Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I hear big trouble coming there way.
Should be an interesting week.
Dejavue of when the stock went from .0175 to .06 and I was being told to sell sell sell just before it ran to .75 cents.
Remember that? I sure do!
Who want to listen to someone who gives advice like that?
I'm talking specifically about posting a hyperlink on the Ihub message board.
"Everything they have done" is the answer? That doesn't sound like someone who is an expert in running corporations.
Why don't you share with us the long list of low priced OTC stocks that have been burning up the market and making people money over the last several months by going up and staying up?
Really? What were the bad decisions? I love learning from experts like you.
Yeah, like 98% of the people in the NFT space, right? Still had many happy investors before the NFT market shit the bed.
The S-1 was not a dilutive or toxic financing. Maybe, a little education is in order. The term "dilutive financing" refers to convertible notes that have no specific exercise price or "floor" and is considered floorless. This means the funding conversion price is set at a set discount to market and means that regardless of how low the bid price of the stock may go the funder can exercise at a discount to market even if the stock drops down to .0001 bid. This can cause an OTC company with a 50 million share float go to a billion share float with the blink of an eye.
The S-1 that was done was set at a relatively small discount to market and all the shares for the $3 million were sold at .15 cents. Was there minor dilution? Of course, because they sold shares to raise capital, but it was not what anyone would consider to be a dilutive or toxic event.
Many years? Does that include during the time the stock ran from .017 to .75 cents or are we just gaslighting?
Anyone who doesn't believe in the company should sell their position and move on. Crying about what could have or should have been done serves no purpose and certainly unless actively involved in the company no one really knows what happened previously or what they plan to do going forward.
Real money is always made in the market when things look at there worst. This situation will prove to be no different.
Seems this is something new that Ihub is doing. I found that if you just start the link with www instead of http that seems to work.
Never happened! LMFAO!
Over the last several months this stock has traded as high as .08 cents which is an almost 400% swing. I'm sure the company spent monies marketing the public company before the overall market tanked.
I agree the company needs to focus on marketing their games and hopefully with these gaming streamers and a new tournament series that is what we're going to see.
Nope! Unlike 99% of other OTC companies this one has a parent company who will support them without having to do any types of dilution fundings.
I don't listen to people that are consistently wrong.
They are doing a live streaming event at 12 pm
www.tiktok.com/@moshaaai
I don't see anything......
Would be a shame to screw over the shareholders because they were peddling something they don't own or have the rights to.
Again, I question how they go from R&D to a marketable pharma with some pretty significant technology in two months?
We could say, maybe they bought exclusive licensing rights for this incredibly innovative detoxifier, but then we would see a PR and 8-K filing.
Nada!
It's just a matter of order of events.
The hire a marketing coordinator
They come out with a new game
They market the hell out of the game
They attract gamers into their discord community
They work the discord to make it grow
I know they have recently hired a marketing coordinator so let's see how the new game works and is promoted.
Swarm Defense trailer.....
youtu.be/1dxZQPYX8NM
Their newest game Swarm Defense should be out within the next two weeks. I just saw the trailer and it looks promising. If they can get their act together with marketing to the consumer we should anticipate some positive results.
Maybe, I do know more than they do.
I don't think Mr. Harrington did enough due diligence on this company and may be getting duped.
Wouldn't that be something?
I smell something fishy with this alcohol/hangover product. It takes years to develop a product like this yet they magically came up with something in a couple of months?
Why can't you find anything about it on their website?
These Canadians are always snaking the system. I hope Harringtom knows what he's getting himself into with these characters.
Has nothing to do with the PPS. It would be up to whatever the analyst recommended on behalf of the broker dealer who sponsored them on the uplisting. It really comes down to how many shares outstanding they would want them to reflect as a NASDAQ listed company.
This company is already considered a relatively low float deal. A middle tier investment banking firm that would sponsor them to the NASDAQ would probably want their share structure to be sitting around 30 million outstanding. The share price would be irreverent because with a reverse merger of that magnitude, the share price would take care of itself.
Also, it would not benefit the company to do a significant reverse split because it would adversely affect the trading volume of the stock with too few shares in the market.
Most likely, they would do eveything simultaneously in succession starting with the rolling in of operating assets. That would automatically qualify them for their NASDAQ listing requirements and bring in a new threshold of investors based on the exponential growth and profitability of ViaOne Services over the last 3 years.
In regards to P/E multiples....
While a 20x PE multiple is the industry average that normally doesn't apply to companies that are showing aggressive growth. Institutions, money managers and analysts allow for much higher multiples in consideration of growth. The PE multiple of a company is not a requirement for a NASDAQ listing. Once the company were to decide to stop investing in growth and start consolidating for earnings potential we would expect the PE multiple of the company to come down.
"If" the company were to roll in their operating assets from ViaOne Services the public entity would be doing in excess of $200 million in revenues with positive EBITDA and net income.
They are many ways for the company to meet the criteria for a NASDAQ listing. Most likely, they would convert all shares into a fully diluted stage then do a small reverse split to maintain about 30 million shares outstanding. Unlike most OTC companies that do a RS for the wrong reasons this would be a positive. On a hypothetical 5:1 reverse even people who bought shares at .50 cents would do well when you take into consideration NASDAQ wants an initial $5.00 per share price.
Again, all hypothetical but very doable considering the amount of money ViaOne has invested in GMER.
Since when has the amount of shares outstanding in a company ever been a listing criteria for NASDAQ?
Me thinketh not!
Call the company and find out. Oh, that's right, they are only a shell. LMFAO!
If the company were a shell they wouldn't have ongoing operations nor would they be creating games like their latest game Lightspeed Obby which just came out 3 weeks ago.
Misinformation is never a good way to develop credibility.
You have to look at the big picture. "If" they were to do something like that they would be a NASDAQ listed company.
There is no doubt that should ViaOne ever choose to reverse merge one or more, if not all of their operating assets, that would speed things up exponentially in building shareholder value.
Like I've said many times before, this company has over $2 million invested in this venture and they are not planning to lose.
We should be grateful that GMER has the ability to fall back on ViaOne Services for support because whatever benefits ViaOne is going to eventually benefit all shareholders.
Don't shoot the messenger. The statement was made that the game never has more than a few players at one time and that was false information. Like you say, facts are facts.
Why would anyone be bitching about Super Craft Brothers when the game is in Beta and isn't currently being marketed?
Show us where in Roblox their data says there are little to no players playing the game.
YEAH, I love taking advice from people who don't know the difference between Mind Craft and Minecraft.
Not such a great look! LMFAO!
More misinformation....
I watched a stream a few days ago that had almost 100 people playing their latest game Lightspeed Obby at the same time.
Why don't you talk to someone from the company as opposed to making things up?
Private companies do not have to submit to the same scrutiny that public companies do regarding the SEC and FINRA.
Also, when dealing with public shareholders there is a substantial amount of liabilities that private companies are not subjected to.
I'm sure all of these issues and more weighed in on the companies decision to produce a tradeable token.
But, like I said, why guess when you can simply pick up the phone and ask?
Do you know where they are based out of?
U.S. based company's that are publicly traded are required to play by a different set of rules.
That's why MicroBuddies couldn't duplicate the same business model of Axis Infinity.
Let us know when you find out.
Yep, and still wrong after all these years.