Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I wrote ir this morning to see if we should expect any updates on the recent filing. I'll post when I hear back.
So you believe that because she went to business school in Lansing that she immediately knows the people at Dow which is over 80 miles away in Midland, or that she knows the chemists at Eastern Michigan State which is over 70 miles away? How exactly do you feel there is a connection other than she went to school in the same state?
I got my degrees in NC. Does that mean that I'm connected to Bank of America and RJ Reynolds? I'm not a banker or in the tobacco industry, but I am a chemist and I'm in NC. There must be a connection. WOW!!!
You're reaching. Skiluc is usually way off base, but here you're reaching and making connections that don't exist and he correctly called you out on it.
Proof or just more endless speculation?
If there was progress, it wouldn't be halted by such a small order.
When is the China contract going to be "implemented"?
Or was slow and got the joke last.
It's all about perspective.
Simply ask for the spec sheet and msds for comparison to products you're currently using. Be direct and you'll get it no problem. You'll probably get dozens of emails after trying to sell it to you also.
No one cares about the past? Really???
The past is a very clear indication of how this company is being managed. If you don't care about the past, you're really saying you don't care about the future.
Actually, the market seems to not care about the future of this company either. Maybe that's why the pps has been stagnant even with the "news" of new loans and deals.
It's not, but there are many other benefits that put it miles ahead of any competition.
Use the contact us page on the IR website and tell then you would like email updates. Steve will email you when news comes out.
I agree, they would not. Significant progress has been made and proven or companies would be looking for alternatives and not returning HCTI's calls.
I'm comfortable with that.
When the next PR update comes and says the formulation is complete and we're in the ramp up period, people are going to complain that we already knew that.
It will be similar to what we're seeing today. We've been updated on the process, and people are upset saying we knew this all along, not realizing that this is developing in stages and not all at once as they would like.
Exactly, to modify. Why modify if the formulation is complete as you keep saying?
I'm in this. Have been for a while.
Read what the words say, not what you want them to say.
The agreement is finalized and executed.
Hcti will co-own patents that come from the ONGOING modifications.
This may be as simple as the chemical engineers figuring out the optimization process, but it's still ongoing, not complete.
The PR still says, upon completion of modifications.
This would imply that they are still ongoing, not complete.
Are you invested in a Canadian bottled water company or the one in the New York?
Do you have signed proof of the investment either?
The revenue from the China deal was enough also....Right???
How did that turn out? Why do you expect it to be different this time?
Ben’s principal areas of practice include business transactions, business formations, business acquisitions and sales; estate planning, trust administration and probate; real estate as well as financial institution and creditors’ rights issues. He also has litigation experience, guiding his business and financial institution clients through disputes and dispute resolution. Ben’s business practice focuses on the entire life cycle of businesses and their owners from startup, to operations and transactional matters, and all the way through acquisition, merger or windup.
From:
http://arnoldgallagher.com/team/benjamin-m-kearney/
No worries. I'll post it again next week after you've bought back in. Then you can agree, tell me how is the best post ever, and buy me a month of ihub premium.
What that should tell you is that the float is pretty much locked up. When this starts moving, it's going to go fast.
The massive sell off has already happened. Just look at the pps over the last few months. Anyone left is naive or so far in the red, they might as well keep the position and hope something happens that allows them to get out.
The nice thing about facts, they're true whether you agree with them or not.
The market tends to not agree with you, as shown by another zero volume day.
How's that China deal going?
That showed on the financials released....RIGHT????
That's the lens you and everyone else should be looking at future deals through.
Time has already told everyone a couple of times. There are a few people here who just haven't listened.
Leopards don't change their spots.
What is negative?
Are you serious?
The company had never been profitable and doesn't have the money for taxes or the mortgage. The loan (toxic debt) won't cover this.
Now the company is committed to spending more than half a million dollars to maintain the water source.
Where is all this money going to come from?
How can you possibly see anything positive?
Who audited the report?
Are you being facetious, or do you not realize that the "report" you're referring to does not represent what you state that it does.
The short report counts a lot of market maker trades as shorts. We all know this isn't the case.
I think dh had a post recently where he gives the only reputable link to see short volume. It was more on the order of ~90,000 shares if I remember correctly. That's all of about $200. So yeah, as stated, chump change.
The only reason I still check this board is to see your posts like this.
You're right, Dr. Figovsky is a great scientist. His work is extensive and does span decades.
Early on when deciding to invest here I wrote an email to him asking if he was truly working with this company. He replied, had Mr. Trossman reply, as well as the guys in California. He outlined his involvement and went over some specs. I was duly impressed and invested the same day.
It wasn't the epa, the management, or anything other than his involvement that convinced me to invest.
I think if others wrote him and his team they would be impressed as well.
I've joked in the past about my near autism and how I believe this quality has made me a better scientist.
That's a good point. Not shutting down operations after an installation us a huge selling point.
I don't want people to think I was belittling the epa award earlier, so I'll add to the speculation a little myself. When I went through the list of previous award winners, they were either very large companies, acquired by very large companies, or saw huge increases in pps after.
I also saw someone say something about dilution and future financing earlier. With the amount of capital coming in versus expenses, I don't think we'll see the need for either of those again.
I misspoke. I actually have really enjoyed reading the speculation and sleuthing done by the board recently. When I said I don't like speculation, I mean to say I don't like calling it fact.
I'm excited by the future of this tech. I hope the management team is diligent enough to stay in front.
I am saying that. Yes.
I'm just not saying it's the only "green" option.
A single award doesn't make a company. Do you have a contract that shows that California is exclusively using HCTI? No, so don't pretend that we do.
Govt. will choose the lowest cost green product, whether it is the better product or not in most cases.
Companies will choose the lowest cost option as well. In some cases that will be licensing a formulation. In other cases it will be to develop their own.
Also, first to market with a specific product, not first isocyanate polyurethane ever to market.
Can you point out where I've ever said the f500 deals aren't real?
Look at my post history. The only thing I hate is wild speculation and outright false statements being made and called DD.
There are other products that are competition. Hcti still has a place in this market.
They are being sold. I've pointed them out several times. DD isn't just looking for facts that you like. Instead, know what you own and what your competition owns.
It's true that the competition still employs voc's, but there are isocyanate free options other than hcti.
Funny thing about people who know nothing about synthetic chemistry, there are many ways to isocyanate free polyurethanes. Some have been documented in scientific literature for a couple of decades.