Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I assume then you are watching and waiting for a couple more positive indicators then you might join in?
That won't be a problem on uplisting/validation. It will not only be an ihub it will be a world story stock.
This may be an "ihub" story stock or it may be lighning in a bottle. Doesn't matter. It's a traders nightmare
with a 10-30% spread and less volume than the Sarasvati river... (It dries up halfway from the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean...)
There's a 100,000 down payment for each site.
What's exaggerated ot made up?
There is a TON of VERY impressive stuff in that post......z
It would be if it wasn't either wildly exaggerated or just flat-out made up.
I believe I said, in my post at least, that the media etc. are being invited to the AGM.
Why is everything preceived as being a red flag - is there nothing in your DD that suggests the company is legit and has potential?
Wess: Has the JB/BOD considered inviting NASDAQ and AMEX to the public part of the AGM in April.
Thanks - was out of the country last week and didn't see much of the board - it's great to hear that progress is being made - did he say which exchange?
Thanks - was out of the country last week and didn't see much of the board - that great to hear that progress is being made - did it say which exchange?
With the pending tour of the Plastics to Oil factory, which will include invitations to media, brokers and funds, there will be no further doubt about JB or JBII.
JBII and Plastic to Oil will dominate the news this coming year. I envision cameras showing plastics being dumped by the truck load, compacted into cubes, bulldozed to a conveyor belt, plunged into the processor and tankers of gasoline transporting to the finery - or better yet the blending factory and if that happens the story can then show a refined product being pumped into cars.
Endless stories will follow - Plastics to Fuel Farms, Plastic harvesting of the oceans, P2O ships to foreign harbours for pick-up - the stories will be endless.
PIPES will follow at the 18.00 level and again at 48.00...
I just hope uplisting comes before the AGM.
PPS being walked down again? Look at the bid and asked yet it keeps moving down.
When the Ihubbers own 100 of 1000's of shares and are able to represent the shareholder at the board I for 1 think it's great.
Canadians must remember their passports as well if they're going on the tour of the plant.
Passports are easy to get - if you apply now you should have it in time for the meeting.
I for 1, at least at start up, want JB to be in charge of the direction of his company - it's the only way to get things done w/o interference.
For a small fee and an application, at least here in Canada, you can have it processed within 10 days at a distribution center. It's not a big deal here and you'll need it for travelling around the world after you make your 1st million and are retired as a result of being a JBII shareholder.
This can mean only one thing - BIG P2O works. He's not inviting press and funds and brokers to look at something that might work.
Better get your shares now - this is going to explode!
From FB:
Q: Do you still expect to have media, hopefully more than just NF media, present in some capacity?
A: Yes, and we are accommodating for funds and brokers flying up.
That's all I've ever used to cross.
You will require a passport - especially if you want to re-enter your own country after the meeting.
3 tapes were recovered by others - ok I guess JBII isn't exclusive
Well will today be another PR day disclosing significant news - if not today soon - real soon.
PrintEmail
John Bordynuik has spent years downloading data. Old data. His company, 310 Holdings Inc. (Niagara Falls, Ont.), has technology that can reclaim information from spools of tape from 40 and 50 years ago.
One of its most loyal customers is the US National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA), with which his firm has an exclusive agreement, but its technology is used by both scientists trying to reclaim old information and large corporations concerned about archival data.
Now, he is adding hydrocarbon technology to his field of operations, and is about to launch a commercial plant in his home town that will produce oil from scrap plastics. The company he runs, Plastic2Oil, employs a proprietary catalyst used on molten polymers to extract about a litre of oil from each kilogram of plastic scrap.
According to Bordynuik, the catalyst technology was developed many years ago, but no way to commercialise it was found until now. How it works exactly is being kept under wraps, but the catalyst is put into a liquid form, then melted plastic is introduced to it.
“We check over the data we retrieve,” he says, “and that was essentially how we found out about the catalyst, which is used in a different field than plastics. It’s quite a complex molecule, but it’s not too expensive.”
And price is a key factor here. Other methods to break down scrap, such as plasma-based approaches or microwaves, need considerable energy to power them, and have not proven economical. With this system, enough gas is produced as a by-product that the process becomes essentially self-powering once it’s under way. Oil can then be extracted for about $10 a barrel.
The initial plant is expected to get through up to 20 tons of scrap per day. The process, Bordynuik adds, can be highly automated, and if all goes well, other plants will be set up in other communities.
Primarily, 310 Holdings is working with polyolefins – PP, PS and several version of PE. It is not working right now on PET, and while it can handle PVC, reprocessing that would require a system to capture the hydrogen chloride gas that would be given off.
These polyolefins tend not to have much in the way of additives or fillers, so that there is little residue to be removed. Bordynuik estimates such residue to be around one percent of the total output from the system.
“We are taking plastics from both post-industrial and post-consumer sources,” he says. “The municipalities right now are paying up to $80 a ton to landfill scrap plastics, so they like the idea of shipping them to us for recycling.”
For initial feedstock, the company didn’t have to look for. It has now worked through about 50 tons of magnetic tape and casings that it stockpiled, and with the data extracted and safely stored again, the tape can be reduced back to basic hydrocarbon molecules.
“NASA use to specify destruction of the tapes, then it mandated recycling,” Bordynuik says. “That was what got us into this in the first place.”
At present, 310 Holdings is looking at 10 to 12 joint-venture situations. Most of these are in the north-eastern US, but Bordynuik plans to add Canadian facilities.
“It’s just that the approvals process in this country takes a little longer,” he says.
http://www.canadianmanufacturing.com/plasticsincanada/news/industry/article.jsp?content=20090924_110713_6584
Your kidding right - if they're satified at 20% why bother having them read. Are you laughing again about how ridiculous your answer is. We posted to you already Nasa comments that JBII was the only company that could do the job, hence the sole sourced contract and the skids and skids of tapes sent to JBII.
From the customers who know what should be on the tapes. Do you not think that the customers would not know if the process works? That's the same as me asking you how do you know it's not 100% accurate - In fact your question is easily answered by the number of companies/agencies using JBII. Unless you can find someone who cancelled there contract or commented that they were not completely satified with the accuracy of the tape reading you can't even suggest that companies who sole sourced to JBII were not completely satified. JBII is the only company who has proven they can do this. JBII has skids and skids of tapes waiting to be read. I've seen them myself.
You wrote:
If the contents of the tape are unknown, by who's standard is this 100% measured?
why do you guys keep beating this to death - it's been responded to many times. If the SEC has a problem with the filling then they will take it up with JBII. Are you that hard up for dirt that you have to repeatedly bring one item back up time after time after time after ........
"not to mention 18 NRs in a single day."
You know full well that the 18 PRs were required disclousure items - what are you saying - he shouldn't have made disclosure of material facts. As far as your concerned he can do nothing right - 1st you say he didn't disclose something and the next you complaint that he disclosed too much - which is it? Oh I know it's whatever suits you at the time.
Are you kidding me. He's going to PR the names of shareholders? How would he know the names of shareholders and what right (i.e. invasion of privacy) would he have to PR that info. You are grasping now. JJ was the one who started this by saying he was not a shareholder w/o any proof.
Since JBII can demonstrably be shown to place great importance on apprising the media of company notables (people, places, things) with $10MM in media credits, not to mention 18 NRs in a single day, it can be inferred that the notable 'Paul Allan' would be 'noted' as a stake holder in JBII, to wit, he hasn't been noted as such, ergo unlikely :)
No the onus is upon the person who made the claim that Paul Allan was not an investor of JBII as JJ inferred. Why are you answering for him. Maybe he took my advise to leave the board?
Exactly - guess you got the point.
Where's the link showing Madonna hasn't invested in a few million shares?
Zar - I think we should strongly recommend someone (maybe Wess or other BOD members)to let Allan know what JBII is doing.
Where's the link showing Paul Allan hasn't invested in a few million shares?
Nice post from a friend of Johns'.
yes, and if you are wondering if Bordynuik and the technology in 310 is real, the answer if YES. I have known John for a long time and everything he does is amazing - he has worked with some of the best minds on this planet, his technology is always leading edge and designed to solve "unsolvable problems" and his focus is to maximize investor return. This is the big one we've all been waiting for ... Bordynuik will not disappoint us
just what we said. Obviously they did some DD first and saw great potential.
don't know what's really going on with JBII, but for anyone to claim that someone just happened to find the secret ingredient to make P2O profitable on an old mag-tape is ludicrous
Do you have a link proving this is ludicrous? Wonder why those big oil companies didn't discover the hula hoop and the frisbee first? Maybe they we're looking in the right place - John did obvoiusly.
your incredible. not everything in life has a link - call Nasdaq if you want verification - or sorry - what they tell you won't have a link so you won't believe them.
and to think that Nasdaq came to JBII speaks volumns to their credibility don't you think?
Natural State Research, has developed a way to turn plastic into finished oil products for a final cost of less than $1 a gallon.
That 48.00 per barrel - John does it for less than 10.00 a barrel.
Might we expect another surprise PR - would hate to be short - it will happen soon.
Lots of new longs getting cheap shares - good for you and welcome.
You can't be serious why do you keep doing this - knowing full well when John purchased this company and it's numerous acquisitions. AND they are debt free
I don't think this is literally - it means they have been working closely with the JBI team to make this a multi-purpose mean, green processing machine.
Why do you think shareholders have this answer? Why in the world would you deem this a red flag.
John told up that Big P2O was a done deal. We're looking at verification/certification (i.e. EPA standards)from Isle.