Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Assuming the process for Mexus is the same - heap leach, cyanide solution, Merrill-Crowe some may enjoy seeing how its done:
https://www.comstockmining.com/files/video/20120929_firstpour.mp4
While waiting for the two drivers (JV and land sales) watch for a change in ownership among the only two that matter:
John Winfield Common Stock 46,165,201 25.7%
Van Den Berg Management, Inc. Common Stock 30,189,136 16.1%
Hopefully that particular change is due to investor complaints. That would indicate that they at least hear us.
That would most likely be a question for the Company. Seems odd that one would be singled out like that - especially Bill Nance.
Thank you for attending and relaying to me and others what you heard. It seems my assumptions were correct. Coupled with the PR released last evening, I expect to see a drop in pps. I will be, quite frankly, surprised if that is not the case.
Here's hoping the real estate investments pay off. With no cash, the inability to take on debt, there is only one way left to handle the $1mil Sutro deal you describe below. 5500 acres? That will increase the land position by ~60% - is that correct?
Comstock Mining's technical reports are posted on their, now, hideous website. Those NI 43-101 technical reports were done by an independent third party: Behre-Dolbear - with better than 100 years experience in the mining industry. http://www.dolbear.com/
Without question, resources, should not and, do not carry the weight of proven and probable reserves. However, to completely dismiss the cost and effort that went into those reports would be disingenuous.
I completely agree that people should be concerned, and recent events have not instilled confidence; however, this IS a penny stock, as is every stock that trades for less than $5.00 per share, and should be viewed as such. I do not agree with the statement you made "The only way a prudent investor can be reasonably sure (and it's still no guarantee) that profitable could occur at the Dayton, Lucerne or any mine, is through an independent analysis that looks at all the potential costs and returns - which CMI has never done and never will do."
#1 - a "prudent investor" would never invest in a penny stock. This one, or any other.
#2 - I could make a really, really long list of the "never will do" things people have said about this company. They were proven wrong.
I reached out to someone else, and he has told me he will ask. Hopefully, the company will issue something after the meeting, but I am not holding my breath.
You really need to stop. Willful ignorance is stupidity.
Vanguard decreased their position by almost 6%.
Please don't be shy and ask the hard questions. I'm sure you have your own. Here are just a few of mine:
When exactly are drills going to start running?
Expected costs for exploration and development this calendar year?
Will any exploration / development be done if the land deals do not go through as expected?
How will material in the Dayton/Spring Valley area be processed? As in, will it be hauled to American Flat or will a new processing facility be required?
Are they waiting for the results of the new tech to come in before making those kinds of decisions? If so, what other tests/requirements need to occur outside of the currently running column tests?
Tell Corrado and my personal favorite, Larry Martin, Kimberly says hello. I spent years asking questions for investors, but I cannot go this time. Hoping someone else will ask the questions that actually matter.
Bobby - With a new job, another kid graduating college, harassing the powers that be at the other company I follow and just life in general, I haven't had the time to read all the info here. At the risk of starting a fire, I was wondering if you could give me some info:
#1 - Estimate of costs - if I understand correctly, MarMar will be reimbursed 100% for the up-front costs - do you know how much that is or the best estimate? Then it is a 50% split, correct?
#2 - Cost estimate once stabilized. Understanding that it is going to take some time to get everything up, running and stable
#3 - recovery estimate - it is impossible to recover 100% - gold/siver ratio and recovery % of each metal?
#4 - mining/processing days? 24/7 365 a year is unlikely - at least for now??
What I skimmed shows they have a 3 million ton capacity currently? Assuming that can be expanded?
Thanks! K
Comstock Mining Progresses Strategic Activities
Full PR: http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/05/12/984221/0/en/Comstock-Mining-Progresses-Strategic-Activities.html
The relevent part of the PR:
"The Company recently extracted additional mineralized samples from the Dayton Resource Area, for the purpose of assessing optimum metallurgical feasibility for the Dayton mineralized material. The samples were crushed, agglomerated and loaded into four ten-foot columns for leach pad simulation. These simulations are located on-site, in the Company’s metallurgical labs, and funded by U.S. National Science Foundation research grants through Cycladex Inc., a strategic investee and partner. This simulation is focused on comparing cyanide-based leaching alongside “Cycladex Lixiviant” based leaching so we can provide a preliminary assessment for determining the fastest, most efficient and economically feasible process solution.
Mr. De Gasperis noted, “We completed a scoping column test in the first quarter and have now established four, full metallurgical column tests, two cyanide and two non-cyanide, running parallel, that support and advances the feasibility study for establishing proven and probable reserves at the Dayton Mine. Preliminary results from these columns would be available mid-July.”
The Company also advanced three out of four strategic venture discussions this week and anticipates that at least one transaction will occur during the second quarter."
They still own the hotel. It is being leased and operated by a third party. I saw a post on the hotel's Facebook page and thought the same, so I asked the Company and was told not sold, new operator.
They have posted a new presentation and photos of the non-mining assets held for sale are on the bottom of page 11. Those are:
Gold Hill Hotel, acreage & water rights in Silver Springs and the Daney Ranch property.
http://www.comstockmining.com/images/stories/investor-library/LODEOverviewAPRIL2017.pdf
Lester - I'm not wrong. I'm realistic and I take a considerable amount of time actually reading the filings and then doing the calculations. When I see posts that are blatantly false and/or mis-leading or when someone is asking a genuine question that I believe I can provide information to, I will respond with factual information, with supporting evidence - such as links to the actual company filings, technical reports, institutional holding, short interest, etc...
I am a shareholder. I have no more access to information than anyone else does. I simply utilize every tool that I have available from SEC filings to the county (Storey & Lyon) recorders office to the county planning & commission meeting agenda and minutes of those meetings. When I am unclear of something, I ask the COMPANY for clarity.
That being said, I would not be a shareholder if I did not see the potential for great value here. For years, people said they would never mine and never produce silver and gold. I knew they would and I put up the cash to purchase a dore bar from the first pour and I put up the cash to purchase the 150th silver commemorative that is .9999 pure Comstock Mining Inc. silver.
The company has hard earned and very costly assets that are worth great value. Getting the proper zoning and permits in the historic district is huge. The infrastructure, hard assets, like the Merrill-Crowe facility, fresh water pond, leach pond, permitted and expandable leach pad, crusher are there.
There are numerous other items that have cost a great deal of money to accomplish, but will have a very positive impact for shareholders IF the company can develop and deliver an economical mine plan. That is the unknown. I have no doubt that the gold/silver is in the ground. I have no doubt that the drill results, like the previous ones, will be positive. The question is: can it be mined at a profit?
I don't know and neither do you. I remain a shareholder because I believe that they have learned costly, but very valuable lessons while mining the very small section of the Lucerne, that they will consider as they develop out the much larger Lucerne area, Dayton, Spring Valley, northern section, etc...
Mining is a VERY costly venture. It would be foolish for any shareholder or potential shareholder to think that they are done spending. Without immediate revenue to cover those costs, the money comes from somewhere. Who do you think pays the bills? Whether through interest payments on loans, payments in future production of silver/gold or shares of commons stock? Answer: shareholders.
Just keep it real with both eyes wide open.
Do you have any idea how much cash they had after the recap? I'll give you a hint...it was in the 10K. Do you know how much their annual payments are for claims, the NCJV, etc...?? I'll give you a hint....it is in the 10K. Of course, you have to take the time to add it all up. Do you know how much G&A will be for 2017? Again, it was in the 10K and in the PR. If you add up all the known bills, not including any costs for exploration drilling, you will find that they do not have enough funds. That is why they go into very great detail to tell the public about a $2mil loan, an ATM facility that had approx $4M available. So....no, they are not fully funded.
Next, they just filed a new prospectus with a 2nd ATM facility allowing for $3.25M to be raised.
BTW - ATM means "at the market". This is a MUCH MUCH MUCH better deal than a public offering, but it is still dilution. They have had the first one in place since early summer last year and have utilized only a small portion. Which is good news. It means that they have been very careful with the cash they have.
It is just foolish to say that they are funded when they have clearly put forth, not once, but twice, the intention to raise funds via these various facilities which will increase the share count and thus dilute existing shareholders. Let's not forget the drilling deal with American Mining. Oh, and interest payments on the debenture (which you should not be all that happy about, btw) and then there would be the repayment on the $2m loan if it was exercised.
You don't take out loans and file registration statements if you have enough cash to make it through the next 2-3 years. It's not rocket science.
As for me being on the sidelines....you clearly don't know me.
That is simply not true. They absolutely are NOT funded into 2019.
Read the prospectus filed after market today coupled with the 10K.
Education is a powerful thing.
If insiders were buying (or selling) they would have to file Form 4.
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001120970&type=&dateb=&owner=only&count=40
If the link works, you will see that the last Form 4 filed was in November of 2016.
You will not see the actions taken by the institutional holders during the first qtr until approx May 15th.
It is simply not hard to figure out. If a company, on a consistent basis, delivers at or above expectations, the price increases. If it does not, the price declines. Stagnation - no demonstrable movement forward - equates to stagnant or decline in price.
Short interest is fairly low @ approx 1%
http://shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=lode&submit=Short+Quote%E2%84%A2
Short Interest (Shares Short)
1,239,700
Short Interest Ratio (Days To Cover)
6.1
Short Percent of Float
0.96 %[color=red][/color]
Short % Increase / Decrease
4 %
Short Interest (Shares Short) - Prior
1,189,700
Shares Float
128,791,100
Trading Volume - Today
206,490
Trading Volume - Average
204,800
Trading Volume - Today vs. Average
100.83%
% Owned by Insiders
13.02%
% Owned by Institutions
21.40%
Earnings Per Share
PE Ratio
Market Cap.
$ 39,262,395
% From 52-Wk High ($ 0.50)
-58.10%
% From 52-Wk Low ($ 0.19)
10.26%
% From 200-Day MA ($ 0.26)
-20.78%
% From 50-Day MA ($ 0.24)
-13.12%
It's always better to provide a source and complete information:
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/lode/institutional-holdings/activity
Institutional Ownership 29.43%
Total Shares Outstanding (millions) 187
Total Value of Holdings (millions) $14
Increased Positions 11 - 256,057
Decreased Positions 12 - 638,644
Held Positions 20 - 54,247,998
Total Institutional 43 - 55,142,699
Add John Winfield Common Stock 48,165,201
(see most recent 10K)
No preferred stock and appears that as of 12/31/2016 there are only 190,000 shares that could potentially be issued under the warrant and restricted stock categories (see most recent 10K).
Transcript of cc is posted on Seeking Alpha.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/4054300-comstock-minings-lode-ceo-corrado-de-gasperis-q4-2016-results-earnings-call-transcript
To read full transcript you would have to sign up for a free account if you don't already have one.
The 43-101 question is asked and answered along with other ramblings.
One must know how to read between the lines. Example: if the drilling reveals more positive than expected, they will most likely continue with the drill program and the 43-101 will be delayed. If the modeling is accurate, the weather allows them to begin drilling on their pre-determined schedule, the contractor is available and they have funds, they will complete drilling in October and use the winter time to work on the report.
NI 43-101 Perspective for Investors
http://www.rpacan.com/site_Files/Content/Downloads/NI_43101_In_Perspective_for_Investors.pdf
Some may find value.
Re-posting the same inaccurate "fair market valuation" does not make it true.
#1 - you are using the wrong share count
#2 - the last NI 43-101 was issued in 2013
I could go on and on, but we've been through this before.
Try reading the newly released 10-K and PR.
Give it a rest.
Vanguard is an INDEX FUND. A computer algorithm determines shares held.
This has been explained to you numerous times. The position changed by less than 9,000 shares. That equates to less than $2,500. Do you truly believe that an investment manager personally evaluated and determined that this billion dollar fund should purchase less than $2500 in stock for the qtr?
Nope. A computer algorithm determined that based on industry, sector, market cap, geographic location that the dollar amt should be "x" and the shares were purchased. Next time it could go the other way.
What investors should be happy about is that Van Den Berg maintains its better than 30% ownership, that US Global, Royce and Gabelli has held steady and that the decrease in Sun Valley Gold is negligible. Those are actively managed and real people actually review the companies in their portfolios.
We can agree the potential for a significant increase in gold equivalent ounce resource not only exists but is quite likely, provided the company has the resources to resume the already laid out comprehensive drill program.
I have my personal wish list for this company:
#1 - That the company provide a clear and concise short and long-term outlook coupled with guidance for costs to achieve
#2 - That the company expend whatever resources are necessary to develop and conduct a complete drill program for each target area
#3 - That based upon the actual core and RC drill results and geologic modeling expend whatever resources are necessary to complete at minimum an EA to determine whether the cost to develop each target will generate a ROI
#4 - To determine and publish the results with complete costs, with sound judgement for those costs. This would include determining what the PM pricing would have to be to make each project economical. Low grade ore can be economical at high gold/silver prices but will kill a company when prices are low (see Allied Nevada and Midway Gold if you don't believe me).
#5 - That the company makes all projections based on a highly conservative basis (much like accountants use lower of cost or market and NEVER higher than cost) so that it places itself in a position to under-promise and over-deliver versus the other way around. I am NOT talking about fudging expectations or in any way mis-leading, but rather building in a buffer so that the market does not react negatively to the company missing an objective by a short time period.
#6 - That should the company find itself unable to meet a stated objective or timeline, notify the market immediately as to the cause/effect, rather than waiting for the next qtr/annual report. There are things that the company cannot control causing resources to be deployed in areas that it either never planned or planned for a later date. An example of this is the road construction project. It was always planned; however, the storm and resultant damage required resources to be expended at a time when it was not most advantageous.
If you have been a holder since 2008 then you are perfectly aware of the hype that drove the pps up and the collapse that followed. The company should rise or fall on its own merit - not on speculation and promotion, or conversely, on speculation and defamation, of what may or may not happen.
#1 - Vanguard is an index fund. This means that dollars are designated for investment across industry/sector/mkt cap group. It is not an individual investment manager decision. We won't know until they file for 4th qtr, due by February 15, whether or not they are still holding. The institutions that matter are those like US Global, Van Den Berg, Sun Valley Gold, and Royce. Those are managed funds.
#2 - You need to understand the GF deal. From the PR: "The Company issued an 11% Senior Secured Debenture due 2021 in the amount of $10,723,000. The Debenture is secured by the pledge of the equity interests in all of the Company’s subsidiaries and substantially all of the Company’s assets." This would indicate that they don't have much to lose. If CMI fails to make the required payments, GF Capital owns everything.
#3 - I am fully versed in this Company and its potential. I have been invested here since 2008 and have a substantial amount of money at risk. My issue with your original post was the better than $10 "fair market valuation" you are insinuating without proper metrics.
What you are failing to recognize is that it is impossible to base any valuation on the 3.2M oz. First, the ounces include silver ounces converted to gold equivalent base on "[1] Gold equivalent ounces were calculated using January 31, 2013 London PM prices of $1,664.75 per ounce of gold and $32.03 per ounce of silver, as published by kitco.com. This resulted in a ratio of 51.97 ounces of silver per equivalent ounce of gold, without taking into consideration the relative recoveries of gold and silver. The Company’s current estimates for heap leach recovery are 70% for gold and 45% for silver."
Those prices do not remain the same today. Nor does the conversion ratio. It now takes 69 ounces of silver to equal one ounce of gold (as opposed to 51.97 ounces), so the 3.2M ounces no longer stands. Further, you fail to account for the recovery. Originally, they were looking at 70% for gold and 45% for silver. The gold recovery ended up being much better at around 85% and 57% for silver. Now, let's take those numbers and apply against the total resource, measured, indicated and inferred.
Gold = 2,582,000 * .85 = 2,194,700
Silver = 22,890,000 * .57 = 13,047,300 / 69 = 189,091
So, we have a possible 2,383,791 recoverable gold equivalent, not 3.2M ounces.
I also understand the difference between a resource and a reserve. I also understand the enormity of infrastructure, permits, legal, claim and a myriad of other costs associated with mining.
BTW - per the Fact Sheet on the home page of the website, the company is showing Common Shares Outstanding of 188.7M.
Again, people should read the reports filed by the Company and direct questions to the company with regard to valuations, cap-ex costs (which they have not stated) and the like.
That is straight up ridiculous.
I trust that any person that has ever invested in a PM stock can see through that and toss that notion straight into the garbage bin. If you think they will make $600 dollar profit on every ounce of gold you are lacking information. There are significant costs that still need to be funded before another ounce is poured.
#1 - The 3.2 million ounces you are referring to are resources - measured, indicated and inferred. Not proven and not probable reserves.
#2 - The cutoff grade for those ounces is quite low - at current gold/silver prices (even at $1500 gold) much would not be economical.
#3 - You post quite a bit about underground mine development. I would encourage you to carefully read the last 10Q filing and listen carefully to the last conference call that is posted on the company website. The focus is no longer Lucerne. All emphasis has been moved to the Dayton/Spring Valley area. Which, unless a drill program shows significantly higher grades will be surface mining.
I, like you and everyone else that reads this board, am anxiously awaiting the 10K and conference call where, hopefully, a clear, concise and meaningful plan will be detailed.
Expect that not to happen on the 9th.
The company ALWAYS issues a PR advising of the conference call date, typically about a week out. If the past is indicative of the future, the earnings release and filing of the 10K will come at or about the same time as the conference call date.
Hello Rich.
I posted here earlier as to what I believe the catalysts are for this company. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125596529
I am hoping for a cohesive, detailed plan; however, I have no expectation. Had the company resumed drilling or sold real estate that materially affected the balance sheet, I believe they would have announced. When the 10Q is filed, I will read it cover to cover as I always do and if I am available I will listen to the call.
I would encourage any that are able to participate in the call to do so. Ask your questions. Express your expectations.
As to the other, I have skin in the game.
Comstock Mining Announces Notice of Third Quarter 2016 Results and Business Update Conference Call
VIRGINIA CITY, Nev., Oct. 13, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Comstock Mining Inc. (“Comstock Mining” or “the Company”) (NYSE MKT:LODE) will host a conference call on Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time/11:00 a.m. Eastern Time to report Third Quarter 2016 results and provide a business update.
The live call will include a moderated Q&A, after the prepared remarks. The dial-in telephone numbers for the live audio are as follows:
US / Canada Toll Free: 800-279-9534
International: 719-457-2080
The audio will be available, usually within 24 hours of the call, and for 30 days thereafter, at http://www.comstockmining.com/investors/investor-library
[url]
www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/10/13/879387/0/en/Comstock-Mining-Announces-Notice-of-Third-Quarter-2016-Results-and-Business-Update-Conference-Call.html[/url][tag]insert-text-here[/tag]
The price of gold is irrelevant with respect to this company.
Economical ounces, detailed mine plans, permits and the money to act will be the driving factors here.
Infrastructure, zoning and production permits (Air/Water) are in place; however, the drilling, assays, technical and other reports, and other costs associated with developing the mine plan to enable further permitting are not free. All of which must be completed before any new mining/material stacking is done.
With production from the existing material on the heap coming to an end, what little cash has been generated over the past quarter is not enough to fund all of those costs in addition to the run of the mill expenses every business must pay.
Non-mining asset disposal will reduce liabilities and put cash on the balance sheet, asuming that the company is: a)able to sell them and b)able to sell them for the desired amount.
As has been stated before - if the answer you seek cannot be found via the company website, NDEP, sec.gov, or via the numerous state and county resources easily available to those willing to use them, CALL OR EMAIL THE COMPANY until they respond to your satisfaction.
CALPERS held but did not increase.
You have asked others for their data sources, perhaps it is time you start providing yours.
Holders Shares
Increased Positions 9 169,289
Decreased Positions 12 1,619,938
Held Positions 19 52,594,810
Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/lode/institutional-holdings#ixzz4JlngzGDX
What on earth are you talking about?
From the 10Q for the period ending 6/30/2016:
"The Revolving Credit Facility was fully paid on April 1, 2016, from part of the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common
stock on March 31, 2016. Under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company may have borrowings of up to $10 million
outstanding at any given time, subject to satisfying certain conditions and obtaining certain consents. The Revolving Credit
Facility has a maturity of April 28, 2018, and allows for re-advances on the facility up to the $10 million availability."
Nasdaq shows that Vanguard added 5,180 shares for period ended 6/30/2016.
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/lode/institutional-holdings
They are index funds - not actively managed.
The greatest vote of confidence comes from Van Den Berg, Sun Valley, US Global & Royce.
The conference call has now been posted.
http://www.comstockmining.com/investors/investor-library
http://www.comstockmining.com/images/stories/audio/7307784_08-04.mp3
CORRECTION - Comstock Mining Conference Call - Aug 4, 2016
Comstock Mining Inc. ("Comstock Mining" or "the Company") (NYSE MKT: LODE) will host a conference call on Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time/11:00 a.m. Eastern Time to report Second Quarter 2016 results and provide a business update.
The live call will include a moderated Q&A, after the prepared remarks. The dial-in telephone numbers for the live audio are as follows:
North American Toll Free: 866-253-4737
Canada Local / International: 416-849-4292
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/correction-comstock-mining-announces-notice-130000389.html
Rather than using the contact form, contact Corrado directly. His contact information is on the bottom of every press release.
You are correct. From the latest 10Q:
"The Company’s current capital resources include cash and cash equivalents and other working capital resources, cash generated through operations, and existing financing arrangements including a lease financing agreement and the previously drawn revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with Auramet International, LLC (“Auramet”), which outstanding balance of $1.2 million was fully paid off on April 1, 2016, from part of the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock on March 31, 2016."
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1120970/000112097016000101/0001120970-16-000101-index.htm
Today's Roth Presentation by CEO:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1120970/000114420412014668/v305822_ex99-1.htm
Pay close attention to the PRODUCTION section.
Institutional Investors - Current Data:
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/lode/institutional-holdings
Keep in mind that Sun Valley Gold bought at $1.65 when the recap was done. They just bought another 395,737 shares @ $1.90
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1120970/000091957412000536/xslF345X03/p1264990.xml
Yes, two holders sold out but 7 holders increased positions with a net positive effect.
CEO Blog - February 13, 2012
Monday, February 13 2012 17:16
Q: Why is Comstock Mining raising money right before going into production?
A: We recently concluded pricing an equity offering raising $15 million from an outstanding group of U.S. based institutional and retail investors. The transaction attracted some of the most reputable institutional investors in our segment and meaningfully strengthened our investor and capital base.
Our 2010 recapitalization and capital raise was designed to fund the Starter Mine production activities, land acquisitions, working capital and exploration and we continue to use those funds for those purposes.
The capital raised from our recent offering will primarily fund our targeted and expanded exploration and development model for our Lucerne, Dayton and Spring Valley Resource Areas. Based on the strong success of last year’s 125,000-foot plus drilling program, the recently received exploration permits that authorize exploration drilling at the Lucerne, Dayton and Spring Valley Areas and the strong probability for completing expanded mine plans for Lucerne and Dayton by the end of 2012, we felt strongly that further funding the acceleration of these projects is the most value enhancing opportunity for our Company and our shareholders. The Lucerne and Dayton mine plans also enable us to launch the expanded permitting processes for these two, larger mine plans. The work of our core team of geologists and mine planners have presented a more complete model for the drilling efforts in 2012, that are already starting to show exciting results.
This capital allows for the achievement of greater resource and potentially reserve expansion in 2012, securing expanded permitting and ultimately, consistent production growth, from 20,000 gold equivalent ounces per annum in the Lucerne Starter Mine, to the potential of up to 100,000 ounces per annum in each of Lucerne and Dayton. We are excited by the exploration results to date, as they validate our current modeling to expand our exploration targets for our drilling program in 2012. We believe these activities will be accretive to our shareholders.
We are confident our capital will continue to be deployed for the best returns for all shareholders, by more rapidly expanding the resource, commencing and growing production and cash flows and building an asset base that will serve the company and provide outstanding returns for many years into the future.
Kindest Regards,
Corrado De Gasperis
President and CEO
Air Quality Permit goes to public hearing Jan 26th, 2012:
http://www.comstockmining.com/corporate/ceo-blog