Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not sure surf may trace back to $2.60 or so. I'm leaving it for the minute until a reversal trend is in position. I'm in CKYS at the minute and have made good profit so far. GLTY
Having seen an email from someone at the CES show yesterday posted on this board by another source, I would caution people from posting information that could be construed as insider information. The phrase ''and they are huge'' implies that the emailer has already sighted the financials, which I'm sure was not the case. News of an SEC investigation into any company is extremely damaging, proved or otherwise.
Insider trading:
Disclosing material, non-public information about a company to any other person, including family members, friends or colleagues, where the information may be used by the other person to profit by trading in the company’s securities.
I just think there is a need to curb the enthusiasm slightly!
The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement act has wiped approximately $8 BILLION off the share prices of companies like Sportsbet/888holdings etc as revenues plunge because banks/cedit card companies are not allowed to authorise card transactions for online gaming, however as detailed previously by the ruling from the supreme court Fantasy games are 'skill' and not 'chance' and so have been sanctioned for online 'gambling'. It seems then that the new conduit for online gambling is in the future of the Fantasy networks, aka BSN. I can only hope that CKYS is in the process of providing a secure 'portal' for fantasy online gamblers.
I might be talking goggledygook but anyone have any views either way!
I think the partial acquisition of a company that has had many guises with no recorded revenues and is starting a new business is dangerous at best. I can only assume that the BSN network across the internet is what has attracted CKYS and there is a format for the myfankey etc that they believe will be a winner.
Depending on the price they paid for it and until revenues are realised after the the purchase is finalised I guess the jury's out. However, looking at the market it seems the investors of HMWM like it a lot more than the investors of CKYS.
Aroon isn't looking good and if the RSI dips below 50 then momo will be to the downside with 022 looking likely. Anything below 022 isn't good.
As of 28 Dec 06 TASR has successfully defended 30 lawsuits against products used by law enforcement and appears to be 'lawsuit proof', it remains to be seen what happens when the first law suit is brought in the civilian environment.
However, IMPO The personal protector is going to be the biggest earner over the next 5 years for Taser especially when international sales start to be included in full year revenues 07/08.
I agree that $20 is a realistic target over the next 12-18 months. GLTY
As always buy on rumour sell on news and I am waiting for a reversal trend to start and then take it from there. I agree, Anything in 7's looks good value as IMO this is going to be a great revenue earner from here on in (subject to the first lawsuit which is almost a cert)GLTY
Over 1m people worldwide die each year from malaria, with unsubstantiated numbers far above the death toll for malaria 'sufferers'. Any progress in the treatment of malaria would be positive for xkem.
Foxwood, I look for potential re-listing late 2008. JMO
Foxwood:- went trawling for xkem's past trading history and came up with the following.
Effective following the close of business on February 4, 1997, the
Company's Common Stock and Common Stock Purchase Warrants (the "Warrants") were
delisted from trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. In its determination to
delist the Company's securities, Nasdaq noted that the bid price for the Common
Stock had fallen below the $1.00 per share level required for continued listing.
Although the Company believed that with the capital provided under the Blech
Purchase Agreement it had satisfied the criteria for alternative listing, namely
having capital and surplus of $2,000,000 and market value of the publicly-traded
shares of at least $1,000,000, Nasdaq stated that the Company's evidence of such
compliance was inadequate, and that, in light of certain delays in the funding
by Blech under the Blech Purchase Agreement, Nasdaq "lacked confidence" in the
Company's ability to maintain compliance. In addition, Nasdaq raised concerns
regarding Mr. Blech's involvement with the Company in light of a pending
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") investigation regarding the
operations of D. Blech & Co., a broker-dealer controlled by Mr. Blech which
terminated operations in 1994.
If xkem sees $1 again then nasdaq is a possibility it seems
Foxwood thanks for the link, but having read that section I am of the opinion that there are quantative requirements ie the $3 tag etc that are mandatory and then in addition further aspects of a company may be taken into consideration to aid the listing. I still feel that standard 3 is the quickest route into amex in the next 18 months. However I will be happy to be wrong and wealthier. GLTY
PS How do you paste an active link?
Foxwood, there are 3 standards for initial listing and the first 2 require a stock price of $3 but the third standard basically requires $50m in pre tax income. For some reason I can't paste the active link but below is where I got my info from. If you have different info please share, Many thanks!
www.venturelawcorp.com/listing_requirements_amex.html - 17k
The reaction to the pps after the CNBC airings was disappointing due to timings of the adverts IMO. Take a look at tasers pps just minutes after their ceo got a primetime spot on CNBC this morning. Hopefully we can aspire to their planning one day.
Brady I don't trust anybody on this or any other board and certainly not a person that IMO is in cloud cuckoo land when it comes to xkem pps predictions for 2007. If I'm wrong I will be more than man enough to bow to your superior knowledge and apologise. GLTY
Revenues for the 1st year after facility construction finished (June 31 08) was predicted by Pandey at $30-50m, This will mean a pps no where near $1 IMO, however 5-HMF trials and share buy back will enhance shareholder wealth and improve the pps. Can't see xkem moving to another exchange as share price needs to be $3 for amex (unless revenues over $50m)and $5 for nasdaq (at time of listing)
IMO PPS will be lucky to see .25 before the facility is built and lucky to see .50 before the end of 2007. That said anyone unhappy with 25 cents is being unrealistic whilst the O/S remains high as it does impact PPS and that's a fact. JMO
I myself will be ecstatic with a 1000% gain, as it will be my first. GLTYA
I agree, your right! Xkem is looking the best it's been for a long while and I'm especially hoping that the 5-HMF trials start this year and technically we all seem in agreement that the charts look great! I just can't get my head around the fact that I see CEO's, day after day, being survivors at the expense of shareholders. I'm still a shareholder so it isn't so much of a negative as to get me to sell, but the jury's still out IMO.
GLTY in your trading.
Success begets success, very impressive 10QSB by INMI. Look forward to CKYS one day seeing similar revenue increases. IMHI sound very aggressive in the latin digital media field and hopefully ckys will benefit from it sooner as well as later.
Agreed this could be web portal we are expecting with a sound footing in the latin emerging market. All good!
I think this puts a slightly negative slant on xkem because Pandey is saying the same things 10 years ago that he's reiterating now and even with Blech's money xkem is still 'not there yet'. It seems to me that Pandey is a survivor because he receives a salary whatever the pps does, but what happened to investors along the way?
I will remain a speculative shareholder until concrete proof that xkem's problems have disappeared is confirmed.
3 years ago I didn't have the funds to get into taser to take advantage of the 'early' days but I have followed them on Yahoo ever since and after 3 years of trading I actually got into the stock in August 06. TASR has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that their products are safe and I would think that the personal protector has had 'above and beyond' the normal testing because of the last few years of legal actions.
I am looking for very strong 07 revenues. IMO
If there's one product in Tasr's locker that's going to rock the pps it's the personal protector. IMO I see huge revenues from this. GLTYA
Turbo - I try to follow any TA work here by gaswas or dart and generally agree with them. I would be interested to know what are your reasons for thinking it will dip back down again given the strong rally and breakout back into the short term trend channel. MTIA
Good morning everyone, technically speaking xkem bounced off the short term support and closed above the short term high on Dec 20 so looking very strong. I am looking for consolidation next week above the closing price.
Fundamentally speaking I looked at ICGN and in august it took an 80% swan dive on an independant surveyors report due to their phase 3 trials being restricted to one set of patients and even if their drug 'senicap' is approved this year by the FDA, impact wise I think it will be negligible on xkem as we have 5-HMF starting trials this year which appears superior to senicap (icgn). We also have SCD rights to the largest suffering countries in the world and so once again impact wise ICGN should have a negligible effect on our future revenues, at least for the next 12-18 months.
IMHO XKEM is set to have a good 2007 GLTYA
In para (3) it says that xkem has given restricted shares away in CepTor, 15% of xkem nigeria O/S stock and $5m of xkem common shares.
My question:- is this old news or part of the new deal? MTIA
Gaswas you make good sense, I look forward to your charts.
Don't fret it, you still might get your chance to buy at the bottom.
The disclaimer did say 'significant' amount of money and it certainly is that. At least the shares are restricted.
Well I guess dumb old me will have to try and learn a few things from you 'true' geniuses on this board. I feel blessed that I'm in the company of people who buy at the bottom and sell at the top!
Maybe you can tell me what a bagholder is? lol
I've never said I don't like this stock period, I just don't like this stock currently, but once the pps consolidates then I will be a buyer. If you read my comments from a few days ago you will see that I said that I was looking for consolidation above 022 but that view may change as the price fluctuates!
Soros: 'buy late - sell early'
Coolcat GLTY!
I couldn't give a flying foxtrot if nobody membermarked me. I'm not here for self gratification, I'm here to make money pure and simple and that's why I've been on the sidelines for the last few weeks, too many red flags appearing.
PFRENZ yesterday morning I posted what I thought on a fundamental and technical basis and one of the 'true' longs posted the opposite. I guess I did have a clue and they didn't.
Another clue I have is that some of the 'true' longs on here that have been pumping this for all its worth have sold their shares in order to buy in at a lower level only to find that they are still bagholders and are now trying to rally the 'troops' so that they can push the pps up in order to get out at an even point. But I guess as they are true longs that's ok!
ON THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE the market is currently pricing in what they think CKYS is worth, that is a fact. If the A/F's change that perception I'm sure the pps will move accordingly.
The market has already priced those revenues in, ckys needs to start producing new signed sealed and delivered contracts to have any positive effect. IMHO
Dcbass:- I watched RSHN for 12 months and they sell real products. After every convention and trade show they attended they came out with a pr saying what a sensation their product was and how they envisaged strong company growth, trouble is it didn't convert into solid sales and increased revenues and the pps is now under half of what it was in Feb. The pps would rise a few points on the attendance PR and then fall back a week later.
Technically, CKYS bounced back off the new short term resistance and closed below it. I'm currently cautious as I don't want to be caught again with a falling knife. JMO
I'm not sure it was for nothing, the disclaimer says that the 'issuer' can spend a 'significant' amount of money to redistribute Amalfi's reports.
However, this report is excellent and can only be construed as an emphatic article for xkem, and so it may be money well spent!
As I understand it, if drugs are given fast track status the FDA could rule for approval within 6 months from the date of fast track designation. 5-HMF fast track designation will be a huge positive for the pps. Judging from past history IMO
Absolutely on the nail. Good post!
I presume that is unaudited 3/4 qtr financials?
I believe that Big D said 4 working days, which means the 8K may not be out until monday.
I don't believe a single word from any poster on any board and anyone doing so is a fool in my opinion, especially if your investing strategy is based on another posters comments. However, 8K filings have an SEC regulation timeline and that is what I believe in.
I think the problem is the way that the A/S was executed, ie in a fairly covert way. Too many people have been badly burned by this very sort of action in previous companies and no matter how much they hear that CKYS is different, they recall past experiences and so have marched with their feet.
As posted before, the market is very rarely wrong.