Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
penny...I'll buy that....something is leaked.
35[4] x 36[1].
CLYP on the ask.
35[2] x 36[1].
L2 taking off: 35[2] x 36[2]...news leaked??
34[3] x 35[1].
34[4] x 35[3].
34[3] x 35[3].
34[2] x 35[4].
31[1] x 32[1]
2 bidding 30.
Volume a little heavy this AM.
hit bid...now 30[1] x 32[2]
make that 29[1] x 32[2].
29[1] x 30[1].
28[3] x 29[2].
28[1] x 29[4].
27[2] x 29[4].
27[1] x 28[1].....still no laptop....using company machine....until I get caught!!
prediction: .006.
vlf....if they attend the one in Kansas City, I will go....am only 25 minutes from there.
Short interest (August 25)....go to bottom and enter symbol:
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/OTCE_Short_Interest.asp
Laptop down....don't know if it was posted earlier.
My laptop broke....should be fixed by tomorrow...I hope.
Good morning. My question is that how can a company do such an outstanding job on their website and yet put out such horribly misunderstood PRs (both in regards to spelling and clarity)?
Maybe they should use their website builders to write the PRs!!
Have a nice day all.
Coorection to the correction to the correction in L2: 31[1] x 34[2]....sorry...couldn't resist the corrections!!!!!
30[4] x 31[1]....where's my cash??
picks..check metro's post August 31, 2006 is FY2006. He has the link.
Little?? Volume is big....30[2] x 31[1].
34[3] x 36[2]....slow start.
Thanks metro for clearing up the FY2005 FY2006 question. Have a nice day all.
terryt...follow this though why I think it is calendar 2004 to calender 2005 for the 400 units...because it is virtually the same PR put six months later. I do not know why they would compare units on a calendar year if their fiscal year is different. You hit the nail on the head....gives the impression have been sold. Maybe the impression they are trying to give is they have 9 months of sales in which nothing has been reported (all of 2006 calendar year to date.)
We will find out very soon. Might be a good question if someone calls?? Are you comparing the 400 units on calendar year or fiscal year??
If they are doing calendar year for the units, then this is much bigger that we know.
metro...what is HSM? THX
OK....since we are killing this.....does the 2004 and 2005 mentioned in the PR mean fiscal or calendar year? Since FY2005 ends August 31, 2006, the two years mentioned must mean CY2004 and CY2005. It cannot mean 400 units more in FY2005 over FY2004, because FY 2005 is not over yet and you cannot compare something when it's not finished.....so in a nut shell and I am guessing.....2004 is compared to 2005 calendar year....also almost the same PR came out in March using the same wording....therefore.....we have from January 1, 2006 to present that there is no mention of how many systems have been sold.....but will appear in the filing sometime after August 31, 2006 (FY2005).
Is this clear!@##$%$!#@$^%#@^%^$#@!
I just compared the two PRs. Did NO ONE proof the PR that came out this morning....there are multiple errors with the years and even the headline?????
Maybe they are too busy making and selling the Kiddiesystems.
That new IR company can't get here fast enough.
The updated PR is on the website.
http://www.atwec.com/news_details.php?nid=38
ThSeeker...sorry for the misunderstanding!! LOL
hawk....add 411 to the previous trade of 500 and you get 911......it's been showing on a lot of different stocks lately...maybe because of the short positions due out August 25.
35[3] x 38[2]
Now it makes cents (I think).....34[5] x 36[1].
PR said 400 in units in 2005 over 2004, but never said what 2004 units were??