Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We don't know the circumstances regarding the shares failing to issue yet. It is too early to say what happened. There was definitely a gag order or protective order involving the federal court cases so we won't know until those cases are resolved.
Settlement reached is all I need to know
Tarpon Bay Docs 12/22/2016 ORDER GRANTING APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION:
https://cvweb.clerk.leon.fl.us/public/clerk_services/online_searches/search_courts/process.asp?report=full_view&caseid=2764025&jiscaseid=
100k is starting bid for CPD Mobile
thx pb1973! TALK sounds like a ten bagger to me.
URSA did not make a good faith effort or any attempt at all to seek any resolution. URSA has not shown good cause for the Rule 2004 Motion and cannot do so because its requests are out of proportion to its interest in the case.
https://cdn.pacermonitor.com/pdfserver/UB3MDIY/67176113/United_Mobile_Solutions_LLC__ganbke-16-62537__0123.0.pdf
Nice to read TMUS does their homework
Kramer can't touch this
Can't destroy the destroyed
The truth about TALK must hurt like hell
The preferred shares were never converted and that is no lie as stated by an attorney legally the exchange was never fully consummated.
They aren't playing with little lawyers nemore lol
NITE won't see anymore of my money if they keep doing this to TALK
Kramer has succeeded in destroying UMS, CPD Mobile, TALK, and all the shareholders. The Powerup case' gag order has provided the means to drive to share price down. Hopefully the truth becomes evident and the price rebounds.
My thought was he came straight out of the sewer
They take out the bid then drive the price down at the close. It has been the same pattern every day
I place the blame not on TALK but on the brokers and the toxic lenders
who
New TALKers Please beware of dog and average in slowly
I'll be averaging down my price per share soon because I think TALK should be around 3 cents at this P/S ratio
Truth does always seem to reach the light.
TALK 2017
Happy New Year
Curt Kramer Bad Actor filed suit against TALK
Eastern District of New York
Power Up Lending Group, LTD. v. ITALK, Inc. et al
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/19602725/Power_Up_Lending_Group,_LTD_v_ITALK,_Inc_et_al
Some court rulings concerning Curt Kramer who formed Powerup Lending:
Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc.(fka LLEG) Post # 103285
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120387721
Charged with Selling Billions of Shares of Unregistered Stock, Penny Stock Financier to Pay $1.4 Million
A New York-based penny stock financier and his firms have settled charges that they violated the federal securities laws when they purchased billions of shares in a pair of microcap companies and failed to register them before they were re-sold to investors for sizeable profits.
Curt Kramer and his firms Mazuma Corporation, Mazuma Funding Corporation, and Mazuma Holding Corporation agreed to pay $1.4 million to settle the Securities and Exchange Commission’s charges.
The SEC said that its investigation found that Kramer and his firms obtained unregistered shares in penny stock issuers Laidlaw Energy Group and Bederra Corporation. For the Laidlaw transactions, they claimed to rely on an exemption in Rule 504 of Regulation D that permits certain companies to offer and sell up to $1 million in unregistered shares. However, the Mazuma firms’ purchases of Laidlaw shares exceeded Rule 504’s $1 million limit, so the shares were restricted and not exempt from the registration requirements of the securities laws when they were re-sold, according to the SEC. Mazuma Holding Corporation’s acquisition and sale of more than one billion unregistered shares of Bederra that had been misappropriated from the issuer by its transfer agent also were not exempt from registration, the SEC alleged.
“Unless there is a valid exemption, shares can’t be sold publicly without a registration statement that provides investors with the level of detail they deserve about the investment opportunity being offered,” said Michael Paley, co-chair of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Microcap Fraud Task Force that was created earlier this year to target abusive trading and fraudulent conduct in securities issued by microcap companies that often don’t regularly report their financial results publicly.
“Billions of shares were not vetted through the registration process yet became publicly traded as a result of the violations by Kramer and his Mazuma firms, and the SEC will continue to punish non-compliance with the registration provisions of the securities laws to ensure the investing public is protected in these types of transactions,” Paley added.
According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings:
Kramer and his firms purchased two billion Laidlaw shares, which amounted to 80 percent of Laidlaw’s outstanding shares at the time. They purchased these shares at a significant discount from prevailing market prices, making it highly likely they could immediately re-sell them publicly for a short-term profit. Kramer and his firms purchased the shares in 35 tranches with no six-month gaps, thus quantifying the transactions as a single, integrated offering through which Laidlaw exceeded the $1 million limit under Rule 504 by raising a total of $1,259,550. No registration statement was filed for any shares that Laidlaw offered and sold to Kramer and his firms, nor was any registration statement filed for any shares that Kramer and his firms subsequently re-sold into the public market. Despite exceeding the $1 million limit, Kramer and his firms continued to acquire and sell additional Laidlaw shares and profited by $126,963 from these transactions.
Kramer and Mazuma Holding Corporation acquired more than one billion shares of Bederra in 2009 and 2010 through 21 separate transactions from the principal of Bederra’s transfer agent, who had misappropriated the Bederra share certificates. Again they purchased the shares at a significant discount from prevailing market prices. Kramer and Mazuma Holding Corporation re-sold the misappropriated Bederra shares to the public without any registration statement for a profit of $934,404.
In the settlement, Kramer and his Great Neck, N.Y.-based Mazuma firms agreed to pay disgorgement totaling $1,061,367 plus prejudgment interest of $128,611 and penalties totaling $273,000. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Kramer and Mazuma consented to the entry of an order finding that they violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The order requires them to cease and desist from committing violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) and not participate in any Rule 504 offerings. Entry of the order will constitute a disqualifying event for Kramer and the Mazuma firms under the recently enacted bad actor disqualification provisions of Rule 506."
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/financial-fraud-law/b/blog/archive/2013/11/26/charged-with-selling-billions-of-shares-of-unregistered-stock-penny-stock-financier-to-pay-1-4-million.aspx?Redirected=true
FINRA Blacklists Curt Kramer, Mazuma and Asher Enterprises
ECOS attached FINRA’s letter to Michael Siegel, president and chief executive officer of Ecolocap, as Exhibit 99.1 to the filing. The letter informed Siegel of its decision. FINRA acted pursuant to the provisions of Rule 6490, which allows it to refuse to process corporate action requests in some circumstances.
In this matter, the regulator determined that Ecolocap’s request was deficient and its denial was necessary for the protection of investors, the public interest, and to maintain fair and orderly markets. In the letter, FINRA cited specific factors that led to its determination. Those factors had entirely to do with the company’s reliance on toxic funder, Curt Kramer, for financing. Kramer is well-known in the penny stock marketplace as a toxic dilution funder. In November 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged Curt Kramer and his Mazuma companies with violating federal securities laws; Kramer settled the charges for $1.4 million.
Consistent with the SEC’s recent action against Kramer, FINRA did not hesitate to identify Kramer as a bad actor, which disqualifies him from some types of market participation.
By virtue of FINRA Rule 6490(d)(3)(3), if the regulator has “actual knowledge that … promoters or other persons connected to the issuer … are the subject of a pending, adjudicated or settled regulatory action or investigation by a federal, state or foreign regulatory agency, or a self-regulatory organization; or a civil or criminal action related to fraud or securities laws violations,” it can reject corporate action requests.
In this case against Curt Kramer, FINRA specifically stated that it:
“has actual knowledge of a November 25, 2013 Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Cease-and-Desist Order (Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-15621) (“SEC Order”) involving Curt Kramer (“Kramer”), President of Asher Enterprises, a convertible note holder of ECOS. The SEC’s investigation found that Kramer and his firms Mazuma Corporation, Mazuma Funding Corporation, and Mazuma Holding Corporation (“his Mazuma firms”), obtained unregistered shares in penny stock issuers Laidlaw Energy Group (“Laidlaw”) and Bederra Corporation (“Bederra”). According to the SEC Order Kramer and his Mazuma firms purchased two billion Laidlaw shares, which amounted to 80% of Laidlaw’s outstanding shares at the time. They purchased these shares at a significant discount from prevailing market prices. Kramer and his Mazuma firms purchased the shares in 35 tranches with no six-month gaps, thus quantifying the transactions as a single integrated offering through which Laidlaw exceeded the $1 million limit under Rule 504 by raising a total of $1,259,550. No registration statement was filed for any shares that Laidlaw offered and sold to Kramer and his Mazuma firms, nor was any registration statement filed for any shares that Kramer and his Mazuma firms subsequently re-sold into the public market. Despite exceeding the $1 million limit, Kramer and his Mazuma firms continued to acquire and sell additional Laidlaw shares and profited by $126,963 from these transactions.
Further, according to the SEC Order, Kramer and Mazuma Holdings Corporation acquired more than one billion shares of Bederra in 2009 and 2010 through 21 separate transactions from the principal of Bederra’s transfer agent, who had misappropriated the Bederra share certificates. Again they purchased the shares at a significant discount from prevailing market prices and re-sold the misappropriated Bederra shares to the public without any registration statement for profit of $934,404.
In the settlement, Kramer and his Mazuma firms agreed to pay disgorgement totaling $1,061,367 plus prejudgment interest of $128,611 and penalties totaling $273,000. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Kramer and his Mazuma firms consented to the entry of an order finding that they violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The order required them to cease and desist from committing violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) and not participate in any Rule 504 offerings. Entry of the order also constituted a disqualifying event for Kramer and his Mazuma firms under the recently enacted bad actor disqualification provisions of Rule 506.
In SEC Press Release 2013-249 “Penny Stock Financier Agrees to Pay $1.4 Million to Settle SEC Charges,” dated November 25, 2013, the co-chair of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Microcap Fraud Task Force stated that “billions of shares were not vetted through the registration process yet became publicly traded as a result of the violations by Kramer and his Mazuma firms, and the SEC will continue to punish non-compliance with the registration provisions of the securities laws to ensure the investing public is protected in these types of transactions.”
FINRA pointed out that while Asher does not appear on the current ECOS shareholder list, other documents the issuer provide reflect Asher has transferred 640,474,489 shares into Cede & Co., the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’s (DTCC) nominee name. Further, on October 21, 2013, Asher was issued an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in exchange for a $32,500 loan with a conversion date of January 2015. Once converted, Asher has the potential to become a beneficial shareholder of the company holding approximately 10% of ECOS’ outstanding shares which Asher has the option to convert in its entirety, as stipulated in the July 14, 2014 Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note.
FINRA noted the above activity raised concerns for the protection of investors and the transparency to the marketplace as it relates to the proposed corporate action request. As such, the Department has deemed ECOS’s corporate action submission to be deficient under FINRA Rule 6490(d)(3)(3).
FINRA notified ECOS of its right to appeal and of the required fee of $4,000.00 made payable to FINRA. Payment must be submitted in the following manner within seven (7) calendar days of its notice.
Failure by ECOS to file a written request for an appeal within seven (7) calendar days after service of FINRA’s notice, along with the required fee, will cause FINRA’s determination to become final.
FINRA’s action in the Ecolocap case could have far-reaching effects. The kind of toxic financing offered by Asher is extremely dilutive. Typically, the funder gives his client companies cash in exchange for convertible notes. The relative financing agreements provide for conversion of the notes into common stock at discounts of as much as 50 percent to market price. As the funder converts and sells time after time, stock price is driven down, and so more and more shares must be issued to meet the terms of the agreement. That is why these arrangements are called “death spiral funding.”
As dilution takes the shares outstanding to dizzying heights, many of Asher’s clients find it convenient to effect large reverse splits so they can “start over.” As of April 13, 2014, ECOS had 6.9 billion shares outstanding; the number is likely higher now. A 1:2,000 reverse split would have brought that under control, but it would also have destroyed the investments of current holders of common stock.
Thanks to FINRA, that split is no longer an option. That’s bad news for the company, but perhaps worse news for Asher Enterprises and Curt Kramer. It will be interesting to watch the next moves in this chess game and whether FINRA will blackball other bad apples in the future.
For further information about this securities law blog and dilution funding, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton, Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at info@securitieslawyer101.com or visit www.securitieslawyer101.com. This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2014/finra-blacklists-curt-kramer-mazuma-asher-enterprises/
Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com
Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
Taxpayer ID:
32061442292
Taxpayer Name:
ITALK INC
Mailing Address:
6140 NORTHBELT PKWY STE A1
NORCROSS, GA 30071
Location Name Status Address Location Number Permit Begin Date
ITALK INC ACTIVE 6302 FRANKFORD AVE STE 2LUBBOCK, TX 79424 00001 07/06/2016
ITALK INC ACTIVE 4921 34TH ST STE 200 LUBBOCK, TX 79410 00002 07/06/2016
ITALK INC ACTIVE 5407 4TH ST LUBBOCK, TX 79416 00003 07/06/2016
ITALK INC ACTIVE 1702 E 4TH ST LUBBOCK, TX 79403 00004 07/06/2016
ITALK INC ACTIVE 6002 SLIDE RD LUBBOCK, TX 79414 00005 08/10/2016
https://mycpa.cpa.state.tx.us/staxpayersearch/processTaxpyer.do?tpNtrlId=4012751806146
yes an ironic post though pertaining to a lack of DD
Great DD
Links?
10 cents
If "TALK assumed existing liabilities in the merger" then what makes you think nothing was given to TALK in return? Your misguided interpretations only reinforce an arrogant reputation which does little to persuade me or any longs into selling. Until we see filings which parlay that information, we cannot say what the truth is. However, the overabundance of evidence contrary to your extraordinary statements strengthens my resolve.
Why did UMS LLC owe iTalk $249,313.75 Isn't it likely that UMS LLC owes iTalk for taking over some of their 1600 kiosks and stores? That will become known when the SEC filings come out
Exponential growth is the key here and shorty is being investigated because of all the false accusations thrown around like rice at a wedding
or Kramer started a gag order suit claiming fraud can of worms which is akin to tax evasion
Tax evasion is what it comes down to and NITE's umbrella has been broken. Selling is the first thing that will be looked at.
The corruption lies in the claim that TALK is a scam and that is why any investigation will include a thorough look at the plaintiff and market manipulation. Some very phat cats will be under scrutiny
Public corruption, the FBI’s top criminal investigative priority, poses a fundamental threat to our national security and way of life. It can affect everything from how well our borders are secured and our neighborhoods protected to how verdicts are handed down in courts to how public infrastructure such as roads and schools are built. It also takes a significant toll on the public’s pocketbooks by siphoning off tax dollars—it is estimated that public corruption costs the U.S. government and the public billions of dollars each year. The FBI is uniquely situated to combat corruption, with the skills and capabilities to run complex undercover operations and surveillance.
Maintaining operational oversight of several International Contract Corruption Task Forces, which investigate and prosecute individuals and firms engaged in bribery, illegal gratuities, contract extortion, bid rigging, collusion, conflicts of interest, product substitution, items and/or services invoiced without delivery, theft, diversion of goods, and individual and corporate conspiracies on every level of U.S. government operations.
No other law enforcement agency has attained the kind of success the FBI has achieved in combating corruption. This success is due largely to the cooperation and coordination from a number of federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies to combat public corruption. These partnerships include, but are not limited to the Department of Justice, Agency Offices of Inspector General; law enforcement agencies’ internal affairs divisions; federal, state and local law enforcement and regulatory investigative agencies; and state and county prosecutor’s offices.
https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/public-corruption
iTalk will be exonerated of all claims of fraud
Bias clouds one's judgment when it comes to objective DD. TALK hasn't filed SEC documents that prove any intentional misconduct.
I know one thing for sure; Claiming fraud most always opens an investigation into the plaintiff.
Are you saying the Powerup case is frivolous?
Claiming fraud in federal court automatically opens an FBI investigation. TALK will be excused from the frivolous charge.
SECTION 215’S AUTOMATIC GAG RULE VIOLATES THE FIRST
AMENDMENT.
The constitutional defects in Section 215 identified above are further compounded by an automatic statutory “gag rule,” 50 U.S.C. § 1861(d), that prohibits anyone from disclosing that a order has issued. The gag rule provides:
No person shall disclose to any other person (other than those persons necessary to produce the tangible things under this section) that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has sought or obtained tangible things under this section.
Id.
The provision is little more than a blunt law enforcement tool that recklessly infringes on First Amendment rights.
https://www.aclu.org/files/FilesPDFs/amicus_firstamendment.pdf
Your interpretations are misguided as there are no disclosures