Always Digging
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"Just serve charts"
ROFL , okay.
Awfully squirmy , words against facts? Lol
"Bath salts" noise? Lol
https://teamsters710.com/2017/08/24/notice-of-nomination-and-election-for-officers-of-local-710-ibt/amp/
What is this ?
What happened early 2015 ?
You didn't negate anything I said .. that's all that We need to see. Ty
GAHC Long
Keep trying , all energy is gainful and valuable , And so will be all shares of GAHC.
Bitcoin is not on topic , GES/GAHC running teamsters elections ,, says you scamming public like us right ?
They would hate a scam company running a former mob run union elections ? Agree?
Tell that to DoJ ? You know we are running around on their turf right ? Or does justice just remain behind a safe curtain ? That doesn't make sense , no?
I have been brain dead hodling since all time lows ?
Naaahhh. Lol
Not because we got current and received a Grant on the parent patent ? How much coin are we exposed to again ?
How much bitcoin action is GAHC exposed , so much talk here of Bitcoin and not Blockchain, ihub doesn't have a board for a currency.
I do not know him personally but normally a good poster of DD and Long support. Last he talked was of a ppm and not since. This year he has made mentioned of a number of things that although the puzzle pieces fit we do not know with absolute certainty if belongs in our picture.(i.e.: PD/sports association deal, 3 silos(platform uses) with US listed company, Eleison database) makes all the sense in world when we have Block Voting patent and Slidechain.
Also saying GAHC was at GETSummit with the other heads of industry, I have been crawling around looking to solidify that one for a while now. A PPM ... the acquisition deposits paid in consecutive Q's .. primaries over bounced back from 77k revenue first Q '17 to 275k this past , will be nice to see what we were pulling Q1 of '16 back on books again.
Found before they could finish site? , 2017 on it. *shrugs
Who knows just yet but I like the direction. Any thoughts ?
"Medic!!!" Not that far off weimeraner actually, BTCorp is branching out its application of the Granted patent it appears , database creation and utilization no?
http://medmoto.com/
Bottom of page
"Get in touch. Email info@ blocktechcorp.com"
"Overall, legislators who had never heard of blockchain technology just a year ago are becoming aware that the distributed ledger industry is ripe for regulation. Intelligent investors, recognizing the inevitability of state-level blockchain regulation, will need to keep an eye on the progress of the bills"
Already starting to redefine
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b932faaa-17d4-4476-ba4c-a0fc2edfd22c
All I said was "see ya". That was simple. I am pretty dead set here with Global. No need to pull all the stops and charts. I am actually in slight reflection currently, not on my investment choices , but perhaps my Long support would have been better served if my thoughts and reference were developed on more open platforms. So far my firsts beyond rt is at FMV and linking articles that underline how they have a failed product for their intended use. Good questions though , "use any device to vote" ? That was on their site .. that was poorly chosen words by them Imho.
Are not we all ?
Why would anyone with a neuron be so focused on little ole GAHC JB ?
Laid down all facts so far, are you saying otherwise ?
How long did I say to hold for to get the full gains of the Blockchain mega trend btw ? So far my Long hold has been doing rather well, Granted first half of year it took to catch up financials and then within last month a great update.. you did see "Blockchain voting platform" in there as well. First the parent patent received grant and now ours is on deck... what pump ?
Something that would pin this to a currency ? Something that would shake shares ? I see that , even now.
"Crypto trend dead" where do you see that??
Being written into laws last I saw
http://www.azfamily.com/story/36283340/arizona-edges-to-front-of-states-eyeing-blockchain-technology
Here is the truth , per Harvard
https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain
Blockchain is sticking around.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryjuetten/2017/09/13/legal-technology-and-smart-contracts-contract-as-automaton-part-v/
And following up the voting fraud in NH post - Blockchain to fix that as well it appears, no ?
http://reason.com/archives/2017/09/12/bitcoins-blockchain-tech-could-be-the-an
"Correct, Votem has that"
They certainly do have a worthless product to their target market.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=134571235
Before there was no room for a little company I thought ? But now online voting platforms are blown out of the water its , "no voting machine sales" ... lol , yet.
GAHC Long
You talking mainstream elections , right ? Early in the game to say "nobody" isn't it ? Everyone coming to grips that the system needs a upgrade this year.
Is revenue climbing back up ? Same question that Terp avoided. Yes/no?
Off main topic but subject is elections industry related with
what is happening in NH... Been following, dealing around the reported abuse of voter registries.
I like this data miner who is involved.
"There's a high likelihood of voter fraud, based on what we've done so far with our analysis. There's likely a lot more to be found," said Ken Block, president of Simpatico Software Systems. His company studied voter data in 21 states and concluded "with high confidence" that there were more than 8,000 cases of people voting twice"
But that doesn't sit well for
"New Hampshire's longtime secretary of state, Democrat Bill Gardner, who happened to be the host of Tuesday's commission meeting."
Go figure how that meeting went when the overall NH elections viewed as "House Democratic Leader Steve Shurleff added: "Democrats are taking back red seats across the state by standing up for our values, offering a positive message, and being willing to work across the aisle.” - or work across state lines ?? Well that is just what data strongly suggests.
We also have "Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, Democrat , questioned Block's findings, saying he has found that most problems can be explained by human error." I suppose human error factor helped assist the 1bil saved in Texas or uncovering Medicare frauds he was involved doing. But then Maine did not want to see a study on Blockchain Voting And paper ballot solution ... right ? Interesting.
http://www.npr.org/2017/09/12/550518986/tension-and-protests-mark-trump-voting-commission-meeting
But before NH Ken helped in R.I.
"After Block turned his findings over over to state election officials, both the state Board of Elections and the secretary of state's office promised to investigate and purge the state's rolls of voters using bogus addresses." - they will purge the rolls but doesn't change the outcomes of previous elections where abuse was found..."promised to investigate" - compelling data Im sure ... what Dunlap and Gardner will want to avoid , right ?
http://www.govtech.com/data/Report-Sounds-Alarm-on-Potential-for-Duplicating-Voting-in-US.html
Ken Block - wiki
"As a small business owner, Block has run several software companies which have worked with state governments to identify fraud and government waste in social service and welfareprograms. In 1995, Block was able to save the state of Texas over $1 billion by developing a new statewide debit card system. Shortly after the 2010 election, Block offered his company's help free of charge to find waste and fraud in Rhode Island's entitlement programs. He was subsequently involved in the state's Medicare waste and fraud report as well as assisting the Providence Police Department's fraud unit to better access state records in late 2012. Police investigators have claimed that the new computer software will help detect millions of dollars in fraud."
"who cares"
I would assume all the opinions who stated "no revenue" and supported that false narritive now have a broken argument. "Agreed" ?
How about acquisition deposits in filings ?
Misdirection will not work , since drop(primary election) is it coming back up ? Yes/no ?
"Agreed" - no revenue and nothing in pipeline?
The straw house always falls as will this poorly chained set of misleading statements. Thankfully we have filed facts don't we ?
GAHC Revenue-
First 6months in '16 is 990k
First 6months in '17 is 352k
3 Months Ending June '16 322k
3 Months Ending June '17 275k
Break it down ? Sure thing.
Starting 2016 we had 666k first three months then with presidential primary started coming up that we have no market in .. yet .. revenue dropped to half that the following months to 322k and the next 3 months ending sept '16 182k when Mainstream voting was Center stage and we had 53k become the low point last 3months ending '16 ... still 77k first 3 months ending March '17 but it's a start after the fiasco of a primary and middle market starting to gear back up.
Take Note the 3 Months Ending June '17 now .. 275k .. very nice jump , and We know they have been busy conducting major Union(teamsters) and association(AES) elections of late, and that's just what's publicly able to be mined.
Just to hash out the BS "no revenue" comment.
Keeping to "nothing in pipeline" ?
The multiple acquisition deposits paid from recent filing gives one the distinct impression and strong resolve that there is absolutely nothing happening to take notice of or even mention...lol.
"Vote with your phone"
Probably best for opinion and sports polling but not mainstream. With as many vulnerabilities as online based and electronic voting machines have now , even though certified, having elections threw any Walmart bought special that can download a app doesn't give the safe feeling. Sure the Blockchain based app will record send your phones vote flawlessly , its a Blockchain after all, but the hardware/software under it is secure ? Pick your president on a prepaid, unless it's not you controlling your phone right ? Opps
Paper ballots must remain , the voting machines must stay, the best and Long lasting solution will surface and we have it.
Here is recent article on a Wifi bug for over 1Billion users of android and IPhones. Let's get the country on a app ??!
"But a modern computer or smartphone is a kind of silicon Frankenstein, with components sourced from third-party companies " Perfect foundation to give the executive seat of the United States.
"Without that fix, it would have allowed a hacker who comes within Wi-Fi range of a target not only to hack a victim's phone, but even to turn it into a rogue access point that would in turn infect nearby phones, quickly spreading from one device to the next in what Artenstein describes as the first Wi-Fi worm."
A motivated attacker with the future of the United States in play couldn't make use of that one if elections were phone based ?? T
https://www.wired.com/story/broadpwn-wi-fi-vulnerability-ios-android/
More recent one .. Sept 07
"—or it could simply take over the screen and lock the user out of all other parts of the phone in a form of ransomware.
“They can make it look like you’re touching one thing when you’re touching another,” says Palo Alto researcher Ryan Olson. “All they have to do is put an overlay a button over ‘activate this app to be a device admin’ and they’ve tricked you into giving them control of you"
https://www.wired.com/story/hack-brief-patch-your-android-phone-to-block-an-evil-toast-attack/
Votem,FMV,bitcongress all good intentions but not first in this space and all having incomplete products for what the country requires currently and market they are attempting to capture. Only thing they are really doing is validating our Patented solution that is already binded with paper ballots and the newest hardware advancements from what the recent PR had said.
FMV is based is Virginia , like a punch in the gut.
Good read.
https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazine/article/david-dill-why-online-voting-danger-democracy
"There is no way with any reasonable amount of resources that you can guarantee that the software and hardware are bug-free and have not been maliciously attacked"
Paper based Voting machines , offline , using Blockchain tech.
GAHC/BTC Long
Although that one article that mentioned them "far ahead and above the rest", I noticed they had said "Thanks!!" On the twitter platform toward article.
They gave the thumbs up to mislead ?
Been weighing how to impale with that one.
Lol we went over this , clever marketing but that's about it .. prove otherwise ?
They do not have a full and complete product .. Maybe for middle market but we have that already don't we ? No?
Good read on Blockchain
https://www.bna.com/tech-giants-eye-n73014463697/
Responding to mainstream industry direction
http://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/oh-cuyahoga/more-counties-switching-to-paper-ballots-amid-election-hacking-fears
http://www.governing.com/topics/politics/tns-georgia-election-paper-ballots.html
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/26895-virginia-decertifies-paperless-electronic-voting-equipment
Oh and here is a wrap up article I liked that said --1hr ago
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2017/09/12/blockchains-and-voting/
"Wrapping up, it’s easy to see how blockchains are an exceptionally useful primitive that can help build voting systems, with particular value in verifying that the final tally is consistent with the cast ballot records. However, a good voting system needs to satisfy many additional properties which a blockchain cannot provide. While there’s an intellectual seduction to pretend that casting votes is no different than moving coins around on a blockchain, the reality of the problem is a good bit more complicated."
I think you need to take your concerns "scam" elsewhere , or don't stop here .. be true and notify DoJ like you should or stop pushing false and empty blocks.
"An independent election supervisor will, after the transition, continue to ensure fair elections, the court documents say. During the transition, the federal government will need to approve the supervisor and even after the transition ends, must still be given seven days’ notice of the appointment of an independent election supervisor."
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/justice-department-teamsters-union-supervision-ends-114281
GAHC/GES running them ...
https://teamsters710.com/2017/08/24/notice-of-nomination-and-election-for-officers-of-local-710-ibt/amp/
To hear advancement in that area and "old deal" would be apex in my catalyst book for GAHC and Long waited for.
Not a bad price tag Imo for the piece of critical infrastructure that can change everything and how our country runs. It all starts with a vote , for country direction , its future , kids future.
All that from head or tails posted article that mentioned votem ? Did you skim by chance bc it said "far and above the competition in terms of creating a trusted blockchain voting solution"
- They were founded 2016...
We have had a product since 2015 ...
it's a mobile platform for states that want a paper solution .. jump on that leaky boat if you want , I'm content here with the patent holders Ty.
GAHC Long
Blockchain Article a while back
Notice optical mark recognition mentioned , recent PR looks even better when we put all the gears together ? GAHC/BTC
https://medium.com/@blocktechcorp/creating-the-next-generation-voting-machine-6c566a3a3a84
Exactly !! The resource being used now is easy basis that Grant is coming for Blockchain Voting Patent, but then why wouldn't it ? It has been cleared since 07/12.
We can not forget either the new designation of Election technology.
"The designation allows for information to be withheld from the public when state, local and private partners meet to discuss election infrastructure security"
So we will be last to hear but best seats in the house.
GAHC Long