Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sizzl, yes, Mexico said that to do a trial they wanted in combination, and Nader said, "NO." That has nothing to do with the company submitting an application for approval under EUA. It was originally Nader's idea to do a trial in Mexico, not the other way around. Just because Nader decided not to do a trial in Mexico under their terms has nothing to do with him applying for approval based on M/M and anecdotal evidence of previous EUA cases.
Howard, 100%. I straight up asked BP, among many other things, in an email. He kind of shook it off, but it is definitely present. I sense that they had a business falling out.
Basically, Nader is no longer giving out any guesses on timelines, or any other numbers, for that matter, based on shareholder rage received when timelines were wrong.
Mulholland Hosting......interesting....
Pac, as much as I would like believe that I will believe it when I see it (it should be approved, based on efficacy/safety, but I don't believe someone at FDA leaked information). Regardless, I hope that there is something to that.
Chasing, my thoughts exactly. I love this move. IF 1 country approves, and L is saving lives and reducing sick time (we know it works), the press coverage will essentially force acceptance elsewhere
"Just," so what, what does that have to do with whether Leronlimab works or not? It is only prudent to hedge one's bet. Retaining a chunk to be sold at much higher prices. I would do the same thing. Foiled again.....
Ben, no, I haven't seen that, but so what? He IS Leronlimab, and the pps wouldn't even be this high were it not for his credibility. I haven't a problem with him putting some money in the bank. I have traded the sh.. out of this stock, but I always retain my core shares. That's just prudent. Nice try.....
BP feels that based on this data (M/M), a strong argument can be made to the FDA for approval. I would like to see BP retained as a consultant to help formulate this argument.
Wealth, Dr. Patterson will be on Dr. Yo's show this evening at 9pm EST to discuss the results.
BBalls, that schedule has changed. Dr. P will now be on Dr. Yo's show tonight at 9pm EST
I agree with your 2nd statement, and feel that we will get more significant news tomorrow. The science cannot be denied. Good luck.
Venture, I saw the piece with Dr. Gottlieb this morning, he was saying that he wouldn't take the Russian vaccine, not Leronlimab.
hopester, and among that competition IS NOT Athersys!!!! Leronlimab WILL BE extremely successful!
Grip, I feel that more news is coming tomorrow; otherwise, Nader would have had the C.C. today. JMHO
I added 5000 shares....
I will bet that we get more news tomorrow; otherwise, Nader would have had a C.C. today. We shall see...
I thought was probably the case, good!
Hey guys, as I have not been able to review the board much lately I am just wondering if there is another "hit piece" floating around out there today. This should be a very good week. Adding a few here. Please advise.
Angry, I would reach out to Dr. Bruce Patterson as he is an M.D., and probably the most knowledgeable person understanding how the Mechanism of Action translates to patient symptoms.
Not that any of this matters......at this point if the science manifests in great trial results the pps will do very well, if not it will get killed. It really is that simple....
Just peaked in here for a moment, according to Nader, his wife's money is what saved the company and helped purchase L from the previous custodian.
Ordinarily, I would not take this position, but this is a unique situation. This is an all or none proposition. All eggs are in 1 basket, and that basket is Leronlimab. Nader and company did what they had to get here. They survived with whatever it took to get to the show. Much credit. Now it is 100% about the science. If the data is overwhelmingly positive this asset will get gobbled up quickly by the big boys.
Clarify...
Yes, 12 years specifically, my point was the antiquated reference. "just" provides NO real DD, ever, are you kidding me? As I have said 1000 times, I am buying the asset Leronlimab, I don't care about any of this stuff regarding NP or his past, or the company's past, for that matter. Either the science is there or it is not, nothing else matters, and the science appears to be.
just, WOW! You are really reaching, now. A 10 year old reference. LOL
He actually said "10 days or so."
hite, we are on the same page. We have lots of milestones pending. BTW, I am not applying too much pressure on getting CD10 data next week as, you know how that goes, if we don't. There is absolutely nothing in the history of this science that suggests that the data should disappoint.
Additionally, as far as "impatient investors," there is no shortage of that as we are now in the immediate gratification world, where results are expected tomorrow regardless of what needs to be done to attain them (I see as a fiduciary, attaining assets (historically reduced ages of high ticket purchases....homes, cars, etc.), lack of priority of retirement investments (I tell my 24 y.o. Electrical Engineer daughter who maxes her 401k, Roth IRA, and HSA that she will be a millionaire by the time she is 45, but that the vast majority of those that she knows will literally work until the day that they die), the gym (body transformation), etc.......
HH, ultimately it will ALL boil down to the data, and there has been no criterion, thus far that I have seen, that suggests data should be anything but good. With all of the attacks, they never go after the science.
Om, I agree and I love this move. Although progress (trial results, etc.) are not necessarily coming as fast as we may want, we know they are coming and should be good. This will all be worth it!
Plan "A," Mexico fell through. On to plan "B"....
Persian, rather. Spot on
Persion, that is as I see it, as well.
Awesome, BIO!
....just a matter of time.....add if you can....
$10? ......you might set your sights higher.....
JLA, nice!
Grip, in all fairness, until perhaps recently, no "qualified" CEO would have even come close to considering stepping into CYDY. I do believe that this company would not have gotten here without the unconventional actions of NP. Should he pass the baton, at this point? Perhaps, but I feel that BP will step in and swallow the company once the science proves out.
Do you happen to notice the almost daily "hit pieces" of late. Why do you think that is happening? Do you also notice that they never discuss the science (which ultimately is ALL that really matters). Chill out. If you can't take the heat of biotech land buy 10 year treasuries......
Saltz, exactly! Best of luck to you and all LONGS!!!!