Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
it's too bad there are no naked shorts here. gene selling discounted shares, yes.
you wouldn't happen to have 1, just 1 link to prove your nss claim?
but this source has been credible
gotta love that third party hearsay passed on as a fact.
doesn't really matter what you think.
OSC will do what they want.
what would you considor "original victims"
the OSC is part of it too. like you said, it's not right for US money to go up there.
i feel this way from your posts that has poked holes in all the facts gathered over the years. they(OSC) HAVE to be a part of it.
nope, your post make plenty of sense. dont sell yourself short.
your posts.
What would make you change your position on their reliability?
not far fetched if you know all the facts.
clears it up.
what ever happened to your 'source' then?
yes, that's what i'm saying.
no, i did not say anything about the windsor star......
that was part of the pump. i sure you have seen that PR saying prior ones are not 100% truthful.
i glad you are buying more each week at these bargin prices!!
thing is, gene selling deep discounted shares is a fact.
claims of naked shorts are not factual.
agreed. it's mind boggling how people have said for YEARS that rcch is going up.
do YOU know the float?
didn't think so
As you are well aware through our mutual friend, I am not far away from the pulse.
is this correct?
I just want to clarify that I DO NOT have access to insider information, either directly or indirectly.
or, is this?
would be nice if you could clear that up.
what do you considor very soon? 2-3 years?
just what solid product you talking about?
i heard that Gendarme was short over 2bil shares and gene helped them cover.
that what my source said.
could be more shares than that, they wouldn't say
OK, so something that you have no real proof of, caused you to buy. that was 1 question.
must of missed this one. or, is the answer in your reply cause i didnt see it.
and if shorty already covered at .0001 during the last 2 years?
what happens then? i'm sure you've considored that.
why buy cause of shorty?
and not based on real revenue?
and if shorty already covered at .0001 during the last 2 years?
what happens then? i'm sure you've considored that.
not insider trading. he trade because of lies, not valid information.
i am not aware of your 'friend'(wanna name them?), didn't think so. just more third party hearsay.
hell, maybe you just make it up. i'm basing this on past posts. cant recall anything actually happen. it's not shorty or bashers.
IT'S THE TOTAL LACK OF REVENUE!
how much are you down since you freely admit to not being up in rcch??
Other agendas have been noted
what does that mean? any proof? third party hearsay dont count.
the only agenda is gene's. how's that working out?
nothing for years. no change here.
any word on the move to a different exchange?? weren't you posting about that about a year ago?
whom do you mean by "they"??
It's as if they don't want RCCH around? Hmmm, I beg to differ, they are wrong.
are these the same who have done harm to rcch? but, cant prove what they have done?
can you explain?
Lots of wrongdoing by outsiders to RCCH
actual proof, not third party hearsay from a message board.
just how do you know what is going on with the conpany? lotta hype from gene. still no facts.
common sense does that to ya.
it's ONLY been 14 months. what's the rush??
same as hiphop. that was part of the pump. i sure you have seen that PR saying prior ones are not 100% truthful.
did you actually believe it?
can you explain?
Lots of wrongdoing by outsiders to RCCH
actual proof, not third party hearsay from a message board.
i hope you didn't buy because of that PR. did you see the PR stating prior PR's were not 100% truthful?
all you are posting is part of the pump. many got taken because of that. got anything a little more current??
sorry you believed that one. i recall a PR telling shareholders not to believe any piror PR's.
which other PR's do you feel are 100% truthful?
speaking of which. have you found that 1 truthful PR yet??
i sure am glad the house painter didn't con me. jsut a little old union ironworker that did not get snookered. many smarter than me got conned.
sorry, your reply is too long to hold my attention.
a simple yes or no is all is was looking for.
i have no inkling to explore any of your red herrings.
are you blaming them on the scam that took peoples hard earned cash? look at the date, was only 13 days before the a/f's. they could of also been a part of this scam.
have you filed any type of written complaint?
that's a strange website. only 1 page and no links to the owner of the site.
where did you locate that?
of course the hype is 5 years old. that's when it (sljb) was being pumped. pps was around .16 back then too.
the man just showed you prove and yet you still deny. seen that for a while now. haven't we?
so you are OK with shareholders getting screwed?
If a major negotiation or problem arose which required direct and immediate attention, it would be attended to preferentially. If it meant that a group of shareholders got stood up, or that some hands didn't get shaken, well then so be it.
what stuff was flying at petar? got proof? can you explain?
I suspect that in the current state of his business development, STUFF is flying at Petar from every direction, including some directions he hadn't even anticipated existed.
little did you know back then(OSC). huh?
I have served in very senior management in Fortune 100 companies. The CEO's that I have served have most certainly been aware and sensitive to the IR function, and they certainly understood that they worked for the shareholders.
did any of them get conned by petar too?
have you noticed that there are many other activities in process, such as:
CCM merger
Kronk's Gym
Cement Factory Deal
Re-negotiating Saw-mill
Additional Cement supply deals
SAM's deal
Product centers in ME and NA
just what happened to these? you clearly posted that those things were happening
maybe your DD is faulty?
so you dont agree with it. why? haven't you seen enough to prove to you it was all a scam? if not, just what is lacking?