Email addresses used in the website

healthcoachingwithkylah@gmail.com

info@healthkaleandkyndness.com


Looks like 'healthkaleandkyndness.com' isn't even a registered domain?

Agree - my only concern is Alpharidge.

Not a great track record of late, but definitely worth a punt - if they get custo this thing could seriously fly.

The new website really lit things up...

Last minute paint job saved the day once again.

I'm pretty sure a novice built it.

Amateur hour is not a good look - doesn't instill confidence or reflect any level of corporate professionalism.

Imagine a blue-chip company putting something like that up? No, neither can I.

#MONDAYPANICSELLING?


Might be more likely after seeing that website.

It’s the sort of page you’d put together if you wanted to appear as if you were doing something, whilst actually doing the absolute bare minimum required - both in terms of time, and money.

We waited two years for this?!

I’ve been in advertising, marketing, brand and business development for 30 years - that website should have never been published in the public domain, it provides zero credibility.

The absolute bare minimum was done to get a page up, and we waited two years for that? It’s the sort of website you might put together if you wanted to appear as if you were doing something - to me, it serves no other purpose.

If the website was consummately branded, slick, polished and professionally coded it would have been very encouraging - but this does exactly the opposite. It has amateur hour written all over it, embarrassingly so.

It also raises a big question - if Doc thought he was uplisting back in Q1, why is the website only being developed now?

We waited 2 years for the website

I could have thrown that together in half an hour.

That website is so bad I actually think it will do more damage than good - I can’t even take it seriously - if someone 'new' to UNVC were to visit that page whilst doing DD, they would probably run a mile.

It's a complete embarrassment.

UNVC has a Google template website

Let's be completely honest - that is not a website which instills confidence or is in any way suggestive of a large professional corporation, could it appear more amateur?

Looks like something a first timer would produce in their bedroom, a single page with no branding whatsoever.

Even the copy writing is embarrassing.

That was almost two years ago.

Looks like he's definitely finishing last though, I'll give you that.

What can happen before June 30?

Without filings, a sell-off of truly epic proportions.

A merger could cause major problems.

Can't even be bothered to go into the details.

A UNVC uplist to the NASDAQ?

Or a downlist to the grays?

So everything now hinges on IFAH?

I do a considerable amount of work and consulting within the US and European healthcare arenas - mainly blue chip, major group providers, biosciences and emerging technology - looking at the lists of IFAH speakers / investors / exhibitors / sponsors - I cannot see a single company I recognize... they are all tiny players and independents.

Wonder if they'll ask him how the website is going?

Regardless, if nothing happens at IFAH, and there are no filings prior to the event - it leaves 3 trading days for everyone to dump stock prior to the June 30th cutoff.

The end of June will be very interesting.

So many dots, so little time.

One way or another, we'll find out if Doc really has been doing anything in the coming weeks.

The closer we get to the OTC deadline, the more the downward pressure on the share price will increase.

Wonder how many will hold beyond June risking any gains they already have? Too much blind faith for me, in the remote hope Doc will pull a rabbit from a hat at the last minute.

The current UNVC share price doesn't matter...

Allegedly.

What I find incredible is that Doc has managed to string a number of his investors along for quite some years - purely on tweets, personal messages, and a whole bunch of unquantifiable dots.

Well, the share price WILL matter if nothing materializes by mid-June, as I expect even the most hardened investor will be dumping their holdings to avoid the price crash that comes with the 'Expert' market - and I'm also sure they'll be pumping the hell out of it to maximize their exit.

As I see it, Doc has roughly 4 weeks to save his credibility, and the investments of his shareholders.

So many dots, so little action.

This is like the 'Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon'.

Almost comedic at this point, only filings will make a difference.

So why doesn't Doc say something?

We can only assume it's because he wants to continue stringing his cult-followers along, rather than having any intention of actually filing or delivering something. After all, UNVC still has plenty of shares to sell before September...

Will UNVC continue its downtrend tomorrow? Docs insipid tweets have a minimal lasting effect these days - everyone is sick to death of them - yet they are seemingly the ONLY thing he brings to the table, and despite him doing this time and time again and not subsequently delivering anything, his devotees gratefully lap them up.

It's mind-blowing.

Could not agree more, no more fluff

It looks as though Doc's tweets are becoming less effective, it jumped to 0.085 first thing and the price is already back down to mid 06's.

Given Doc has been tweeting his generic positives for some years it astonishes me they still have any effect at all.

Ultimately, most people are sick and tired of dots and useless tweets - we've heard them all before, sometimes literally 'Silence is golden', for example.

Doc should stop stringing people along, and stop doing the absolute bare minimum to support his shareholders. It's time to prove your 'Type A' personality and actually deliver something of value - be a legitimate CEO, and file before we get delisted.

Nothing else counts.

More vague fluff to feed the followers.

We have had years of tweets / dots / private messages - only filings will make a long term difference - and establish some legitimacy for UNVC.

Otherwise it will slowly retrace as before.

Oh look, more deliberately vague fluff.

Do something tangible, shareholders are tired of your over-promising and under-delivering.

Perhaps address why you touted 'NASDAQ' and failed to deliver?

Contract was signed on the 5th January...

05-Jan-2021 / 14:58 CET/CEST

TubeSolar AG: Contract signed for investment in US company Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

Augsburg, Germany, January 5, 2021: TubeSolar AG (ISIN DE000A2PXQD4, XETRA, primary market Düsseldorf, m:access) today closed the announced agreement on the strategic investment in Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (OTC market "AscentSolar", ticker symbol: ASTI). In exchange for US-dollar 2.5 million in cash, TubeSolar AG will receive Ascent Solar shares at a price of US-dollar 0.0001 per share. Taking into account outstanding capital adjustments, TubeSolar AG will in future hold approximately 15 percent of the share capital of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. The financing will be provided from the proceeds of the capital increase completed in December 2020.


Announced on the 4th, signed on the 5th - not too shabby.

FWIW - despite the red market

TubeSolar is up today.

TubeSolar AG: Planned acquisition of stake in US company Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. secures long-term access to solar thin film technology

Augsburg, January 4, 2021: TubeSolar AG (ISIN DE000A2PXQD4, XETRA, primary market Düsseldorf, m:access) plans to acquire a strategic stake in Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (OTC market "AscentSolar", ticker symbol: ASTI). For the intended investment of 2.5 million US dollars TubeSolar AG will receive AscentSolar shares at a price of 0.0001 US dollars per share. Taking into account outstanding capital adjustments, TubeSolar AG would in the future hold approximately 15 percent of the share capital of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc..

Through this planned step, TubeSolar AG is implementing its "second-source strategy" and tapping into another source of supply in addition to its existing European supplier for flexible copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) photovoltaic cells.

The investment is to be financed from existing liquid funds. TubeSolar AG assumes that the contract will be signed in the short term.

Wonder if Doc Dalton nominated himself?

https://www.ifah.world/be-recognized

As Beer said, that how this works.

Well, we'll find out soon enough.

He has to file something shortly, or be delisted come September - it really is as simple as that.

Doc Dalton has never given a date.

But he HAS given a wide selection of tweets repeatedly suggesting corporate action is imminent:

Mar 31, 2020
Silence is Golden

Mar 1, 2020
Almost there! With all my heart Thanks to those who Believed

Feb 5, 2020
Bringing it all together

Dec 31, 2020
I made a promise it is time for me to deliver. Get on board

Nov 29, 2020
Blessings coming, move from conflicted to confidence

Nov 6, 2020
All is good going to great

Oct 19, 2020
Pennies to dollars Nasdaq

April 14, 2020
Long road with challenges but we are almost there

Dec 8, 2019
I promised a rainbow, may also have to add fireworks

Nov 20, 2019
Silence is GOLDEN

Oct 2, 2019
Thanks shareholders we are good

Sept 1, 2019
Last SEC reporting

Aug 1, 2019
Love it when auditors and attorneys agree

June 21, 2019
I have a rainbow of dollars for you

And all of these are just from Twitter.

The 'any day now' mantra has been repeated almost daily for over 2 years - people have lost credibility due to their unfaltering belief in him, but still continue to do his bidding despite Doc never delivering anything, even a website.

Doc isn't in a quiet period, but he'd like you to think he is - it's convenient for him and means his actions will not be questioned by his supporters. Very convenient.

Regardless, the game is up on the 30th June - if he doesn't file to get current, anyone holding shares beyond that date will be at risk of losing their entire investment.

UNVC will not magically appear on the NASDAQ.

Organic growth and uplist is an option

But UNVC would have to file all documents required by June 30th, in order to avoid being delisted come September 28th - in other words, they would have to get current and reporting.

If they don’t do this by the end of June, direct listing would be the only remaining option - and if the direct listing is not approved, they would be delisted from the OTC at the end of September when the new regulations come into effect.

A very risky strategy.

At this stage, options are limited.

Traditional uplist
Name change, 2 years of audited financials, OTC profile approval, Transfer Agent appointed, pink current, then they would still need to meet the upper exchange criteria (PPS / assets / shareholders), go through the application process, and uplist. In its entirety, this would take around 5-6 months.

Direct listing
Coinbase was a confidential direct listing so we can use them as a guideline - their initial public S-1 / statement of registration was filed on the 25th February, went through a couple of revisions, and they did indeed produce a full prospectus even though they were not using the listing to raise capital. They received conditional NASDAQ approval on the 24th March and their S-1 was certified on the 2nd of April, the NASDAQ listing went live on the 13th. So the 'public' part of the process took just over 7 weeks.

So, even if Doc had filed confidentially several months ago, it would still take the best part of a couple of months from the point that the initial S-1 is made public, to going live on the upper exchange. Bear in mind, Coinbase was relatively straightforward, they were not merging other entities, absorbing other stocks, or partnering with outside companies - and their initial S-1 was still 850 pages.

Here's my greater concern: if Doc is seeking a direct uplist he has no need to file the documentation required by 30th June in order to get current/reporting on the OTC. Therefore, once we are beyond that date, a DL would be the only option - but if the direct listing is subsequently NOT approved / certified by NASDAQ and does NOT proceed, UNVC will be delisted from the OTC on September 28th.

That's a serious gamble, and a serious risk for shareholders.

ASTI being pounded once again.

The entire OTC is being pushed down day in, day out - and it's now been going on for several weeks.

I'm an active trader but have barely bought anything in the last month, little reason to as new lows are created almost daily.

At some point people will simply bail from the market.

So much due diligence, so many dots

But the complete and utter lack of fundamental knowledge about the legal and regulatory processes involved is truly mind-blowing.

An 8K will not do it, simple as that - an 8K won't even get UNVC current, let alone uplisted.

Perhaps Doc's watch is running very slow?

His idea of 'soon' and everyone else's seem to be polar opposites.

I am at the stage where I seriously wonder whether he even intends to submit documents to go Pink Current, or simply let it get delisted and conveniently blame someone else.

Correct - 30th June deadline

No negotiation, file or be delisted.

One good thing about this situation

Is regardless of the deadline for adoption of the new regulations - UNVC will have to submit the required information by the June 30th in order for the SEC to have time to review and rubberstamp prior to the new regulations coming into effect on September 28th.

These filings would be public and viewable on the otcmarkets website upon submission.

So, if the required filings and documents are not submitted by 30th June - its very possible UNVC will be delisted come September 28th.

Your guess is as good as mine.

I've questioned this many times and posted about it previously, it's a big red flag to me.

Being dark means they do not have to do any public reporting, but in order to retain their 'Dark' status they do have to submit rudimentary information to the OTC on an annual basis to ensure ongoing compliance. I'm guessing this would be shareholder counts, basic revenues, etc - the items which would, or would not, qualify them as dark.

The share count question was explained in my previous post, we might have many thousands of shareholders, but due to the way they are reported in 'street name', it might only show a couple of dozen official holders - essentially, the brokerages that hold them for retail investors.

According to the regulations - if UNVC's reported revenues were indeed in excess of $10 million, they would have to immediately resume full reporting.

Which certainly does raise questions.

Correct - 10M or 500 shareholders

As soon as a 'dark' but publicly traded company exceeds 500 shareholders or the share issuer's total assets exceed $10 million, all SEC reporting obligations are automatically reinstated and the company must become fully reporting.

The issue with the shareholder count is this - nearly everyone buys shares through a brokerage (eTrade, Fidelity etc) and they hold the shares in 'street name'. So eTrade could have 200 people who have purchased UNVC shares, but all of those shares would be registered to 'eTrade' who would count as a single shareholder of record.

So we might have many thousands of shareholders - but due to a ridiculous law which hasn't been updated since 1927 - we have no way of knowing, as the shares are officially held by the brokerages.

In order to go Pink Current

In addition to the standard OTC regulations outlined in my previous post, Doc would still have to:

• Correct the DE / OTC naming discrepancy so both match

• Assign a Verified Transfer Agent

All of this would have to be done just to become 'Pink Current'.

Once completed, UNVC could then apply for an exchange uplist - as long as they meet the criteria for NASDAQ in terms of minimum share price / value of assets / number of shareholders etc etc.

All in all - not a quick process.

Correct - 'Dark' will no longer exist

The OTC will only have two reporting standards - all companies will have to be 'Pink Current' or 'Limited Reporting', or be automatically delisted come 28th September.

The 'Limited Reporting' would not apply to UNVC, as this designation is only for companies who are essentially late in filing recent reports. Basically any Pink Current company who are late filing quarterlies etc would be given 'Limited Information' status until they get up to date, with a six month maximum.

Clarification on my previous post.

I included the information that refers to the upcoming SEC regulation changes, but the second section outlines the steps required for a Dark company to become Pink Current - these steps have not changed under the new rules.

This information is directly from the otcmarkets website.

As I have stated previously, a single 8K won't do it.

From Dark non-reporting to Pink Current

The upcoming implementation of amended SEC Rule 15c2-11 will require that all companies quoted on our markets must disclose current information on a continuous basis, effective September 28, 2021. Companies must follow the Guidelines to be designated “Current Information” or “Limited Information” to remain publicly quoted.

Impacted companies should provide the required disclosure to OTC Markets by June 30th. This will ensure that our Issuer Compliance Team has sufficient time to review and update market status for companies prior to the rule’s compliance date on September 28th. Securities that do not meet the Rule’s disclosure standard will have their public quotes removed from Pink as of the September deadline.

Companies will be processed for Current Information once all required documentation has been submitted:

• Financial Statements: Two most recent Annual reports and any subsequent Quarterly Report

• Disclosure Statement: Most recent Annual and any subsequent Quarterly Reports

• Attorney Letter covering all relevant information for non-audited companies

• The Company Profile has been verified through OTCIQ


Not quite as simple as just filing an 8K.

Absolutely no reason for a quiet period.

UNVC hasn’t filed a registration statement - which would be required for a Direct Listing, and it would be public.

UNVC aren’t doing an IPO, and haven't released a prospectus - which would require a quiet period.

UNVC cannot do a traditional uplist due to dark status, and do not qualify anyway - so a quiet period is irrelevant.

Even if he was in a quiet period - which I can pretty much guarantee he is not - that one tweet would definitely fall foul of the SEC regulations. And no, the SEC do not give exemptions or permissions to circumvent the rulings.

Just stating facts, once again.

Yes, today - and November 2019.

Wonder if he realized he had posted exactly the same tweet before? And nothing came of it.