researching
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sputnik again I ask you.
are you sure they are doing biz with the REAL wellington?
http://www.asiatradingonline.com/stockscam.htm
Wellington International Bangkok, 10110 Thailand Tel 662-653-5010Fax 662-653-5129 #Please note that this company is not connected in any way and should not be confused with Wellington International Management Company Pte Ltd of Level 61, MLC Centre, 19-29 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW which is a registered securities dealer (ASIC licence number 187915), nor with its parent company Wellington
Sputnik
You have been SNOOKERED.
Or are you doing the SNOOKERING?
Sputnik post your DD @ the Scams thread.
Sputnik are you sure they are doing biz with the REAL wellington?
http://www.asiatradingonline.com/stockscam.htm
Wellington International Bangkok, 10110 Thailand Tel 662-653-5010Fax 662-653-5129 #Please note that this company is not connected in any way and should not be confused with Wellington International Management Company Pte Ltd of Level 61, MLC Centre, 19-29 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW which is a registered securities dealer (ASIC licence number 187915), nor with its parent company Wellington
Sputnik
From the Stockhouse .com...AHE thread(You have been Snookered)In my humble opinion.
SUBJECT: RE: AHE Posted By: BJINVAN
Post Time: 8/28/00 18:53
« Prev Msg Thread « Previous in Thread Next in Thread » Next Msg Thread »
Good history lesson OTC. Yes the directors are the same. A gentleman by the name of Bill Robinson started up In House Video, does that name ring a bell? I think its stock performance (ITKG) is pretty typical, there are lots of people holding long and strong in the hopes of solid long term contracts.It may happen soon, we shall see. What in my opinion makes this a better deal? For all it's worth, if I sell at US$10.00 plus, I will consider it a better deal!! The timeframe is also important, when are things going to start happening? I dont know. You are certainly right about the advantage of closely held shares. this puts us in an enviable position when things start to happen. Best regards to all,BJIN...
Message Thread:
AHE - BJINVAN - 8/26/00 9:43:00 PM
> RE: AHE - BJINVAN - 8/28/00 6:53:24 PM
RE: AHE - OTCGURU - 8/27/00 8:57:29 PM
Bad news Sputty
You been had,IMHO this aint BR,s first pump and dump.
SUBJECT: AHE Posted By: BJINVAN
Post Time: 8/26/00 21:43
« Prev Msg Thread Next in Thread » Next Msg Thread »
Go back guys, Maybe 15 years, maybe more, who started up AHE? Or should I say the company that became AHE (was it called sleeping gold, I can't remember. OTCGURU, I'd love to hear how you heard about ITKG. Did You buy @.20 and sell@$ 8.00? Let me know when You find some answers posters!!! We'll keep in touch,BJINVAN.
Message Thread:
> AHE - BJINVAN - 8/26/00 9:43:00 PM
RE: AHE - BJINVAN - 8/28/00 6:53:24 PM
RE: AHE - OTCGURU - 8/27/00 8:57:29 PM
__
SUBJECT: RE: AHE Posted By: BJINVAN
Post Time: 8/28/00 18:53
« Prev Msg Thread « Previous in Thread Next in Thread » Next Msg Thread »
Good history lesson OTC. Yes the directors are the same. A gentleman by the name of Bill Robinson started up In House Video, does that name ring a bell? I think its stock performance (ITKG) is pretty typical, there are lots of people holding long and strong in the hopes of solid long term contracts.It may happen soon, we shall see. What in my opinion makes this a better deal? For all it's worth, if I sell at US$10.00 plus, I will consider it a better deal!! The timeframe is also important, when are things going to start happening? I dont know. You are certainly right about the advantage of closely held shares. this puts us in an enviable position when things start to happen. Best regards to all,BJIN...
Message Thread:
AHE - BJINVAN - 8/26/00 9:43:00 PM
> RE: AHE - BJINVAN - 8/28/00 6:53:24 PM
RE: AHE - OTCGURU - 8/27/00 8:57:29 PM
__
SUBJECT: RE: AHE Posted By: OTCGURU
Post Time: 8/27/00 20:57
« Prev Msg Thread « Previous in Thread Next Msg Thread »
Sleeping gold was the name of the company. Before that In House Video. As far as who started the company? I think it's the same guys who are still there.
Heard about ITKG from a friend in the Vancouver. I wasn't lucky enough to be in at .20 If I recall correctly I got in at around .70 in Nov and out at $3-5 in Feb. To bad they weren't able to keep the price stable for a longer time. Price came off almost as quickly as it went up and volume all but dried up. I hope AHE will go about things differently. Was ITKG as tightly held as AHE? BJ do you think the run up (fingers crossed) will be sustainable with AHE? What in your opinion makes this a better deal?
Sputnik do you work for titan?
SUBJECT: RE: WELCOME OTCGURU Posted By: OTCGURU
Post Time: 8/25/00 22:53
« Previous Message Next Message »
All I know is that Titan Financial - the group behind ITKG took down a very large portion of the AHE PP in Jan @ .16
I'm not sure if Titan was involved in FRLK but have heard that they will be involved in AHE. It just keeps getting better!
Is there something else that they have in common?
Something I missed?????? IMPOSSIBLE :-o ha ha ha
Any insights are much appreciated BJINVAN.
Any thoughts on timing of the OTC listing?
If you check the chart.
You will see that PDGE has bounced off this mid 1.30,s level several times. I think we go up from here I bought a few more at 1.35.
JMHO.
Dick...I mean Richard.
ITKG has been falling, are the loyal longs bailing?
Are you gonna go down with the titanic?
Sputnik
You sure know how to find the real gems. LOL.
this one is better than ITKG at least.
So you admit it
That ITKG is a scam.IMO.
Catfish
Does that venture capital company in the Virgin islands still own 50% of PHPG.ob
Sputnik post your DD to me somewhere else.
I dont want catfish to tell Matt on me, how would I sleep if I got kicked off this board with whooping 1k post after 3 years.
Let me make a note...only post messages that fill bigpikes and catfishs own adgenda on microcap kitchen.
Oh and dont forget Sputnik ...you have been WARNED.
Sputnik..questions
Are you an ITKG insider?
Are you holding restricted shares in ITKG?
Are you a convicted criminal?
Have you sold shares of ITKG into the pumps?
Tell the truth Sputnik.
Sputnik
The longs on the RB board are accusing you of being Natch.
Are you Natch, or are you Richie? what gives.
Sputnik
The price of ITKG has been falling, did you say something about fireworks.
Len I see you have met my little stalker.
Be careful his cyberhands are registered as letal weapons. LMAO.
Sputnik
You have been SNOOKERED.
Now settle down before your big bulbous nose explodes.
Babe
MDF
I got some yesterday below 2.40, never thought I would get it that cheap after selling at 3.20.
Take care.
Sputnik who is deleting all your post? must be a basher.
My friend Ksuave/binno told me he was selling his 200+ shares
Sputnik(aka Sptwns). give it a rest.
Zen(aka Ksuave)
Chill I am not bashing your play, dont take it personal.
I only made a comment. I will check it out if it looks good I will say so.
But just without looking it sounds like a zero revenue/zero contract pipedream thats just my humble opinion.
PS please dont send me anymore harrassing emails, I am at Rb adotisle everyday if you wants to lash out at me.
Regards.
Ksuave/Zen MYMX sounds like a scam to me.
I havent looked at it yet but it just sounds like an textbook scam.
Did you see this.
By JOHN O'NEILL
In 1971, I debated John Kerry, then a national spokesman for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, for 90 minutes on The Dick Cavett Show. The key issue in that debate was Kerry's claim that American troops were committing war crimes in Vietnam "on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command." Now, as Sen. Kerry emerges as the presumptive Democratic nominee for the presidency, I've chosen to re-enter the fray.
Like Kerry, I served in Vietnam as a Swift Boat commander. Ironically, Kerry and I served much of our time, a full 12 months in my case and a controversial four months in his, commanding the exact same six-man boat, PCF-94, which I took over after he requested early departure. Despite our shared experience, I still believe what I believed 33 years ago -- that Kerry slandered America's military by inventing or repeating grossly exaggerated claims of atrocities and war crimes to advance his own political career as an antiwar activist. His misrepresentations played a significant role in creating the negative and false image of Vietnam vets that has persisted for more than three decades.
Neither I, nor any man I served with, ever committed any atrocity or war crime in Vietnam. The opposite was the truth. Rather than use excessive force, we suffered casualty after casualty because we chose to refrain from firing rather than risk injuring civilians. More than once, I saw friends die in areas we entered with loudspeakers rather than guns. Kerry's accusations then and now were an injustice that struck at the soul of anyone who served there.
During my 1971 televised debate with Kerry, I accused him of lying. I urged him to come forth with affidavits from the soldiers who had claimed to have committed or witnessed atrocities. To date no such affidavits have been filed. Recently, Kerry has attempted to reframe his comments as youthful or "over the top." Yet always there has been a calculated coolness to the way he has sought to destroy the record of our honorable service in the interest of promoting his political ambitions of the moment.
John Kennedy's book, Profiles in Courage, and Dwight Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe inspired generations. Not so Kerry, who has suppressed his book, The New Soldier, prohibiting its reprinting. There is a clear reason for this. The book repeats Kerry's insults to the American military, beginning with its front-cover image of the American flag being carried upside down by a band of bearded renegades in uniform -- a clear slap at the brave Marines in their combat gear who raised our flag at Iwo Jima. Allow me the reprint rights to your book, Kerry, and I will make sure copies of The New Soldier are available in bookstores throughout America.
Vietnam was a long time ago. Why does it matter today? Since the days of the Roman Empire, the concept of military loyalty up and down the chain of command has been indispensable. The commander's loyalty to the troops is the price a commander pays for the loyalty of the troops in return. How can a man be commander in chief who for more than 30 years has accused his "Band of Brothers," as well as himself, of being war criminals? On a practical basis, Kerry's breach of loyalty is a prescription of disaster for our armed forces.
Kerry's recent admissions caused me to realize that I was most likely in Vietnam dodging enemy rockets on the very day he met in Paris with Madame Binh, the representative of the Viet Cong to the Paris Peace Conference. Kerry returned to the United States to become a national spokesman for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, a radical fringe of the antiwar movement, an organization set upon propagating the myth of war crimes through demonstrably false assertions. Who was the last American POW to die languishing in a North Vietnamese prison forced to listen to the recorded voice of Kerry disgracing their service by his dishonest testimony before the Senate?
Since 1971, I have refused many offers from Kerry's political opponents to speak out against him. My reluctance to become involved once again in politics is outweighed now by my profound conviction that Kerry is simply not fit to be America's commander in chief. Nobody has recruited me to come forward. My decision is the inevitable result of my own personal beliefs and life experience.
Today, America is engaged in a new war, against the militant Islamist terrorists who attacked us on our own soil. Reasonable people may differ about how best to proceed, but I'm sure of one thing -- Kerry is the wrong man to put in charge.
Forget it tincup ITKG is a SCAM.
IMHO.
Sorry Zen I dont know you.
And I dont invest in China stocks.
never owned ACCR,or whatever.
I just happened to be lurking and saw at the MCK SI and saw Gary posting about ITKG. Which is a known scam with mob ties.
I just thought other posters should know, including Gary.
ALL IMHO.
Now I will leave you to your thread.
PS. Did you know that the American auto companies will be history in 2 years. its true.
Re: ITKG.
Not very impressive!
http://www.antennex.com/Stones/st0604/plast.html
- - - - -
THE WHALE HAS SPOUTED
Now that the "whale has spouted", shall we throw some harpoons? Our experts say yes we should, mainly because the information above is far from adequate in explaining how the basic material described by Tom as "highly conductive polymers, ElectriPlast" is as conductive or more so than metals.
Tom implies he achieves the conductivity by grinding "something" into a powder which is added to the resin-based recipe and the result is a sort of plastic that conducts electricity like metal. What is that "stuff?" Merely grinding a highly conductive metal into a powder would bring us back to the same metal--wouldn't it?
If that were explained, then the drawings would be more useful as well and experiments could and would most likely be conducted with excitement. And, if ElectriPlast is more conductive than metals, does that also mean a smaller antenna could be assembled to do the job of its bigger metal version? Tom implies a yes!
I have always said the antenna of the future will most likely look nothing like the antenna of today -- if for no other reason, to accommodate the drastic technological evolution necessary to reach the goals for high-performance and low profile. If Tom have made some great breakthrough, bravo, but at the moment there are a lot more skeptics than believers. A bit more info can turn that around. Further, if Integral Technologies desires to feed at the capital-funding trough again, it will be much harder if essential technological disclosures are not made.
SURVIVING SCRUTINY
One of our "experts" in the group has a Ph.D. degree in Polymer Chemistry, headed up a leading company in the field and now does full time work for the US Navy as a consultant/contractor at the Navy Research Labs. The Navy is where there could be a lot of interest for such a polymer as well, but, our expert wants to be convinced first and remains skeptical about the conductive properties for now.
Perhaps Tom will be willing to share more with our experts and explain the better-than-metal process if permitted. Filing a patent is just the beginning and the work really begins for Tom to now convince others he has indeed made a breakthrough. Apparently Integral Technologies believes. So, stay tuned, folks--the "test of time" has commenced!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catfish ITKG is a scam.
8 years, zero revenues, zero contracts.
several fraudulant contract announcement over the years.
the founder is a convicted criminal.(Robert Pratt,Integrity capital)
they have a new product every couple years, have never sold one of any of there pump jobs. IMHO.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 16429 / February 9, 2000
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. DAVID ABISH, CHRISTOPHER BETTS, MARK CHARVAT, MICHAEL COHN, JAMES CORCORAN, CHARLES DISTEFANO, PAUL FEENY, STEPHEN GOURLAY, BRIAN KEARNEY, MICHAEL MACCAULL, TIMOTHY MATTHEWS, ROBERT PRATT, MARIO RODRIGUEZ, WILLIAM SCUTERI, SCOTT SIEGEL, DONALD TURNEY, ANDREW TURSI AND DAVID WEEKS, 00 Civ. 0978 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y.)
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that it filed its fourth civil action today arising from the massive securities fraud that was conducted through Sterling Foster & Company, Inc. ("Sterling Foster"), a formerly registered broker-dealer. In today's Complaint, which was filed in federal court in Manhattan, the Commission charged eighteen Sterling Foster registered representatives with using fraudulent "boiler-room" sales practices to induce investors to purchase micro-cap securities in six public offerings ("Offerings") at prices artificially inflated by Sterling Foster and others in a market manipulation scheme that defrauded investors of at least $75 million. Named in the Complaint are:
David Abish, age 29, of New York, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 27, 1994 to June 2, 1997. In or about the fall of 1995, Abish became an assistant branch manager.
Christopher Betts, age 31, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 27, 1994 to February 21, 1997. Betts became a branch manager and team leader in or about the fall of 1995.
Mark Charvat, age 26, of Patchogue, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 27, 1994 to February 6, 1997, except between May 1995 and July 1995 when Charvat worked as a registered representative of VTR Capital, Inc., now known as Fairchild Financial Group, Inc. ("VTR"), a broker-dealer registered with the Commission. Charvat became an assistant branch manager at Sterling Foster in or about the fall of 1995.
Michael Cohn, age 29, of Lawrence, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to February 1997. In or about the fall of 1995, Cohn became a branch manager and team leader.
James Corcoran, age 26, of Patchogue, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to February 1997. In or about the fall of 1995, Corcoran became an assistant branch manager of Sterling Foster.
Charles DiStefano, age 31, of Middle Island, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to January 1997. In or about the fall of 1995, he became an assistant branch manager.
Paul Feeny, age 27, of Stamford, Connecticut, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from October 1994 to February 1997.
Stephen Gourlay, age 28, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to February 1997. In or about the fall of 1995, he became an assistant branch manager.
Brian Kearney, age 30, of Farmingdale, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 until March 1997. He became a branch manager and team leader in or about the fall of 1995.
Micahel MacCaull, age 29, of Hauppauge, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from January 1995 to March 1997, except that MacCaull was a registered representative of VTR from May 1995 to July 1995.
Timothy Matthews, age 39, of Stonybrook, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to April 1997. He became a branch manager and team leader in or about the fall of 1995.
Robert Pratt, age 30, of Coram, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to February 1997. Pratt became an assistant branch manager and team leader in or about the fall of 1995. He became a branch manager in or about the fall of 1996.
Mario Rodriguez, age 37, of West Islip, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to April 1997, except when Rodriguez worked as a registered representative of VTR from May 1995 to August 1995. He became a branch manager and team leader at Sterling Foster in or about the fall of 1995.
William Scuteri, age 29, of Charlottesville, Virginia, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 27, 1994 to March 11, 1997.
Scott Siegel, age 29, of Hunt Station, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to March 1997, except when he worked as a registered representative at VTR from May 1995 to July 1995.
Donald Turney, age 29, of Pompano Beach, Florida, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 1994 to March 1995 and from August 1995 to March 1997.
Andrew Tursi, age 30, of St. James, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 27, 1994 to March 10, 1997. Tursi became a branch manager or team leader in or about the fall of 1995.
David Weeks, age 29, of West Hills, New York, who was a registered representative of Sterling Foster from June 27, 1994 to March 7, 1997. Weeks became a branch manager and team leader in or about the fall of 1995.
In its Complaint, the Commission seeks permanent injunctive relief, an accounting, disgorgement and prejudgment interest and civil penalties against each of the defendants.
The Complaint alleges that:
Between October 1994 and February, each of the Defendants, with the knowledge and encouragement of Sterling Foster management, including team leaders, committed numerous sales practice violations. Such violations include: (1) executing unauthorized trades in customer accounts; (2) failing to execute customer sell orders; (3) failing to execute stop-loss orders; (4) soliciting customers to purchase securities in the aftermarket prior to the completion of the IPOs for those securities; (5) making baseless price predictions; and/or (6) making other material misrepresentations to customers, including telling customers that stop-loss orders would be entered on their purchases and that the registered representatives had important confidential information about the issuers of the securities.
In its Complaint, the Commission alleges that Defendants violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-6. The litigation is pending.
In February 1997, the Commission filed a civil injunctive action charging Sterling Foster and four individuals, including Adam Lieberman, Sterling Foster's president, with obtaining $75 million from investors by using boiler-room sales practices and other fraudulent conduct in connection with IPOs of Lasergate Systems, Inc., Advanced Voice Technologies, Inc., Com/Tech Communication Technologies, Inc., Embryo Development Corporation, Applewoods, Inc. and ML Direct, Inc. On November 9, 1998, Sterling Foster and Lieberman consented to the entry of final judgments that: (1) permanently enjoined Sterling Foster and Lieberman from further violations of the federal securities laws; (2) ordered Sterling Foster and Lieberman to disgorge $75,000,000, waived down to $11,486,064.21, including prejudgment interest, plus proceeds of the sale, at fair market prices, of additional assets turned over to the United States government. The Commission's action against the remaining defendants, Craig Kellerman, Frank Monroig, and Dennis Rueb, is pending, but has been stayed pending the conclusion of a related criminal investigation.
Also in November 1998, the Commission filed a complaint against Michael Krasnoff a/k/a Michael Krasnov ("Krasnoff"), Michael Lulkin ("Lulkin"), MD Funding, Inc. ("M.D. Funding") and Special Equities, Inc. ("Special Equities, Inc.") alleging that Krasnoff and Lulkin and two companies that they controlled fraudulently obtained over $8.6 million through their participation in the IPOs of Advanced Voice Technologies, Inc., Com/Tech Communications Technologies, Inc., Embryo Development Corporation, Applewoods, Inc. and ML Direct, Inc. These defendants allegedly knew or were reckless in not knowing that the prospectuses for these IPOs failed to disclose their arrangements to sell their stock to Sterling Foster immediately after the commencement of the IPOs at below-market prices. That litigation is pending.
In May 1999, the Commission filed a complaint against Hartley T. Bernstein ("Bernstein") alleging that Bernstein, an attorney, with fraudulently obtaining over $500,000 by selling securities shortly after the IPOs of five companies for which the defendant's law firm acted as counsel, Advanced Voice Technologies, Inc., Com/Tech Communications Technologies, Inc., Embryo Development Corp., and Applewoods, Inc., companies whose IPOs were being underwritten by Sterling Foster, and of Perry's Majestic, Inc., a company whose IPO was co-underwritten by VTR Capital, Inc. and Investors Associates, Inc. The unregistered securities of those issuers that Bernstein acquired were registered along with the securities that were to be sold in each of those IPOs. In all of the IPOs except Applewoods, Bernstein knew or was reckless in not knowing that he would sell those securities at below-market prices to one of the underwriters soon after the commencement of the IPO. In the Applewoods IPO, Bernstein and Sterling Foster agreed that Bernstein would sell his Applewoods securities to Sterling Foster, through another broker-dealer, immediately upon the opening of the first day of after-market trading. Bernstein's sales of securities to Sterling Foster and Investors Associates provided those firms with a source of cheap stock to sell aggressively to their customers. Simultaneously with the filing of the Complaint, Bernstein consented, without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint to the entry of a final judgment that: (1) permanently enjoins him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5; and (2) orders him to pay a civil penalty of $40,000.
The Commission also instituted public administrative proceedings against Lieberman, Sterling Foster and Bernstein. On September 29, 1999, simultaneously with the institution of these proceedings, the Commission accepted offers of settlement from Lieberman and Sterling Foster, under which Lieberman consented to the issuance of an order barring him from association with any broker or dealer and Sterling Foster consented to the issuance of an order revoking its registration. On July 28, 1999, the Commission issued an Order instituting and settling administrative proceedings against Bernstein. Bernstein consented to the Order which bars Bernstein from participating in any offering of penny stock pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act and denies him the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice.
Separately, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced today the indictment of the Defendants, Monroig, Rueb and two others, on related criminal charges.
This enforcement action is part of the Commission's four-pronged approach to attacking micro-cap fraud: enforcement, inspections, investor education and regulation. For more information about the SEC's response to micro-cap fraud, visit the SEC's Micro-cap Fraud Information Center at http://www.sec.gov/news/extra/microcap.htm.
For more information see Litigation Release Nos. 15261 (February 18, 1997) , 15971 (November 9, 1998), and 16163 (May 27, 1999).
The Commission thanks the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. for its assistance in this matter.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16429.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------