Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"Magic assets?" Is that what they are being called now?
$TTCM
PEPSI
Issuing 2 BILLION shares after would literally be STUPID man lol.
$TTCM
PEPSI
"Con" remarks go on forever on this discussion board? Because there's nothing more too it than that.
$TTCM
PEPSI
You replied to the poster who stated a 50% discount (not at all correct) "63%." It wasn't clarified then as to what you meant by just stating that and now you have clarified it.
Yes it's a 37% discount. So thank you for that.
Care to clarify the other question regarding your remark when you referenced talking to Penelope and Dixon:
$TTCM
PEPSI
Still wondering how in the world you came up with a 63% discount.
And please if you will: Please tell us more regarding an earlier conversation with Penelope and Dixon. You made the following remark at that time.
$TTCM
PEPSI
So you actually believe without showing any proof to the contrary mind you that what's being stated by the company as stated in the 8Ks regarding this is not factual.
The Kool aid is in the Wizard of Oz but that's it bro.
IMHO
$TTCM
PEPSI
Looks like they licensed the platforms to monetize the imagery.
$TTCM
PEPSI
100% Bullshit "con" myth.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Need to read that over carefully. That's some 8K man!
$TTCM
PEPSI
Good morning Reaper and everyone who is in $GVSI
PEPSI
Now the need to prove a positive? No one needs to "prove" what the company has said to be the case. Often when companies make false statements the facts come out right away (pretty much immediately) because it's FALSE information that can be readily shown.
In this case stating that what the company put out in the 8K is not factual etc., is BS because there has been nothing presented to support that contention. The company claims its factual.
Nothing has been proven here other than making a statement of fact with no showing of proof. That's called opinion.
Huh? Whatever dude
$TTCM
PEPSI
Ahhh I see. What you are asking for (LOL) is for something to be proven that can't be disproven.
It's the other way around man. The 8K states it clearly. You are the one who has made the claim that its not factual which is NOT in harmony with what the 8K states.
Your statement (opinion) is some type of proof? No it isn't.
Show the damn "proof."
There isn't any to show or it would have been. If so show it
IMHO
$TTCM
PEPSI
You are asking to prove a negative? How about showing the proof that it's NOT factual. Waiting to see it man. Making statements that its not factual is meaningless.
The 8K says it is and says would made the appraisal.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Ever notice how such supposed "trumped up" assets as claimed on this discussion board can be stated but can't be proven to be factual?
Heaven forbid the company being responsible and notifying the public that the filings will be late. I suppose a company-any company has never done such a thing before? Would this be a first?
Bullshit man
$TTCM
PEPSI
Good morning Raven and all who are in $GVSI
PEPSI
Are you saying it's a 63% discount? Where did you get this information from?
Also please tell us more regarding an
earlier conversation with Penelope and Dixon. You made the following remark at that time.
Where did that language come from?
$TTCM
PEPSI
Did I say anything about debt conversion being BS? I stated that the 50% debt conversion discount you claim is BS.
Exactly. Wow is right. Not even close
$TTCM
PEPSI
So the response should naturally be "scam" this and "scam" that? Not to mention other colorful words like "conpany," "CONsultants" etc. And of course nonsense about an imported anything.
It doesn't change the fact that the COMpany intends be successful regardless of such remarks that are not based in fact.
50% discount? What BS dude.
"Bamboozling?" Now that's a new one lol. 100% Bullshit
$TTCM
PEPSI
Good morning everyone.
$GVSI
PEPSI
Yes but it does give a patent pending date of submission.
$TTCM
PEPSI
That's a broad statement that if accurate could apply to any company. Discussion board chatter not backed up by solid facts never takes precedence and Ego has nothing to do with anything.
Ones should not rely on discussion board opinions more to the point. That would be and often is ill-advised. Proper weight should be given to such things.
IMHO
$TTCM
PEPSI
Good for you my friend! The trading action here was alright today.
$GVSI
PEPSI
Yeah man. Just patiently waiting it out bro.
$GVSI
PEPSI
No. That is not the case as it's being portrayed. You are referring to what the company's stance was in the past as is well-documented by the company. There was no secret as to what their stance has been. Refer to the IBOX.
"Someones" kept stating that there would be an RS more than once through the years on this stock on this discussion board but it wasn't the company stating it.
If you are referring to conversations about what the company had not stated way back when (no RS) when ones were saying an RS was coming (this goes way back) then of course yes it was corrected at those times (on this discussion/opinion board) since that was not the stance of the company as the company had stated more than once that there would be NO RS.
No clue what in the world "someone else said there not being a reverse coming." Nor does it matter. The DAMN company had stated that and more than once LOL...
And?
Is that their stance now? No, it isn't is it as everyone knows who follows this stock as stated by the company.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Strange how other questions can't be answered on this discussion board at times as well. Yes. Funny how strange that is.
Talk to the company man and BS to the Nugent and Leonard's Novagen NOVZ nonsense that is pointless and meaningless. Or SRAX getting kicked off from the Nasdaq for that matter which has nothing to do with anyone but themselves.
"Smoke everywhere?" and no guns. A regular fictional mystery thriller.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Yes.
$GVSI
PEPSI
Some type of "smoking gun" Huggy? It's not like that discussion hasn't been discussed more than once, or twice, or three times etc., etc. on this discussion board. But hey.
"Wells notice" coming? It's just been filled out by the Munchkins and signed by the Wizard of Oz himself. Yes, a make-believe "wells notice" is on the way bro
$TTCM
PEPSI
That wouldn't be surprising.
$GVSI
PEPSI
What the hell? "Enforcement actions?" Uhh huh. Sure.
Nonsense Bullshit.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Good morning everyone.
$GVSI
PEPSI
Sure. Need more "CONsultants" "carnies" "SCAMS" and the fantasy list goes on and on.
$TTCM
PEPSI
I tried my updated web browser with the ad blocker and same thing happened attempting to open that link. It won't allow a read without paying.
Enough of that nonsense.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Show the proof of the assets that are "trumped up" as you claim.
BS to the "scam" myth...
$TTCM
PEPSI
I'll have to check that out to see if it works. Thanks.
$TTCM
PEPSI
The link when opened shows a heading and it's from May 2015. It immediately brings up a pop up that won't allow the article to be read without paying so forget that.
Point of the article?
$TTCM
PEPSI
The "scam theme" that's BS but nothing of note referenced.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Total Bullshit to the "scam" myth.
IMHO
$TTCM
PEPSI
Who valued it?
$TTCM
PEPSI
You still have not answered the remark you made earlier regarding a conversation with Penelope and Dixon.
I will ask again.
Where did this come from? Penelope and Dixon are bound by rules. Did they make that statement or not? If yes, please provide the discussion thread for transparency.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Saying 19 years was another way of saying how utterly ridiculous this wild goose chase is from how we read it.
Still waiting for a follow-up response regarding this statement you made earlier.
Where did you get that language from?
Please provide the language here as to what exactly was stated (back and forth conversations between Penelope and Dixon) so we can have transparency on this. Screenshots will suffice. In the event it was an interpretation of something else then please indicate so since your language expressed didn't appear to be an interpretation. For transparency sake.
After all, that is what's been stated on this discussion board to paraphrase, seeking transparency.
$TTCM
PEPSI