Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No He won't. Telling everyone a hundred times wont make it come true.
So you are saying the SEC overreached in their allegations. Not surprising with the SEC today.
Just look at ripple as an example. Wow the SEC is getting their Asses handed to them there.
Its a civil case. Not a criminal case.
I have no idea why that is so difficult to understand.
Could have Hmmmm. Could being the speculation but then there is the likely scenarion presented below too. Hmmm.
so which is it? Cant guess on both.
Could and did are 2 completely different scenarios.
Everyone is just guessing until the court does something.
Very nice explanation.
Here is good reading for you. It will help you.
Nowhere in the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act does it say OTC Market Companies get a pass and the act doesn't apply to them.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sarbanesoxleyact.asp
What Is the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002?
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a law the U.S. Congress passed on July 30 of that year to help protect investors from fraudulent financial reporting by corporations.1? Also known as the SOX Act of 2002 and the Corporate Responsibility Act of 2002, it mandated strict reforms to existing securities regulations and imposed tough new penalties on lawbreakers.
RotenbergMeri discloses they audit using the PCAOB standards. There's your disclosure. That doesn't mean believe what a company says.
It means verity. Saying you don't believe Deutsch loaned the company money is akin to saying RotenbergMeri didn't verify.
In fact keep reading the 10k and you will see they were very specific in the loan ,/ notes payable and stock conversions auditing.
Our audit procedures related to evaluating the Company’s accounting for notes payable and related accounts included the following, among others:
Confirmation of selected notes payable and related terms.
Reviewing relevant documentation related to the issuance of convertible debt with attached warrants
Performing independent recalculations.
Determining if there were unusual transactions related to notes payable and the appropriate accounting treatment for such transactions.
Testing of selected transactions related to this matter.
/s/ Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C.
Guess your theory just got thrown out the window huh.
I guess you will bestow your fraud proof that RotenbergMeril committed fraud with NPHC Financials. I cant wait to read this.
Sure you do. accounting and auditing are 2 different jobs.
I understand the significance. You need to realize that a company doesn't need pre-approval to do trials. It is that simple.
When your phases are complete, a company can then submit the phase data to the fda.
It's that simple. you even state it.
From NPHC 10k
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Here are the auditing standards the US follows. It's worth reading.
https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards
You are confusing accounting with auditing.
The auditors dont tell nphc how and where to put info into their financials.
The auditors do however verify the numbers.
LMAO. You can do clinical studies without the fda and in different countries. If you want the studies recognized in the USA when all phases are completed, you then submit them to the fda.
You don't have any understanding of how a OTCM audit works.
Financials are audited with bank statements. Everyone knows this as fact. Disputing it is quite funny.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/audit
" a methodical examination and review"
You are confusing accounting with auditing.
NPHC goes thru independent outside Auditors. I would say those loans are 100% real unless you are saying the auditing company is isnt doing their job.
Indeed. NPHC
Nice full-page ad on Pet pain away.
https://digitalmag.petbusiness.com/petbusiness/december_2021/MobilePagedReplica.action?pm=2&folio=44#pg44
I disagree with you.
Nothing gets by you
That seems to be the logic some people have. amazes me.
If you dont look, you wont find.
Here is what Deitsch the CEO has done for NPHC in 19 years:
Added Many patents and trademarks to Nutra's portfolio
Clinical Trials in Multiple Phases
1. Multiple Sclerosis Trials
2. Herpes Simplex Infections 1 & 2 Trials
3. Adrenomyeloneuropathy Trials
4. HIV Trials
5. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Trials
6. Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials
7. Pain Trials
Products launched and brought to Market
1. Cobroxin
2. Nyloxin
3. Pet Pain Away
4. Equine pain Away
5. Luxury Feet
Published Research
http://receptopharm.com/drug_development/published_research.php
https://www.nutrapharma.com/research
Increased Sales on Amazon and Walmart
RPI-78M has received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for the treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis
Huge personal loans from Deitsch to NPHC tells me the CEO knows and believes in NPHC
What is this violation? We need proof.
words without substance are just words.
Where does it say that?
The so called promo that didn't make it anywhere was well after nphc hit above 1 cent.
You need to understand financial information. Those people converted their loans into stock. It's all in the financials.
Nphc has traded over a hundred million per day many times. Go back and look up a chart. Charts are helpful.
If OTCMarkets is blaming SEC Lawsuit for the CE, then why didn't the CE appear 3 years ago? OtcMarkets should have a specific reason given to the public as to why CEs are put on companies.
OTCMarkets made up this sec lawsuit rule. There are many companies in SEC Lawsuits on the Nasdaq right now that do not have their trading inhibited. You can buy and sell with no issue.
In Fact, only at the beginning of this year has it been an issue to trade CE stocks.
1045 companies with 1046 CEs as of 11/19/21.
Really, there is only 1 Company that has a preferred stock that is listed 2 times. only 1. There are 3 other companies that show preferred but are not listed twice.
There are 1045 CEs.
Just so you know, the whole number issue of CEs was with OTCMarkets as a whole. Not limited to only American stocks. OTCMarkets also handles Foreign stocks which can be bought in the US and which would be included in any number cause OTCMarkets still has to review them.
Just Google it. Do u have to screen shot that too. Did you figure out how to use the otcmarkets screamer?
It was really simple. But if you need help, just send me a message.
saying no one has money as a retail customer to short NPHC, a penny stock, is just plain ridiculous. My info is guaranteed.
Also, brokerages are not subject to the $2.50 rule. just look up how the sec fines them all the time for not reporting short positions.
I hope this gives you a better understanding of how shorting works so the hilarious narrative of NPHC being shorted has caused enough embarrassment.
I posted absolute proof. My Data comes from a major broker. Because you dont understand how shorting works doesnt mean it doesnt happen.
Again 2 things are in play.
1)The report only shows the actual number on the last day of the reporting period. the report does not show what happened in the middle.
2)Brokerages get fined all the time for not reporting short positions. Look up sec fines broerage sho. Bet you couldn't believe that there are bad actor brokerages.
Oh then please post which grant nphc applied to.
My point is very clear and easy to understand, you were saying as if they weren't getting a grant.
You dont know that at all. nice opinion.
Prove it. Nobody knows this unless they work for otcmarkets.
Otherwise its just an opinion.
The correct CE companies are still 1050. GO to otcmarkets.com for right info.