Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is everyone enjoying lowlife lying Lamstein's daggers in their backs?
POS Squires, Scumbag Lamstein both need prison time.
Theiven Sleezen Squires must go immediately:
Please enlighten us how Squires and Lamstein are our friends? Are they doing a great job? Is Squires the intelligent choice of CEO's? How could this possibly be happening when Lamstein repeatedly stated QMC is not obligated to report financials? Why doesn't the SEC understand what Lamstein explained? Should we continue to trust Squires and Lamstein?
Million per year salary and can't afford an accountant a few times a year? Please explain? The SEC tells me the jackass is in default and they need to protect investors from a scam. Thus shareholders no longer have money (try to access your funds).
Well hell, except for Squires and Lamstein, who are rolling in dough, everyone's money is literally gone at this moment in time. As far as good, the company is literally in default according to the SEC which means there is no money to pay any bills due. That may be good for Lamstein...but it is only good for the shareholders who wanted their investment to be a gift to these 2.
Lamstein disappeared with everyone's money stuffed in his wallet.
Has anyone noticed the majority of marketing consultants have disappeared for a while now? Their internet presence has vanished everywhere replaced by dead silence. It is especially quiet in the QMC boiler room. Either they have sold out completely by now (although I did not notice large blocks of millions of shares being dumped) or are hoping for a price drop prior to good news they know about and can't bring themselves to actively manipulate the price downward?
Common sense tells us Pasaca would not be expending resources and time if they were not planning to profit from the use of QMC's function.
The only devil now is in the details. Shareholders must stick together and reject any detail which does not fully guarantee that Pasaca will not take it private or allows either Pasaca or Squirez to spin off any part, i.e. solar, without taking shareholders on board. Do not believe Lamstein's bullshit.
Squires screwed over shareholders not Dr. Stott.
Drugman, I'll give you one thing. I've bashed your erroneous predictions mercilessly in the past. Your prediction of twenty cents was dead on the money. But with it coming 5 weeks earlier than you claimed; it reminded me of a young brash 22 year old Cassius Clay brazenly predicting an 8th round knockout of champion Sonny Liston back in '64. Clay was fined heavily for the scene he created at the weigh in. Liston didn't answer the bell for the seventh round and Clay was then champ. A year later he changed his name to Ali.
WhyVote affirmative without guarantee company won't go private? Lamstein liking the deal alone is enough reason to give pause and wonder what is going on.
Well $5++ is now 2% correct up from 1% last week.
Lots of optimistic and/or insider trading going on. Anything could happen here on out. Count me as at least temporarily pleased. I just hope there is some substance behind it all. Although the volume has picked up considerably in recent weeks. This still trades at relatively low volumes to the public float. This could drop like a rock or hopefully take off like a rocket on substantial positive news when serious buyers move on this.
Is this a good thing or bad thing? Without knowing whether he plans on dumping or bringing along shareholders I cannot tell. Listening to the "marketing consultants" he has hired has proven pointless and, in fact, pointless in the past. The share price tends to be optimistic. I see this as risky as hell either way at this point.
Very astute assessment of what likely transpired. Your post and longvester's post from last week give much insight into this dilemma.
Must mean Pauly hasn't met the Squirez children yet.
Hope it lasts. It will take truly positive developments. It still isn't much compared to the broader market at this point.
So how long until Squirez screws Pasaca over? We know from experience it is only a matter of time until Pasaca gets the shaft while Squirez & Lamstein move on to the next mark.
Trades of 100&1000 shares? $5&$50 trades before commission? Tell me this stock is not being manipulated both up and down. Who trades $5 and $50 and then pays commission on top of that? What is the point if not to manipulate the price?
This equals saying they need a hole in the forehead.
When has POS Squirez ever cared about shareholders? It might have occurred to him to earn a few bucks every now and then over the many years'; don't you think?
10-to-1 or 100-to-1 reverse split? I see nothing less than 100 shares into 1 in order to stabilize at Nasdaq required price levels over an extended period of time.
Only major contracts for QMC would reduce or nullify this.