Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
An example in regard to my dilution question.
Let's say the original dilution/tech success scenario would have taken the share price to around $30. How much would NVEI's current dilution situation cut down on a similar tech success? Would it cut it from $30 to $20 for instance?
How much has dilution affected a future rise in the share price? I realize there was some dilution needed to develop the tech. Let's say everything falls into place with the movie and financing deals that lead to the tech being successful with reasonable revenue produced. I'm curious if somebody can give me an idea the difference potentially in what the shareprice will do compared to if the original tech would have been successful when it was expected to?
Cobra another thing. You shared this from your meeting with Ketch, "The tech is a done deal. It works without a doubt."
What then is holding up verification by the companies testing the tech?
Cobra, thanks for sharing, but what exactly did you mean by this, "He also wants to keep in the drivers seat for as long as possible."?
excel, again your candor is appreciated. I've been concerned for quite some time that there has been a compensation/production unbalance. I hope the production starts matching the compensation, SOON.
excel, when a long-time NVEI supporter like you expresses displeasure and serious concern, the company's "ears" probably "perk up".
cosmoworld, a very good comparison. NVEI has to finally "walk the walk, not talk the talk".
Who approves NVEI's salaries? Haven't some been a tad excessive comensurate to actual prodution?
So Pengy, when do you expect a PR announcing the movie deal?
kgoodrich, what do you think about the potential of NVEI's tech?
excel, I'm almost sure there was some kind of a comment from Ketch about a month or so ago about a tech update coming within weeks or something like that. Maybe the Shareholders' Letter was what he was referring to.
dsc31, what was the date on this?
ElderWolf, didn't Ketch say in one of the RAQ's that we'd be getting an update within a couple weeks? Or was it some other PR?
excel, you got it on this, "Once the equipment manufacture says we are going into production that is our verification."
That would do it. Better than simply verifying the tech.
excel, you said, "As far as the tech goes I'm not sure where and why the third party verification term keeps being used?"
As a shareholder, wouldn't it be comforting to know that a reputable company (somebody other than NVEI) feels and says publicly that NVEI's tech has what it claims.
So excel, if we didn't get the movie deal substantiated by May 1st and some real solid evidence that the tech was viable in the eyes of a third party by July 1st, would you be concerned or possibly real concerned? What about if no financing substantiated by May 1st (especially if no movie deal by then)? I ask you to comment because as upbeat as you've been about NVEI, you seem to be a "straight-shooter".
excel, do you have dates in mind as targets for important NVEI objectives being fulfilled? Possibly movie or financing deals by May 1st or tech verification by July 1st.
Does anyone have dates that they would be concerned about if certain objectives aren't met? maybe no movie or financing deals by May 1st or no tech verification by July 1st.
NorthernTrader or anybody, maybe I missed the obvious, but has anybody seen or heard that it's a "done deal" that, if the tech works as advertised, the companies testing it will "definitely" buy it?
spokeshave, I wished I'd have followed your plan. I thought .35 was close to where a base would form. Your affirmative remarks following the call from Ketch made me feel pretty good about having bought more at .35. I still don't feel that bad about buying there in light of the positive Shareholders' Letter. But now the .20s are a distinct possibility unless some solid news is delivered. Any thoughts?
NorthernTrader, I enjoy your take on NVEI. Would you give me your impressions of the recent Shareholders' Letter and the current dismal share price?
Voyager, I think you "hit the nail on the head".
TripleSevens, you think NVEI will find a base in the .20s?
Fellow shareholders, how could this letter from Brad Ketch have been any more encouraging without "actual, substantial" news?
McCloud, what will keep this from happening?
If Brad Ketch is honorable, and I believe he is, then these comments add up to a splendid opportunity to bring in revenue. If these statements are indeed true, what could possibly keep NVEI from being extremely successful?
"We will reiterate to you that the technology works, that it is superior to current technologies,"
There is something about this NVEI/Microsoft association that really appeals to me. I hope I'm not reading too much into this, but Microsoft would certainly be a fabulous partner in a future venture. Oh, it doesn't hurt to fantasize a little does it?
"Powerline Broadband", is this what the NVEI tech will likely be or what's the correlation?
Also, how open is the window? “Basically, powerline technology needs to move quickly in 2003 or it will be too late.
Cable and DSL in the U.S. is now well-entrenched,” said eMarketer analyst Ben Macklin.
on?
Cobra, that would really be nice.
spokeshave, let's see if your questions are addressed publicly next week. Maybe it's the sort of thing that needs to be released publicly. If they are not addressed, please call him and try to get to the bottom of it.
immitt, if Ketch is indeed going to "release a President's Letter" next week, I hope it is more than an effort to keep our spirits up. Though I personally plan to be reasonably patient, I would very much appreciate "solid evidence" somehow from Ketch that "the ship is on course".
As a long-time shareholder, when I think back, I really thought NVEI would be on NASDAQ by now and on it's way to reaping revenue and increasing shareholder value "manyfold" (hope that's a word). As it turned out, with the original tech apparently not being as dynamic as once thought, we, as long-time shareholders, are probably fortunate just to be where we are with this investment despite the floundering share price. "Surviving", if you will.
What I mean is, we are fortunate to have some respected people come aboard, making needed adjustments to the tech, trying to make it viable. At least we are surving for now and still have a chance to succeed. It could have been worse. IMO
Any comments on the "old tech" versus the "new" and past hopes compared to realistic future hopes for NVEI's success?
Earl, south-central Missouri.
Welcome coach 9. What did you coach? I was a Head Basketball Coach for 17 years. Go NVEI
excel, so much of these consulting shares were for "bringing financing to NV". Was this for past financing or future financing? Frankly, our financing doesn't look too good right now.
Is NVEI a typical OTC company?
Trexville, that letter from Ketch would really be well-served.
"One of the companies testing the tech is the largest and leader in its field." Very interesting and good news. Does anybody want to guess which company that could be? Would Lucent possibly fit that description? Actually, wouldn't that describe Cisco more so that Lucent? Just speculating, but I've thought for quite awhile that Lucent could use a "boost" from implementing NVEI's tech. But wouldn't it be nice to be "hooked up" with Cisco?
Trex and Pengy, thanks for sharing. Some kind of public affirmation of the tech's testing status from Ketch would really be nice to see.
wheels, very interesting commentary.
Trexville, Excel or anybody. When do do you expect to see or hear anything definitive on the prototype testing? Actually a progress report of some sort would do for now, don't you think?.