Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
BID=.0022,.0025,.0027/ASK .0029,.0032,.0039
Hold ! Don’t give into the MM’s
MM are definitely driving the PPS DOWN!
How do I know?
Two days ago, before the “run-up” I tried to sell 500K shares @ .0021, that was hitting the bid. The MM drop me a 5000 share lot and then a 1000 share lot. This action brought the PPS down to .0018. I then pulled my order! I saw the writing on the wall. (I’m glad I did with yesterday’s action).
The point is the MM’s are playing this stock. In the long run…they’re trying to run it up, and if you try to sell, they’ll buy a little at a time from retail sellers. Just look at the spreads swings. The PPS is up and down huge percentages.
Don’t let them bring it back down in the .0020’s. The MM’s know the potential of UWRL… So make them PAY for it like the rest of us have!
If you need to sell…Make them PAY the ASK!
Not for long!
Quiet before the storm. News Soon.
Excellent choice Mel.
I agree with the name change back to “Highline Technical Innovations Inc.”
The best and surefire way to regain creditability is to return to the name that stands for excellence!
Keep up the good work.
http://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/search.html?ScriptForm.startstep=viewentity&ScriptForm.startScriptForm.start.ScriptStepView.viewentityFILEvalue=C39899
Doctor! I think I detect a heart-beat! Come quick!
It’s turning out to be a tough day in the markets. 2-1 to the down side.
I sure would like to see some positive news released today. Maybe Earnings?
News always draws a lot of attention on down days. That’s the only way to “Beat the Street!”
Yeah, A real investment, Not just a "Paint-Job!"
Anticipating name change approval?...Soon!
The “Short Sellers” think SSEV is “Over-Sold!
I checked FINRA Short selling list today, (http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100318.txt) and on 3/18/10 short sales dropped to 4.095M from 9.639M on 3/17/10
In case you don’t follow these stats, that’s a very good trend. It means that not only is the PPS going to stabilize, SSEV is poised for a possible “Short-Squeeze” when good news is released.
A “Gap-Up!” Is inevitable…”That’s what I’m Talk-in about baby!”
It’s Friday, Kids do you know what Friday’s bring?
“Pay-Day Bonanza!” Buy! Buy! Buy!
20,000 sold @ $.0022 = $44.00 - 8.00 (Com) Net $36.00 fricken dollars!
Really People. Stop the bleeding you “Nervous Nellies”. If you are going to sell for 36 bucks, at the least make them buy @ the ASK….Please!
I agree with the bottomed out theory!
This is really an excellent entry point to get in sense the last run-up. I missed the boat last time and I’m very surprised to see come down to $.0018. I have been accumulating under .0025 when cash is freed up.
IMO the PPS is in a “Over-sold” at this level and a rebound is inevitable. The only question that remains is “How high will it go this time?” Maybe a PENNY?
GLTA-Schlumpy
Positive attitude is all I have left!
I honestly believe that the PPS will increase on the name change approval, because the lack of it happening is what drove the PPS down into the ground. Approval will at the least give the forward moving business plan some credence, Humphries at the helm or not. I would just prefer not after witnessing the action on SSEV.
$.0020 is a Very Good entry point. If you have been contemplating an investment in SSEV this is your opportunity to get in a 50% discount from recent highs. Oh sure there maybe a few shares traded a bit lower, .0019 maybe, .0018 doubt it, .0015 NO-WAY!
Even if it does go a little lower, chances are few shares will be traded and the MM’s will suck them up before you can think the word BUY!
Buy now while those Bastards (MM) are waiting for the cheep shares from those “Nervous Nellie’s“.
If you do the math, you will find that a whole lot of shares have been bought over $.0020. IMO anything less then $.0020 places SSEV into the “Oversold” category.
Hang in there people, news will be out soon.
That's just your hemorrhoid flaring up, from sitting there so long watching this boring stock.
There will be NO need to RS, Humphries is going to retire and hand over the business to someone that know how to grow a business the way should be run.
Then DLAD will run up to $.0010
Pauly, thanks for all your efforts in keeping some sense of reality here on the DLAD board.
As you know, there are individuals who post messages that exploit, misinterpret, draw imaginary conclusions and out right lie about the few facts we receive from press releases and daily trading stats. I personally have no idea what motivates these people to go to such lengths other then to get a some sort of thrill out of reactions from true shareholders such as myself.
I have written messages on this board that have supported the CEO and his decisions over the past nine months, knowing that he is doing what he believes is in the best interest of the shareholders. Now I’m not so sure that he has our best interest in mind. In my opinion he should have disclosed more detailed information of the business acquisitions shareholders, which includes percent of ownership, expected revenue ect. By not giving full disclosure, it appears he is hiding something, and with the Private Cabal and the public Cabal split companies, how can one not be skeptical of his intentions. Not only is this a disaster in public / shareholders relations, it gives those individuals that are unsavory ammunition to kill any sort of life the company has left.
With the small shreds of detail Steven Humphries did divulge, such as FINRA asking more questions (kicked it back at least twice) we have been able to surmise an approximate date of approval for the name change. I believe SH when he said that the lawyers have answered the (hopefully) last of the questions concerning FINRA. This leads me to also believe that this week or no later then early next week we will receive the FINRA approval. I check the website you posted everyday at the market open. Today’s list had three company name changes and I could only verify one of them had file for the name change on 01/21/2010. This coordinates with the last DLAD press release on 02/01/2010 where SH made the statement “The lawyers answered the last of the question from FINRA” last week. This would be the sixth week from that date.
To say the least, I am very disappointed in the way SH handled this fiasco of events over the past nine months, however I think that he still has a chance to clean-up the mess we have before us. With the name change approval announcement I would like to see him answer our questions about the company. If he was to have a shareholders meeting, I would drive the 800 miles one-way to attend. Because we / I have a lot of questions about the company WE own. If no meeting, then a conference call would do.
The bottom line here is…Steve Humphries needs to do what is right with this public company. What is right is to put in writing what the hell is going on! FULL DISCLOSURE! I cannot for the life of me think of a reason why anyone would want to buy a share of this company after what has transpired over the six months.
In closing, lets pray he can pull off the biggest turn-around in history when the news comes out. Because that’s what it going to take to ever sell another share of this joke of a company.
Sorry about the drawn out post, I needed to vent.
Hey Midwest….Day 91 no Bid! (Not, we had bids on Feb. 1st. 2010) Tag, your it!
GOOD LUCK TO ALL LONGS, we need it!
Let’s start a “Grassroots” Initiative!
This is just a start. Help me refine this letter to our senators and then we can us it to copy and send each of our state senators and state representatives. We should also send them to the local elected officials as well. Let’s bring to there attention that we as Tax payers are will to spend money to save more money.
Date March 16, 2010
Dear Senator ___________,
In today’s fight toward energy independence, we must take into consideration all forms of fuel savings technologies. Hydrogen Generators installed on all combustion engine vehicles in the USA is a “Base Hit” toward energy independence.
Hydrogen Generators have been proven to work. They save as much as 30% in fuel economy, 50% reduction of harmful exhaust emissions and deliver as much as 10% more horse power (allowing smaller engine designed for existing vehicles thereby magnifying all benefits already mentioned).
I am writing you this letter to encourage you to spearhead a bill in the senate to make it mandatory to have all new combustion vehicles sold in the USA to have hydrogen generators installed as factory equipped.
Not only will we use less fossil fuel and save money, will all breath better doing it.
Sincerely,
_____________
I believe the HHHI business plan is going to work.
I wasn’t sure what type of technology they were really working with, but after further review and speaking with real customers using the products, I must say I'm sold on SSEV/HHHI for the long run.
If you had read my resent post to this board, you would know that I personally have tinkered with hydrogen generators. I believed at that time the technology was not only feasible, but may also be the answer we Americans have been looking for as step toward energy independence.
Energy independence in my opinion is going to play out like a baseball game. Sure we may have a homerun hitter in the line-up, but it going to take team effort from the each player hitting those proverbial base hits.
Wind turbines is a base hit, photovoltaic cells is a base hit, Hydrogen generators is a double base hit that brings the runner in for a score!
HHHI hydrogen technology is going to be around awhile folks. So…“DO YOU WANT TO PLAY BALL!”
Join a winning team. Buy some SSEV and be a winner!
Hey Senator, maybe this will help SSEV get to a buck.
Spread the word!
Just lend me whatever you guys used over there at SSEV. Why try to change something that works so well.
It’s time Humphries puts up or gets out. I find it very difficult to believe that he is acting in the shareholders best interest. I hate to be cynical, but this guy appears to have lost connection with reality.
No updates, very little useful information when he discloses and evasive with the facts. Always hiding the important things like…What are the questions from FINRA, and what answers did you give them?
I am beginning to think FINRA isn’t going to approve the name change, Humphries knows this and he’s trying to cover his tracks before the law suits begin to flow in. I for one have one ready to be filed.
So Humphries, MAN-UP! And give us the straight scoop!
Enough already!
P.S. We all know you read this board.
During the development of the first devise I used an equal number of anode and cathode rods. The second device I used 12 anode in the center of the vessel and 24 cathode surrounding the anodes with a slotted (below water surface) one inch PVC pipe between them with the bottom open for flow. I then collected the oxygen in separate accumulator. (I just vented the oxygen on the truck application).
I believe the oxygen could be used for additional HP. Maybe you know something about this.
I’ll look into your suggestions, however, I’m working on another project at this time.
Thanks
Schlumpy
As for the grants. Do a search on the Department of Energy grants, It will explain the process in depth. As I explained in my earlier post, government only gives out research grants to universities. However the grant that SSEV is seeking is from the EPA given to municipalities for emissions and fuel conservation for improving their fleets.
If you look at the EPA grant picture, every city in the USA with more then 20,000 Population will be jumping at this opportunity to save BIG $$$ on energy cost, besides the grant monies. That’s a lot of units!
Lynn, respectfully disagree about years of research to make one.
I already have a working generator that I built from 3” PVC, 36- 5/16 x 12” stainless welding rods and an accumulator and regulator with pressure relief value. The only difference from the HHHI version is the micro processor used to control output.
I have installed it in my 1996 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L and I also have more HP and better economy. Can’t really tell yeah how much, but it is noticeable.
I’m not interested in developing a hydrogen generator for sale, just tinkering around. I was hoping to develop a generator to run a 5HP / 5000W electrical generator to supply my work shop.
I have only just begun!
Don't let the screen name fool yeah.
Rob, Here’s what I know about the technology. Try not to fall asleep…
First of all, I am not trying to Bash the company or it’s technology. I simply looked into the EPA grant program to see what types of technology has been awarded grants. As you may have read the links I have post, the EPA appears to give grants to municipalities that are looking to improve their fleets emissions output. Most if not all the products are sure-fire proven technologies such as catalytic converters.
I have investigated the government’s grant and loan programs for items that I have invented and I have found the government doesn’t give out grants to companies or corporation independently. The grant may however be awarded to a university working in conjunction with a corporation. Otherwise the company may only qualify for Government loans.
As for the hydrogen technology, I personally have built a hydrogen generator last fall. While I was doing the research, I came across an article from the university of Southern California where the professor explained that the energy used to create the hydrogen gas thru the process of electrolysis is more then what is derived by the hydrogen produced. He further explained it in an example that went something like this….If you view the hydrogen generation via electrolysis, it’s like a battery. You can produce a charge by charging a battery for later use. Hydrogen can be generated and stored for later use. There is no net gain of energy thru the generation process.
The professor (Damn I wish I could remember his name) did explain that is the hydrogen is generated via solar cell, then stored for later use, then it would be a practical application.
I continued to study the hydrogen generator application for use in a combustion engine vehicles and I found that there is an additional energy gained thru the combination of thehydrogen and the hydrocarbons in petroleum fuels, via chemical reaction, Not combustion. Which may also lead to excessive heat that may break down the engine’s aluminum components.
Like I said, I’m not bashing, just cautiously optimistic. Let me know if there is anything else I can do for you.
Schlumpy
This isn’t looking good folks… Humphries doesn’t even want to paint the tape today.
EPA link Error…
Google…EPA's National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program
Click….http://www.epa.gov/oms/eparecovery/prognational.htm
Click….http://www.epa.gov/otaq/diesel/projnational-aara.htm
You’re there
Sorry about that!
EPA-Grant
Hey guys, I was a little curious about the feasibility of the EPA grant being awarded to HHHI. Here what caught my eye.
First the bad news…Most if not all of the previous grants awarded were for already proven technologies, like catalytic converters and particulate filters being installed on existing equipment. A few had been awarded for the replacement of old equipment with natural gar burning engines or improved diesel engines. Point is, it appears EPA prefers proven technology.
The EPA grant HHHI has applied for thru the State of Arkansas would be much different then any of the others awarded. However, if they can pull this off, HHHI will be way ahead of the pack and all other municipalities will be knocking down the SSEV doors to get their piece of the pie.
This is truly a pyridine shift in the way we power vehicles. We should all write our own representative and ask them to get on board and support this technology and bring it to our communities.
EPA's National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/diesel/projnational-aara.htm)
I hear yeah. Robinson is probably trying to figure out Humphries creative book keeping. When does, I bet he gives it to us straight up. It may not be pleasing to the investor, so do expect a lot, but I think they will be much more forthcoming.
I think “Crushed” is a little strong. After the pull-back on Friday all the way back to .0019 I think that SSEV is holding up pretty good. I didn’t expect it would close @ .0028, I thought maybe .0025, so were doing ok.
Greener days ahead!
GLTA
Sky, I’m going to leave that question for Mr. Robinson. Referring back to a recent press release, Robinson said in a statement… “ in lifting investor confidence, bringing a newly established sense of optimism among shareholders” I would like to believe we will see timely Q-reports in the near future. Humphries played the evasive game. Let’s wait and see what these guys do.
I believe their numbers do add up. A 50% reduction in emissions with a 30% increase in fuel efficiency and a 10% increase in horse power is equivalent to what you get when you introduce hydrogen to a gasoline engine. From what I learned about the hydrogen technology, the energy used in electrolysis generation of the hydrogen uses more energy then produced, however the increase in chemical reaction volatility between the hydrogen and fuels hydrocarbons is significant and that is where we get the increase in fuel efficiency.
As for the implementation of the fuel cell, believe this technology is best served with the electrical generation and motor system. I’m not sure how HHHI combined the two technologies.
Maybe someone else can help us with that.
No-Way! I sold @.0032 bought back in @.002 Friday. Long for at least a double (.004).
We'll get more news soon.
I agree. A deal with Dongfeng would be huge, but let’s not get too excited just yet. The auto industry moves slowly. Lots of safety testing, let alone part durability and warranty qualifying. Then there’s production implementation. Even if they struck a deal today, were talking a minimum 18-24 months before SSEV sees a dime.
What I’m really looking forward to is the acceptance from other large cities and municipalities coming on board with SSEV technology. Humphries stated in a recent PR that we will see income in 2010 from additional deals.
That’s the next PPS gap-up is coming from.
I can’t figure out the lack of buying today either… The only thing missing today is a quote from Warren Buffet, …..and a then a few concise messages. ;}
I like how you worked out the math, however I didn’t use a compounding shares formula as you did. I added together the net % gain of each buy and sell cycle.
The fact of the actual transactions was I compounded the first trade cycle and split proceeds after the second trade and took profits to invest in another company. (no compounding on third trade, same share amount as second trade)
I also agree that this strategy doesn’t always work, however if you are able to keep your finger on the trigger, it pays off more then not.
Thanks for your input.
Looks like a slight up-tick in the volume on Friday opposed to the tinkle throughout the last two weeks.
I’m looking forward to some sort of development in DLAD. Maybe Humphries will at the least keep one of his weak promises and post Q report in a timely manner. I sure would like to see the impact the new companies will have on the parent. I’m not expecting too much though.
The best possible news we good get would be similar to the news SSEV received, Bye By Humphries!
No offence taken. Have a good weekend and let’s pray it leads to a fantastic week!
GLTY
Schlumpy
I only post my personal purchase, not all trades @ .0020. Some also traded @ .0019, I didn't believe that I would get them in time so I put in a limit order @ .002.
Waste of time…no, I don‘t think so…. You add it up.
Buy .0006 / Sell .0022 = 366% gain
Buy .0012 / Sell .0032 = 266% gain
Buy .0020 / Sell ? (.0028 close) 38% gain
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 670% Total Gain
Buy @ .0006 hold….close @ .28 = 466% Total Gain
Net difference = +217 %
I forecast that the PPS will reach a high near 100-150% from .0028 (.0056-.0086) depending on the value of new news from company press release. If the new is outstanding, we will see PPS over the .01 level. If so, I will be watching for the volume to dry up and the price to deteriorate. As that happens I will then sell and wait with bird in hand to buy back at a lower price. If I am wrong and the PPS continues to climb, I can always buy back in with a small percent loss gap. At higher PPS the percentage is less effective per each .0001 rise.
I’m not saying that your method is wrong, I have learned that there is more to this game then buy and hold.
I practice buy and hold with the large cap stocks. I have read Warren Buffet’s book as well and it is very informative. I just believe that the people that invest in the pink penny stocks. I personally have lost a lot of money on the pinks with the buy and hold strategy. Now I play the momentum, fear and greed game.
If you have read my past post, I am long on SSEV because I believe that they have an interesting product. I also know something about the fuel cell and hydrogen technology they are working with. It has a promising future but it has it’s problems also.
Just because I don’t subscribe to your investment theories, doesn’t make me a geek or a schlimpy or any other derogative name you may come up with, it just means that I play a different game. As the moderator, you should be nonbiased in your approach when directing others, and certainly more mature.
"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."
(It's better to have a small actual advantage than the chance of a greater one.)
How does this work for yeah?
03/12/10 Bought 350,000 of SSEV @ $0.002 (Order #1902) -707.99
A little respect please..SchUmpy
Did idol Warren have anything to say about common sense?