Good Lawwwd... He STILL has over 69,000,000 shares... that's 69 MILLION. At just .10 a share... that's still $7 Million dollars. He wouldn't care OR notice... if he sold 10 million shares. Geeze... What the heck... Guess he just needed $40k pocket money or... a new car or something... Wish I had that many shares... I wouldn't mind cashing some in too. Explains a LOT.
Hard to believe.. isn't it after all the downwards movement... to actually see some improvement? It seems that we MIGHT have reversed the trend. IF we can keep the upward momentum... that would make my shorts a little looser.... that's for sure. Would take at LEAST another .05 for me to begin to lose the Pucker. Oh darn... that's 50%. Stranger things have happened. I'm thinking that just about ANY really good news would give us a double anyhow.
Perhaps you're right about damaging my already feeble thinking device... Maybe I'll just go sit in the corner and wait for some sort of positive developments... LIKE.... some really GOOD NEWS to arrive. I won't hold my breath while waiting, but, hopefully I won't age too much either during the wait.
I certainly don't find it to be an act of confidence... However, I do have some observations. 1. He did NOT take it "out of the company". He sold shares.. right? 2. I don't know what his cost basis was... and if I'm not mistaken... he has LOTS and LOTS more shares...
So... I would be more concerned if the present administration were selling shares. but... they're NOT.
The short answer is... Enough to make the SP go up a couple of cents! There were about 300K shares that traded when we moved up... I suspect that one buyer was responsible for probably 200k or more shares. That's just my guess using caveman trading tools...
Looks like the spread is getting a LOT tighter than we've seen it for a while... Soooo
Where's the next order for 250K @ .105 ?
Somehow I don't think we'll ever know WHAT the significance of "It's On" is all about. I believe this was Gary's FIRST "tweet"... so maybe he was surprised to find that his Tweeting device was operational. Also... If I'm reading this correctly... he has a total of 25 "followers"... at LEAST 2 of which are stockholders... so perhaps we give this Battle Cry too much attention. I wonder what he had for breakfast! lol.
It's ON !!!!!!!
There... now I've adopted the same technique as Exobox Sales Management... to what end... I am not sure.
I wonder if having done that will create sales.... or make the SP go up.
I'm not feeling more "psyched" about it all... just yet. Give me a minute, perhaps it has a delayed reaction.
I did a google search for data loss prevention tools.... Still haven't found Exodetect or Exobox under that search. THIS is something that they can and SHOULD work on... Search Engine placement. If I HAVE to use the term Exobox... or Exodetect to find it... that defeats the purpose... since I'd ALREADY know about them if I were using either of those terms... DOH!!! There is no excuse for not making us rank VERY high under many many different search terms. This needs to be fixed.
Harvey.. do you have any idea what it costs to air a single :30 national tv spot? Forget what it costs to produce one...
Perhaps Exobox needs you to become their marketing guru.
I just saw a "tweet" from Gary Leibowitz from last night... "Its On !!!!!!" Seems like that's the Exobox Tweeting battle cry. I am hoping that means he has had some good news... or expects to get some soon regarding a client or contract. Then again... he might have just had his electricity put back on. Or maybe he was excited to see that his computer is working.
My understanding is that there are several different tiers of subscription.... which to me would equate to being a contract of sorts. Prices per scan, I believe, are tied to the volume of scans contracted. Scan more pay less.... (per scan, that is).
To save money clients would have to make some sort of committment.... I would think.
I think that if you look at a lot of what they've NR'd.... I wonder why you DO believe it all. First of all... the multi-million dollar contracts for nuggets and buffings that we've had oh... forever are simply not viable. The prices we've agreed to leave no room for profit. And.... let's see... the $15 million financing that NEVER happened.... And... the tire dump in CO that MDOR was going to buy.... but never did....
And there's LOTS more. STILL NO reason NOT to believe?
Given the nature of Exobox's clients business profiles... and the fact that many corporations want to maintain their anonymity.... I wonder just how much we might hear about contracts. I feel sure that if we COULD manage to get a highly recognizable client AND we could NR this new business... it would help a LOT.... Just not sure how likely it is that we'll be able to use their name.
I agree about this being a Non-event. Don't get me wrong... I think that ANY opportunity to present before a viable audience is great. I just don't think this was Newsworthy. On the other hand, I think the group that's having the "Luncheon" is quite valuable, however... and I see that they're having a convention this next week in LA, if I recall correctly. Wondering why we're not attending THAT instead of the lunchie-poo at home.
Even though that high a number CLEARLY means "we're not selling any right now"...you're probably right about it being a signal to other MMs as well. Those guys do seem to communicate with eachother... and I'd LOVE to have an opinion of what such an absurdly high ask might mean from someone who would have a reason to KNOW what it means. I HOPE that it means that they have reason to believe that the SP might move up a lot.... therefore letting other MMs have a clue. I am just guessing here.... but it does seem like a message... I mean... they COULD have just done like others and put the ask at $1.00 instead of $1,000 and change.
ANYbody have an MM source who might explain what this might mean, if anything?
And that point about the music/movie industries is an exceptional one. Can the present ExoDetect product.... be of use to these industries? If not.... I'd love to know if we are working on a product that WILL be able to do so. This capability alone should be worth an ENORMOUS amount of money. There's also the pirated versions of software out there too... Windows.... Games, and EVERYTHING in between. IF we could close up these "leaks"... we should be ENORMOUSLY wealthy in short order. Can ANYone give me a knowledgeable answer on this topic? THIS capability WOULD sell itself.
Even now, though... it will FIND the leaks... and tell you where, when, and basically WHO dun it. This is clearly one heck of an improvement and something that is actionable. Anybody leaking information can be sued. This in itself should be deterrent enough... Yes, it WILL be better to have the ability to prevent leaks, but then... you'd hardly ever know that the software was even working! You'd never even SEE a leak! Well... I suppose that the software will indicate attempted breaches... but actually CATCHING the leaks... as they've done already is pretty darn impressive.
And I'm not even GOING to look at mine... it's too pathetic. I disagree with you about asking investors for leads. You NEVER know who an investor MIGHT know. ANY viable lead is just that... a viable lead. I also disagree with you about expecting any contracts. With the beta testing AND the very positive remarks from the testors... I would have expected several of them to sign up. The fact that we have NOT heard of any testors now being clients is also not a positive sign.
Early on... the commments from the beta testors were identified by their position and company. They were made anonymous later after the initial exposure in an NR. I understand that companies don't want ANY of their business known... particularly ANYthing they might be doing with security. This might also be the reason any contract information isn't being released too. Then again... they might not HAVE anything good to say yet.
There have been plenty of people with a great deal of stock market and/or other financial experience that haven't managed to get this one right. Your friend...on the other hand, got the "going back down" part right for sure... but as to predicting a bottom of .06 or .07 well... that's just guesswork, I don't care how smart you are. NOBODY knows what this thing will do. I would just feel better knowing that it has, in fact bottomed out (when it does) and is headed back in the direction that it SHOULD (in my view) be going!