Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Scott Terry is giving his best estimate as far as timing of the award. Does it hurt his credibility? Meh. The proposal had to be amended to hold the pricing through April, so we know the contract and award are still up for grabs. Could be tomorrow, could be a week. All I know is that TMPS is still in the running, that's all I care about.
Nice 500 share trade. I guess somebody really needed that $65 bucks. Manipulation without capital.
Absolutely.
Call the DOD for crying out loud. Proof has been provided ad nauseam. It's not your fault, you can't help that you're slow.
TMPS has been communicating with the DOD for months and is finally waiting to hear the DOD/Navy's final decision on a 5 year air-to-air refueling contract that's worth potentially hundreds of millions of dollars. Period, end of story.
There's one thing that can't be denied, everything else is just noise. TMPS has been communicating with the DOD for months and is finally waiting to hear the DOD/Navy's final decision on a 5 year air-to-air refueling contract that's worth potentially hundreds of millions of dollars. Period, end of story.
A $0.16 stock, market cap of $4.17MM, and a small float?
Are. You. Kidding. Me? Astronomical potential.
Don't you have a hole to crawl into?
I know what? I've been critical of TMPS and I've always given my opinion and analysis without any intentions of manipulating investors. You on the other hand fabricate stories and make up scenarios that are obviously not based on any factual evidence, and are meant to steer the truth away from real investors that are legitimately looking to put their hard earned money at risk to earn a return, just so you can try and make your car payment with a minimal amount of capital and a two penny spread. Your name says it all, pennypincher LOL. Fly along now Marry Poppins.
You have ZERO evidence to support that claim. In fact, it's asinine to say that at this point, especially since you've been proven wrong at every turn from day 1. Aren't you the one that flew to the UK and had coffee with Mary Poppins in the fuselage of the L-1011? What a joke.
How can you not? Scott Terry is still listed as an advisor on financial websites, Johan Eliasch has not made any wild moves in 2 years, TMPS is a serious contender in a Navy air-to-air refueling contract that's potentially worth hundreds of millions, Johan Aksel Bergendorff is still the CFO, you have UCC filings from Johan Eliasch related companies as recent as October 2018 (shows potentially more capital committed), and they have current performing contracts. The problem is that TMPS is a penny stock, which attracts low level retail investors and stock manipulators. Also, Scott Terry I'm sure is regurgitating what he's being told, but unfortunately, this is the government we're talking about (one day means a week). I personally think Scott is communicating too much with non-institutional investors, but at the same time I'm glad he is. At the end of the day, does it matter? So far he's spoken the truth, whether the timing has lined up or not.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong? You've been proven wrong at every turn. Still trying to overcompensate for something?
If the contract is secured the last thing I'll be worried about is the note.
No different than any other company that has a senior secured lending facility in place, which is basically every major company out there. This is a pretty standard lending arrangement, and a good one at that. It's allowed TMPS to fulfill their current contracts and bid on new ones.
So if you're so confident in this happening then why are you here? If it's to nurture your ego there are better ways to go about it. Enough time has gone by to realize that Johan Eliasch isn't here orchestrating some elaborate scheme. If you can't see that by now then you're either not very bright or your sole purpose is to manipulate the stock, especially with the actions/examples (note extension, no dilution, etc.) that have played out since Johan came into the picture. You don't spend two years on a company, appoint your CFO, and absorb legal costs just so you can steal a hubcap or two. If you're asking yourself why a billionaire (Johan Eliasch) would step into a company like this, it's probably because he saw an enormous opportunity to take a $18MM per year revenue company and turn it into a $300MM top line revenue company in a matter of years. Figure. It. Out.
Dropping the hammer? You mean like last year? Oh wait, I forgot, you were absent the day Johan Eliasch extended the note. You also seem to forget that Johan Eliasch hasn't diluted the company or stripped the assets of the company when he could have done so long ago. Keep up the fearmongering, it's doing wonders for your reputation on this board. Just a word of advice, no one believes you because you're not smart enough or subtle enough to be believable.
Excellent. TMPS continues to move forward.
Yes, having a feeling implies that I'm speculating. You can look up the word speculating in the dictionary if you don't know what it means. Also, I don't find it necessary to post evidence in order to prove that water is wet and the sky is blue. The DOD website has been very clear about what has transpired and it's been posted on this board numerous times. To put it simply, it's why the DOD granted a limited 12 month extension to Omega and clearly stated that "a competitive follow-on effort and competitive procurement is forthcoming." You're obviously not understanding that their are extensions and amendments to the original solicitation, all of which are public record. The notion that there is no five year contract award that will be given to either TMPS or Omega in the coming days is simply not true. You're an open book, everyone knows what you're trying to do, and to be frank, you just look ridiculous trying to manipulate investors into thinking there's something sinister going on. However, keep it up, I'd love to pick up some more shares under $0.10 for a company that is days away from an award announcement worth hundreds of millions and whose chairman is Johan Eliasch. Quack.
You have no clue what you're talking about. To say that a 5 year air-to-air refueling contract isn't up for grabs at this point is so asinine that it's hard to even fathom how anyone could be so ignorant. Figure it out.
I was wrong. I'm hoping for Monday. Just more of a gut feeling. They need to make a decision so TMPS can work towards getting mission ready. Every day counts at this point.
I'm thinking today could be the day. I'm also thinking $5 a share could happen in the not so distant future.
I believe he is informed before the news actually hits the site, but I think it's only by a matter of hours.
With all the trolls that have looked to discredit and spread misinformation on this board, it would be ironic if the contract award was announced today of all days. How poetic that would be.
You're probably the one that just sold $50 worth of stock in an attempt to manipulate. If you think TMPS is a joke, it's because you made it that way.
Good question. Projecting the future earnings and growth of a company is difficult, especially at this stage. However, I could see TMPS going to $5 very quickly after a favorable contract announcement based on very conservative price multiples.
It's fallen way off the radar, nobody fully understands the ins and outs of TMPS, and the lack of financial reporting obviously doesn't help. The next 24 to 48 hours are going to get REAL interesting. Most people want the easy buck, and you really had to dig and be patient with this one while reading between the lines. I'm still surprised the stock isn't above $0.50 based on these three undeniable facts:
1)TMPS is backed by Johan Eliasch
2)Imminent decision for a 5 year Navy refueling contract worth
hundreds of millions
3)TMPS owns assets that are desperately needed by the A2A refueling
community (global scale)
Where else can you buy a company for $0.15 that has this much potential?
Would you file a lien (Deed of Trust) without buying a house? Come on, buddy. Also, what does Firefly then have to do with Firefly now? I'll give you the answer: NOTHING.
UCC Filings
2018/10/25 2018 7402403 Original CARNSDALE OVERSEAS LIMITED (A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLAND COMPANY)
2018/10/25 2018 7402403 Original FIREFLY FINANCIAL LIMITED (A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLAND COMPANY)
2018/10/25 2018 7402403 Original SANTIAGO BUSINESS CO. INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLAND COMPANY)
It's not that simple, you have to pay for it. It's just like doing a lien search on real estate, you have to go to your county recorder's office, go through a title company, or pay for it through a company that offers it. Same situation here.
Yes, I'm surprised we haven't heard something already. All evidence is pointing to TMPS receiving the 5 year A2A refueling contract. I've also looked at the UCC filings (lien filings that allow a lender to formally lay claim to collateral that a debtor pledges to secure their financing), and the latest filing is from 10/25/18 from Johan Eliasch related companies. This tells me that Johan has invested more capital into the company. Unfortunately, we don't have updated financials, so we can't see the details. However, on the surface, it tells me that he's committed.
I'm tempted to buy more shares, but I'm fully loaded at this point. However, if an opportunity presents itself, I'll look to add a lot more to my position. This thing can't stay coiled forever.
Nickel and dime manipulators. Sell $300 worth of stock to drop it down 18%. Ridiculous.
People, this is GREAT news! I believe this implicates that TMPS will receive the new 5 year contract. How else can you interpret it? The GovTribe release from earlier this year looks to be very accurate. I expect the DOD will announce that TMPS has been awarded the new 5 year contract very shortly.
I hate to be too optimistic when it comes to penny stocks, BUT why would the Navy/DOD spend soooo much time on TMPS and their proposal? I'm convinced that TMPS is going to win this contract. From what I understand Scott continues to provide info and documents to the DOD. I'm under the assumption that as long as the info provided is satisfactory, the contract is ours. However, you never know. One thing I do know, the doom and gloom that some people post on this board is absolute trash. No way TMPS would have made it this far without being credible company.
Ahhhh, the truth! It's so nice to hear actual facts. Great post!
It's ok, we can have a difference of opinion. First off, I don't pump. I've indicated plenty of times that this is a high risk investment with a lot of hair on it. However, if you bought in previously, how can you not like TMPS now? Johan has extended his note twice, they're still a major contender in the refueling contract with only one major competitor, they have assets that are desperately needed (regardless of the contract outcome), the balance sheet is pretty clean, and Johan has given no indication that he's here to steal hubcaps. I agree that Scott's resignation was odd, but he's still very much involved (as a consultant) and he's given adequate and professional responses with regard to his departure. I think you're looking for "evidence" that's as bright as the sun, but it doesn't work that way with public companies, you have to read between the lines. It's researching and getting in before the obvious "evidence" is visible to everyone, otherwise you're late to the game and the big move up already happened. What I find odd is that you want the stock to appreciate so you can get out, but yet you're here being a negative Nancy??????? Seems counterintuitive.
So dump your shares. What's there to think about? Move on, your analysis is that it's not worth investing into. For me, I see a company with a billionaire chairman, 4 refueling tankers that are desperately needed, a DOD contract barreling down, and a very cheap stock with a small float. I don't need to explain myself, but you do. Why are you here? Move on, it's that simple. I can tell you why you're here. It's because you can't let go. It's because you know deep down inside that TMPS can win this 5 year refueling contract worth hundreds of millions of dollars. You know that a $0.10 stock with this much potential is too good to pass up. Dump your shares and walk away, I dare you.
I don't think you're grasping the situation or looking at it logically.
I'm not sure. This is just speculation, but I think Omega and TMPS could both perform refueling missions during the 12 month extension. The govtribe posting was from January, so who knows if something has changed since then.
However, keep in mind that the prime contract allows the prime contractor to subcontract. I'm very confident that whoever wins the prime contract will subcontract out to the losing party. In other words, I'd bet that if TMPS wins the prime contract, they'll subcontract to Omega, at least in the beginning.
"Please be advised that a competitive follow-on effort procurement is ongoing with a planned award in March 2019." That's what you want to focus on. It sounds like Omega may get another extension while TMPS transitions into the space. That's just my take. I'm sure you'll get responses from other people on this board at a later time. Sounds like pretty damn good news to me, especially since the follow-on procurement is for 5 years.
That's a ridiculous notion. You can call Omega and they'll tell you that TMPS is in on the bid.
From the horse's mouth. You can choose to believe that or not, but I assure you I only speak the truth.