Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No it has a joint venture with instadose sas which is a sub of instadose
Or worldcom, tyco, qwest..
Nothing about swrm came from the company. Just from this board.
Actually yes they are. They have before. The biggest difference in regs now is that ceo are ultimately responsible. Now that's true regardless if the reporting is audited or unaudited
No but i haven't sent an email either. In the past when he takes a long time to respond its either because they are in the process of completing somthing significant or he'll wait till the weekend to address a lot of questions at once
lol. all audited mean is that someone else signed off on it. Doesn't mean that information is any more accurate then the unaudited. WCOM, ENRON, QWEST... all had audited finanicals
EXMT - nobody how is given free shares and returns them to the company because they couldn't be deposited goes in the open market and pays for them. Look up Tim Paul in the bottem of the filings
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/212467/content
they been saying that for 5 years
i don't anticipate that happening. Talked to the CEO many times and he has no intention of reverse split. The activity today is a head scratcher. somebody knows something
GNCP - On the money for that. Simply email them. They do respond and will get more better understanding then here.
Instadose and Biocann debunked?
or you can call the transfer agent and ask.
we should've known once Tim Paul got involved. He may go down with this one.
man you see this
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GOPH/news/Gopher-Protocol-Implementing-Reorganization-with-Name-Change-and-Reverse-Stock-Split?id=234411
remember that pump about $30 a share
you should ask them, they'll tell you. The initial information regarding the Biocann purchase also has information in regards to it as well. IF there is a question just ask.
where did they say the below?
i'm curious. What's the date on the article :)
but yet the OS hasn't increased. What your seeing is the gap between the OS and float closing. That's the reality. The OS is not increasing. Common share certs being held look to be deposited and sold.
it's not semantics, it's about correct financial information. Incorrect definition can lead to incorrect valuation and conclusion.
Float can be equal to OS and never more.
average OS is used for EPS calculation
OS is used for market valuation
Float are freely tradeable shares
Dilution only takes places when OS increases
Basic finance
100% incorrect. Market value is Outstanding shares. Float helps with liquidity.
lol that's a new one. Dilution of float.
it's not dilution
follow the OS here
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GNCP/security
It hasn't increased. It looks like shares held in cert form have been deposited and being sold. If any debt or preferreds are being converted then the OS will increase. The transfer agent reports it.
GNCP - if it's usual then it's the norm then it's not a surprise. I would be more concerned if no filings after 8/15.
Tim Paul is a front. He should've disclosed his shares when he pumped the stock
someone has already bought a product on this board. It's been validated
i think in the press release they said it would be late today.
Lol. Really?
if you want to ask a question to the company, email them. They do respond
wow a scam that sells products. never heard that before.
how is the dog doing?
the week isn't over yet. lol I was told this weekend so either today or tomorrow. Monday is something totally different
I still stand based on the corporate structure and his statement. Active would imply frequent involvement in the day to day activity of the company which is something the board does. So unless he's on the board ,he's not all that active as being portrayed.
I'll just take then long winded responses as a no and call it the day
So why not just answer the question. Is he on the board, yes or no?
So does that documentation also say lumb is a director? I didn't see it in the post
By your definition all shareholders are actively involved. He a director? Yes or no?
So the answer is no he is not on the board of directors. Okay, its good that everyone knows that lumb is not on the board od directors and thus does not make any decisions. He has the ability to vote on matters put before him based on shares. Owning debt means nothing. Debt holders are bound by the convenent of the debt.
Is he a director yes or no?
Is he a director?
Interesting do you have any prood regarding lumb activities? When asked he specifically stated he's not actively involved. Just so you know, owning preferred shares doesn't make you an active decision maker. So please show any documentation where he is making any decision other then the right to vote which shareholders have.