Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'll believe in "change" when I see sweeping indictments in congress, Wall Street and the banking industry. Until then, it's business as usual.
My question raised again, why isn't there a law or regulation requiring the "banksters" to wear masks when they conduct their affairs?
No Laws Were Broken
"It looks like the EU is getting a bailout from the IMF that could be nearly $800 billion. Gold is going straight up, and I am sure global stock markets will also surge on the bailout news."
http://usawatchdog.com/wall-street-fraud-eu-imf-bailout-but-no-laws-were-broken/
Interesting Level 2 action. Looks like someone is doing their best to keep it from going past .12. Aggressive buyer(s) today.
2 considerably undervalued silver plays, SVM & MGN:
http://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=svm
http://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=mgn&ty=c&ta=1&p=d
Disclosure: I'm long calls SVM
Gold is very probably the ONLY asset that will emerge out of the
Euro-Swamp with any semblance of value. My long unanswered question: Why doesn't the law require bankers to wear masks when they do business?
European Banks Frantically Trying To Dump $7 Trillion Of Crap Assets -- But No One Will Buy Them
http://www.businessinsider.com/european-banks-frantically-trying-to-dump-7-trillion-of-crap-assets-but-no-one-will-buy-them-2011-11
Yeah, I've averaged down quite a bit, as well. That's something I rarely do.
Great selling opportunity to take advantage of today.
Back in the game with calls. Chart's hinting at a turnaround.
Couldn't have said it better.
Don't pass up a good chance.
Might be a good day for those that are unhappy to sell if the volume holds.
Nice find!
Here's a miner worth keeping an eye on:
http://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=uxg&ty=c&ta=1&p=d
The CEO for UXG is the former CEO for Goldcorp, one of the most efficient gold miners globally.
Thanks for correcting that.
True, I've had many advise me about that.
Some don't take their own advice, run from board to board badmouthing multiple stocks, yet refuse to post facts or want to do serious DD on their favorite pump.
That's the strategy, change the subject. How did I know I wouldn't get an answer? So much for facts.
T'would be nice to have this fellow in our congress:
Yes, but I secured the correct number. Would you like it so you can interview them and share it with your board? You like to keep them factually informed, right? Let me know, I'll post the number for you. As for Mercator, you're the one that keeps comparing the
Emerald to them. Aren't you the least bit curious why a company that is aggressively expanding their interests wouldn't want to snap up such a logistically cost effective mine like the Emerald? I mean, Mercator's right there with all their manpower, all their equipment and an ability to put the Emerald into production quickly, right? Surely that is something you'd want to share with all your faithful followers on the SIRG board, right?
No bashing here, I sincerely hope this finally works out for you. 8 years is a long time. I'm in another stock where some have been waiting 20+ years, but I'll be the first to say I don't have that kind of patience. GLTY
Stupid questions??? I remember a bunch of double-talking vague statements being removed, but they weren't mine. Why not simply answer the question instead of calling people stupid? Why didn't Mercator jump on the Emerald? That lease was available for years and they're within spitting distance of each other. Seems a bit odd in light of the fact that Mercator has been and continues to expand its interests. Also, you conveniently never answered the other question, did you interview the prior owner of the Emerald?
It does. Question is, will it hold?
Good point Gem.
Good question. The only thing that makes me "think" something good is coming is the fact that all the heavyweights are still in place. This gives rise to hope, but the elongated timeline does create an uncomfortable sense of anxiety. I have kind of a mix of "think" and "hope" at this point.
True, but one who repetitively posts the same thing over and over and over comes across as having an agenda whether they do or not.
No, have at it. I think what irritates most folks is repetitive day after day after day saying the same exact thing.
Totally agree.
How many $$$$$$$ to do that, any idea? When they going to re-open? Have you interviewed the prior owners yet? Why didn't Mercator snap up that Emerald lease that was available for so many years? You're aware they're side-by-side neighbors, right? Who's going to provide the financing? SIRG will be able to pick and choose their lender, right?
Very possible.
LOL. Someone's been slapped with a couple cease and decists and informed warning time is over.
You'll have to do your own DD. How many lenders are pounding a path to SIRG's doorstep? I know you have some inside on that that's not yet public. Imagine the heartbreak now being felt at the Mercator Mine knowing, as you've touted repeatedly, that Emerald's first year production will match Mercator's production before their expansion. I'll bet Mercator's kicking themselves in the butt for not grabbing the Emerald's lease for all those years it was available, right? After all, Mercator's been expanding for some time now. What a shame they'd miss such an opportunity when they're within spitting distance, next-door neighbors. Unreal, huh.
Wow, sure makes the current SP look cheap, eh. With those kind of results the company will have the lenders beating down their doors. No worry about the company having to resort to toxic financing with such pristine results.
You should post this article on your SIRG board. Any reason why you don't?
Yeah, let's encourage him to see how much more money he'll cost the company. IR is there for a reason, he can go through them first just like anyone else who has a sense of responsibility and doesn't want to cause any more trouble or expense to the company.
That isn't all they're saved from. LOL
Oh, all the shareholders post on this board? Are you serious?
People do sell TEVE, but believe what makes you happy. Type it as slow as you want. By the way, when did the word "everyone" become an excluding adjective?
"Everyone of the shareholders..."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69001280
Like I said, read the thread to see how real questions are treated on this board.
Wrong. And you don't know all the shareholders and certainly don't speak for them. Anyone notice what happens on this board when real questions are asked? Read the thread.
Well, you think as you wish. You don't speak for everyone. I've received numerous PMs from various folks that contradict your perception totally. As I mentioned, I don't DD off message boards, so you're right about that.
Possibly you could develop a rapport with management and get those questions answered. Certainly shareholders have a right to know such things, no reason they would be considered out of bounds. Absent explanations from management on the questions I iterated all that remains is a palpable void full of question marks. How does one DD a void?