Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SCOTUS explicitly stated this idea for due process as another out for us if we reach that point.
Nothing major(other than are path to victory just got extended longer), in an earlier post I mentioned there is some useful information in this ruling yhay could be beneficial to WDDD although o expect it to be anon issue.
No regular posters here from over two years ago and still around got in for Oil States. Only one poster was certain it was going the other way and they are a major wddd cheerleader. Most seemed to agree with the 50/50 sentiment falling on the unlikely side wddd would get any benefit from this.
Hey Alpha,
Who said this Oil States was going to be a sure fire win for World's benefit?
Kid
Hello,
Now we can advance quicker since this decision came earlier than expected. There are some useful tid bits for World's lawyers in this ruling too which might be helpful.
Kid
Waiting on Oil States decision. If favorable, we begin the climb as CAFC has easy call if IPR process is unconstitutional, if negative, we wait for CAFC decision to decide official next step forward.
Oil States should come out between now and end of May if historical trends are followed.
Mixed board opinion about what the outcome of our CAFC appeal will yield. My opinion to you should be worth next to nothing ;)
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
Have you heard of Gamblers Fallacy?
Kid
At this stage, very little to none. It would likely only cause more delays if we were to wait on this new law to pass.
The details of why were provided already here but I will restate them based on the written decision in that case.
"The Federal Circuit went further and determined that the record evidence could not supply the Board with a basis for a more reasoned explanation to support obviousness. For this reason, the Federal Circuit reversed, rather than remanding to the Board for additional investigation or explanation."
What exactly did the judges in World's case ask about? Maybe what evidence Bungie/Activision had to support PTABs findings? The one response was to summarize without writing down the recording, out lawyers argues better than World's. The CAFC judges pressed on with no response.
I will post more later when I have the time.
Except for this DSS v Apple case where CAFC did exactly what you say they can't. They did it with less ammo than WDDD's has too.
It is likely due to the fact we haven't won anything yet, and why get spread thin here? More lawsuits are more cash drain with only a finite amount of cash left for us. No other announcements for this until after district court is my opinion.
Are they going to apply Alice at this time as you predicted previously?
But CAFC is totally throwing this out willy nilly with Alice since they can do whatever/whenever...
Hmm, what else was are panel asking Bungie about? Why should the panel allow PTAB to hold. The reply, we argued better than WDDD. Next question, anything else? Reply, crickets.
Another recent court case to support a dismissal of PTAB.
Hello,
There is another MAJOR risk here nobody has mentioned in the last 2 years and I won't bring it up more than this.
Hello,
On the remand scenario. Dont't you think the CAFC would provide a very narrow window on what the PTAB can review? Like, they can only look at the RPI issue? The PTAB already reviewed the patents and ruled on them. In the name of efficiency for the judicial system, why would the CAFC allow PTAB to review everything again after already reviewing the patents? My take from the orals.
For the RPI, Bungie is and PTAB would then be forced to throw out it's ruling or it isn't and ruling stands as is. I would imagine this scenario would then go to District Court as nothing else new would be needed to review as CAFC should be covering it in their current process.
Regards,
Kid
Side note, I only trust fully one poster here. Most others are grain of salt trustworthy and a few have zero credibility to me.
Hello,
What is the wager?
Hello,
Looking to discuss all of the options moving forward stopping over step past District Court. Here is my list so far. Others please chime in.
Back to PTAB, back to CAFC, District Court, back to CAFC
District Court, CAFC
PTAB, District Court, CAFC
Settlement at any time
Hello,
I hold more shares than the large majority of posters here. Enough shares where if we see a 300 million plus win I can think of retiring within the next few years. I am in my 20's and savvy with my blue Chip dividend plays that make up my retirement accounts.
Hello,
I sold 12k today, been trying to move shares for a few days. First sale in around 2 years since when I was swing trading. Needed extra cash for some major unexpected expenses. No plans on selling any more until DC decision.
And please since you are attending, place your bets before reporting back to us ;)
Sweet, so a judge can just for no reason give all of WDDDD's patents back then too!
Correct they killed patents that were challenged. Were all of World's patents challenged?
52 week high!!!!
Hello,
Here is why Kidrin did this. First, to be in legal compliance as the company did not have enough shares to cover the warrants. Second, to position itself to uplist. If the ratio was high enough to uplist then people shorting could bring it down causing problems trying to get it listed. The 5 to 1 leaves us ready for a positive catalyst to cause the rise in process before the uplist is used. The positive catalyst will then be a good point for other new investors that can now invest due to the uplisting to get in. Third, now we never get in a pickle of running out of shares. We either are successful in this case or we die.
Why can't they just keep doing reverse splits and basically create infinity shares? Wouldn't be the worse case?
7 million warrants left minus however many are used by investors. 35/248~14% if all warrants go through. The warrants are reduced at the 5-1 also.
Like six months ago.
Hello,
Oh I very well am aware of Judge Casper from reading through some of her court cases. I know my opinion of how she will handle this case. I also very well know my investment strategy and my risk threshold.
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
One could ask from this perspective, how much does it cost them to fight the case? If it isn't much or the cost to settle is high they will fight this until it dies or a court makes them pay.
Hello,
What is your opinion in Justice Casper? I have been reading through some of her cases so I have my opinion already.
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
The video is on this board. Not buried in the posts but somewhere not crazy hard to find. Most Recent World's Videos". I found it under the world's detailed quote section.
Kid
Hello,
What is your definition of NPE?
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
People should probably slow down here. One step at a time. Let's get calendared before we hope too much for a positive district court outcome.
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
Were all of the claims challenged? The article addresses that even though the claims survived PTAB they were challenged and then thrown out at CAFC.
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
So with this wi-fi one ruling, we can appeal our time bar ruling effectively eliminating the real party of interest if we win this appeal? We have just been given grounds to do this correct?
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
Do you have any reading material so I can educate myself on this idea?
Kid
Great find! I need to cross reference this with my DD about the judges. A quick read confirms Dyk is really the only real bad option or at least IMO.
Hello,
It has been addressed by others here before but here you go.
"Item 1A - “Risk Factors” includes information about the most significant risks that apply to the company or to its securities. Companies generally list the risk factors in order of their importance. In practice, this section focuses on the risks themselves, not how the company addresses those risks. Some risks may be true for the entire economy, some may apply only to the company’s industry sector or geographic region, and some may be unique to the company."
Specifically, "In practice, this section focuses on the risks themselves, not how the company addresses those risks"
It is almost as if WDDD doesn't have to hold investors' hands on exactly they might dilute or something.
https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersreada10khtm.html
Regards,
Kid
Hello,
Would you provide some evidence of something material you have accurately predicted in the past few months? Material is not one day of ~15% loss. I know you call for general dilution which is likely to some extent. Either via a public offering, deal with Privite equity, selling merimed shares, or something else I haven't considered. Dilution has yet to occur though or at least publically since no new shares have been authorized and no news has released on it plus the lack of evidence of continually slow stock decline.
Regards,
Kid