why is rcch off the petroleum co. Website? If , as some say he has over 50 company's why will he not get the chill lifted? Honestly I wish you guys were right just once about newton and rcch, just once. If you were we could actually make money instead of sitting in purgatory going on 5 years
For those who don't I have to ask why? At this point after all this time and the obvious track record and can any other honest conclusion be reached? I cannot see how.
2 explanations, PROMOTERS of the stock,, or the most gullible individuals in the world.
For those who don't I have to ask why? At this point after all this time and the obvious track record and can any other honest conclusion be reached? I cannot see how.
2 explanations, PROMOTERS of the stock,, or the most gullible individuals in the world.
Just like newton made the most out of nothing saying we have a $3.50 stock!! Keep supporting him and believing, that has worked really well hasn't it.
God, it is pathetic to hear the public defender argument!!! YOU CAN'T JUST ASK FOR ONE , YOU HAVE TO PROVE YOU CAN'T AFFORD A ATTORNEY TO QUALIFY FOR ONE!! Aka, this means you are broke as f&&&!!!!!!
Yes I do hype, just checked newtons legal records !! Now that's due diligence!!!! GOOD LUCK TO YOU
I noticed you said NOT TO MUCH CONTACT INFO , talking about buffet!! That is hysterical!!! Please, comparing a successful man like buffet with a con man like newton is laughable!!!! Keep reaching, show us some more research from 10 yrs ago, in case you haven't noticed we are stuck at no bid, chill , .0001 for how long now???? You can't contact newton and you know it, yet you continue to support a man that has lied for years now, why is that?? Forget it, everyone here knows the answer