How do you come up with LOGO being the first spin-off?

It would be more logical to spin-off MTV or one of the other entrenched stations versus a station that is certain to cause controversy and not a proven entity.

Berlin Exchange: The investor page says they are aware of Q trading on the Berlin Exchange.

Can we tell how long we have been on the Exchange?

This is probably the worst news I have heard so far.

Wow! Really? Cool!!!

Useless post.

Yes. I own Viacom stock.

Logo has orginal programming lined up. Live I do not recall but the orginal is what is important. The line up is very solid for them.

I still do not see why the same PR's got bashed on the Q side but no bashing for LOGO. They have missed dates, reworked shows, hired new people, have miss spelling ins the PR's, etc.

I think the hirings mentioned are good for LOGO. I also have no doubt LOGO will be a good station. The line up looks solid and they could possibly be the #1 station for G/L.

With that being said you can not rule out Q just because LOGO is coming to market. I see each one serving a differnt segment of the niche market.

So they missed the dates, hired new people into bigwig position, and have typos in the PR. That means they are moving forward.

Although, if Q laid a log it would be bashing left and right.

Remember people who are unsuccesful in life are generally bitter and like to insult those who have worked hard to achieve what they have.

Also remember those that have riches can be the poorest of all.

More pathetic than say going from board to board bashing people that are holding a certain stock?

I do not think about it just like I do not think about my other stocks (LC,SC,MC) that are going down. The market is in poor shape right now anyway.

But I find the analysis presented here entertaining especially considering it's a micro-cap.

Why the personal attacks? What is the point of attacking her? Why insult her?

Now to your less than stellar points.

1. A true investment profesional would tell her to stay away from Micro-cap stocks. A DAY TRADER might tell her to play the swings though.

2. Just because a stock is going down does not mean you sell. Your generalizing a point. Many investors sell at a 20% profit and at a 20% loss. Others sell off at given points on a run (say 10% of the holdings). Some take risk stocks and hold no matter what.

3. Many people that have enough funds to retire do not. Why judge someone based off what you would do? Another poster pointed out people who could easily retire but still work. If Q is her passion then so be it. If micro-cap stocks are her passion then so be it. I am not one to judge what you do when you have riches.

Hey, where's the it's going to be at .00nn by the end of the week post. I am surprised it's not here yet. Of course we have yet to hit the old predictions of (.0020 and .0022 and .0006) but I am interested to see the new ones.

I thought the prediction was for .0022 then .0020 then .0006 by the end of last friday or the one before. Now it's .0010 by next friday. Shouldn't we wait to hit .0022 and .0020 before we drive it down even more.

Yes they would at some time have to cover.


I like M. Cuban so i found his insight on shorting and naked shorting interesting. I rarely short but he does give some good insights.

http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000230033533/

Can you give me links to the shows you have seen for LOGO I would enjoy seeing what we are missing. I admit they sound like they could be good but then again most of MTV's stuff is very bad.

Also, I am assuming you watch Q and know the quality of the shows are low?

No. Why would I be frustrated?

I would never invest heavily in a micro and expect it to make anything. Micros are losses as soon as I purchase them. I have been lucky and hit on a few to cover any losses I have had on them but your chances are not good.

If you are not getting a good balance of stocks in your portfolio I could see where you might be frustrated. My outlook as always been to balance out my risks and depend on other stocks to carry my risky investments.

I own SLE it's ranged from 20-25. I own PG and it's ranged from 50-57. MSft has been from 24-30. All of which are down from my last allocation period (ex. PG 54.80 now 53.25 after a few days recovery).

The market is very fluid in any class of stock. All of the same outside factors effect Micros-Large Caps. The price of oil, interest rates, unemployement figures, etc. The differnce between a large cap and micro is simply how early the people are going to move the money they invest into other investments.

As an example last year I converted another 10% of my investments into gold and other precious metals versus stock.
You have to consider the fact that the entire market COULD be in a bad situation soon with interst rates, oil, etc.

OT: Actually, I already have four of them. One at work, one in each car.

Why have they not removed the .0006 as the 52wk low?

2003 Silver Spyder. Going for 220hp.

Basihing on the board has no effect on the stock.

Although, it does seem there is a group of people who enjoy bashing and not using facts or twisting facts into fiction.

Although, it is funny to read most of the posts. Experienced traders here let me tell ya. Almost like what I used to see on the SIRI boards. Not quite as bad yet though.

OT: Just ordered the Turbo for my MR2. Now I just hope it's not undrivable when done.

Charts & Techs are not very accurate for Micros.

Yep. Forward looking statements.

Your point?

So exactly why are we dropping using charting terms?

Solid facts are all around. Most just choose to ignore it. So now we will hit .0010. Man the guesses keep coming.

Saw the same thing with SIRI. I ever mention I like my new MR2?

When I say in QBID I mean that is the allocated amount in thier portfolio not in QBID it self.

I do not know anyone who is involved with the actual company. We all have the same Micro-caps bar one and got to ride SIRI up to where it is now.

I see the same happening for QBID. My long term goal in QBID is simply .25. Nothing more nothing less that will be enough for me.

Depends. I know 6 longs that have at least 2-5% in QBID. They have no issue with the PR's. They see a company being built and forward progress being made.

But wait. They are not day-traders they are investors. Longs will tend to be investors versus the day-traders. They knew the risk going in and allocated the proper amount of the portfolio to the risk stock. So they have plenty of time to wait.

Qbid is 3% of my portfolio. I keep between 9-10% in micro-stocks. Currently I am sitting at 7% Micros since I now classify SIRI as a small-cap.

I think your seeing the differnce in man-power. There are only so many things they can do.

I would rather Q get the job done than bother updating me.

Then again I am not a daytrader. So the PR's are to let me know what is going on and what is in the works. They are forward looking statements not facts.

I invested in Q as a long term investor so I could care less as long as I know he is making progress. That is obvious so I am not concerned.

So you would trust Viacom after lying about Logo's dates? You would trust Microsoft after them lying about Longhorn release dates & features?

Nice double standard there if you trust one and not the others.

Not all dates can be met.

How is it confirmed? Please post the facts so we can evaluate them.

Actually, I am impressed with both stations line ups so far. From what I can tell they will both have a market. I posted some of Logo's line-up earlier.

So why is Logo not up and running already?

We know what shows are going to air on Logo so therefore we have a good idea how they will be operating.

Logo is not a threat to the long-time value of Q.

Who was on the air first Showtime, HBO, Cinemax or the Movie Channel?

Who was on the air first ABC, NBC, CBS or Fox?

Of course WB, TNT, Etc are all doomed to fail because of the others.

I do see a drop in the chart that would confirm what your are saying.

Why has it not been removed or fixed then? I have seen bad tics in other stocks I hold an they do not show the wrong 52 wk low is it because it is sub penny anyway?

So we have heard over and over yet it has not happened. Eventually someone might be right. WE were supposed to be at .0022 or lower already.

52wk low is .0006. What are you talking about?

There is no single indicator to show what the stock will do. Especially in a micro-cap stock.

So what does mean something?

Ok. I get your point now. That what I was trying to figure out.

My rule has always been "NEVER invest in airlines even if they look like a good value".

JBLU is the one exception I see right now but still not getting in my portfolio yet.

What does all this mean?