Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah, that $9+ we were at is a long way off now.
Say ONE thing positive about this company, just SAY IT, if not, Im putting you on ignore. Good lord.
Naw, never mind, welcome to the ignore list.
No, just dead cat bounce. But we can bounce lower.
Im not adding, I have enough in this game, at an average of $6.6 a share already, Id have to buy quite a bit to get that number to budge lower, and then, we STILL have to climb out of this hole.
It isnt comforting either to think of the PS hit we suffered, adjusting for that we would only be where we were at last support levels around $3-$3.50
And there is $1.76 :puke:
AH is printing $2.05. Never say this stock has a floor, it WILL go lower. Getting so tried of this direction.
Another one with only a post history on the APDN board, going back a year now, at least, but nearly every comment designed to try to get people to sell.
Anything more specific than that?
Can someone post a transcript link when it is up?
I hate nearly everything about this release, cept the Opex, nice to see it going in the right direction, and the enthusiasm about Pharma.
$1.85-$2.05
Thats the rub. We have a proven, working product. We just need the numbers to move product in volume to various industries and the rest will take care of it self. Question is, WHEN is that going to happen? The science is in (Al Gore), lets get the sales team all over everything else.
I know if I was a business that sold products that were subject to theft, I would happily pay for and advertise my "guarantee of authenticity"!
I emailed Debbie a few questions for Hayward for today and she said they were received about an hour later.
You gloss over the fact that we were around $9.20/share a bit over a year ago.
No you paid that back before the split.
Shouldnt there be some revenues from this BY NOW? That article was done in January of this year, we have had a few quarters of reporting since.
I do like the aggressiveness of new updates hitting the official site, but it still isnt generating revenue drives (that we know of) and we are sitting at $2.2 again this morning.
Sorry about the possible scare guys. Swore I thought I read the threshold was $4. While that is encouraging, we are dancing too close to the sub $2 range for my liking.
$1? Where am I getting $4?
How much longer until we are de-listed?
I thought we had to maintain a 90 day average of at least $4 a share and we have been well below that for way too long.
One would think companies would want to say they guarantee authenticity hand over cost.
What actually changed? More revenue and customer contracts.
I am not a persistent cheerleader. I have made known my beefs with the performance of this company time and again. My hopes outweigh the beefs and I havent purchased any more shares in quite a few months.
Skeptical is fine, but you deflect and change. You said you discuss the pros and cons. So far, nothing but cons from you. You are spurious in your "support" for what you provide to this page. You have zero posts on any other board, you have done nothing but dog and rag on APDN in order to try to shake people loose of their shares in order to drive it down further.
Skepticism with valid reasoning is welcome. You do nothing but trumpet every negative you can latch into.
I and other are aware of the negatives and you have provided nothing of value when it comes to substance in to new information as to why APDN shouldn't be invested in. You pretty much come down to childishly calling everyone else on the board a bag holder while you smugly comfort yourself at how "awesome" your insight is. DTC, VinceM, AGStock, you, all sound very very similar.
So then, again, why are you here? You dont invest in APDN, you obviously hate the company, you are not here for our benefit as you have yet to discuss any "pro" for APDN at all.
So continuing and extending contracts from the .gov isnt a good thing? FSG expansion isnt a good thing? Pilots moving to commercialization isnt a good thing? Cotton isnt a good thing?
That is rich. You keep deflecting. Pros and cons? We are all familiar with the cons and have discussed pros as well. Welll except for you. What pros of this stock have you provided?
At least it isn't Vince_M!
His post history is 100% on APDNs board. For such a savy and awesome investor, why are there no posts on any other board in order for us to gauge his success?
Nice evasion. You know exactly what my question about you is. You are being coy.
What, exactly, is your point? Also, what is your real username. Your post history is 100% on this portion of the board, we have no way of gauging how you really invest as your history of other usernames is not available to us to see what you posted elsewhere in regards to how things move in the markets...
And why does it have to be $10,000 for that length of time?
Dont know why my last post was removed for being "off topic" as it was on topic in the discussion of the performance of this stock.
Shorts getting killed should be an unlimited activity.
But for anyone in post split.....
Nice "recovery", hitting $2.64 a bit ago and resting now at $2.6.
Encouraged by renewed .gov contract, still miffed about what PS did to us, so without that damage we should be mid 4s.
Why are we down to $2.3 at open? A new contract for a year with another option of an extra year is great news for us. The .gov would not willingly enter into a contract with a company on the verge of folding when they need to keep fakes out of the supply chains.
So if that is the case, that makes up nearly a 3rd of todays trading volume. Shouldn't a sale order of that magnitude at a price of $2.2 have dropped us and held us at that area or lower? Instead we are up 10 cents $2.35
Which is weird, why would you get out at such a low level for what would surely have been a loss? Tax lost harvesting is one valid possibility I guess....
Only the email address that I found. DB gave me her number and asked that I call her, but she never answered.
Its not even worth a copy and paste. The gist was "tune in to our earnings conference call"
That...that was really the summation.
Because I cannot stand the misapplication of how the First interacts with XYZ. It is so commonly thrown around without the proper respect that it deserves in the situations for which it does or does not apply.
Anyway, I dont like our price action, our lack of news, or the canned response I got from DB from investor relations about what is being done to increase shareholder value.
I am not happy with recent performance, and I never told him to quit posting. I DID correct him on the application of how the First Amendment works, and in this case, does not apply to iHub posts.
Assumptions reveal your mindset.