Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We are 3 months closer to any merger/acquisition.
If I had concrete information, that you did not have, it would be considered as 'insider'. That would be illegal. So, even if I had some, it would be crazy for me to say. I think we all expect some acquisition/merger in the short run. That is what I am suggesting as the reason to be part of this.
These are definitely exciting times for those that see the potential. Some appear to not want to wait.
Thanks, and thanks for agreeing with me that that would never happen. As I said he does not want to lose that election this year.
Not if he wants to retain his chance for that micro-cap Ethical CEO of the Year award.
The process of building a company is a long and arduous task. There are pitfalls, and we have gotten through them already. I am ready for the rewards that are going to be announced.
I am holding pat at this point, awaiting the curtain to be lifted.
To close the question once and for all, I just spoke to the NESV today and verified that Stock Legends is still under contract with them until the end of this month.
I call bullshit. Tell me when it ever went to 'no bid'....How about never.
Not from what I can determine. I see him as a good businessman, with his interest in building a company.
Again, our opinions and knowledge differ/
Thank you. That was my point exactly. Each venture was thought by the management team to be in the best interest of Bayport.
Gee, and I was told that my definition was pretty good.
IT APPEARS THAT WE WILL NOT AGREE ON EVEN WHAT A SCAM IS.
I think you are setting your sights too low.
I keep well informed on what is in the hopper, and agree with your assessment.
There are people much smarter than me on this board that can give you advice. One of the unknowns is the impending acquisition/merger/deal. That can change the course of everything. I would hate to put up my shares at $1.00 and watch as it zips right by that number. I had that happen before in another investment.
If that were true, there would be no shareholders making profits.
I guess we first need to agree on what a scam is. I say it is an activity that the person perpetrating it knows to be false before he starts, not one that just does not work out. Please let me know your definition.
Not what I was saying....Sometimes you need to take profits, and let it settle again before you buy back in....my philosophy is that trees do not grow to the sky, and you need to prune them, and let them come back to life, and grow some more. The trick is learning when to do each of those things. We all get it wrong sometimes, but when we get it right ...WOW..........
I do not think so because of the specific statement that it too far off the current price. Maybe Scottrade does this to prevent having to pull shares back in?????
I guess we have different opinions on whether this is a scam.
I just tried to enter an amount as low as $4.00, and it would not let that happen, as the limit price is TOO FAR AWAY from the current market. I will call Tuesday and have it done manually.
Not what I was saying....my philosophy is that trees do not grow to the sky, and you need to prune them, and let them come back to life, and grow some more. The trick is learning when to do each of those things. We all get it wrong sometimes, but when we get it right ...WOW..........
On Tuesday morning I will take action #1 on my account (67K shares) and will 'encourage' my associates holding just short of 200K additional shares to do the same. Hopefully that will put more pressure on any shorts.
As I said, know when to fold em......Timing is everything.
Is it true that to force any shorts to cover, if all held shares are listed for sale at say $10.00, they would have to take them out of the borrowing category? Or does that effect all shorts, but only those that are naked. This is a tad confusing to me.
It could also be that they hesitated too long and want in at a much lower price, which will not be coming.
Sorry about any issue you have had with Bayport. I for one have made a rather large profit with them. Check all my posts if you do not believe me. The thing to remember is to....KNOW WHEN TO HOLD EM, AND KNOW WHEN TO FOLD EM....
Not sure where that 5 year thing came from....are you sure you are thinking of the right company here? I know that James Porter, and Bayport, only became part of this company a few years ago. Where do you think Diana Shatts fits into this?
It is inappropriate to say what you have said, especially when Jim Porter will be winning the micro-cap ethical CEO of the year award this year for sure/
Like the way you think.
Of course......Every enterprise, until it is proven, is a story....waiting to be proven or failed.
I believe they already have sold short....
I did not want to continue this but waving the red flag in front of my face gets me to do it. It would be unlawful if they did so with knowledge of what they are signing was untrue. They relied on a licensed professional to prepare the data, and they are not accountants....are they.
That is certainly something to look forward to, as I remain a stockholder with 1M shares.....love the optimistic view. It has been dead here for awhile, so your perception of new opportunities opening up for Bayport is exciting. I am still awaiting more information regarding Clay's trip.
I disagree with your opinion. Leave it at that. My associates and I remain a strong buyer. We are on the edge of our seats waiting for the big shoe to drop....and we will buy all the way up.
The subject of the restatement of earnings, and balance sheet was discussed before it was posted. Not the specific numbers, but the fact they were restating due to a different CPA opinion.....I want to make it clear that this is one CPAs opinion versus another.
So, is it your opinion that when a company is not hiding anything, and corrects the accounting for all transactions, it is time to take a class action suit against them. That really is hilarious, and I can only guess the reason.
What illegal activity has the company been part of? I see minimal accounting adjustments.