Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Blueheel1, Tryn2 is right about what he wants to do, which is not hold during that turbulence. Nothing wrong with holding though but flipping a portion of your position during that time can be extremely lucrative and one of two things, either you taking cash off the table and use it for whatever else you wish or you reinvest some/all at a lower price in order to increase your position without spending more cash. I would find it very difficult to just hold through all of that knowing I could potentially increase my position. This is where charting becomes important. One needs to understand how to set up their charts, how to read them and how to efficiently execute the trades. Using a paper trading account certainly can help with learning the mechanics of charting and quick trade executions. Admittedly, it's not for everyone though and that's okay too. GLTU/A
Tradinplaces, now you're just teasing me with those P/E's. Speak 'soothe' to me! You'e so absolutely correct when it comes to today's crazy stock market. It's not what it once was and the expectations have changed considerably as is evidenced by the recent WallStreetBets crowd. CYDY is becoming increasingly recognized in more and more places by not only the medical community but also the investing/trading crowds. We used to be able to, with some degree of accuracy, predict approximate P/E valuations given a particular sector. That no longer seems to be the case, at least not reliably speaking. Expectations are being actively rewritten and investors and market professionals are being shocked.
Tryn2, when a stock doesn't have underlying explosivity built-in by way of being shorted/suppressed, it will slowly climb over time as it adjusts to reported revenues and various potential news events and the price can organically achieve proper stasis. That occurs in a normal, healthy functioning market not being manipulated. However, when serious shorting has taken place and something of a fundamental nature occurs that changes a company's status in a seriously positive way then the shorts are now forced to cover.
A couple of major things happen at once. The normal MOMO and FOMO crowd jump on board to buy shares. Then institutional buys also join if required conditions are met. The short crowd are also attempting to buy to cover and are now competing with the institutional, MOMO/FOMO crowd for those same shares. Additionally, those holding the now coveted shares wanting their long awaited payday don't want to sell cheaply and are now holding onto their shares until a price is achieved at which they find attractive enough to sell SOME of their tightly held shares. Meanwhile, there's a mad rush to buy so the offers keep rising with only a 'trickle' of shares being sold into the exceedingly large demand. The obvious result is that the price will temporarily exceed where it should be based on revenues and PE ratio love. So, although it will reach a price that is beyond where it should be, it will eventually find a proper valuation UNTIL the next major news hits like HIV BLA, etc. Then watch for similar action once again but by this time, many/most of the shorts will have moved on to greener pastures so the explosivity probably won't be as dramatic. But, the action will still be similar.
Just my opinion of course.
CTMedic and Scooter, those last two posts made me audibly laugh. "The sticking point is the injection device" and "Three digit stock price, I can hire someone to play for me" comments...priceless...or rather 3 digit price.
CTMedic, the following isn't directed toward you but just a follow-up to Tryn2.
Tradinplaces and myself made comments in reply to Tryn2 about the speed at which and how high the price will initially go. We both gave different answers and we both discuss this frequently. I think we arrived at this from different perspectives. My perspective was in thinking about the FIRST part of the run up, which is to say the initial big move and I stand by that belief that it will move up for a few days before it takes a 'rest' while some take some initial profits off the table, others dump all thinking 'that is it', while others attempt to short again. Then the next part of the run up will occur and this will take place over over a longer time frame. If I recall, I think TP said something like a couple of weeks but I may have that wrong. In any event, I believe that following the initial burst and subsequent drop, there will be more bursts on the way up accompanied by some profit taking, etc. Again, these are all just my opinions and only worth the digital paper on which it's written.
That's exactly what I do as well and after reading that particular article's disclaimer, I didn't read the rest as I knew it had nothing useful in it.
Tryn2, if you'll notice, whenever you find articles that support the MAB Leronlimab/Vyrologix, you'll typically find quote from medical people who are on the front lines treating patients or medical scientists/researchers who are giving their professional assessments from either first hand knowledge by way of using Leronlimab on their patients or from researchers who are studying how and why this molecule works.
On the other hand, if you read anything of a negative nature, it isn't written by medical professionals/scientists/researchers. It's written with disclaimers at the bottom, as in the one on seeking alpha wherein they admit to be short on CYDY.
So, on one hand, you have folks seeking a way to save people people's lives and on the other you have folks trying to make a buck by counting on not saving people's lives. Now, tell me, which do you believe?
Tryn2, did you happen to read to the end of the article and see the "Disclosure" section? If not, here's what it says:
Disclosure: I am/we are short CYDY, HGEN. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Tryn2, I'm not Tradinplaces but once a manic run starts I've seen it last anywhere from as little as one day to about 5 days on the outside before a major pullback, resulting from a correction/consolidation/profit-taking/shorting. Usually, I've seen 2-3 day average run-up. There's no way to accurately predict this though. Tradinplaces often tells me to never stand in the way of a runaway train. I think this is good advice.
Consider this stock like a pressure cooker building up steam. This lid has been locked into place due to a number of factors. This keeps explosivity at bay, for now to a degree that, in my opinion, the price may be considered undervalued due to the artificial nature caused by illegal naked shorting. You combine that with legal shorting, general uncertainty and hesitancy by institutional investors to buy pre-uplisting and pre-FDA approval and you can see why the price is where it's at.
Once you remove the factors keeping the lid locked in place, the lid will blow off. Some of those factors (as relating currently only to Covid-19) are: EUA, FDA approval, multiple press releases. Then you see the shorts stop their campaign while they instead start covering. FUD comes to an end because the shorting crowd move on to greener pastures. Then you see FOMO / MOMO kick in. Then revenues are reported and contracts announced for future revenues, etc. THEN not long down the road, future announcements re: HIV, Cancer, etc. are made and then the next BIG Jump upward. Artificial depression of price followed by swift appreciation from legitimate news and you have some serious juice (institutional investors) behind this thing. It'll be a fun ride for anyone long in this stock, in my opinion.
PREX41, thank you for that info. I appreciate it.
Rockleo...Misiu... Yes, this is what I was alluding to in my question about antibody counts. Thank you for addressing this.
Misiu, yes, I'm very happy Samantha is feeling great now...that's fantastic to hear!!
Rockleo, fascinating article. Thank you for sharing that.
I'm not a member of the medical community. My medical knowledge is very limited and I won't bother with where I obtained the limited knowledge I do have as it isn't really relative. I said that to simply say that my original question about Samantha's 13k number of antibodies was just an attempt to understand the relevance of that number. My assumption is that it's a good number but relative to what other number and at what stage in Covid-19 might you see different numbers and what do those numbers mean? I'm just trying to understand what kind of numbers a person might see at different stages in the viral load.
Pre-virus (normal):?
Peak load:?
Longhauler:?
Samantha's 13K fits where?
Hopefully my question isn't too convoluted.
Misiu, okay. Thanks, just trying to understand that number.
Misiu, I was trying to think of how best to respond to dadbrotheroftwins question about other countries stepping up if the FDA fails to approve. I know that I believe another country would but I wasn't sure how to effectively express it so I did not. Your response was, in my opinion, spot on correct.
1. Big problem, getting bigger with mutations.
2. Mortality a global concern and apparently getting bigger with mutations.
3. Leronlimab/Vyrologic's MOA becoming widely known and understood and gaining traction. This fact alone will begin to make it hard to ignore and the demand will become too great.
4. Safety is undeniable.
5. Efficacy soon to be proven via CD-12 results but already undeniable by many, especially the folks who have directly benefitted via EIND.
I'm not saying if the FDA doesn't approve that it won't slow us down but I don't believe for a minute that it will stop us. It would be just another hurdle that, in my opinion, will be successfully cleared. I have a feeling though that because of the aforementioned reasons, and probably more I haven't listed, that the FDA will find it hard to legitimately deny EUA and eventually full approval.
These are just my opinions.
Tryn2, no need to apologize for attempting to contribute. You're just getting started here getting up to speed. Continue digging and contributing.
I, for one, had never read that story about NP's background story. I've only read small allusions to his background with the company, most of which are cheap shots. I really enjoyed reading that and appreciated you sharing it. It only made me appreciate what NP has had to endure even more.
Has NP made mistakes? Sure, but who hasn't? What can't be taken from him is his tenacity and dedication. There may be others who would be better suited for this job, no doubt, but I would suggest that there probably aren't many who would have been more tenacious at getting us to this point. Many would have taken a path of lesser resistance and caved. Because he didn't, we are now looking at what will most likely be one of the best, if not THE best solution to Covid-19 for the foreseeable future. So yes, for me at least, you did contribute, even if it was a year old story. I thank you!
When Samantha Mottet states her antibody count was 13,000 as of a few weeks ago, I assume that's in the normal range? I have no idea what someone's count is when their body is in full blow cytokine storm. Do we know what Samantha's antibody level was when she was severe/critical? Or, what is typical when someone is at a severe/critical level?
Oh, I know....like I said, just some 'fun' math. Besides, I like $435 better than $5.95! ;)
Let's see take a look at some fun math:
$290 / $4 = $72.50. So, for each dollar of value on 1/2020, there was an increase of $72.50 in value 13 months later.
Now, let's apply that same fun math to CYDY:
$72.50 * $6 = $435.00 by 3/2022.
I know, I know...not how the math works but it's fun to think about nonetheless.
SmileyRiley, excellent work and thank you for sharing.
BWA, you were extremely close to your prediction of 5.83. You made it to within two cents, 10 minutes after the opening bell. It'll be interesting to see if volume kicks in to make the next big push above the 6.35 area resistance area. If so, then I would not be surprised to see your 6.69 and possibly higher. Given the 3-day weekend in front of us and expectations of data release / EUA, I wouldn't be surprised to see those who are short or wanting to simply add to their position generate the needed volume.
GLTA
Learning, thanks for sharing that great podcast. I agree, prevention far better than cure/treatment.
BWA, good call for sure. I also very much agree that healthy ladder steps hold far better than a pole vault jump.
Mohave, wouldn't it be great if eventually every paramedic carried a vial of Vyrologix with them to administer on-scene where a severe inflammatory response, due to any number of causes, could be administered before the patient was even transported to the hospital? :)
Misiu, thank you. I hope that we one day (soon) find that indeed Vyrologix will help people with diabetes and many other inflammatory response issues.
Learning53, I'm not a medical expert by any stretch of the imagination. So, take this with a grain of salt. However, from what I understand, inflammation is one of the big factors resulting from diabetes. I also know that Vyrologix greatly reduces inflammation, which is what makes it so effective. What I don't know is if there is a direct correlation that can/has been established. If there is then I would think that there is also potential for diabetes treatment of symptoms but not the underlying cause. The underlying cause of type 2 diabetes, from my understanding, is insulin resistance? The inflammation is the resultant effect.
Whosonfirst, I believe the term you intended is 'support' at 5.40 rather than resistance. The $7 area is where I currently see the new resistance. Of course the resistance is weak at best. It'll quickly dissolve when tested with any real buying and/or when the shorts realize their goose is cooked and are scrambling to cover. I'm sure I don't have to tell you that but it's fun to remind the shorts that their day of pain is quickly approaching.
Marksch1, thanks for the great update. This makes me very happy to hear!
Monroe, I agree, my wife and I also take / use tumeric and coconut oil as well as avocado oil. The fat in the coconut oil helps with uptake of whatever else you're taking as well, if I understand that correctly.
Monroe, I applaud this doctor for recommending D3, Boron and K2. I've personally noticed that since taking small amounts of Boron that it has helped with eliminating gout. My simple understanding is that without the presence of Boron, Calcium can't effectively be absorbed into the bones and teeth. The calcium has to go somewhere, right? The calcium, from what I think I understand, attaches to the cell walls instead, which isn't good, causing an unhealthy build-up where it doesn't belong. Boron, if my understanding is correct, binds to the calcium, thereby making it available for delivery to the bones and teeth, where it's needed. I'm also under the understanding that it will then remove the existing calcium build-up (over time) from the cell walls. Since a component of gout is a build-up of calcium deposits in the joints, Boron prevents the build-up of calcium in the joints and helps remove the presence of calcium in the joints. The conclusion is that it reverses and prevents gout.
Now, couple D3, Boron and K2 along with Zinc and Quercetin to guard against Covid-19, what's not to love?!
Stockorus, you're telling me that there's no way possible that after her purchase from 3 years ago that she might be looking to cash in on some of her investment during what will most likely be a huge runup after approval? Are you seriously trying to tell us that? If that were the case, why would anyone EVER invest?
I would suggest that EVERYONE invests for one reason. Quite simply, it's looking for a payday or multiple paydays.
Yep, more specifically "Warrant (right to buy)" 166,000 shares of common stock.
Also denoted:
"Explanation of Responses:
1. The reporting person disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by his spouse and this report should not be deemed an admission that the reporting person is the beneficial owner of his spouse's shares for purposes of Section 16 or for any other purpose."
I still have my TD Ameritrade's 'Think or Swim' platform running from this morning and it shows we closed at 6.3150, up 1.53% or up .095. I also checked my phone app and it's showing the same thing. Really makes 'ya wonder how someone could 'sell' at 4.75 just over 2.5 hours after the close on an OTC stock. I understand T trades (or at least I think I do) but that's just weird. It's almost like someone put in a market sell order and some unscrupulous MM decided to fill it wherever they wanted. One of those head scratchers....
Misiu, no, I wouldn't say I'm smart, just careful. I think maybe it falls in line with Black-Ops saying not to share your playbook with folks. No point in giving 'ammunition' to opposing forces. I appreciate your comments, passion and compassion very much. I just have a different approach when it comes to sharing grievances maybe.
Nothing wrong in sharing your concerns at all. Just know that there might be valid reasons why others might not take the same approach. Keep on fightin' Misiu. You've intelligent and you've got a good heart.
We need folks fighting the good fight when it comes to informing the public about Leronlimab and other viable, safe and effective health remedies!
Go CYDY
Misiu, I have yet to talk to one person in my circle of influence who isn't absolutely beyond mad about the censorship and cancel culture that is taking place and how that is adversely affecting, businesses, individuals, politics and medicine. I just don't go posting it all over the place because generally the places I might be inclined to rant and rave are usually people of mostly like minds, thereby making my rants pointless. Please understand, I'm at least as equally angry about this as anyone but I don't typically post that publicly for reasons of my own.
I do firmly believe, that assuming the CD-12 results are as good as most are expecting, that Vyrologix will be able to speak for itself and that the positive nature of this drug will overcome whatever forces are currently acting against it's success. Those results, in my opinion, will be far more effective than my public rants. The drug will speak for itself and I believe the world's outlook and hope will begin to shift is a positive direction once they know what's available. Will that solve cancel culture and censorship? Nope, but it's a great step in the right direction in healing people and that's something I definitely can get behind as I'm sure most on this board will agree.
Glad you're back. Keep on fighting!!
Misiu, glad to have 'ya back. I too think this week or next will be our week, nay, the world's week.
Leronlimab on Frontline Pilipinas
Scooter, for right now, I only get one post a day. I choose, for today's post, to simply say 'Insightful and Excellent Post'! - Well said.
Grip, I think to say that innocent people don't settle, is a bit naïve. I understand the sentiment behind your statement in that some people believe if you're accused then you must be guilty and if you're not then how could you possibly agree to settle. Well, let's look at just three reasons why one might want to settle despite innocence or guilt:
1. Controlling the outcome. When parties settle, each side knows what it is and is not getting.
2. Controlling the costs is another compelling reason to settle cases. Even if a party does not get everything it wants in settlement, it usually avoids a lot of attorney’s fees and court costs by settling.
3. Finality and certainty - Finality is another reason to settle a case. Even after a trial is complete, there can be expensive post-trial and appeal processes. The losing side may file for a Motion for New Trial followed by an actual Appeal. Even doubtful appeals can drag on for over a year and cost both sides significant money. Normally, settlement eliminates all of this, providing both finality and a high degree of certainty. I believe it's also can be in the best interest of fiduciary responsibility. If a company wins a battle but at extreme cost to the shareholders in defending itself, did it act in a manner considered to be fiduciarily responsible?
In this particular case, the lawsuit was against individuals and not the company but my point is that there are reasons to settle, even when you're innocent, as distasteful as that may be.
You can look up OTC/non-nasdaq stocks via that site. Try a few and you'll see.
Marksch1, wow, such great news to hear. Thank you for the wonderful update. I'm so sorry you have both had to go through this horrible ordeal but am thankful she's better now. Still keeping you both in prayer.