Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
H3 - As am I (expectation wise). You have a great one too. I will be working all weekend, so I don't know if "great" is appropriate, but it could definitely be worse!!
Take it easy!
H3 I can't PM you ( with all the funds that PCFG is generating for me, I guess that I should spring for the ability to do so though). But yes, anyone (company) involved in the earthmover tire business is doing well at the moment.
The truth of the matter is that the worse the economy gets, the better job security I have, (Higher raw material values = Higher demand for our product), so I guess that I am in a rather unique position in this hellacious economy.
I have no doubt that we will all do well here. If I did, I wouldn't be here now would I? We shall see over the course of time what the future holds for us!
Sit tight and (hopefully) enjoy the ride!
You are exactly right! And I have been a part of it. It is "off task". I have made my point and will say no more on the subject.
You are wrong. Equipment cannot be rented if tires are not available. I don't believe that you understand the dynamics involved.
I have to back "carhauler" up on this one. I work for Michelin. The market is very, very tight! If we could double our capacity tomorrow, they would still all be sold! Our biggest front end loader tire goes for $120,000! Tires are not a cheap purchase by any means!
Very simple! Parabollic + ballistic = PARABOLLISTIC!
Perhaps this should be the new moniker for PCFG (All in due time of course if and when it is justified)
"PARABALLISTIC GOLD CORPORATION" instead of "Pacific Gold Corporation"!
Do ya think Mitch and Rob would go for it? LOL
Sorry to be off task here.
You do understand that the SEC is "in the pocket of wall street traders" don't you. They do what they do to pacify the masses.
You are likely to get into more trouble for stealing a twinkie from the local convenience store than if you were to bilk millions from shareholders.
All of the Wall Street scams that have been exposed in the past decade or two, how many of "the perpetrators of fraud" actually served time in prison?
Think about it!
It's all good. We are still doing well. It was just a "Darn, what happened here?" moment (to put in PG rating terms). We are making a slow, steady climb which is good for all.
I really can't complain from where I sit. It was just one of the "OOPS" moments that are bound to happen over the course of things.
I am into PCFG for the long run. No other place I would rather be at the moment.
BTW, glad you came across from "the dark side". You have been a good advocate here lately!
Nuff said!
What the heck happened in the last 10 minutes? I go to make a funds transfer into my trading account and by the time I am done there is a noticeable drop in PPS.
Kinda in poor taste there Chopp. JMO
We need to stick to PCFG and not worry about personal motivations.
Good call, 3 minutes before the close! LOL
Seriously, good to see that the "typical" EOD rundown hasn't happened the last 2 days. Does that mean that MM's are losing their grip? Just a thought.
Is the "mudflow zone" a good zone? Just wondering.
Okay, I think my minute or two is up. I wanted to add this.
No matter the sequence of events: financials & uplisting, production news, rates of extraction, etc... (unless something really bizzare happens) this will all come in due time.
Considering the amount of time that many of you (one unnamed, in particular) have waited for this (these) day(s) to come to pass, why be cranky now when all is at the point of fruition?
I have said this a few times in the past, "I am neither a businessman nor a miner but I have to believe that Mitch and Rob desire to be wealthy (based upon all the prevailing DD that is available) and I will be more than happy for them to carry me along on their way up!" Well that is not exactly what I stated, but that is irrelevant.
I hate to quote #'s because I have been chastised in the past for doing it but I have a valid point in doing so. In May I was down about $3000. Now I am up about $55,000. Can someone please tell me what I have to complain about??
OK, I guess that is it for now.
Have a good evening all.
I can't believe the amount of dissention on the board today!
We need production news, no we need financials! Uplisting is most important, no it's not production is! Why are they PR'ing BS financials, we can get that from the SEC site, They are not PR's they are SEC updates...... Ad Nauseum...
The board was very busy today but for the most part it was frivolous point and countre-pointe discussion! I have to wonder if idle observers were wondering "Do you want some cheese with your WHINE?" I have been a party to this in the past, so I can't be too critical. But all day long! Give me a break!!
What, pray tell, are we going to have to talk about when PCFG is fully reporting and producing?
That is the view from where I sit. I will shut up now (at least for a minute or two, LOL).
I don't see how anyone can view the fact that PCFG wants to expand it's processing capabilities as a bad thing! Purely speculation here, but maybe that means that the new concentrator "kicks butt"!
I do agree with JS (in post #50633) that the logic behind the decision should have been stated though. Perhaps when they divulge the reasoning it will be a "YEE HAW" moment!
That is an interesting perspective (needing more geotubes to meet their production goals). If that is the case, I hope that PCFG produces as the current process allows at first based upon their present cababilities vs. delaying producing for the sake of increasing their capabilities.
"And yes the charts don't look to shabby"
I almost hate to keep responding to you, but you intrigue me!
You keep shouting EXIT STAGE LEFT but then you reply with the previous statement. You are an enigma to me!
Addendum: I guess "true fundamentals" (technically, stock wise) and "fundamentally sound" (based upon stated capabilities and what is coming down the pike) are two different things.
Apparently most here on the board subscribe to the latter as far as PCFG is concerned. I don't blame them. There is nothing here that screams "RUN FOR THE HILLS, WE ARE OUT TO ROB YOU OF ALL OF YOUR SAVINGS!
As always, JMHO
"Besides, playing the OTC game is about now, not 10 years ago."
Pray do tell, what is it about "now" with PCFG that does not look viable to you?
You say that we are "gambling on expectations". Please list for me the number of "blue chips" that have missed the mark of analysts expectations in the past year. Or to make it even easier for you, the past quarter.
I (and I am sure that many here) believe that you are barking up the wrong tree on this board!!
Have a good evening and I wish you well on the majority of your trades, (no one hits 100%).
Nuff said!!
You seem to be a chartist. Valuations rely on both fundamental and technical aspects. To rely solely on one aspect is akin to going through life with one eye closed. You may see what is going on, but you don't get the full depth of the picture.
All indications for PCFG point to a strong fundamental aspect. My perspective is that the charts don't look to shabby either. I used to follow the charts back when I traded commodities, but that was a long time ago!
JMO
I would have to disagree with you. It should be "sell on a run up and buy on a retracement". jmo
I do believe we have been trading "based upon the retail reaction to PR's" And so far it has been good!
Welcome. You have chosen to be in the right place at the right time!!
IMHO
Thank you!
I started to cut and paste a few excerpts from this to post on the board (since it is rather long) but gave up since there was so much that was relevant in the article. It may be from 2004, but that does not decrease the value of the information.
I am constantly amazed by the amount of information that is posted here on the PCFG board. Often times, too much to absorb!!
I do not frequent other boards since I am "all in" on PCFG. But, if other boards offer 1/10th of the info that the posters on this board do, I would be surprised!!
Thank you to all. I am sure that your input is appreciated by many here!
I guess that at some point in time we all have to make the call to sell some or all. Personal circumstances and/or perspective of the future of PCFG are the determining factor I suppose.
Hopefully we will all make proper choices. There are alot of good people on this board and I would love to see us all profit handsomely!!
I like "e". that was funny! I'm not looking to exit PCFG by any means. Just looking for "recoupment of base investment" perspective from others.
I thank you and the others whom have given me their input. Choosing when to take profit from PCFG is a tough call. I (fortunately) am not in need of the funds at the moment.
I'm sure there are some better plays out there, but so far PCFG has been good to me and I believe that the ride has just begun.
Good luck to all. Anxiously awaiting Monday to see what happens!!
Would it be practical for you (or anyone) to contact Mitch/Rob to pose the question as to what would be the minimum ROI that will keep the company viable? I have no idea if such questions are responded to by companies. Worth a shot??
Just a thought
Thanks for the response (I'm assuming it was based upon my question to you). You have obviously done your homework.
There is a very low possibility of any other of the properties coming online this year (I believe). Your #'s all sound viable over the long term. It's just the "by the end of the year" statement that brought what you said into question.
No problem with what you said, per se, just the timeline.
Go PCFG!
I honestly hope we don't hit that level this year. I will be dead from either a stroke or a heart attack (due to the level of excitement) or toxic alcohol poisoning (due to the level of celebration) ROFL!!!!!! Can't enjoy the profits if I am dead!
Reasonably slow and steady beats the heck out of the "rocket up, rocket down" roller coaster!!
Go PCFG!!
No offense, but please verify the basis of your calculations. If they are valid, there will be ALOT of excited MF's here
"I plan on riding the rest free for at least a year for tax purposes"
That is another thing that I didn't hit on in my post. Capital gains Tax considerations. That weighs in on my decision too! Short term vs long term capital gains and how it figures into the "big picture".
Being new at this, I still have alot of learning to do!!
PCFG is up 50% since you started here.
Robo has been here alot longer than you are aware of apparently! He/she/it is a harbinger of good things to come (at least so far). Take Robo's posts as "tounge in cheek" if you will.
It is all good. No worries!
There is something I have been wondering (this is relative to all stocks, not just PCFG), at what point do you sell some to recoup your initial investment?
If we go to 0.10 then I have made a considerable profit. But, if at that point in time the indications are that it will go to 0.20 why sell any? I would lose 2x of the "potential" profit on the shares that I sell. And then if it is @ 0.20 and indications are that it may go to 0.40, what then? This could be extrapolated into infinity!!!!
The common "Don't put your eggs all in one basket" doesn't apply to me. I have a boatload of eggs (All stamped PCFG) in one HUGE basket. I'm just wondering if anyone can give me some perspective as to when I should start making crepe's with my eggs?
PS: It's easy to walk away on a loser but hard to walk away from a winner!
As I put it in a previous post. "Robo is our contrarian good luck charm".
The fact that he has been posting this weekend bodes well for Monday perhaps! Time will tell.
Does it have to be in quotation marks and/or Caps IE: "PCFG", or is PCFG/pcfg good?
Just wondering.
Fox,
I don't know if you have the answers, but I have a couple of questions for you. These are based upon "long term" expectations for PCFG.
The info on the mining almanac site indicates that of the 4 subsidies of PCFG the relative value of BRCM is @ 4.4% and Fernely is @ 49.6%. I'm not sure what to make of the info.
I know that getting Fernley up and going is not anything in the "near term". but isn't it next in line? Does that mean that we will see an exponental increase in the PPS when Fernley comes on line?
I also noticed that BRCM, Graysill & Pilot Mountain all show 100% ownership by PCFG but that Fernely shows 0%. Not sure of the importance of that info either.
Just wondering what your thoughts were concerning this.
TIA
Dakota,
Yes, that was a good find by Fox. But you have to remember that at this point it is purely speculative that it is associated with PCFG. I believe you are causing yourself undue stress based upon something that has not been defined as a fact.
The "smiling" phase is just beginning. To be followed by the "broad grin" phase and then, potentially by the "delirious giggling" phase. LOL
Things are at the point of fruition right now. It will be interesting to see where PCFG takes all of us investors from here on out!
AIMO of course
I think that was our contrarian good luck charm Robo who said that. lol
No matter where we end up @ EOD, I will consider it a good day. My only hope for today was to see us break the wall @ 0.04, which was done easily (with the help of an unexpected PR).
It was cool to watch the account balances over the course of the day!! It does not bother me that we are no longer @ 0.0495. Those numbers will be back and will be a distant memory one day (IMO).
Long and strong and wishing like heck I had more powder!
I know. That is why I said what I said. I used to get annoyed with Robo. Now I am happy to see him. It's all good.