Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Defend Ward Churchill? I doubt it.......
This is a note I sent to a Rocky Mtn News reporter following an investigative article published by RMN:
Mr. Steers,
Thank you for your story exposing prof. Churchill as a non-indian. You did well except for two disrepencies......The Keetoowah people are Cherokee, but definetly NOT connected to the CNO. Also, the Keetoowah require a blood quantum of at least 25%(1/4) for membership....not the 1/16 quoted. CNO has
no blood quantum requirement and only rcvd Congressional mandate as a Tribe in 1998 due to certain political realities when Ada Deer headed the BIA. The CNO was a Okla. corporation started by Phillips Oil in 1951 to gain access to oil leases in eastern Okla. To this day, full-bloods regard CNO as a federal scam. (CNO = Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma)
I am white, but was married to a Keetoowah for 30 yrs until my wife's death in 2003.
Respectfully,
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Claremore, OK.
re; SOLM..........
I bot on the high (of course) a bit over $5...it hit .46 last yr & is back around $2 & climbing slowly. (16,250 sh.)
Naked shorting in the news.....
General Electric's (NYSE: GE) NBC Dateline, which is purportedly preparing a major expose of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., and the alleged almost $1 billion in "borrowed" ' some say counterfeited" ' certificates that have reportedly been lent out above the legal issued shares by hundreds of companies, and the Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle legal challenges being filed for dozens of such companies, is also reportedly looking into the threshold securities that can only be described as "missing in action."
In an appearance now archived on StreetSignals (http://www.streetsignals.com), Christian/O'Quinn legal expert C. Austin (Bud) Burrell, said that the firms have filed some 15 actions, including key formative lawsuits for Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA), NanoPierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT), Datascension Inc. (OTCBB: DSEN), Eagle Tech Communications (OTC: EATC) and Hyperdynamics (OTCBB: HYPD).
Burrell said the lawsuits allege a vast conspiracy to manipulate all stocks, and "provide substantive proof of manipulation." He said that the suits allege 7,500 companies have been bankrupted since November, 2000, by illegal naked shortselling and conspiratorial manipulations, resulting in a loss of $17 trillion in market cap, "greater than all the losses in the 1929 market crash."
http://cobrand.knobias.com/templates/aware/story1.3.htm?eid=3.1.56b140fd0723c1457dbc718c4d196a372714...
Well, Ben...............
I'm 'sposed to be an "investor", right? How come I feel like a "contributor"? I'm about ready to try gambling.....more fun, same pain.
Slo
Grab yer sox...............
Economic `Armageddon' predicted
By Brett Arends/ On State Street
Tuesday, November 23, 2004
Stephen Roach, the chief economist at investment banking giant Morgan Stanley, has a public reputation for being bearish.
But you should hear what he's saying in private.
Roach met select groups of fund managers downtown last week, including a group at Fidelity.
His prediction: America has no better than a 10 percent chance of avoiding economic ``armageddon.''
Press were not allowed into the meetings. But the Herald has obtained a copy of Roach's presentation. A stunned source who was at one meeting said, ``it struck me how extreme he was - much more, it seemed to me, than in public.''
Be sitting when U read this....
http://business.bostonherald.com/businessNews/view.bg?articleid=55356
Specter Resurrected...............
Sworn fealty to the president as the answer to everything.
http://www.slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2109983&
re; 9~11...
What DID bring 'em down?
"Resonance Factor" maybe?
'Nuff said.
Slo
Firefox.......
Works great! Haven't used IE for 6 yrs. IE sux.
Slo
Poor Ed..assuming again!e
Prove he has one!.e
I tolya so....
About 2 yrs back, I said that REITS were gonna gotohell in about 4 yrs. I realise it's sooooooo out of character for me to gloat, but....
NYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Slo
eddy no likeum satire? LOL!e
found on the net.....
MY MODEST PROPOSAL: THE U.S.A.R.
By C. B. Shapiro
I feel bad for the Red States.
Yes, they won the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court and most of the state houses. But they still can't have the country they really want because the last few Blue States won't roll over. So I am making a simple proposal:
Secession. Divorce. Splitsville.
Personally, I think we made a huge mistake not letting them go when we had the chance back in 1862. Well, no time like the present to correct an old mistake.
Then, they would finally be free to have the kind of society they've always wanted; church and state can be fused so they build the kind of theocracy they've dreamt of, with Jesus at the helm. Then the new USAR (United States of America Red) can ban books, repeal civil rights, persecute gays and have all the wars they like. They want prayer in schools? More power to them. They can ban abortion and post the Ten Commandments in every federal building in their country. Bring back slavery, if they want. We'll be free to live with our like-minded countrymen who believe in science, modernism, tolerance, religion as a personal choice, and truly want limited government intrusion in our personal lives. Why should each side be driven mad by the other any more, decade after decade?
Call the Culture War a tie and everyone go home.
Of course, we in the U.S.A.B. get the Gross Domestic Product, businesses and universities of California, New York, Massachussetts -- basically the whole Northeast and Northwest (plus Illinois and Michigan if they want to come along). They get Wal-Mart and Duke and most of the Nascar tracks. But they can feel free to import movies, TV shows, financial services, and defense technology. We'll import country music, bibles and Confederate flags.
The two countries will by necessity have open immigration policy: anyone who feels they are living in the wrong country can just move across the border, no questions asked.
Ultimately, why should I have to convince my fellow countrymen that Darwin may have had a point and that the word “liberal” is not equivalent to “godless communist?” And why should they be forced to live in a country with morally corrupt non-believers? I'll stay in the messy, free-thinking U.S.A.B. And to the U.S.A.R. I say…
God bless you all, and see you at the U.N.
Ahh, bureauocracy....
A New Orleans lawyer sought an FHA loan for a client. He was told the loan would be granted if he could prove satisfactory title to a parcel of property being offered as collateral. The title to the property dated back to 1803, which took the Lawyer three months to track down. After sending the information to the FHA, he received the following reply
(Actual letter):
"Upon review of your letter adjoining your client's loan application, we note that the request is supported by an Abstract of Title. While we compliment the able manner in which you have prepared and presented the application, we must point out that you have only cleared title to the proposed collateral property back to 1803. Before final approval can be accorded, it will be necessary to clear the title back to its origin."
Annoyed, the lawyer responded as follows (actual letter):
"Your letter regarding title in Case No. 189156 has been received. I note that you wish to have title extended further than the 194 years covered by the present application. I was unaware that any educated person in this country, particularly those working in the property area, would not know that Louisiana was purchased, by the U.S., from France in 1803, the year of origin identified in our application. For the edification of uninformed FHA bureaucrats, the title to the land prior to U.S. ownership was obtained from France, which had acquired it by Right of Conquest from Spain. The land came into the possession of Spain by Right of Discovery made in the year 1492 by a sea captain named Christopher Columbus, who had been granted the privilege of seeking a new route to India by the Spanish monarch, Isabella.
The good queen, Isabella, being a pious woman and almost as careful about titles as the FHA, took the precaution of securing the blessing of the Pope before she sold her jewels to finance Columbus' expedition. Now the Pope, as I'm sure you may know, is the emissary of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and God, it is commonly accepted, created this world. Therefore, I believe it is safe to presume that God also made that part of the world called Louisiana.
God, therefore, would be the owner of origin and His origins date back to before the beginning of time, the world as we know it AND the FHA. I hope you find God's original claim to be satisfactory. Now, may we have our damn loan?"
The loan was approved.-
Mr ED/Andrew is right...
Even though I'm NOT a Dem, the pure idiocy expounded by the fundie extremists simply repulses me.The damage incurred upon mankind by belief systems professing "Love"......and the obvious hypocracy revealed therein is mind boggling, to say the least.
I must say I'm continually amazed that a belief system that fanatically condemns mysticism ulilizes same to manifest itself.
Can we say "MindGame, Inc."?
Slo
Mr Ed....
Actually, the Rep's did it by placing "Family Values" initiatives on the ballot in many states to draw out the fundie vote. Very chickenshitt,but....it worked.
Sad.
Slo
re;USWF...
Placed order for 150k @ .02....still sitting there.
humpf!
Slo
re; P/E...........
The one thing he ignores is variable availability of mkt share. As long as there's a consumer group somewhere in the world w/ purchasing power, P/E's of 7~9 will be unreachable. In the past, high transportation costs have acted as economic "fences", forcing most economic cycles to remain largely localized. This is no longer much of an issue. For proof, simply graph money mkt perf over the last 30 yrs....I'll bet the overall profitability has fallen markedly due to diminished net differences in valuation of world currencies. i.e:The mkt cycle duration is now much shorter than the experts realise....wanna bet?
Slo
corr/Watcha thunk re;ADSX?e
Ben/paypal....
Looked like old nooz to me. I've never had a prob resolving an issue w/'em by phone. Their habit of erring on the side of caution tends to pizz off the scam artists a bit....all it takes to shut down a "fraudulant" vender is one phone call since eBay bot PayPal.
Eatcha thunk re;ADSX?
S
Posted on RB/ADSX this evening....
Beginning to wonder......
Any of y'all ever heard the phrase "short squeeze" before? If so, would you know what to do when you see one?
Why am I asking dumb questions?
Because info was posted this evening that many investors never see throughout their lives......and nobody reacted.
I do not believe it.
SloJon
More info
The msg that appeared on my screen was a DTC msg to brokers.....I wasn't supposed to get it, I think. MY broker couldn't get off the phone quick enuff to "find out what's happening"......so, I forwarded it to Len Hall, media relations guy for ADSX. I spoke w/ him a moment ago....he said he'd call me back.
Slo
From my broker's site re;ADSX:
APPLIED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS INC NEW
Short Sale RESTRICTED
(NASD Rule UPC11830)
I presume this means that da shorts gotta fill.......RIGHT?????????????
ED/ADSX closed @ $4.05....
If da shorts GOTTA fill.....& I'm sittin' on 8k+ shares.....I think I'm agonna be happy!!!!
Slo
Get happy...
June 20, 2000
Robinson Markel, Esq.
Rosenman & Colin, LLP
575 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022-2585
Re: Request for Interpretation File Number SR-NASD-99-37 – Hard to Borrow List
Dear Mr. Markel:
This letter is in response to your request dated March 30, 2000, to Mary Revell for interpretive guidance regarding the use of "Hard to Borrow" lists to comply with the affirmative determination requirement for short sales pursuant to Rule 3370. On March 30, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") approved amendments to Rule 3370 regarding the use of "Hard to Borrow" lists to meet the requirements of Rule 3370.1 The National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") on May 9, 2000, published Notice to Members 00-28, which advised members of the SEC's approval of the amendments to Rule 3370 and described the nature of the amendments.2 I have enclosed copies of both items for your reference.
Your inquiry concerns subparagraph (b)(4)(C) of Rule 3370, which states:
"…Should a member relying on an Easy to Borrow or Hard to Borrow list fail to deliver the security on settlement date, the Association shall deem such conduct inconsistent with the terms of this Rule, absent mitigating circumstances adequately documented by the member."
Specifically, your inquiry concerns the circumstances that would be sufficient to mitigate the inability to deliver securities on settlement date where a member has relied upon an Easy to Borrow or Hard to Borrow list. In your letter, you list the following scenario:
(i) A member executes a short sale in a given security and satisfies the affirmative determination requirements of Rule 3370 exclusively by determining that the security in question is not included in a "Hard to Borrow" list, thereby meeting the requirements of clauses (i) (list must include securities restricted under UPC 11830) and
(ii) (list creator must attest that NNM or listed securities not included on the list are easy to borrow or are available for borrowing) of the second sentence, and clause (i) of the third sentence (list must be less than 24 hours old), of subparagraph (b)(4)(C) of the Rule; (ii) On settlement date, a member fails to deliver the security sold short because of inability to actually borrow the security, notwithstanding its absence from the "Hard to Borrow" list and the attestation by the list creator, made not more than 24 hours before the short sale was executed, that securities not on the list are easy to borrow or are available for borrowing; and
(iii) Adequately documents reasonable efforts to borrow the security in question.
In addition, your letter states that the "reasonableness of the efforts to borrow" involves a subjective judgment and that, for the purposes of your request, you assume that the NASD would be the judge of the reasonableness of the situation.
While we recognize that the above scenario contains the proper procedural elements necessary for a "Hard to Borrow" list to comply with Rule 3370(b)(4)(C), we do not believe that the procedures are in and of themselves facts or circumstances constituting mitigating circumstances for failure to deliver the securities on settlement date. We do recognize, however, that the "adequate documentation of reasonable efforts to borrow" may be a factor in demonstrating whether a particular fact pattern will be considered a mitigating circumstance, but standing alone, would not constitute a mitigating circumstance. In other words, reliance on a "Hard to Borrow" list that otherwise complies with Rule 3370(b)(4) and a showing of reasonable efforts to borrow the security does not relieve a member of the requirement to deliver the security on settlement date, absent documented mitigating circumstances.
I hope this letter is responsive to your inquiry. Please note that the opinions expressed in this letter are staff opinions only and have not been reviewed or endorsed by the Board of Directors of NASD Regulation. This letter responds only to the issues you have raised based on the facts as you have described them in your letter, and does not necessarily address any other rule or interpretation of the NASD or all the possible regulatory and legal issues involved.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further questions about this issue. I can be reached at (202) 728-8159.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Dean
Assistant General Counsel
cc: David Leibowitz, Vice President, Director - District 10
Enclosures
1 SEC Release Number 34-42571, 65 Federal Register 16993 (March 30, 2000).
2 "SEC Approves Use of Hard to Borrow List to Comply with the Affirmative Determination Requirement for Short Sales (Rule 3370)," (Notice to Members 00-28, May 2000).
WHAT IS THIS..........
From my broker's site re;ADSX:
APPLIED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS INC NEW
Short Sale RESTRICTED
(NASD Rule UPC11830)
I presume this means that da shorts gotta fill.......RIGHT?????????????
ABCNEWS HOLDS TERROR WARNING TAPE
**Exclusive**
In the last week before the election, ABCNEWS is holding a videotaped
message from a purported al Qaeda terrorist warning of a new attack on
America, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
The terrorist claims on tape the next attack will dwarf 9/11. "The
streets will run with blood," and "America will mourn in silence"
because they will be unable to count the number of the dead. Further
claims: America has brought this on itself for electing George Bush who
has made war on Islam by destroying the Taliban and making war on Al
Qaeda.
ABCNEWS strongly denies holding the tape back from broadcast over
political concerns during the last days of the election.
The CIA is analyzing the tape, a top federal source tells the DRUDGE
REPORT.
ABCNEWS obtained the tape from a source in Waziristan, Pakistan over the
weekend, sources tells DRUDGE.
"We have been working 24 hours a day trying to authenticate [the tape],"
a senior ABCNEWS source said Wednesday morning, dismissing a claim that
ABC was planning to air portions of the video during Monday's WORLD NEWS
TONIGHT.
The terrorist's face is concealed by a headdress, and he speaks in an
American accent, making it difficult to identify the individual.
US intelligence officials believe the man on tape may be Adam Gadhan -
aka Adam Pearlman, a California native who was highlighted by the FBI in
May as an individual most likely to be involved in or have knowledge of
the next al Qaeda attacks.
According to the FBI, Gadahn, 25, attended al-Qaida training camps and
served as an al-Qaida translator.
The disturbing tape runs an hour -- the man simply identifies himself as
'Assam the American.'
More......
ADSX & DOC will present financials on/about Nov 3 - ONE DAY after many of the recently-granted options become marketable.
Slo
ADSX nooz/this morning...
Applied Digital (NASDAQ: ADSX), a provider of Security through Innovation(TM), announced today that it would report its third quarter financial results, for the period ended September 30, 2004, on Wednesday November 3rd before the market opens. After the release, the Company will hold a conference call to discuss the results.
The conference call will take place at 9 am eastern time that day. Interested participants should call (800) 472-8309 when calling within the United States or (706) 643-9561 when calling internationally. Please use passcode 1857362.
There will be a playback available as well. To listen to the playback, please call (800) 642-1687 when calling within the United States or (706) 645-9291 when calling internationally. Please use passcode 1857362. The playback will be available beginning at midnight eastern time that day and accessible for 30 days. The call will also be webcast and will be available on the Company's web site at www.adsx.com on the Home Page of the site.
The Company's majority-owned subsidiary Digital Angel Corporation (AMEX: DOC) will announce results on November 2nd before the market opens and hold a conference call for investors at 10 am eastern time that day.
Looks like a one-two punch to me.
Slo
ADSX.......
Should be a nice 10~15% pop today/tomorrow morning.
Slo
STOCKGATE TODAY
SEC Chairman Donaldson, Pershing, and Fraudulent Liquidity – October 26, 2004 Dave Patch
“How much fraud are you willing to tolerate for Liquidity?” Financial Times
“Greenspan is focused on market liquidity provided by Hedge Funds, while the SEC is charged with preventing fraud – different missions that account for differences of view.” Wall Street Journal
These are the words of Securities and Exchange Commissioner William Donaldson with respect to Hedge Funds and the need to have Hedge Fund advisors register with the SEC. The question is why does Chairman Donaldson continue to use the word fraud in his communications and what exactly is the SEC doing about it TODAY?
To answer that question we must all understand some of the players.
In 2000 a firm called Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette Securities Corporation (DLJ) were major players on Wall Street. DLJ was more than simply a major Wall Street Brokerage; its affiliate DLJdirect was a top on-line brokerage operation and affiliate Pershing was and still is a major player in Wall Street’s Market Making, clearance, and settlement operations. DLJ and its affiliates were sold as a unit to Credit Suisse First Boston in late 2000.
Pershing, the DLJ affiliate clearing firm for many on Wall Street has been listed as a defendant in numerous lawsuits regarding naked shorting. These lawsuits date back to times when DLJ owned and operated Pershing and extend into present day operations. One such lawsuit; Sedona Corporation (OTCBB: SDNA) has already had the SEC confirm that they had been manipulated by shorting abuses in a February 2003 Enforcement action against Rhino Advisors.
In the follow-up $2 Billion civil lawsuit filed by Sedona in NY Federal Court, claims are being made that the settlement failures that were created by the shorting manipulation of Rhino Advisors and their affiliated offshore clients were alleged to be illegally cleared thru Pershing, a DLJ affiliate at the time. According to the filed lawsuit:
“Pershing, illegally converted short positions into false long positions, was responsible for stacking bids and/or offers in an effort to manipulate the stock up or down, and likewise was responsible for the manipulation of Sedona’s stock herein. Upon information and belief, Pershing is a direct participant in the manipulation, in that Westminster clears it’s trades, including but not limited to the trades set forth herein, through Pershing, and that Pershing, among other potential violations, failed in it’s duty as “gatekeeper to the public markets” to report these large suspicious transactions to its superiors, the market regulators.”
Sedona’s claims are that Pershing was facilitating the stock manipulation through failed clearance of the fraudulent short sale liquidity and thus lead to the manipulation of Sedona and their shareholders. Audio tapes of Rhino Executives in possession of the SEC and DOJ captured the executives congratulating brokers for collapsing the stock using shares they did not own. Pershing allegedly not only failed to properly clear and settle these trades but as a market maker in the stock allegedly covered up the short trades by converting them on the books to longs. This is neither the first nor the last complaint of this nature against Pershing at a time that DLJ owned and operated this division.
Fast forward to today.
On June 23, 2004 the SEC released Short Selling Reform SHO intended to eliminate the loopholes that have allowed for fraud and manipulation to take place in our markets. In the release the SEC admitted certain aspects of why this reform was necessary including the issues of naked short selling and settlement failures.
Naked short selling can account for fraudulent acts that are affecting a minimum of 4% of all publicly traded companies according to the SEC. The SEC also states that the magnitude of settlement failures from naked shorting have reached, at times, levels that exceed the entire public float of some companies. Excess share liquidity in these stocks is greater than 100% of the shares registered by the company. The SEC admits that this is an abusive situation that harms the investing public.
Settlement failures, for the record, can only happen when Clearing firms like Pershing fail to meet the necessary standards required to protect the investing public as outlined in the Securities Act of 1934. Settlement failures can only be originated when a seller is selling shares they do not own or have access to - as in “fraudulent liquidity”. Hedge Fund liquidity! Clearing firms that do not force the buy-ins and settlements of the trades thus become active participants in the abusive liquidity as they allow the funds a free ride to sell unregistered shares. The same liquidity Chairman Donaldson speaks of when he lashes out at the Hedge Funds.
Today we have a problem with settling trades and the solution resides within the SEC. Chairman Donaldson can correct the fraudulent liquidity problem he continues to speak of. It does not come with Hedge Fund Registration. The solution comes with cleaning up the behavioral issues of clearing firms willing to accept settlement failures from the members they clear for. Clearing firms like Pershing, a former affiliation of Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette. It comes with the forcing settlement of all trades in a timely and efficient manner as defined by Section 10a of the Securities Act of 1934. It comes with the courage to do the right thing.
The courage of Chairman Donaldson and his Commission however is lacking. Staffers willingly admit that the SEC is either “Not Responsible for forcing the settlement of trades” as stated by John Heine of Media Relations or “We (SEC) cannot force the settlement of the trades because there are more unsettled shares than shares to settle with” as stated by Jerry Carpenter of the Division of Market Regulation. Neither is an answer acceptable to those who have been defrauded and lost nearly $1 trillion in the process. These are more likely answers that show cause for why Investors are being screwed by Wall Street. Regulatory neglect and indifference.
If the SEC has no responsibility for the settlement of trades than who does? Who is it that addresses the fraudulent liquidity that floods our markets with unsettled trades and unregistered shares? Who are the investors to turn to as they buy something they never really receive? Why is Chairman Donaldson afraid to come clean and deal with the issue? Are there skeletons left behind in the closets of DLJ and Pershing that the SEC Chairman intends to leave as skeletons in a closet?
For nearly four months I have continued to ask members of the SEC exactly why the SEC will not address the manipulative trades they highlight in Regulation SHO. Why have they not taken any enforcement actions against these admitted illegal activities? How can settlement failures that become manipulative be allowed to remain unsettled if they are considered MANIPULATIVE by the SEC? The SEC will not provide answers but instead excuses.
Chairman Donaldson’s agency is now reviewing the efficiencies of our Self-Regulatory agencies (SRO’s). He is questioning their effectiveness. Many wonder about the same with regards to the SEC’s performance. Should Congress rethink the value of the SEC in light of the most recent scandals? Would our tax money not be better spent
The SEC continues to tout their successes but what we fail to see are their failures until it is too late. The SEC is clever at keeping those secret until some State Attorney General comes out and forces their hands. The issue of clearing firms contributing to Hedge Fund fraud is coming closer and closer to light. Our State and Federal Courts will take the ball on this even if the SEC won’t.
Many within the Industry have quietly informed the SEC of the issues as they speak of the Behavioral issues in the settlement of our trades. Settlement issues that lead to manipulation through excess supply – liquidity. The Industry is fully aware of the problems but will never change if the top cops do not force their hand. The whistleblowers are out the SEC is just not listening.
While there are no direct links to William Donaldson and Pershing at a Management level, Pershing was a division of DLJ. Recent SEC actions would infer that corporate officers are liable for the activities of those below them. Pershing is well known in and out of the Industry and Pershing is, at least for now, alleged to be involved in helping the criminal elements manipulate our stocks. All of this brings into question the objectivity of now SEC Chairman Donaldson as he casually derails the SEC’s support of the small business issuers and their investors who watch their investments be manipulated by “fraudulent liquidity”.
It is time the Chairman and his staffs come clean and address this issue. Define a clear SEC position regarding the abuses in settlement failures and force all past, present, and future trades to settle in the manner defined by the Securities Act of 1934 - promptly. Anything short of mandatory settlements should not be accepted.
For more on this issue please visit the Host site at www.investigatethesec.com .
Copyright 2004
(((((ADSX)))))!eom
re; Dawg.....
I think she can read....for what it's worth, she's tooo smart for my good. Thinking 'bout appointing her "Stock Adviser".
Slo
where IS y'all?eom
"But this is an opp to make OODLES of money... "
Hows about a simple outline for a sleep-deprived Okie?
Slo
p.s;9 mo old slovac german shepherd iza insomniac bitch!
Source 4 r/t quotes?
Being as I've finally decided to jump back in, who has decent $/mo charge? Is Yahoo @ $10/mo about avg.?
Slo
p.s;Ben, GITurA$$outaBED!!
re;ADSX...
...don't forget their subsidiary DOC. Both have made me very happy of late.
Slo
Of interest.....
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/03/17/BUGTA5M3M21.DTL&type=bu...
Any ideas?
S