Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL....now thats funny..Skipper you are a funny one
LOL...ok boomer...LOL ...ok
DD doesnt ensure anything...an investment is a risk....not a gurantee....once you accept that then the board will be a nicer place for all of us and only new ideas or at least those not discussed ad nauseum...may come to the forefront for discussion....please put me on ignore....you know what I think of you and your lack of informed posts. No one owes you a dime of return...you take the risk..if you win great...if you lose be a man!
boomer just so you know..I dont give a chit about the nutmeg deal and never felt it warranted discussion...but you are correct...your DD or lack thereof was dead wrong.
jack respectfully...you need to go back and read many posts...you don't really know much about this stock....the link you ask about, http://www.tngroupllc.com/, is provided by the moderators as a helpful link above...I would suggest you peruse those links and other posts...walker, benz, profitchaser and a few others are invaluable resources.
PS before you call a CEO you need to have your bases covered...you are still on deck.
You do as much DD as anybody? You have been screaming about this non stop. Stop patting yourself on the back and telling the board how to behave. The whole nutmeg DD took me five minutes to put to bed...ANYONE could have done the same...especially you..
"Is Strat Petroleum a client?"
Reply from rwhite of tngroupllc email dated today at 12:52PM:
"They are not a client but rather a former portfolio company."
Lets bury this ridiculous thread now. "Former" makes it pretty clear there is no active relationship.
yes you brought Nutmeg up two times in your post to benz ONE HOUR AGO...no one asked you to...
I don't wish to be combative. I don't wish to post to you. But once something has been discussed ad nauseum....drop it....dont pretend to drop it..I gave you definitive proof the nutmeg deal is NOT active...so now we can all move on and discuss what potential SPRL has...Nutmeg is now over.
From Boomer:
"After we have slid well over 90% Brent who's outlook is more justified?
"oh I see benz was nice enough to give you verifiable and easy to find info in a previous post"
No Brent...this info is NOT verifiable and you know it. You believe it but you don't KNOW it. Is the Nutmeg deal dead or alive?"
Boomer I am amazed at the amount you post and how you try to impress everyone with your background. You say you are in venture capital but it precludes you from finding anything out first hand about the Nutmeg deal? Are you capable of any DD or just rants on your brilliance? Amazing what a phone call and email can do. Put the keyboard away and do some DD!
"Is Strat Petroleum a client?"
Reply from rwhite of tngroupllc email dated today at 12:52PM:
"They are not a client but rather a former portfolio company."
Lets bury this ridiculous thread now. "Former" makes it pretty clear there is no active relationship.
cat post fact please...your post contributes nothing...a year ago in the pinks means nothing. 100% Pro Mold is owned by PLNI. Three people on the board have been to the facility in the past three months and two to corporate. You are woefully misinformed.
great post benz
Captain...when did I say an Amex listing pps of .0010....any idiot knows that isn't the requirement? Did you have a point or just more acid?
why should we all be expecting a major reverse split? Why is it the best thing? If its for the AMEX then the rest.. audits etc will be intact...what exactly are you talking about? Your points collide in mid air.
150 million OS is a blessing in the pinks.
He told me that there was no R/S until AMEX...he can abide by that promise or he can change his mind...who knows
Care to discuss how you know the total short position? I bet ADP says something very different...
I "think" it the beginning of this year....not sure though
Captain don't attack the moderators if you wish to continue to post. But to your point, everyone of your posts have a sharp attacking edge to them and that needs to stop...now...whether you love this stock or hate it, rrm posted a blueprint for civil posts and presenting somewhat of both sides of the fence to stir debate.
ps I deleted them not keynesian
its interesting...very
You are right..NO ASSETS is not hysterical...you are right on the money.....wtf? are you unstable? I'm taking greenbullz advice...you destroyed RB...won't happen here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"We are very excited to report that along with these acquisitions, Strat and its joint venture entities have all the required Government approvals to construct processing plants directly at the sludge reservoir sites," said Sam Hyams.
Strat Nafta Ufa (SNU) reserves now total in excess of 1,000,000 metric tons with an official market value of approximately $80 per metric, valuing the reserves acquired at approximately $80 million. Strat Petroleum, in conjunction with its joint venture entities, will continue its discussions with the various Government agencies and regional refineries to acquire an additional 1 to 2 million metric tons of reservoirs.
fynley you need to pay for better tools so bashers on other boards can't cause you to panic just like catwithclaws did from RB.
You are obviously delayed. at 11:46 400,000 shares changed hands.
Boomer you simply stated: SPRL has no assets. That was your specific statement. You got called on it as a reckless and near hysterical statement by more than me.
If your point was they haven't filed audited financials to corraborate these assets or the amount of the assets then you should have said so to begin with. But your statement that "SPRL HAS NO ASSETS!" is reckless and yes incompetent.
That was the only point. Your dissertation was unnecessary.Be careful with hysterical ridden comments that have no basis. Saying SPRL has no assets is just that nothing more.
"SPRL has no assets!"
Boomer can you defend that statement? Because face value it seems incompetent....oh lets say about $60 million worth of a misstatement.
But I am willing to listen...lol
rrm,
This is an outstanding analysis. Exactly what the board is looking for. Multiple scenarios written fairly with no acidic undertones or personal attacks. Its also brings up new ideas to consider and debate, not the same message over and over again.
You gave the board a perfect example of what we should strive for. Congratulations and thank you.
LOL...well said
I dont think they are additions.
Actually there are twelve machines in the facility
nothing really...its the only mid morning pr I can recall in their history...curious I thought
doesn't an 11 oclock pr strike you as odd keynesian?
The thing you were warned about was the BS comment and censorship statement against the moderators..you soapboxed in your statement that your post had been deleted....which in this case was crap!!!....and in regards to your message that spammed again ...in response to our post and its personal attacks on posters not involved... has been deleted for the sake of integrity..
So you are clear I posted your original statement ...I ask you again as keynesian has...abide by the rules of the board.....:
Posted by: Captain James Kirk
In reply to: gopackersgo who wrote msg# 16838 Date:9/17/2006 7:10:26 PM
Post #of 16844
Specualtive? Are you kidding me? Its simple math the same specualtion that you BULLS say PLNI is going to $1.00 except dilution grow has been happening all along while others say it has not, and the specualtion is very likely to be true. Specualtion, BS! Restore the post, I can make predictions, that is not a violation. And when you see I am right? Then you will be guilty of hiding the the logical specualtion of others, I smell censorship.
Sigs are considered Spam, no sig shall appear more than once
Captain one of the things we are trying to stop is HYSTERICAL post...somone else's post was deleted!!!!! not yours. Don't do this again. Last warning.
PS I haven't predicted a $1.00 pps. Be precise in including me in your posts from this point forward.
Captain a message got deleted objecting to your speculation of 8 billion OS. The message got deleted because of the way it was written. The concern and a valid one is that it would be professional and prudent to post how you came to a conclusion of a 8 billion OS.
If its just an opinion on volume then that would be very speculative.
Captain it would be reckless for me to give a timeframe. I have no filed information for 2006. Please read again the content of my former post.
Posted by: gopackersgo
In reply to: Captain James Kirk who wrote msg# 16810 Date:9/17/2006 9:49:41 AM
Post #of 16836
your points are well made but are completely based on assumptions of OTHER pinks. You may end up being correct or very, very wrong. I prefer to wait a while longer and see if we have guaranteed contracts, what cash is being bled, if there is a projected date for cash flow being positive and subsequent profitability etc. In other words factual information on filed documents.
You make all your assumptions on OTHER pinks and what you assume to be the financial status. Without 2006 documents which from a financial revenue perspective is all that matters with PLNI and specifics to contracts, it becomes nothing more than wild speculation bordering hysteria.
I'll wait on the facts. If my investment is the price for waiting, then that is the price. If I am right then we could see an incredible percentage gain. Difference is I have real money in it. You don't.
Note to the board: The wild card is Semco. When is the 8k and are they really getting contracts in the millions?
your points are well made but are completely based on assumptions of OTHER pinks. You may end up being correct or very, very wrong. I prefer to wait a while longer and see if we have guaranteed contracts, what cash is being bled, if there is a projected date for cash flow being positive and subsequent profitability etc. In other words factual information on filed documents.
You make all your assumptions on OTHER pinks and what you assume to be the financial status. Without 2006 documents which from a financial revenue perspective is all that matters with PLNI and specifics to contracts, it becomes nothing more than wild speculation bordering hysteria.
I'll wait on the facts. If my investment is the price for waiting, then that is the price. If I am right then we could see an incredible percentage gain. Difference is I have real money in it. You don't.
Note to the board: The wild card is Semco. When is the 8k and are they really getting contracts in the millions?
Captain you have your opinion. I have mine. But if you think the 447k is an accurate reflection of the short position then ....well then I wouldn't know what to say. Have a good evening.
X Fortune just told you shorts. This thread on who you trade with and dont trade with needs to end. Get back to PLNI.
It in my opinion is most definitely a combination of the 2....no question.
This is the key:
"What portion of the non-CNS system (ex-clearing) short position do you think the CNS system short interest of 477K represents.... 1%?? 5%... more?? What would you base your assessment upon?"
I don't understand your question. If your question is a reference to dilution I don't know how much and who...if its a reference to shorting..I don't know how much and who...
Try to be a little more specific next time.
"is that something to be proud of?"
Shorts your statement about not being able to short a stock under $5.00 is absolutely incorrect. Offshore.
he showed up on RB for a few posts
nano..don't give me busy work....back to plni
Captain I am not excited. We all make mistakes. Just correct info and timely info helps the community. You think I don't wish I had bought PLNI now versus 5x higher?