Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I would say that about 4 weeks ago, INO was sitting at about $3. Now it's $13. Even if it follows the same trajectory as ONCS, it won't come down as much. If, what you say, Money, that ONCS is superior to INO or much simpler in method, its time will come. Zoriden also stated that ONCS is a better buy than INO and he said that when it was seventy cents.
I hate to just sit like dead money on this one but if any of you have ever authored an article or book, it takes much time to get published and ONCS is no exception. It has to gain a tremendous amount of acceptance and exposure before it can run up.
I'm not budging.
dawson
Great to see u back Z. ONCS has a great chance of opening doors starting tomorrow.
Always good luck for ONCS shareholders. Or can I say what a mess. Never seen such walk downs.
These MM's are still playing games with ONCS.
Yes he and ero. At the bottom of the screen last night, the bans showed that information.
Yes, a down day, but hey, six cents up from the bottom. Will we ever find out who did the dump a few days ago?
Your information is too important to throw it away by reprimanding someone on this board. No personal attacks or the message gets deleted.
"Big money wants in."
It may be lame but it's realistic. Why don't you explain how "big money wants in," for our edification. I could easily have said the same thing. But, in lieu of the big crash down these past few days, why don't you give it a rest unless, of course, you know for sure and can share the info, why big money wants in.
Yeah, and that's why it's been dropping into a chasm lately. Maybe everyone can drop the pollyanna attitude and get real.
And you've been right so far... NOT!
I thought I was a genius this morning by buying at .46 but now below .43. Crazy.
Now down to .43
Right now Schwab is showing .451
But, of course, you realize there's a difference when Buffet invests, he's allowed to scour the books before purchasing, before buying at a discount. We schleps are just winging it with GUT feeling and buying with both fists as if that means the stock is going up.
Might I add, all this selling is under 500,000 shares. Don't be fooled, there's no bad news just MM crap.
I just looked at my Schwab account and ONCS was sitting at .481 YIKES!
Furbush: Believe me when I say that you are a breath of fresh air. Thank you for your input. I don't understand how some things have occurred here when we all strive for quality.
This is not a matter of balanced but a matter of posts being allowed to be published and we are being overrun with posts that don't make sense. Think about it without stating names.
I wrote a number of posts in the past week and many have been deleted. We have to stop this nonsense.
I agree with Sal. This guy comes out of nowhere to stir the pot with his post on 7/11: "I was looking at Gov clinical trials (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=Oncosec+Medical) and was wondering why it still shows as recruiting for the 3 studies."
And then these two posts this morning 17564 and 68.
17564 is basically the same post on 7/11, just different wording couched with concern. Let him wonder. If you look at his history, he's probably friends with other trolls on iHub.
Good call, Sal.
A Twofer! Ero and Zoriden on the same message. Feels like Christmas. The share price will stabilize. Ero and Zoriden are back!
Yay, Ero you're back!! You can say anything and I will laugh. Ero's return portends good things and the stock price will stabilize.
Glad to have you as an earnest DD member. Welcome.
Who is the prophet? And who will be the profiteer? Hopefully those two are intrinsically joined...here.
Is it possible that the posters of this board can file a claim against JJ to Admin Dave? I think this is the utmost absurdity that we are subject to this poster who knows nothing about ONCS and nothing about being a moderator and what its responsibilities really mean.
I emailed Admin Dave who said that Ero had been warned several times to not post inflammatory comments (of course toward JJ) and then he was canned. Also Ero had the nasty habit of deleting posts and not saying anything. But truly this board has been overrun with wise guys who don't belong here and if I can't get Ero back, I am going to raise hell that JJ be removed. I need your help to send a PM to Admin Dave and let him know the situation here.
dawson
With all due respect... and then you can write, "What do you think smart guy?"
Pertaining to the song only - that was Dionne Warwick.
Did it sound like I was throwing in the towel? Not! On a more relevant note, could the OTC price not be accurate?
So, basically, for the near future, we as shareholders, are in between a rock and a hard place. And I don't see it changing for a couple of months. If no authentic (knock your socks off) news by Oct. 15, wherever the price is, then it's time to rant and vent on this board. :)
It may be just silly to you... I would like to hear from him so I can apologize if that is the case.
The more important point is that he could have, in parenthesis, as part of his explanation made a reference to as not to confuse because apparently "a few posters...seemed confused and think that it's being speculated that ONCS is redoing a Phase 2a..."
Sal, why do you feel the need to step in for JJ? Let him tell us.
"had to repeat trial as the initial one didn't have any women etc.. "
You need to show a source for this inflammatory information. You are claiming this is true. I have not read anywhere what you have written.
This is really bad form for a moderator not to give essential information.
With all due respect to both of you, why keep on exerting so much energy talking to them? I just ignore them. I know what I have in ONCSand I am waiting.
I believe, most of the long time shareholders, know without your copying that ONCS is a huge risk. But their technology is not like serendipity. The "odds" are constantly changing but so what? If it's too hot for you in the kitchen, get out.
I would rather you take your research time and dig up new facts about ONCS instead of this drivel. We are all adults here... don't think there are any kids on this board and would appreciate new information vs. your past 3 posts.
In other words, from the OTC handbook, relax on the waaaay down. Because a company like ONCS will recover.
Sad though, that the manipulation is so incredibly rampant and SOP.
not me
Bidding low on my own stocks to prove that something is out of whack. On no negative news and the stock keeps on getting sold. Something is wrong or someone who has a lot of shares just needs the money and can't wait for that big pay day.
I have also put in these stink bids to confirm something that is not published in the daily stats. Like 45 minutes ago I saw that the price had gone to 57.5 but was not reflected in the stats until a minute ago... I don't know why it takes so long to show that price and can't make sense of it either when today we have fast internet.
I doubt it. Last week I put bids in at .62 and .64 and never got filled. I'm beginning to see a pattern where the price is not reflected in its current range. Not making too much sense but I believe there is some sort of manipulation happening where the price is walked down a few cents and a couple of investors throw in the towel and this process is repeated. I just don't believe that the pps is real and that is why my price is never filled on the day that I put it in.
It only confirms that there is nothing wrong with this stock - so don't panic.
When I put in my bid, Schwab showed the price at .57.5. That's nuts. Larson you have your answer from yesterday. How can anyone be excited when heavy manipulation is "forcing" the pps into downward oblivion.
I put in a stink bid at .54 and will let the board know if it goes through today. Doubt it will, today or by the end of the week.
Yes, I was actually mocking him via my stupid math slip pointed out by others. My apologies to Larson and the board for making that gesture.