Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Susie,it has nothing to do with "ignores".On the IBCX board,tonysib responded to me,post #13201,it repeated itself 10x,see post #'s,I responded to him,my post got repeated 3x,#13212 originally,yet the board shows nothing until #13215,which I can't read,and I can't read # 13217 either.Yet,when I went back to my original post,#13212,and hit "next,it showed me responding to other posters with the same message,weird,imo.
Meatloaf,the problem is this,"tonysibs" post was repeated approx. 10x,I can't see "hank hill's" response to "mick,or even # 13217,from "hogwild".If you look at the IBCX board,starting at post # 13201(talking full view,where all you see is post #'s,plus the first few words),you should be able to see the post #'s jump from 13201-13212,then,with my response,the jump goes from 13212-13215,which I can't read,btw.All these post were repeated,mine,and tonysibs,tonysibs 10x,mine 3x,use the post #'s to see.
OK Meatloaf,here is what you see on IBCX,post # 13201 jumps to # 13212,if looking at the full view of posts,but previously,hitting "next",I saw the same post about 10-11 times,now on my response to that post,#13212,hitting "next",also showed my post repeated 3x,to different posters,and I can't read post # 13215,though I see it in the full view.
Sorry for my inappropriate response,was a bit impatient,will follow-up with links,and post numbers.
Gee whiz,what must I do to get a response?Can't read latest post on IBCX board now,my post got repeated 3x,and the previous one had been repeated 10x.
Meatloaf,an IHUB burp occurred here-
that link didn't work,this is the "edited post",without the link.Go to IBCX board,you will see my post repeated 3x,if you hit "next" only,and the post I was responding to had been repeated 10x,and that was also on only going to "next post".The post numbers show it.
I'm sorry,blondes have a built-in excuse.
LOL,for that,you get this-http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php
Here's your chance,"dirty look","dirty look".
Nope,always have been me,lol.
I posted the exact same thing,it may have been deleted.
The last time Ed Hayter posted what he called "real numbers" on the website,it was 600 mil,and turned out to be 10-11 billion after dilution,,the whole time he denied dilution,and publically stated website numbers were correct.So much for asking Hayter for true numbers,lol.
In the last Paltalk interview/conversation,he out and out lied to shareholders,what,if anything could/would be different now?Leopards don't change their spots.
One thing I'm happy to see on this board,is people now questioning Hayter,and beginning to realize he may be not the most truthful of people.I hope my posts helped some of you to question the drop in SP,,while it had so much volume,with a gagged TA(that was always the key,imo).
Did anyone see Pat Robertson on MSNBC this afternoon?His interpretation of the Bush speech was downright scary.He seems to think we have sent the new carrier group to the Gulf for an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.Can you imagine any more of a worst case scenario re the Middle-East?Yes,there is one,Israel doing it.The overriding question is this-do we want to see Iran with nuclear weapons?There is absolutely no question they would use them,against Israel,which would ignite a nuclear inferno that seems to have been predicted in certain Biblical accounts,maybe this is why Bush is attempting a pre-emptive strike(all this is mere conjecture,based on Pat Robertson's interview,and what he thinks,maybe he is way off-base,let's hope so).
That would be a good start(re the IBOX stating the r/s,etc.,plus the totally unauthorized dilution to 11 billion while the company lied about it),how many new investors/players might you then attract?Of course I am repetitive,it needs to be repeated for all new readers here,to keep them from making the same mistake you,and all stuckholders have made,and to not allow anyone pumping this to sell and get out at anyone else's expense.Let everyone be aware of all the facts,let's not allow some silly prognostication of a jump to .02-.10,without any substantial reason.Or valuation of the same based on un-audited financials,I've seen crazy numbers posted here,and with no deletions of posts,an obvious bias towards pumpers.
I will make a public apology to you,if I can get through to Hayter,or if he returns my phone call.I will provide to you,via a pm,my cell #,for Hayter to call.I will be totally honest,and report exactly what is discussed,unless it is illegal to do so.That is my offer,but consider this,having spoken to many CEO's of both pinkies,and OTC's,I have found few to be truthful,most come across as used car salespeople trying to sell me on their current scam,it's just the nature of the beast.
I consider nothing I said to be a personal attack re the CEO of IBCX,or ICAN,merely informative posts to expose them for what they are,nothing personal,just facts.Like exposing the history of diluting to 11 billion,while totally denying it,and why the company website never updated a/s,or o/s during the whole process.All I see is more of the same here,after all,it is the same company.Maybe this is why shareholders are now asking more questions,asking for more personal responsibility from the Company officers,asking for more transparency re the TA and the gag issue.
Hey,if you've made a permanent move over to timhyma's board it's ok,just let us know.
Yes,it is the PR's,with no follow through that have proven to be the problem.The run/pump came on PR's,which is OK by me,if you follow through.
RDG,I make nothing personal,but I do pay attention,and all I can say will be deemed repetitive by the mods and be deleted,the issue is the stock,nothing else,the officers in control of the stock are by definition part of the issue as is what they may have done in the past,regarding the same stock.IBCX had a name change due to an R/S,previously it was ICAN,that history cannot be ignored by current shareholders,as can neither the behavior of the CEO.Awareness of what you have gotten yourself involved in is all that I am about.
Found you,so "Happy New Year".What,if anything are you going to do with "realstocks"?Btw,hope all is well,and you know what I mean.
I think the truth would do both,it would end all this mindless speculation,which btw,only comes about when the TA is gagged,and the company lies about the reason.
You are right,I do have an agenda.It is to expose IBCX for what it is,to expose Ed Hayter for what he is,and to expose all pumpers for what they are.Is there something wrong in that?Those that didn't listen to me are now down anywhere from 50-80%,and will continue to lose $$,my only point has always been that IBCX is totally untrustworthy,the CEO lies(proven point,see ICAN,now IBCX),no PR's can be believed until they come to fruition,and a gagged TA is a huge negative.Show me where I am wrong?
Yes,and you can take this to the bank,if only select posters are somehow able to get through to a CEO,and all they seem to post is positives,while the stock price plummets,there is a major problem,which seems to be the case here,unless you haven't noticed.
I'm so happy this has diverted attention from what I print.
Absent full disclosure from IBCX,this will continue down.I read every post,and have noticed how sentiment has turned,and am glad to have been a part of it,but it wasn't me that turned opinions around,it was,and continues to be the actions of IBCX.No one to blame but themselves,imo.
Oh,that one,already had you boardmarked,love it btw.
Tax loss selling in a subbie?I don't think so.
Did someone say "food"?
I consider everyone of those posts to be untruthful,that is just imo.
All I meant was bidsells always hurt the SP,and that major volume with bidsells,at this level,usually signal dilution.What shareholders will sell now?Those that bought @ .015?I don't think so.Those that wanted to get out have done so,there is no sense in the major volume down at this level,unless you consider dilution,that ia all in JMHO.
No experienced trader sells at the bid,unless totally desparate to get out on a major downturn,Bidsellers are,and always will be the major killer of a possible run,most traders sell at the ask,or above on a major move,rarely at the bid,that is amateur action,or dilution.
derf1,I take issue with everything you have stated re Ed Hayter,especially his "returning your call".Why has no other call been returned?Why can no other shareholders reach him,as so many have tried,but he is busy in a "meeting" when they call,yet no "return call".Must I post my personal # here to ask Ed to call me?I wish he would,but he never will,too many questions that are unanswerable,starting with a gagged TA,excessive bid selling,all beginning with the plethora of PR's.Something doesn't add-up,unless you consider dilution,that does .
I never had any problems either,transferring money from Paypal to my personal checking account has always gone smoothly.I only got concerned due to the problem IHUB had,btw,I think EBAY owns Paypal now,as of about 24 months ago.
First of all,"longs" in a pinky is the first problem,there should never be any,pinks are for trading,period,the second problem is this, selling volume cannot possibly be attributed to shareholders,too much selling at the bid,which is typical of dilution.One more thing,a CEO with an extremely bad history has a little bit to do with everything.
Meatloaf,do you see any potential problems with Paypal?I ask only because I have some $$ there,I use them with my EBAY business,and have never had a problem,yet,lol.
I'm sure you've heard of this one,"fool me once,shame on you","fool me twice,shame on me",lol.If that doesn't apply to IBCX,I don't know what does.
IMO,the only one that pertains to here would be IBCX.
Correction,cried at my Mother's funeral.
BS,for one thing,I never cry,for the other,I never thought my posts were "off-topic".All any of my posts ever attempted to construe was the fact that IBCX is a POS,the CEO has a history of diluting,and then R/S'ing ,while gagging the TA,and totally denying he is doing any of it while in the midst of doing everything he denies.What's wrong with that?