Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Because only smart or sophisticated investors know whats coming to nphc because they read nphc's social media and company prs. People who dont do that obviously dont know whats coming.
Good find. I knew it had to be somewhere.
Maybe you should check another state. Just saying.
Not sure why this isn't sinking in, but the SEC is CIVIL. The DOJ handles CRIMINAL cases. The SEC CIVIL case does not extend the statute to file a CRIMINAL complaint/indictment. They (the DOJ) have 5 years from the EVENT or behavior to file the CRIMINAL complaint/indictment. All of the behavior that the govt has made allegations on happened in 2015 or earlier, so that ship has sailed. A tolling agreement with the SEC does not create a tolling agreement with the DOJ. They are completely separate. As you just stated, the tolling is“ applicable to any action or proceeding…brought by
…the Commission…including any sanctions or relief that may be imposed therein,”
Your interpretation is incorrect
Tony the tiger?
Not sure why this isn't sinking in, but the SEC is CIVIL. The DOJ handles CRIMINAL cases. The SEC CIVIL case does not extend the statute to file a CRIMINAL complaint/indictment. They (the DOJ) have 5 years from the EVENT or behavior to file the CRIMINAL complaint/indictment. All of the behavior that the govt has made allegations on happened in 2015or earlier, so that ship has sailed.
A tolling agreement with the SEC does not create a tolling agreement with the DOJ. They are completely separate. As you just stated, the tolling is“ applicable to any action or proceeding…brought by…the Commission…including any sanctions or relief that may be imposed therein,”
Your interpretation is incorrect
Watch as the sec loses the ripple case.
The time to do that is over. So that wont be happening.
some people need to be reminded like 10 or more times that its a civil case. there are no stripes.
SEC getting their asses handed to them in ripple case. An overreach just like nphc.
Things happened and is still happening.
Here is what's coming from Deitsch and NPHC
Multiple Sclerosis Trials
Government Grants for validation of NPHC Nerve Agent Countermeasure
Adding to NPHC's 21 Patents
Additional Social Media Endorsements
New Products from NPHC
Here is what Deitsch the CEO has done for NPHC in 19 years:
Pink Current Status
Added Many patents and trademarks to Nutra's portfolio
Clinical Trials in Multiple Phases
1. Multiple Sclerosis Trials
2. Herpes Simplex Infections 1 & 2 Trials
3. Adrenomyeloneuropathy Trials
4. HIV Trials
5. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Trials
6. Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials
7. Pain Trials
Products launched and brought to Market
1. Cobroxin
2. Nyloxin
3. Pet Pain Away
4. Equine pain Away
5. Luxury Feet
Published Research
http://receptopharm.com/drug_development/published_research.php
https://www.nutrapharma.com/research
Increased Sales on Amazon and Walmart
RPI-78M has received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for the treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis
Huge personal loans from Deitsch to NPHC tells me the CEO knows and believes in NPHC
You are wrong about NPHC
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No. No one knows and anyone that says so is just guessing. Otcnarkets is doing whatever they want.
You also pointed out nearly a year ago the ce would be off in a month.
the conversation wasn't about 10 years. it was about 4 years.
Assuming someone is buying and never selling is bad. I merely pointed out that you could've bought after the bad advice from one person and made money on more than 1 occasion.
YOu need to reread the threads again.
The thread was basically saying that you couldve had a better return putting your money into High-yield savings accounts, Series I savings bonds, Short-term certificates of deposit than nphc. But that was wrong as i will show below.
The time frame was 4 years ago from someone else in the same conversation talking about not buying nphc which i clearly showed from this chart below that you wouldve made so much more money buying nphc at that time and selling when it went up on two different occasions. Even if you missed the first run, you couldve traded on the second higher run.
Having your money in some small interest rate bank earning tiny amounts of interest calculating in inflation means you would have hardly earned anything.
Letting cash sit in your bank is bad too. inflation devalues it.
It's very easy. It's the time period that was in question. I never said they needed to hold for 4 years. Geeeesh. I simply pointed out the poster said nphc was a bad investment. I never said how long anyone has to hold their investment. Clearly, the poster was wrong. Here's the pic again where anyone that bought right after the poster made those remarks would've made bank.
I never once said longs or traders.
But great thinking you made a point.
even if you didnt sell after the first run, you couldve sold during the second run.
Would've made way more money in nphc in that time than:
--High-yield savings accounts
--Series I savings bonds
--Short-term certificates of deposit
History like every other stock shows the company will go up again as long as they are in business.
My premise was not wrong at all. You have to go back and read the thread to know whats going on.
In a nutshell, one poster said do not buy nphc and was warning everyone in early 2018. I posted the chart showing 2 huge spikes each having hundreds of millions of volume during these spikes providing liquidity to buy and sell.
There are many here that made money. Just need to read the history of the board to see that. Every single stock goes up and down. Knowing when to buy and sell is key to that.
It will be 4 years in September. I don't believe the sec has a case. I believe the sec is hoping and praying nphc goes out of business to save face. That's just my opinion though.
Not a 1000 a day. a single trade of 1000. Look at todays trades for instance. There were 41 total trades of which 26 trades were 1000 shares or less.
There were 8 sell trades of 100 shares or less. Theres your manipulation. Wheres the sec.
2 days ago NPHC was at .0016. The volume is so small at the moment that 1000 shares in any direction can moves nphc up or down more than 50 percent.
4 years ago the volume was 33+ Million shares a day.
There's a big difference.
There was huge money that was made. Its easy to understand. Chart shows you.
you are wrong as the nphc post time frame was 4 years ago. NPHC is still up. go look at a chart.
Everyone would have missed a couple of really good runs. In fact nphc is still up from 4 years ago.
The info posted was obvious. It is a current Retail Short position on NPHC. I didnt give any future target or hypothetical numbers. Maybe you are looking at the wrong post. Nothing silly about someone shorting with the proof to back it up.
There was an update at the end of march.
Maybe you went to one of the pages started by shorts.
here is the nphc twitter page.
https://twitter.com/nutrapharma/
You have to go to the correct NPHC twitter page to learn anything about the company.
Sec has been prosecuting people over made up false rumors.
I see you don't understand what I said. I wasn't talking about rik. I was talking about the false claim that so.wone heard the cell won't come off until 2025.
We all know that's a false claim.
Really from who??
Sounds like this would make an excellent sec complaint about fraud.
lol...it does unless you think the auditors are committing fraud. lol