Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
True as it can be considered reckless endangerment.
That being said, providing technical analysis on a stock is no different than the countless examples of irrationally exuberant assumptions (or as GILGAMSH calls them- "FACTS") that litters the history of this thread.
The only difference between my Technical Analysis and the thousands of posts containing unsubstantiated hyperbole is my technical analysis has yet to be proven incorrect.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
gernb1,
Please elaborate.
What is an inflection point? Purchasing music through the Internet? Secure files (unlikely as all encryption will likely be hacked)? Elimination of P2P file sharing programs through legal muscle (unlikely)? Elimination through the spreading of computer viruses (asking for legal nightmares)?
The charts, in the event one has experience in technical analysis, have been quite predictive in the case of EDIG stock.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
What was what for?
Your many success in stocks? Okay, prove it. I'll provide you my fax number, you can suppy me with your annual account statements for the past, what, ten years? Just cut out or white out the personal information.
Deal?
The fundamentals are wasted and have been since, oh, 1996. A market bubble, particularly excessive in technology stocks, did nothing to change the underlying fundamentals.
There are hundreds if not thousands of small companies looking to attract investors by promising a return on invested capital at some undiscernable point of time in the future. 1% of them survive, 10%-30% of failing 99% are scams to begin with.
You say: "Yes there are many yes answers about how bad things look ,until you look at the ,what if factor & the emotional factors ."
So two reasons to invest are the:
1.) "What-If" Factor
2.) Emotional Factor
In other words, when pigs fly.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Huh..
The charts never lie. They never do because they are a static illustration of the past.
Of course charting is never a sure bet. Charting is a process which requires forecasting the future using data from the past.
$0.115 is my target price. Watch it happen.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
The charts never lie and they are the only effective method to generate probabilities on uncertain outcomes.
Of course charting is never a sure bet but it provides an ability to forecast the future.
In that vein, how else would one trade/invest in e.Digital?
If you are basing your investment/trading decisions purely on fundamentals; you would have been out of this stock a long, long, long ago as even today, at a 30 million dollar market capitalization, the common stock is grossly overvalued relative to the underlying fundamentals.
If you are investing/trading purely on anticipating Press Releases you are either a fool or accessible to inside information. Which begs an additional point, even if one were plugged into the timing and content of future releases one would still need to "guess" the market's reaction to the news.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
New multi-year lows are imminent.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Right!
That is why I withdrew the post.
I don't think you're a "bad guy" sort-of-speak although I do find issue with the way you treat others who have lost serious money in this stock.
It would be a breath of fresh air if you showed compassion for those who did not profit but found themselves on the tail-end of the rise and fall.
I understand you have "free" shares and I appreciate your "strategy" but it leaves a sour taste when you blame people for falling victim to a well-orchestrated, uh, business idea.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Matt,
Ask Robert or Fred if they would be willing to subject the company's technology to a "independent" review.
Their objection will more than likely entail some need for secrecy, or whatever.
Explain to them that there are countless think tanks that will review technology while ensuring crucial details are not disclosed to the public.
Continue with this direction until they submit.
If they don't, accuse them of running a "software scam" and cite the name of a respected BYU lawyer.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Doni,
e.Digital is the company that assembles the pieces of a puzzle (one technology here, another there, yet another there).
Thousands of companies (as well as university-sponsored engineers) offer the same services.
What they are trying to sell is a "superior" way of "gluing" each piece together, or what is otherwise known as the MicroOS.
Would you agree with the metaphor?
If yes (or no), based on your understanding, why is it that no one else has recognized e.Digital's superior method to piece together the puzzle?
(and please refrain from offering a conspiracy theory)
Thanks,
But Anyway
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
bomba,
DigitalWay "opened" their books.
In 2001 they did about $24 million in sales (that is USD), which was down approximately 30% from 2000.
Their gross margin was about 15%.
Their operating margin was about 10%.
Although their sales dropped off in 2001, DigitalWay is by all means a fast growing company. To their credit, although revenues were falling YoY, their gross and operating margins expanded; a indisputable sign of prudent and forward-thinking management able to adapt with economic and industry-related changes by implementing cost savings initiatives.
So when you say EDIG could generate 15-20 million in revenues alone from one product, well, that is just fanciful on your part.
e.Digital would be a wild success story if the generated one tenth of that from one product line.
Link to DigitalWay financial statements:
http://www.digitalway.co.kr/english/ir/ir_financial.html
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Game, Set, Match..
The big boys have taken this market by the short ones.
Certainly there is always room for marginal players but the cost structures must be extremely low and even then the margins are razor thin.
Expect EDIG to dangle the O1000 "promise" for as long as the "cult" is willing to support speculation regarding it's "elusive release" (ashame as I was really interested in purchasing one but instead went with the Ipod) but at this point I have doubts that the slated 1000 units will ever be delivered.
So where to next?
IFE? Don't see much on that front considering e.Digital's face is APS (a home-based business).
Autotainment? Fujitsu-10 appears to have selected a different contract manufacturer.
Video? A crowded market comprised of superiorly capitalized companies with more experienced and apt engineering teams.
So what emerging technology niche can e.Digital claim some expertise in?
802.11B? Text messaging? High definition set-top boxes (HDTV)?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Chessplayer,
I provided you two examples of a "topping pattern" that did not precisely meet your erudite standards yet resolved in a text-book fashion.
In May of 2001 a head and shoulder topping pattern developed on the Nasdaq chart. I remember vehemently denying the existence of the pattern for similar reasons that you have cited (did not occur after an extended uptrend, volume was not consistent, etc). Suffice it to say, the market cracked in perfect form with a head and shoulder top and the rest is history. (EDIT: And I lost a tidy sum of money on a couple of trades- perhaps the reason I remember the situation so vividly.)
My point is not to argue what the textbooks say (I've read them all), my point is one should listen to the market and lend creedence to it's whispers. Remember, technical analysis is not an exact science.
You can deny my analysis until you turn blue in the face but only time can determine who was right and who was wrong.
I stand by my prediction.
But Anyway
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
sky56,
The general rule of thumb for generating a target price of a double top is subtracting the high (in this case $0.255) from the midpoint/pivot ($0.185) and subtracting that number from the pivot.
In other words ((.255 - .185) - .185)) = $0.115.
In the chart to which you are referring, I was using incorrect number for the pivot and thus the $0.08 target.
Truth be told, and this may allow Chessplayer to step from his crumbling soap box, one could just easily argue the current pattern is a descending triangle- which is a bearish continuation pattern and may better fit into the context of e.Digital's longer term downtrend. Both the double top and descending triangle arrive at the same target price of $0.115.
Regardless of the semantics, the chart clearly illustrates exhaustion by "bulls" and an imminent arresting of control by "bears".
In laymen's terms- it's going down. And if it breaks $0.185, it's going way, way down.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Chessplayer,
My uncanny ability to read the charts predicted today's breakdown.
Here is the evidence.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=658357
EDIT
And here was my chart from Tuesday:
It doesn't get more accurate than that. Wave 5 should be quite nasty.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Until the highs of $0.255 are broken, it is a double-top.
Listen, I'm not trying to convince or persuade anyone to do anything. I'm merely positing my opinion of the charts, you can accept it or reject; it in either event, I do not benefit.
That said, I would be willing to make a friendly wager that my target of $0.11-$0.12 will be hit before the stock pierces $0.255 (which I do not foresee as a remote possibility anyhow); in which case it will certainly appear as a double-top on the charts.
TA requires flexibility, a characteristic that clearly does not describe you.
Tell me Chessplayer, was this a double-top?
Yes? No? It certainly does not fit into your cookie-cutter definition of a double top.
The market is dynamic.. be like water, my friend..
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
I don't disagree.
I believe the charts are a graphical illustration of the market's interpretation of the fundamentals.
Check out some of last year's "waterfall down" charts just before the capitulation really gathered momentum, the prudent investor could have avoided some nasty losses (or generated some healthy gains) as the charts generally hinted that beneath the surface something was wrong.
Here is a good example of the charts foretelling a emerging fundamental disappointment.
The gap down was a response to a earnings warning the night before but more importantly look at the trading six days prior to that fateful evening.
It was just a matter of time and the charts provided early warning.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
True.
My experience with technical analysis is that there are a handful of patterns (set-ups, if you will) with a high probability of resolving in a predefined direction.
As you stated, charts do not and cannot predict the future but they do provide assistance in assigning probabilities on future outcomes.
In the case of e.Digital's chart the odds of a breakdown were high.
Rising wedges in the context of a broader downward trend are a high probability indicator, especially when the volume pattern supports the formation.
The most important aspect to technical analysis, especially when analyzing the price chart (opposed to the secondary indicators such as MACD, Stoch etc), is understanding the psychology underlying the "picture".
A rising wedge in a downward trend is indicative of buyers becoming less aggressive (unwilling to chase the ask) as prices rise. This is understandable, when taken in the context of a downtrend, as buyers have been burned over and over again. Eventually supply exceeds demand and the price breaks lower.
My studies now indicate that the rising wedge breakdown has increased the probabilities that a double-top has formed.
Barring some miracle development on the fundamental front, look for $0.11-$0.12 as the next "low".
Here is the prior double-top on the EDIG chart.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
richardosbourne, Sentinel?
Detractors of technical analysis and others?
The charts never lie.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Chart.
Doesn't look good. $0.255 needs to crack on a closing basis or..
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Leading Set-Top-Box Chip Makers Embrace Windows Media 9 Series
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/sep02/09-12SetTopPR.asp
Broad Support by Equator Technologies, National Semiconductor, Sigma Designs, STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments Paves Way for Next-GenerationHome-Entertainment Experiences With Digital Media
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands -- Sept. 12, 2002 -- Today at IBC2002, Microsoft Corp. announced that the leading manufacturers of chips for set-top boxes and next-generation digital media appliances have announced support for Windows Media (TM) 9 Series. Manufacturers announcing support for Windows Media Audio and Video 9 Series today include Equator Technologies Inc., National Semiconductor Corp., Sigma Designs Inc., STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments Inc. This announcement, on the heels of the Windows Media 9 Series launch last week, paves the way for manufacturers such as Pace Micro Technology PLC to create set-top boxes with tremendous digital media processing power at a low cost while at the same time offering consumers new high-quality content delivery services over satellite, DSL and cable modems.
"Windows Media 9 Series is a significant step forward in the evolution of digital television, especially for telcos and broadband network operators that deliver more content and services than ever," said Tim Fern, chief technology officer at Pace Micro Technology. "Advanced silicon supporting Windows Media 9 Series has been important to our development of the world's first Windows Media 9 Series capable set-top box, which will be on show at IBC2002. Not only has it helped us make product costs viable, it has reduced our time to market -- crucial factors for our telco and operator customers."
Also at IBC2002, several companies will demonstrate for the first time how Windows Media 9 Series can be decoded and encoded at the chip level. Equator will be the first company to demonstrate high-definition video decoding of Windows Media at 720p (1280x720) on a chip -- video resolution that is two and a half times the resolution of a DVD today. Texas Instruments will be the first company to demonstrate encoding of Windows Media Video 9 directly on a chip. These breakthroughs in using Windows Media 9 Series video technology at the chip level will open up new consumer possibilities for next-generation set-top boxes delivering services directly over IP-based networks, new applications for encoding Windows Media Video and new consumer electronics devices. Windows Media Video 9 Series will offer significant advantages by allowing TV programming to be recorded in the same quality as MPEG-2 technology but tripling the storage capacity with its superior video compression.
"Offering Windows Media 9 Series support at the chip level was the next logical step in our vision to enable seamless access to digital media content any time, any place and on any device," said Dave Fester, general manager of the Windows® Digital Media Division at Microsoft. "The breadth of support today shows that Windows Media 9 Series can flexibly offer the best quality audio and video at any bit rate and, by locking the video bit stream for silicon, create new opportunities for network operators, chip makers and consumer electronics device manufacturers."
Leading manufacturers of chips for set-top boxes that support Windows Media Audio and Video 9 Series announced today at IBC2002 include the following:
* Equator Technologies' BSP series System-on-a-chip processors support playback of Windows Media 9 Audio and Video. The BSP-15, as demonstrated on Equator's Tetra (TM) hardware platform at IBC2002, supports high-definition 720p playback. Equator provides chips to many leading set-top box manufacturers, including Pace Micro Technology, a world leader in digital television technology, for its IP400 and IP500 family of home gateways.
* National Semiconductor's Geode processors and Geode CS1301 media coprocessor support the playback and decoding of Windows Media Audio and Video. National Semiconductor currently provides chips to Pioneer for its recently announced DigitaLibrary Digital Network Entertainment device. National also provides chips to other Japanese manufacturers that will be announcing products later this year.
* Sigma Designs' new EM8500 DVD decoder chip will support playback of Windows Media Audio, and a future series of decoder chips will support Windows Media Video as well. Sigma provides chips to Fujitsu Siemens Computers, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Kreatel Communications AB -- all leading sellers of set-top boxes in their respective markets.
* STMicroelectronics is the world's leading supplier of MPEG-2-based chipsets to the set-top-box market. The ST200 family of media processors will support Windows Media Audio and Video 9 Series technologies and complement its OMEGA family of set-top-box and DVD decoder ICs. This will enable the combination of traditional digital TV and DVD platforms with a new range of audio and video applications enabled by Windows Media 9 Series.
* Texas Instruments' fully programmable 600MHz TMS320C64x DSP platform uses Windows Media Encoder 9 Series to help bring convergence one step closer, enabling IP-based set-top-box OEMs to design an all-in-one product for digital media compression, streaming video transmission, HDD storage and more. This means that consumers using devices with this new chip can now play back and encode Windows Media 9 Series. This chip will open up opportunities for real-time encoding of content into Windows Media Video 9.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pace Micro Technology PLC (PIC.L)
http://www.pace.co.uk/home/main.asp
http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/p/p/pic.l.html
Fri 20 Dec: Top Ten Profit Warnings - The Motley Fool UK
http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/021220/35/dh61h.html
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Huh?
"give up their many different lines"?
They don't "give up" anything per se.
They allow a company like EDIG to design a blue print for a widget centered around their chip.
If a company or companies select the blue print and take it to the manufacturing phase, or if EDIG manufactures the widget themselves, the chip company gets paid per implementation of each chip.
Clearly you do not understand the business-side of the equation.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Your understanding is correct.
This is yet another "product" specification available for license by OEM's amid a myriad of competing specifications.
I wonder why EDIG decided to design around Equator instead of established names such as Texas Instruments, Broadcom, Xilinx, Altera etc?
Seems as though a PR using the aforementioned names would have more "bang" to it.
Then again, maybe some of the principals or affiliated individuals at EDIG are investors in Equator?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
Hmmm...
Equator Technologies, Inc. appears to be a 2nd/3rd tier player behind the likes of Texas Instruments, Xilinx, Altera, Broadcom etc.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
MB,
Your terms are fair and I agree to abide by them.
Is the signature at the bottom okay?
I appreciate your leniency.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=661266
MB,
1) What are/list all of your aliases (up in the 5+ range)
Rootus
But Anyway
Crap Dice
AstockcollapseNow
EDIT
Oh yeah! I just remembered the others! A bunch under "OVERLORD" such as -OVERLORD-, --OVERLORD--, ---OVERLORD---, etc.
Sorry, I forgot about those!
/EDIT
Honestly, like I have mentioned before, if I do have additional aliases I do not recall "who" they are and, in fact, would be interested in finding out.
2) Are you invested in EDIG? Were you invested in EDIG? Ever employed by EDIG?
I am not currently invested in EDIG. I have made two round trip trades in EDIG, once in 1999 and again in 2000. I have never been employed by EDIG.
3.) I'm most interested in *why* you put your time, effort into speaking negatively of a company that you (I assume) have no plans to profit from. Surely your time has to be valuable.
I've been following EDIG since the stock was trading at 0.10 in early 1999 when a friend recommended the stock to me. I've spent an inordinate amount of time doing research on the company, its competitors and the markets they target. I enjoy following the story, digging through EDIG's SEC filings and sharing what I find to be pertinent information for other investors to read and hopefully provide feedback.
I also find the "cult" (your word) behavior of many of its investors to be extremely interesting. Studying/observing the groupthink-behavior of EDIG investors has actually aided me in better understanding the "psychology" of the market.
Anyhow, I guess my main motive is following the storyline to it's conclusion. I've been following the company since MP3 players were little more than conceptual devices, long before Napster was created and when EDIG was seemingly a huge up-and-coming technology powerhouse affiliated with IBM, Intel, Lucent, Texas Instruments etc. Nothing ever came about from said relationships in terms of revenues to the comapny although the stock made one of the bigger market moves in 1999/2000.
4) What is your favorite Krispy Kreme donut?
Tough question. Although there is only a few KKD stores within 100 miles, I'm more of the KKD standard glazed donut kind of guy. No frills.
5) If you want to be legitimate and people take you for your word, why is it that you continue to create new accounts, using false names, false e-mails to do this?
One reason is I think much of the stuff I post has some merit to it. If you were to review my posts (those not deleted) I think you will find that I'm not one of those people that post a one line message that is more a waste of space and time than anything else. Anyhow, it frustrates me when I spend time uncovering what I believe to be a decent topic of conversation, compose a message to share with others interested in discussing it and within 5 minutes it's deleted.
I get pissed off and refuse to be, what I believe, unfairly silenced just because my opinion is not the popular one. Is it an immature reaction to sign back up and post the message again? Probably, but I am a big advocate of freedom of speech.
6) Because of #5, what gives you any right to trash a company when you are guilty of lying (multiple times) yourself?
Good point but I don't really see my actions as lying per se. If I was using multiple alias to respond to one another or whatever; I believe that is a form of deception or lying. While I won't use multiple aliases to intentionally deceive, I have, as you know, used them to continue to publicly voice my opinion. The EDIG folk are a tough crowd to please and while I'm not here to kiss arse and make friends by succumbing to the standard group opinion; I wish my message (and alias) wasn't so quickly snuffed out rather than discussed or dismissed based on it's merits.
7) Who is your favorite country music artist?
I'm not a big fan of country music (probably because I haven't listened to it enough) although I think Shania Twain is beautiful so by default I automatically like her stuff. Oh, have you ever heard the sond Japanese Cowboy by Ween? I guess it's a country song, a funny one!
8) Do you follow/invest/trash/pump any other companies besides EDIG?
Yes I do, I trade professionally and manage some investment accounts of friends and family so I generally have a love and fascination for the market and the stocks that make it such. For some reason, I also have a good time (hobby?) researching stock swindles. I love trying to figure out the machinations of a good "mystery". I guess it is sort of a welcome diversion from doing TA and FA on some of the larger capitalized companies.
9) How tall are you?
Six foot three.
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
MB,
Okay! I only have one bullet left so I hope I can satisfy your request in one message.
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
Matt,
That sounds fine.
Can we do this through PM? I don't want to burn through my three available posts.
I don't care if you post what is discussed privately on this or any other public thread.
Thanks.
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
Mister Brown,
No, I am not a lawyer but my wife is a tax attorney if you are seeking some free advice.
Please reinstate my posting privileges and in return I will make a concerted effort to solicit new members to Investors Hub.
As an addendum, this is my third post today and as a result of my suspension will not be permitted additional posts unless you have a change of heart.
Thank you in advance for your consideration regarding this matter and I hope you and I can come to a equally rewarding agreement.
Here's a wish for a Happy and Healthy New Year,
But Anyway
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
Mister Brown,
I would like to come to an understanding with you in an effort to have my charges dropped and privileges reinstated.
I appreciate your flexibility in this matter.
Best Regards,
But Anyway
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
Mister Brown,
A little bird informed me that you made a New Year's resolution to exonerate me of my charges.
I appreciate your kindess and understanding.
Sincerely,
But Anyway
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
How do I get out of this dastardly place ?!
Mister Brown, please release me on my own recognizance.
Signed,
But Anyway
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
That's the best you can come up with?
But Anyway
"If you can make money off stupid people, then by all means, take it from them legally. They clearly don't know how to do use it." - IH Admin (Matt) FATT Thread Message # 553
The logic of your argument is flawed.
In the event an individual violates a policy, it then becomes acceptable that others violate policies as a response?
This would seem to lead outright anarchy, Fred.
The more responsible and prudent course of action would have InvestorsHub hold me to the User Agreement and immediately terminate my account. The irresponsible course was further breach of website policies in response to violations.
I do not find Mr. Brown to be a straight-shooter nor do I believe he "plays fair" and apparently he refuses to operate within the rules he presumably set forth.
I abhor hypocrites, Fred. Mr. Brown is a hypocrite. Do you like hypocrites, Fred?
In the end, it doesn't really matter as I have already commenced a letter-writing campaign to every enterprise advertising through InvestorsHub in part detailing InvestorHubs complicity with "virtual bolier rooms", paid penny stock promoters and a general environment which breeds shills, swindlers, confidence-men, and hucksters whose livelihood is taking advantage of unwitting investors.
I highly doubt any company, after reading about the above, will continue to associate themselves with this operation.
But Anyway
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut. -- Ernest Hemingway
Whether I am a paid subscriber or not is irrelevent.
Apparently anyone can send "private messages" to ihub administrators.
Clearly Mr. Brown is in breach of the very same policies he presumably set forth.
The policies, in no uncertain terms, state that private messages will remain private even when their release is demanded via subpoena. Quite frankly I find Mr. Brown's egregious violation of said policy rather pathetic.
Private Messages: If you are a paying subscriber to Investors Hub, you are able to send and receive private messages using our database system. Our policy is that we will not deliver the contents of private messages to anyone, even when demanded via subpoena. As a user of Investors Hub, understand that this is no guarantee that we won't someday be forced by a court to deliver this information. It hasn't happened yet, but please understand that it is possible.
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut. -- Ernest Hemingway
Absolutely attrocious that Mr. Brown, an InvestorsHub founder, intentionally breaches one of the websites policies.
Private Messages: If you are a paying subscriber to Investors Hub, you are able to send and receive private messages using our database system. Our policy is that we will not deliver the contents of private messages to anyone, even when demanded via subpoena. As a user of Investors Hub, understand that this is no guarantee that we won't someday be forced by a court to deliver this information. It hasn't happened yet, but please understand that it is possible.
InvestorsHub will not release private message even when demanded by a subpoena but they will egregiously post them to public message threads.
Pathetic.
But Anyway
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut. -- Ernest Hemingway
Yes, but I have never posted on any message thread using the account in question.
If requested, I will explain my reasoning for having more than one account, which, of course, my reason seems good enough to myself. <g>
Thanks.
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut. -- Ernest Hemingway
Matt,
Please provide an explanation for the suspension of my account.
Sure, some of my angles on the e.Digital thread are at best controversial and at worst blasphemous to the cultish consensus membrane.
In essence, I am interested in just what was said that warrants a suspension.
Thank you for your cooperation and understanding,
But Anyway
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut. -- Ernest Hemingway