Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Personally - I put the blame on the judges and BIG TIME on the NINE idiots
DOJ - be it DJT or Joe - are doing their job
Judges should do theirs and rule for equity
Yes
I heard that 90% (to include VW $??)
anyway - the driver-owner did note prices are going up
indeed - as possible (new and newer) NKLA should try and set the price to equal that of a new equivalent diesel. 10% is a great starting point but NKLA needs more income per truck - and IMO - constantly rising prices (which drives demand --- given the demand is apparently there already per the voucher reports)
I will gladly agree with the word release as in release AS IF NONE of this happened
My sense - my HOPE - lots of so called obligation is wiped out - as first major step
No dividends need be paid - to themselves or by IOU to GOV
Just keep the profit earned as cash
Then ---- IMO - there will be some sort of ?? action ?? and not just a "never mind - go back to the start and its all over
the lowest number - price - is likely GOV subsidized over and over
but ---- glad to see CHINA is producing GREEN H big time
all part of the building out the road we need for NKLA trucks
no direct impact - while in C ship but
Sales of newly-built homes in the U.S. fell slightly in February, as mortgage rates inched up.
Question
Regardless of R or D - DJT or Joe or ??
Does a POTUS really need the head of FHFA if he/she has their person in at DOJ and Treasury
My impression from the start (remember the power of Paulson !! in a different world) ---- the head of FHFA is not that important for the BIG and BIGGER decisions as compared to head of Treasury and Justice?
what say you
yes and no
a lot of trucks are bought and paid for and waiting NKLA expense to fix them
but - I recall -- ANYONE ????? --- that NKLA produced about 150 trucks with batteries that they never sold and that is MASSIVE %% profit when they are sold ---- (but boy it is slower than slow)
Anyone else remember - how many trucks - battery - did NKLA in essence over build ?
seeds
one must plant seeds
and in a world where China is planting 10 seeds a day ---- USA must catch up
some seeds will not grow !!! reality
some seeds - like the internet from DARPA - can be so massive a win it is hard to comprehend
seeds
?
several courts and judges say that Congress must be involved ---- IF the GSEs are to take any form different from what they were when the C ship entered
POTUS can take a lot of steps that will seriously help our PPS (e.g. 20X in PPS from below)
1. Say no dilution by LP/SP
2. Say the LP/SP is paid off - by the 300 B to GOV for the 200B from GOV
3.etc.
But moves to make them a public utility or IMO to add say 10B shares (outside the Warrants) likely requires congress
??
Hi
A lot more than I do - (not counting trading shares -- but even with that - it is lot more than me)
my point about number of shares relates to PPS of the company stock (listed on pink or NASDAQ or NYSE)
right now 1B or so shares
Can be 5B with warrant exercise (still IMO leaving a healthy PPS for our 1B portion)
Can be 100B - if the GOV wants to and can exchange the 200B they argue is not paid back for common stock)
To me - that is the big issue -------- if we are released or WHEN we are released --- how many shares - or what portion of the total are we
100% at 1B
20% at 5B
01% or so if diluted big time by the GOV
to me that is what matters the most
yes but
always a but
how many shares --- ?
what % of company do we own ? 100% 20% 1%
all will matter big time to us
release can be very different - depends on how many shares total
yes political but - but - who gets elected in November will IMO have MASSIVE impact on companies that depend on several more years of major FEDERAL help for clean energy alternatives - big time
I fear DJT (that it may well be our last election - seriously - history teaches us)
Yet - national polls show he is up about two points on Biden
Horrible for clean energy ---- (put aside we now produce daily the most oil of any nation and any time in our history)
Biden - IMO as a liberal - has done a lot for infrastructure - chips - ACA subsidies - and Western Leadership - but that does not seem to sink in with many Americans who face the food inflation that remains stubborn . Another term could be very good for H Trucks from NKLA
The $54.20 per share offer represents a premium of about 38% to Twitter's close on April 1, 2022, the last trading day before Mr. Musk disclosed his stake in Twitter.
?
I really need to look this up
not counting any sort of dividend or interest if you prefer ---- the GSEs have clearly paid back the money given - invested in - lent to - the GSEs
IMO - that sort of 300 on the 200 -- would allow the GOV to CLAIM they were paid back - and to me that is key !!!!
Yet at say 800 Million a year (4% if 200B from the git go) - over 15 years - even a normal or regular pay out in dividends or interest leaves an open question
TO ME - THE GOV can claim it was paid back - just SHOUT we put in 200B and got out 300B - say it over and over
yes that is trading - good or bad
investing should be long and longer term
so - to help build the H infrastructure - and yes that includes NKLA trucks and stations -
all H for one year at same level
then the "help for blue - or non green" H is down 10% but the green H gets 100%
then the help for blue is 80% of the help for Green
and so on an so forth
If DJT gets elected - and puts on the brakes -- and the HELP was all focused on GREEN -- we will be nowhere at all - there needs to be a BIAS to GREEN and a phase in
As an owner in NKLA equity - I would love a huge and larger immediate subsidy for so called Blue H
As a Grandfather I still want some "runway" - but the bias to so called Green H makes sense if the goal is to accelerate that production -- even if it is not immediate
As both - give me some runway on methane - of say 2 years -- (a number plucked out of the air -- but based on what i read at the petroleum based company websites as they move to GREENER H - and need an incentive that is BIASED to green)
I have some JPS
I have some FMCC
I have FNMA
I do not think of the payout on JPS or FMCC being of any significance in $$ terms
The significance was an 8-0 Jury saying we were robbed and owed some (math determined Judge driven) compensation
The significance is it has been set and grows during Appeal
And I guess when GOV loses appeal it will be significant
But overall the message - by the jury decision - that we were robbed is the 1 2 3 4 5 most important aspects here - IMO
I have forgotten how much I lost on what I held pre Thievery
I have forgotten how much I lost on what I bought at low after low after low
I have forgotten how much I MADE - GAINED on trading (a bunch but likely less than the above --- but never a major part of planning for retirement or paying for sons college --- sort of 10% of equity max at any time)
Now - have been quiet - no buying or selling that I recall for CY 22 CY 23 or so far this year
That is what I am going to take a look at ---- assume 12/31/2021 is my cost basis !! - for holding these last ~~ 30 months
Hope to show a profit -- will be interesting
To some degree the above is stupid (it is money) and to some degree one must look forward ---- own only if you think it will go up - not to hold until and until and until you are even
good luck to all
Interesting
And third grade teacher !!!!
Thank you
?
Do you really think that day trading and short selling 'hurt' the stocks of say the 200 largest listed companies? (95% -98% of the $ action of all markets) ?
A ton of short selling is done by hedge funds for very real and good reasons
I would agree - stocks that trade pink sheet can be pushed around -- but I do not think these stocks (I speculate with 2 -3 ) represent capitalism
Thank you
and it too acts as if FNMA is not a stock under "pressure" from being stock in a FHFA conservatorship
Re income
that is a word used many different ways
I prefer Revenue - Expense and if Revenue is > Expense then income
but --- one can use gross income and net income
there should be revenue Q1 ------ the question is --- how long until there is ""income"" (Cash $$ - above the true cash marginal cost of opening and operating the mobile location) (The reported net income might include expenses from the parent company that are not a marginal cash cost)
Was a Broker-Retirement planner- financial adviser
each day there was discussion of markets etc.
I am 100% convinced what I say can not influence the future (something one has to convince themselves of - in my job - now retired)
EGAD
WTF
How do so called smart analysts talk about FNMA as if its "normal" and not under the AX of the FEDERAL GOV ?
I hope for the best --- and will not sell -- but how do they talk about earnings and operations with no mention of Conservatorship (danger)?
written as if the world was normal and we owned our company
I seriously wonder if that was not some AI bot
as if F and F were owned by shareholders
what idiots
(and I have a subscription !! - may need to cancel)
the system was against him
Sec of Treasury
Sec of Department of Justice - Attorney General !!
both positions 100% his for four years
and nothing good for FNMA - nothing -- enough excuses
Four up days in a row?
Chris Roberts is right
how does the WSJ write about F and F as if they respond to more profits that help equity holders?
what ignorance or ?
none of the dividends paid by F and F went anywhere but Treasury
neither DJT nor BO and their people diverted any such dividend to a non appropriated purpose
no he did not
he could not
why
not the pattern from prior DJT rally
At that time - I asked
Will the market focus on the supply of parts constraints leading to slower production
or
Will the market realize that the WSJ wrote the article
Without talking about 99% fall
Without talking bout the prior scandal rolling down the hill
Wrote the article in a way the treats NKLA as an ongoing concern - in early life - where demand is outstripping supply. i.e. while the news is bad - THE REPORT in WSJ itself is positive
Yes
The WSJ and then MARKETPLACE article that appeared WSJ pre market on Wed
exactly
there appears to be a trade here
the decline in PPS was the air coming out of the expectation -- right or wrong