Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Clearly you have been grossly misinformed just like many of your other statements on this board...they all asked and took bailout money...
The difference is...the bank and automotive industry asked for a bailout...The GSE's were taken over by the government via conservatorship out of fear and not out of necessity...hence the bailout for the GSE's were forced onto the two companies...there's much misconceptions due to many companies (other than GSE's) receiving bailout funds that they automatically include the GSE's on the long list of companies that received the bailouts because they were underwater...The GSE's did not have a solvency issue...it was a liquidity issue...Two very different things....
Sounds like you're on a mission...lol...rescue is a hypothetical term...who needed rescue because it clearly was not Fannie and Freddie...The GSE's were only used as a vehicle to guard the economy from reaching a depression and destroying the government by many companies asking even more handouts than what occurred in this last recession...that's what the GSE's were designed to do and they did it well...In order to understand the GSE's you must look back at the U.S. economic history (why they were formed to begin with) and not a just a snap shot of recent economic events...
There's so much that he's not that it's easier to list what he is...or is it?...
Fake name, fake birth certificate, fake President...how in the world has this guy managed to become President of the U.S. with so much skeletons in the closet?
All say less government, less spending, less regulation, and more private except the the Irish one talking out of his other end...
On the contrary...anything is possible...however, it would have an enormous impact without a replacement...
Lol...It was a different number yesterday...aftermath is always 20/20...try using a crystal ball next time...
Where do you get banks selling derogatory loans to the GSEs as Fannie and Freddie affirmation of collapse? On the contrary, it's quite the opposite. You see, at the time of the collapse the government forced the GSEs into conservatorship because the government needed a vehicle to bailout the banks and they chose the GSEs to be their ride. So essentially, the government bailed out the banks via the GSEs in order to save the economy. The GSEs were being operated by the government as a utility companies through conservatorship. It wasn't the GSEs buying underwater loans...it was banks selling underwater liar loans to the GSEs. Two completely different things. I remember receiving a letter from the bank automatically approving a higher mortgage line of credit just because the value of the home substantially increased without any rhyme or reason in a very short period of time. I never asked for a higher limit...they just gave it to me. As far as your link for a confirmation that you maybe looking for...it's really not in commander's copied article. You might be better off taking a look Carney's tweets or Senator Corker's website. Thanks for playing the game. P.S. Don't hate the players...hate the game...
A fruit case...
I heard lemons are good to eat these days if you like the sour flavor...
29.6% increase from 2Q?..that's awesome...shows the very strong footings of the GSE's...
Well obviously the government doesn't care about those Americans who bailed out the two companies that help was not warranted. Did you get your check in the mail for doing such good deed? Greed for the government can be a bitch! Americans who expect a return on their investment are no different than shareholders who expect the same...the only difference in the GSE's scenario is...the American people got paid much more in return and are expecting much more money while shareholders are still waiting...so who are the greedy ones?
Ya'll see that massive road kill today?
We got ourselves a shooting star...
Wipe Out!!!
As long as I don't get my ear chewed off...I'm good...
That's it?...that's your hope and reason?... don't hold your breath over it...it's sealed tighter than a drum...
When and how are you assuming that we will under sealed conditions? Sweeney has yet to grant admittance for NYT which one can say would be an arm for the public...she didn't deny, however she did say it's premature...so where do you get this thought of sealed documents being released to the public anytime soon and jeopardize the case? Enlighten me thus the board...
You're welcome.
No, it's still sealed from the public.
Just received a late email from god...he said he had to postpone release due to differences in mankind...namely the politicians......ps...he just made the moon into a blood bath to show his anger in mankind...
FMCC Buying 48000 @ ask 2000 left= 46000 overage...WTF?...who's blocking?
Financial Stability
Oversight Council
Home » Initiatives » Financial Stability Oversight Council » Council Meetings
Council Meetings
Get updates to this content.
On Monday, September 21, Secretary Lew will preside over an executive session of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) at the Treasury Department. The preliminary agenda includes an update regarding the Council’s ongoing work on asset management, an update regarding the Council’s ongoing work on central counterparties, consideration of the Council’s fiscal year 2016 budget, and an update on international market developments.*
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires the Council to convene no less than quarterly, but the Council has historically convened on a more frequent basis. The meetings bring Council members together to discuss and analyze emerging market developments and financial regulatory issues. The Council is committed to conducting its business as openly and transparently as practicable, given the confidential supervisory and sensitive information at the center of its work. Consistent with the Council's transparency policy, the Council opens its meetings to the public whenever possible.
Open session Council meetings are made available to the public via live webcast and also can be viewed after they occur here. Upcoming Council meeting dates and times are posted following the official notification to Council members of an upcoming meeting.
Meeting minutes for the most recent Council meeting are generally approved at the next Council meeting and posted online soon afterwards. Meeting minutes for past Council meetings are available here. Readouts for past Council meetings are available here.
* In accordance with the Council’s Transparency Policy, which is available at www.fsoc.gov, this meeting will be held in an executive session to prevent the potential disclosure of information contained in or related to investigation, examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of, an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial markets or financial institutions; information which would lead to significant financial speculation, significantly endanger the stability of any financial market or financial institution, or significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action; inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not otherwise be available by law; and to conduct administrative business of the Council.
http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/council-meetings/Pages/default.aspx
Don't worry about it, it's a safe haven. If they wanted to get rid of it, they would have done it already. There wouldn't be talks of recap with a company they're closing. There wouldn't be a regulator when there's less companies to regulate. Hanky Panky wouldn't have said c-ship was to be temp either...you can't mislead shareholders then close the companies down...it's down right fraud even if it's the government...worse case scenario would be transfer of shares with or without a reversal split...even with a reversal with c-ship exit the value would be the same...just as in forward split...but with reversal split upon c-ship exit, the value wouldn't drop due to the exit...
He's already out of his short position in Herbalife...it's irrelevant on this board...
lol...he just didn't want to talk about it...don't make it more than what it really is...that's like saying Ackman Farted...whoa that's going to make the share price go nuts...lol...C'mon people...I know we all want the price the go up...but meantime...let's keep our heads on straight...
Driving and texting...that's a no no...keep your eyes on the road...nevermind Ackman!!! You'll end up killing someone including you!!!
Why in the world is this turd trading below the bid...the bro is trading in the same pattern. WTF!
Oh yeah...Swoosh!!!
Why, is it moving?
As long as the net income is positive by a penny or even...they won't see another draw...it's actually very far from it...as long as people are not buying with cash...
...inquiring taxpayers want to know...why are taxpayers at a first loss position right now? Why is the government not making any changes? Why are taxpayers not paid dividend payments for their investment? What benefits have taxpayers reaped for their investment? Why can't taxpayers sell their senior shares if it's "taxpayers money" that was invested?
The government can't have private investors taking a first loss while pumping the housing...what idiot is going to agree with,"here, take my money so I can lose it"...
Hindsight is always..."I knew this was going to happen"...lol...boy I'd hate to have this guy riding in the backseat of my car...damn backseat drivers...