Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Leo should consider doing some campassionate use treatments with Brilacidin, report the results, and get us out of this quagmire.
For a comparison: CYDY 3.93
0.73 (+23.04%
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3679216-cytodyn-updates-on-leronlimab-treated-covid-19-patient
I dissagree, IPIX is worth what Leo and the shareholders agree to settle for, willing buyer / willing seller, a sale requires both sides to agree to price.Until that then we wait.
dp70 top line results so far very outstanding, love her Astrology analysis.
Doublej23 maybe add in some other factors to with an EUA: Trump ordered up 500,000 doses of Remdesivir at a cost of $3,200.00 per treatment, plus Remdesivir was approved for use in 50 other countries: "Remdesivir is approved or authorized for emergency use to treat COVID-19 in around 50 countries. Remdesivir has been authorized for emergency use in India, Singapore, and approved for use in Japan, the European Union, the United States, and Australia for people with severe symptoms."
JFM the Dr Lee presentation is one of the most eye opening events I have ever seen, no one should miss it, Rumble is a great media out let: https://rumble.com/vdf68z-dr.-lee-merritt-interview.html
Ivermectin can be purchased from any veternary supply, no pwescription neccessary, the apple flavored oral injection syringe is a great emergency item to have on hand, provides more than 5 times the dosage needed for an individual. Hundreds of people are buying it as a preventive. Dr Lee mentioned Ivermectin in the interview as a treatment.
Well that will be great, goes along with the Jug Fishing license they past last year.
We need to start thinking about a lasting motto, President Trump is forming the new social media, wonder if he will do a public offering to raise money to build out the server centers? Otherwise we will be at the mercy of the existing enemies of America, Twitter, Google, FB and other subversive organizations, I would not support a structure that was dependent on them nor would I feel right to contribute money for an organization that would be owned and controlled by the trump family.
At this point people should make their own plans for survival, thats what is coming, survival of the fittest.
Yes! Biden said plainly that if he became President he could arrange for him to become disabled someway and the VP could take over, IT'S HAPPENING!
NEVER!!!
HE’S ‘NOT RIGHT’: (WE HAVE A LOONEY IN THE WHITEHOUSE) White House Doctor for Obama, Trump Says Biden’s Behavior Raises ‘Major Red Flags’
posted by Hannity Staff - 3.28.21
The White House physician for former Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump raised series new questions about Joe Biden’s fitness for office this week; saying his recent stumble boarding Air Force One raises “major red flags.”
“I served as White House physician under THREE Presidents. I’ve seen what it takes physically AND mentally to do the job. I can tell you right now that the way Biden is hiding from the public is a MAJOR red flag. Something’s not right!” posted Dr. Ronny Jackson.
I served as White House physician under THREE Presidents. I’ve seen what it takes physically AND mentally to do the job. I can tell you right now that the way Biden is hiding from the public is a MAJOR red flag. Something’s not right!
— Ronny Jackson (@RonnyJacksonTX) March 21, 2021
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki updated reporters on the President’s health Monday; saying he was doing “just fine” after falling up the “tricky” steps to board Air Force One last Friday.
“Just checking on the President. He fell going up the steps to Air Force One. Is he doing okay?” asked one journalist.
“He’s 100% fine. I don’t know if you’ve ever been up those steps. They’re a little tricky sometimes. He’s doing great!” said Psaki.
“I’m not aware of him needing actual extensive medical attention,” she added.
Share This Article
https://hannity.com/media-room/hes-not-right-white-house-doctor-for-obama-trump-says-bidens-behavior-raises-major-red-flags/
JFM they also stated on Mar 10th: "The Company is highly encouraged by this independent research suggesting Brilacidin may be one of the best drug candidates capable of attacking and destroying SARS-CoV-2 variants and other coronaviruses, while mitigating or averting the threat of drug resistance developing.
Looking forward to new PR'S from Leo, one regarding enrollment and perhaps another about the completion of phase 2 trials, with 8 Hospitals participating in the trial since March 10th and 15 patients having completed the treatment 1 per day per site would have put us past the number of patients needed for the trial completion by now. .66 patients per day per site would put us to the finish line as of today.
Trading Pro, Exactly, If we haven't got it now, we haven't got it!!!NOT A TOTAL NEGATIVE THOUGH, WE DO HAVE SEVERAL PENDING IND PROSPECTS. PLUS WE JUST MAY HAVE IT:)
OK!
From your link...Feel free to take a 100X dose.
Quote:
Ivermectin is not approved by the FDA for the treatment of any viral infection.
Quote:
Recommendation
There are insufficient data for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.
Here is what the NIH has to say: dated Feb 11th 2021,
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/#:~:text=Ivermectin%20is%20used%20in%20children%20weighing%20%3E15%20kg,profile%20similar%20to%20the%20one%20seen%20in%20adults
Here's what the FDA thinks...(Dated 2/05/21)
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20201208/this-was-a-gift-to-us-ivermectin-effective-for-covid19-prophylaxis-treatment
Other reccomendations include supplements: those at high risk for COVID-19 infection receive ivermectin at 0.2 mg/kg on day 1 and day 3, and weekly for 4 weeks;
Better than vaccines? Frontline doctors prescribe ivermectin to treat Covid-19
Mar 25, 2021 01:00 pm:
Recent news of ivermectin’s ability to rapidly halt and reverse Covid-19 at every stage of the disease continues to be confirmed.
Safe, inexpensive, widely available, with a decades-long track record, and even a Nobel Prize attached to it, the drug recently cleared National Institute of Health (NIH) hurdles to be an allowed treatment for Covid-19.
Frontline doctors using the drug to great success argue it needs to be adopted widely and rapidly.
With public health benefits unattainable by vaccination alone, ivermectin may be poised to effect an end to the vast majority of death and suffering, both physical and financial, wrought by the pandemic.
It is a drug, then, that everyone needs to know about and many should have on their shelf.
One of the most notable physicians to take up ivermectin’s cause is Yale School of Medicine Professor and renowned cancer researcher Dr. Alessandro Santin. The head of a large laboratory at Yale and author of over 250 science publications, Dr. Santin is renowned in his field for pioneering a treatment used worldwide for the most aggressive form of uterine cancer.
“The bottom line is that ivermectin works. I’ve seen that in my patients as well as treating my own family in Italy,” Dr. Santin said in an interview with Mary Beth Pfieffer of Trial Site, referring to his father, who recovered at age 88 from a serious bout of Covid-19 after receiving the drug.
“We must find a way to administer it on a large scale to a lot of people.”
Dr. Santin joins and rapidly growing number of frontline doctors championing the drug as a near miracle in Covid-19 treatment.
At the lead is Dr. Pierre Kory, President and Chief Medical Officer of the President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). Dr. Kory and his colleagues formed the FLCCC Alliance as “a group of highly published, world renowned Critical Care physician/scholars – with the academic support of allied physicians from around the world.”
Their advocacy for ivermectin began in October of 2020, “based on a review of the recent and rapidly emerging clinical trials evidence,” from around the world “showing repeated, consistent, large magnitude improvements” at every stage, whether administered as a preventative or for severe cases.
Reports from South America were also promising. Large scale “natural experiments” occurred when regional health ministries there began ivermectin distribution campaigns. Decreased cases and death rates followed.
Dr. Santin’s journey into Covid-19 treatment began when 10 to 20 percent of his cancer patients began showing up with the disease. Because comorbidities like cancer are leading indicators of risk of death, to find effective treatments was imperative.
In January, the NIH reversed its advisory against using ivermectin to allow treatment outside of clinical trials. Immediately, the majority of patients receiving ivermectin saw dramatic improvement in one to three days, particularly those suffering from problems breathing, severe fatigue, and chest pain.
“When you have people that can’t breathe for five, six, eight, nine months and they tried multiple drugs and supplements with no success, and you give them ivermectin,” Dr. Santin said in the interview, “and you see that they start immediately feeling better, this is not placebo. This is real.”
One Free Press Media Group editor experienced the same results after battling a lingering case of Covid-19. Although, sense of taste and smell returned on their own within a week, and shortness of breath resolved not long after, fatigue continued for weeks. Learning in December of the results of a just published meta-analysis of 26 other studies, our editor acquired ivermectin and recovered from symptoms less than forty-eight hours after the first dose. Less than a month later, the same meta-study influenced NIH’s new stance.
Other recoveries have been much more dramatic.
Pfieffer reports:
Sam Dann is the poster boy for what covid can do to a muscular, active 41-year-old and regular jogger. Like many other patients, he was sent home after a positive test last July with the advice to “drink Gatorade and take Tylenol.”
Over the next months, “I went through an absolute living hell,” . . . worse than three tours in Iraq.
He experienced crippling fatigue, anxiety, sleeplessness and nightmares, uncontrollable tremors, a racing heartbeat, and an inability to think straight or recall basic information. He could not work.
Some six months into his grueling odyssey, Dann got a 10-day prescription for ivermectin. The vertigo went away almost immediately. The tremors calmed. The nights were difficult but gradually improved. The pain went from 8, on a scale of 10, to 1 to 3. “I still get weird feelings here and there,” he told me, “but I’m nowhere near where I used to be.”
Then there is the experience of Judith Smentkiewicz, an 80-year-old Buffalo woman. She contracted covid in December and quickly required a ventilator. When her doctors predicted another month in the ICU and only a 20 percent chance of survival, family members began their own research. They learned of ivermectin and her doctors agreed to administer it.
Twelve days into her ordeal, Smentkiewicz received her first dose. Within 48 hours, she had improved so dramatically her doctors moved her out of the ICU.
Doctors in the new unit, however, refused to continue ivermectin treatment. Her condition declined, but they continued to refuse until the family obtained a court order forcing the hospital to renew the treatment. Thereupon, Smentkiewicz again began to recover. Shortly thereafter, she transferred to a rehabilitation facility.
“It is a miracle from where she was,” the family’s attorney, Ralph Lorigo, told Pfieffer.
The case for ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment now encompasses a weighty body of research. Forty-six trials to date represent the work of 371 scientists, and 15,480 patients. Twenty-four of these were randomized control trials.
The drug’s track record for safety is also well established. Billions of doses have been prescribed worldwide since the 1980s. It is also safe for children, for whom it is commonly prescribed for head lice.
In 2012, 99 million people in Africa received the drug. Ivermectin’s developers won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the human suffering ivermectin alleviated during its 40-plus years as a an anti-parasitic.
According to Drs. Santin and Kory, the need for widespread recognition and use of ivermectin as our most effective Covid-19 treatment remains great.
Echoing our editor’s first-hand experience with doctors in Pennsylvania and at the Cleveland Clinic in December, Pfieffer summarizes the current standard of care: “Newly diagnosed covid patients are typically told, as they have been for a year: Go home, take acetaminophen [Tylenol] perhaps, and go to the hospital when breathing gets tough.”
In other words, to get treatment you have to get sicker. You must let the virus continue to replicate until your body enters the inflammatory stage, typified by pulmonary issues.
However as Smentkiewicz and her family discovered, hospital treatment without ivermectin is not necessarily effective.
“When you are an inpatient with severe covid right now,” Dr. Santin said, “you give them a steroid, you give them heparin and remdesivir. That’s it. If they improve, great. If they get worse, you unfortunately keep on watching them die.”
“I was very disappointed, and I’m still very disappointed, about the treatment protocols that we currently are providing to patients,” he added.
This is why he and others like Dr. Kory and his colleagues at the FLCCC Alliance are speaking out.
The new vaccines do not grant full immunity, are irrelevant to existing cases, and haven’t been authorized for children.
In addition, many question the need for vaccinations with vanishingly low mortality rates, such as individuals under age 50. Others prefer to wait until new vaccines prove their results over time.
Polls show 25 percent of Americans do not plan to get a covid vaccine.
Ivermectin is expected, therefore, to be a valuable therapeutic against Covid-19 well into the future.
https://www.worldtribune.com/bottom-line-is-that-works/
"Illegal naked shorting and stock manipulation are two of Wall Street's deep, dark secrets. These practices have been around for decades and have resulted in trillions of dollars being fleeced from the American public by Wall Street. In the process, many emerging companies have been put out of business. This report will explain the magnitude of this problem, how it happens, why it has been covered up and how short sellers attack a company. It will also show how all of the participants; the short hedge funds, the prime brokers and the Depository Trust Clearing Corp. (DTCC) — make unconscionable profits while the fleecing of the small American investor continues unabated."
http://www.counterfeitingstock.com/CounterfeitingStock.html
dats where du money is :)
US to no longer distribute Eli Lilly’s bamlanivimab alone due to coronavirus variants
Zachary Brennan
Senior Editor
The US government and Eli Lilly agreed to halt all distribution of the company’s Covid-19 monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab as of Wednesday due to the “sustained increase” of coronavirus variants in the US.
All treatment delivery sites will continue to be able to order Lilly’s combo Covid-19 treatment of bamlanivimab and etesevimab, to be administered together, or Regeneron’s antibody cocktail, the assistant secretary for preparedness and response (ASPR) and FDA said. Both of the treatments from Lilly and Regeneron have proven to be useful among people who have Covid-19 but are not hospitalized.
“We recognize the U.S. government has made the decision to no longer allow direct ordering of bamlanivimab alone due to concerns about the prevalence of the California (B.1.427/B.1.429) and New York (B.1.526) variants of SARS-CoV-2. The U.S. government has enabled direct ordering of bamlanivimab and etesevimab together as well as etesevimab alone, to pair with bamlanivimab that sites of care have on hand,” Lilly said in an emailed statement to Endpoints News.
Lilly, in collaboration with Amgen, plans to manufacture up to 1 million doses of etesevimab for administration with bamlanivimab by mid-2021.
The shift comes as the US had halted all shipments of bamlanivimab alone to three western states last week due to coronavirus variants. The FDA last week also updated its three fact sheets on the monoclonal antibody treatments from Eli Lilly and Regeneron, offering new data to show how susceptible bamlanivimab alone is to some of the SARS-CoV-2 variants originating in the UK, Brazil, South Africa, California and New York.
“Using an alternative authorized monoclonal antibody therapy may reduce the risk of treatment failure should a patient be infected with a SARS-CoV-2 viral variant that is resistant to bamlanivimab alone,” the US advised physicians.
For a look at all Endpoints News coronavirus stories, check out our special news channel.
https://endpts.com/us-to-no-longer-distribute-eli-lillys-bamlanivimab-alone-due-to-coronavirus-variants/
Justfactsmam, Found this explanation to be very helpful in understanding the SRO.
Quote: If the trials did not "prompt" the qualification of IPIX (Brilacidin) on the SRO list...WHAT DID?
A DRUG QUALIFIES FOR THE FDA/SRO LIST..."... if its research, development, or other business activities are reasonably expected to result in the development of products that are regulated by FDA."
FDA IS STATING BY PLACING IPIX( BRILACIDIN) ON THE FDA/SRO LIST THAT ...
IPIX's "... research, development, or other business activities are reasonably expected to result in the development of (its) products "...BRILACIDIN!!!
It reasonably appears that this action is a direct result of the current review of the preliminary Clinical Trails...which is leading FDA to conclude ...that it is reasonable to expect IPIX's Brilacidin WILL RESULT IN ITS DEVELOPMENT AS A PRODUCT.
If it is not BECAUSE of the current Clinical Trials interim analysis or information the FDA has...then it is reasonable to conclude there is "OTHER" FDA action going on that has lead them to the conclusion that IPIX will result in the development of BRILACIDIN...which is even better positive news!
IPIS's INCLUSION ON THE FDA/SRO list ... appears to be a HUGE DEVELOPMENT indicating the positive developmentt (via clinical trials activities) of Brilacidin as a PRODUCT!
IMO BEST "NEWS" OF THE YEAR!...coming from the FDA
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=162780513
Ahmad Alissa's Facebook Posts About Islam, Hacking and Needing a Girlfriend
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/ahmad-alissas-facebook-posts-about-islam-hacking-and-needing-a-girlfriend/ar-BB1eT8lP?ocid=BingNewsSearch
Bombshell: Moderna Chief Medical Officer Admits MRNA Alters DNA
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/bombshell-moderna-chief-medical-officer-admits-mrna-alters-dna/
Several prominent physicians, doctors, Sons of Liberty Media Health and Wellness expert Kate Shemirani, her colleague Dr. Kevin Corbett, and I have postulated that the current experimental mRNA injection for coronavirus, aka COVID-19, could alter one’s genetic code or DNA. Bill Gates stated it, which was included in my video “Human Genome 8 and mRNA Vaccine” on Brighteon.com. It is one reason the term “experimental human genome altering mRNA injection” has been used to describe the jab being foisted onto the mostly unsuspecting public. While many in the media, Dr. Anthony Fauci and his merry band of chronic liars, and “fact checkers” have declared this claim as false, a video of a TEDx Beacon Street talk by Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, Inc., one pharmaceutical company manufacturer of the experimental mRNA technology injection, confirms mRNA injection for COVID-19 can change your genetic code or DNA. This TEDx Beacon Street talk occurred in 2017. H/T to YouTube channel Silview Media Backup Channel.
#AskTheExperts – Doctors, Nurses & Health Care Professionals From Around The World: “The COVID Vaccine Is Neither Safe Nor Effective” (Video)
#AskTheExperts II: Medical Professionals Address BBC Panorama Anti-Vaxx Propaganda (Video) #DareToThink
#AskTheExperts – Shemirani, Corbett, Madej & Kaufman – The Vaccine Rollout Has Begun, Here’s What You’re Not Being Told!
Nurse & Nutritionist Kate Shemirani: Experimental COVID Injection Doesn’t Fulfill Legal Requirement & Definition For A Vaccine, But Does Fulfill Definition Of A “Device” (Video)
Zaks calls it “hacking the software of life”. In the first minute of the video Zaks states, “we’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you, that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.” [Emphasis mine.] He even repeats that they (Moderna) think of it like an operating system, which the Moderna website indicates as “Our Operating System”.
At one minute in, Zaks states, “In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will do. So we think about it as an operating system. …. So if you could actually change that, … if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer.” [Emphasis mine.]
When “changing” a line of code or “introducing” a line of code” (referring to DNA), the “code” or DNA is then altered, meaning the individual or “subject” has now had their genome changed to what the “scientists” have coded. The individual or subject is no longer a creation of God but a creation of man, meaning the individual or subject could be the object of a “patent”. He goes on to say, the mRNA would tell the cells to “code” for the protein of the “virus”. This “viral protein” is foreign to the body. The individual’s body is making a foreign protein the immune system is to attack. When the body makes a protein the immune system then attacks, your immune system is attacking a protein your body is making, meaning what is occurring in an “auto-immune response” or “auto-immune disease”.
This has been repeated a number of times by experts, physicians, nurses and countless others. As readers can see, none of us were “whistling Dixie”. Zaks talks about turning this system on; however, there is no way to turn it off. When do the cells know to stop making this “viral protein”? The cells don’t; therefore, this continues for the duration.
In a normal vaccine, the immune system attacks the limited amount of “particles” in the adjuvant to produce antibodies or immune response that the body can recognize at a later time if the individual comes in contact with the same or similar “particle”.
Dr. Lee Merritt On Experimental “Operating System” Injections: We’re Going To See A Lot Of Deaths
Dr Sherri Tenpenny: FDA Has Broken The Law At Least Twice Concerning COVID Injections (Video)
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: How The Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working In 3-6 Months
The Vaccine Interview You Really Should Hear To Educate Yourself With Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (Video)
TRENDING: Former Hillary Clinton Secret Service Agent: She Was Violent, Volcanic, Dangerous, Sexist Against Men, & Condescending
The study Zaks cites at the 3:12 minute mark can be found and read here. The abstract is contained on the NIH Pub Med Library website. In the full test of the study on ResearchGate, the mention of “Luciferase” occurs on page 10. A crucial piece of information in this study is contained on page 4 – “Ferrets immunized with 200 micrograms and challenged [exposed to influenza H7N9 via IN (intranasal)] on day 49 had viral loads below the level of detection”. If a viral load was “below the level of detection”, two questions emerge: 1) did the ferrets even contract H7N9 through intranasal challenge; and, 2) if a viral load is below the level of detection, how do you know the animals even had a viral load? This would bring into question the efficacy of the injection.
Moreover, the studies Zaks cites as occurring in humans only lasted approximately 18 months.
At about the 4:00 minute mark, Zaks begins discussing mRNA vaccines for cancer. Immediately following that, Zaks discusses a children’s condition where a gene or “code” is missing that causes production of a certain enzyme critical for metabolism where the current treatment is to transplant an entire organ – in this case, the liver. Zaks proposes to inject mRNA that codes for the missing gene, a gene contained in DNA on the human genome, it would “correct” the genetic defect.
Ask this question: what causes the cells/body to produce needed enzymes/proteins? Zaks answers that by saying the genetic code or DNA. So, mRNA has to alter a genetic code or the DNA for the body to produce the proteins of COVID-19 for the body to mount an immune response.
Medical Doctors: “You Are Being Played” – “The SARS-C0v2 Virus Does Not Exist”
The Virus Lies & What They Are Leading Towards With Dr. Andrew Kaufman
Dr. Lee Merritt: The Vaxx Is Preparing World For Mass Death Event (Video)
America’s Frontline Doctor Simone Gold Warns Of Risks In “Experimental COVID Vaccine” (Video)
TRENDING: Donald Trump To Drop Bombshell This Week About Alleged “Russian Hacking” Story
Out of the words of Tal Zaks of Moderna, mRNA can alter the human genome. Whether by design or “unintended consequences”, this technology is being used to do just that. He calls this “information therapy”; although, some would call it “mad science”. In attempts to “rewrite” genetic code to correct defects, studies have shown there were “cascading failures”. In other words, changing one “defective gene” in one genome caused other genes to “fail” or cause problems. And, it was not just one subsequent gene becoming defective, but many. This is more than likely why there are over 400 adverse events surrounding the experimental mRNA injection.
So, the next time someone claims these “vaccines” do not alter the human genome or DNA, you can refer that individual to Tal Zaks of Moderna, Inc. who claims otherwise. Dr. Fauci should be eating some four and twenty blackbird (crow) pie.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media
Sorry TD thought this was: Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2021
Delete!
Pete, Thank you, though It didn't show that I was on ignore I put me on ignore and un ignore and it worked. Thank you!
Totally weird, I was just made aware that others can see my IHUB posts but I am not able to, How do they do that, I can see other posts but not mine?
July new study completion date:
Study Type : Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 120 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Brilacidin in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19
Actual Study Start Date : February 22, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : June 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2021
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04784897?term=Brilacidin&cond=COVID19&cntry=US&state=US%3AOH&draw=2&rank=1
July new study estimated completion date?
Study Type : Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 120 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Brilacidin in Hospitalized Participants With COVID-19
Actual Study Start Date : February 22, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : June 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2021
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04784897?term=Brilacidin&cond=COVID19&cntry=US&state=US%3AOH&draw=2&rank=1
Good thinking FA
They will probably need to increase the dosage to once a month if the varients continue to multiply.
I believe it is?
Today, witching day:
That box of chocolate, was paid for by the taxpayer, money goes to Government, Government buys it from drug company, hands it out like a box of chocolate. No such thing as a free box of chocolate, someone has to pay for it.
TheDane, New shorting regulations go in to effect on the 19th, may have something to do with the low volume for IPIX.
TheDane, New shorting regulations going into effect on the 19th may have something to do with it.